21.01.2015 Views

Air Pollution and Health –unanswered questions - IAPSC

Air Pollution and Health –unanswered questions - IAPSC

Air Pollution and Health –unanswered questions - IAPSC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Health</strong><br />

<strong>–unanswered</strong> <strong>questions</strong><br />

Jon Ayres<br />

Department of Environmental &<br />

Occupational Medicine<br />

University of Aberdeen


<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>–unanswered</strong><br />

<strong>questions</strong><br />

• What is the dose to the individual<br />

– susceptibility<br />

• Acute cardiac effects<br />

• Which particle metric<br />

• Chronic effects<br />

– Does air pollution cause asthma<br />

– How much life is lost<br />

• Interventions<br />

– Changes in emissions


Acute cardiac effects


<strong>Air</strong> pollution <strong>and</strong> cardiovascular mortality<br />

% increase /10 ìg/m 3 Increase in PM 10<br />

8<br />

Respiratory<br />

% Change in Daily Mortality<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

Total<br />

Cardiovascular<br />

Santa Clara<br />

Philadelphia<br />

Utah Valey<br />

Birmingham<br />

Cincinnatti<br />

Six Cities<br />

Santa Clara<br />

Philadelphia<br />

Utah Valey<br />

Birmingham<br />

Cincinnatti<br />

Six Cities<br />

Santa Clara<br />

Philadelphia<br />

Utah Valey<br />

Birmingham<br />

Cincinnatti<br />

Six Cities


PM 10 <strong>and</strong> Cardiac Admissions<br />

• Daily hospital<br />

admissions of elderly<br />

(65+ yrs) for 1986-89<br />

(Detroit)<br />

• 32 ìg/m 3 (IQR)<br />

increase in PM 10<br />

associated with:<br />

+1.8% 1IHD<br />

+2.4% IHeart Failure<br />

+1.9% IDysrhythmias<br />

Admissions/Day<br />

Ischemic Heart Disease<br />

46<br />

45<br />

44<br />

43<br />

42<br />

0 25 50 75 100<br />

PM 10<br />

(m g/m 3 )<br />

Schwartz & Morris, Am J Epi 1995


<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> <strong>and</strong> Arrhythmia<br />

PM 2.5 lag 2 days<br />

OR for ICD Discharge<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0 10 20 30<br />

PM 2.5<br />

(m g/m 3 )<br />

Peters et al 2000


<strong>Pollution</strong> Pollutant Exposure<br />

exposure<br />

Pulmonary<br />

Injury<br />

Effect on airway<br />

receptors<br />

Thrombosis <strong>and</strong><br />

inflammation<br />

Impairment of<br />

cardiac vagal<br />

control<br />

Plaque rupture<br />

<strong>and</strong> coronary<br />

occlusion<br />

Myocardial<br />

Ischaemia<br />

CVS<br />

Death


Cardiac effects - what we don’t (fully)<br />

know<br />

• The susceptible sub-groups<br />

• How these effects occur (mechanisms)<br />

• The degree of loss of life


Which particle metric<br />

• PM 2.5<br />

• PM 10<br />

• Numbers<br />

– surface area<br />

– surface constituents<br />

• NO 2


Chronic effects


Asthma <strong>and</strong> air pollution<br />

• Does air pollution make asthma worse on<br />

a day-to-day basis<br />

• Does air pollution make asthma worse<br />

over time<br />

• Does air pollution cause asthma in the<br />

first place


Asthma <strong>and</strong> air pollution in Children of 12<br />

communities of Southern California<br />

(McConnell et al 2002)<br />

• Asthma incidence: increased in high ozone<br />

areas (median 8-hr 57ppb) among children<br />

playing three or more outdoor sports (8% of<br />

all children)<br />

• Asthma prevalence: no association<br />

• Asthma incidence: no association


Prevalence of Asthma symptoms <strong>and</strong> proximity<br />

to traffic. 60,000 children in Nottingham UK.<br />

Venn et al 2000<br />

Primary schools<br />

Secondary schools


ISAAC UK: prevalence of wheezing in urban <strong>and</strong><br />

non urban children aged 12-14 yrs. N= 27,000.<br />

Kaur et al 1998<br />

Urban<br />

Non Urban<br />

60<br />

50<br />

Percentage<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Ever<br />

wheezed<br />

Wheeze<br />

past 12<br />

months<br />

>4<br />

episodes<br />

Daily<br />

activities<br />

affected<br />

Speech<br />

limiting<br />

attacks


Asthma <strong>and</strong> air pollution<br />

• Does air pollution make asthma worse on<br />

a day-to-day basis - YES<br />

• Does air pollution make asthma worse<br />

over time – DON’T KNOW<br />

• Does air pollution cause asthma in the<br />

first place – PROBABLY NOT


Life expectancy <strong>and</strong> chronic effects of air<br />

pollution -<br />

estimated effect of reducing PM 2.5 by 1ìg/m 3<br />

COMEAP 2001.<br />

• On average around 2.5d/person/lifetime<br />

– ca. 0.35m life years for the whole UK population<br />

• But if this applies only to a susceptible proportion the<br />

improvement would be greater<br />

– if 10% population susceptible would amount to around 1 month<br />

per susceptible person<br />

– if 1% susceptible would amount to around 1 year per person<br />

• For a birth cohort born in 2000 the average individual<br />

benefit would be between 0.5 <strong>and</strong> 4.5 weeks


Chronic effects – what we don’t know<br />

• Whether all the population is at risk from air<br />

pollution exposure<br />

• In those who are susceptible to what extent they<br />

are affected<br />

– Loss of life<br />

– Worsening disease<br />

• Whether air pollution causes asthma<br />

• What the cost-benefits would be of reducing air<br />

pollution, in health terms


Interventions


Changes in pollutants <strong>and</strong> mortality in<br />

Dublin – 1984-97<br />

Clancy et al Lancet 2002;360:1210-4]


Changes in pollutants <strong>and</strong> mortality in<br />

Dublin – 1984-97<br />

• 35.6ìg/m 3 (70%) decline in black smoke<br />

• Adjusted non-trauma deaths fell by 5.7%<br />

• Respiratory deaths fell by 15.5%<br />

• Cardiovascular deaths fell by 10.3%<br />

• This represents about 116 fewer respiratory <strong>and</strong><br />

243 cardiovascular deaths pa<br />

Clancy et al Lancet 2002;360:1210-4]


Cardiorespiratory <strong>and</strong> all cause changes in<br />

mortality after reduced sulphur emissions in<br />

Hong Kong<br />

• 2.1% fall in all cause deaths<br />

• 3.9% fall in respiratory deaths<br />

• 2.0% fall in cardiovascular deaths<br />

• Mostly occurring in the first 2 years post intervention<br />

• Average gain in life expectancy per year of exposure was<br />

20 days (f) <strong>and</strong> 40 days (m)<br />

• More recently, suggested this could be due to changes in<br />

health care delivery over the same period<br />

Hedley et al Lancet 2002;360:1646-52]


<strong>Air</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>–unanswered</strong><br />

<strong>questions</strong><br />

• Cardiac effects<br />

– Who are the susceptible sub-groups<br />

– How do these effects occur (mechanisms)<br />

• Chronic effects<br />

– Is all the population at risk from air pollution<br />

– What is the size of the effect<br />

– Does air pollution cause asthma<br />

– What would the cost-benefits be of reducing air<br />

pollution, in health terms<br />

• Interventions<br />

– Are they of short or long term benefit or both<br />

– What pollutants should be targeted

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!