1 INTELLECTUAL NEOCOLONIALISM IN THE ... - Multiworld India

Erwin Soriano Fernandez: Decolonising Our Universities
social science disciplines in the Philippines, Virginia A. Miralao, ed. (Quezon City: National
Academy of the Philippines and Philippine Social Science Council, 1999), 386-390.
42. On Tagalog “linguistic essentialism,” see Amaryllis Torres, “Methods, mind or meaning:
Shifting paradigms in Philippine psychology,” Philippine Journal of Psychology 30 (1997): 17-
37 and Ma. Serena Diokno, “Philippine nationalist historiography and the challenge of new
paradigms,” Diliman Review 45 (1-2): 8-13. On a critique on Sikolohiyang Pilipino, see
Madelene A. Sta. Maria, “Is the indigenization crisis in Philippine social science resolved in
Sikolohiyang Pilipino” Layag 1(1) 1996, 101-120.
43. Virgilio G. Enriquez and Amelia B. Alfonso at one time conflated Tagalog psychology to
mean Filipino psychology. See their “Ang pananaw sa buhay at weltanschauung na
mahihiwatigan sa sikolohiya ng wikang Tagalog,” Asian studies 18 (April/August/December
1980): 79-89.
44. University of San Carlos, “Cebuano Studies Center,”
In http://www.usc.edu.ph/news_and_announcements/news=396 , University of
the Philippines Baguio, “Cordillera Studies Center,” In http://www.upb.edu.ph/csc/index.html
, Tarlac State University. Center for Tarlaqueño studies,” In
http://www.tsu.edu.ph/ , Norman G. Owen, “Analyzing the annals: My thirty
years of research on Bikol history,” inaugural lecture on the creation of the Institute of Bikol
history and culture,” In http://external.adnu.edu.ph/Research/gibon3-v1n1.asp ,
Holy Angel University, “Juan D. Nepomuceno Center for Kapampangan Studies,” In
http://www.hau.edu.ph/kapampangan_center/
45. Norman L. Friedman, “New orders and old: Historians, educationists, and the dynamics of
academic imperialism,” American Behavioral Scientist, 9 (2) 1965: 24−29; Frederick H.
Gaureau, “Another type of Third World dependency: The social sciences,” International
Sociology, 3 (2) 1988: 171−178; Syed Farid Alatas, “Academic dependency in the social
sciences: Reflections on India and Malaysia,” American Studies International, 38 (2) 2000:
80−96; Syed Farid Alatas, “Academic dependency and the global division of labour in the social
sciences,” Current Sociology, 51 (6) 2003: 599−613.
46. Ward Churchill, “White Studies: The intellectual imperialism of contemporary U.S.
education,” Integrateducation 19, Nos. 1-2, 1982: 51-7; also Ward Churchill, White studies: The
intellectual imperialism of higher education (Penang, Malaysia: Citizens International Radical
Essentials Pamphlet Series, 2002); Robert Allen Warrior, “Intellectual sovereignty and the
struggle for an American Indian future,” Wicazo Sa Review, 8 (1) 1992: 1−20; Jack D. Forbes,
“Intellectual self-determination and sovereignty: Implication for native studies and for native
intellectuals,” Wicazo Sa Review, 13 (1) 1998: 11−23; Vine Deloria Jr., “Intellectual selfdetermination
and sovereignty: Looking at the windmills in our minds,” Wicazo Sa Review, 13
(1) 1998: 25−31; Edgardo Lander, “Eurocentrism and colonialism in Latin American social
thought,” Nepantla, 1 (3) 2000: 519−532; Lester-Irabinna Rigney, “A first perspective of
indigenous Australian participation in science: Framing indigenous research toward indigenous
Australian intellectual sovereignty,” Kaurna Higher Education Journal, No. 7, 2001: 1−13;
Cheng-Feng Shih, “Academic colonialism and the struggle for indigenous knowledge systems in
Taiwan,” Social Alternatives 29 (1) 2010: 44−47.
47. Jed Pensar, Manila colonialism: The dark side of the flag (Manila: Luna P. Dacudao, 1988)
and David C. Martinez, A country of our own: Partitioning the Philippines (Los Angeles,
California: Bisaya Books, 2004).
13