21.01.2015 Views

"Thin Skull" Damages into "Crumbling Skull" Damages - Bogoroch ...

"Thin Skull" Damages into "Crumbling Skull" Damages - Bogoroch ...

"Thin Skull" Damages into "Crumbling Skull" Damages - Bogoroch ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-2-<br />

How Canadian Courts Have Turned “<strong>Thin</strong> Skull” <strong>Damages</strong><br />

<strong>into</strong> “<strong>Crumbling</strong> Skull” <strong>Damages</strong>:<br />

What are the Implications<br />

TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

PAGE<br />

1. Introduction 3<br />

II.<br />

The Supreme Court of Canada’s Decision in Athey v. Leonati<br />

A. History of the Action<br />

2. Causation<br />

3. <strong>Damages</strong><br />

4. Independent Intervening Events<br />

5. <strong>Thin</strong> and <strong>Crumbling</strong> Skull Plaintiffs<br />

III.<br />

Determination of Liability in the case of Tortious and Non-Tortious Factors<br />

Contributing to a Plaintiff’s Injury: The Implications of the Athey Decision<br />

A. Principles Enunciated in Athey<br />

2. Judicial Treatment of Athey<br />

(1) Alderson v. Callaghan<br />

(2) Dusk v. Malone<br />

(3) Brown v. Canadian Tire Corp.<br />

(4) Cottrelle v. Gerrard<br />

3. Summary of the Implications of Athey as Applied to Tortious and Non-Tortious Factors<br />

Contributing to a Plaintiff’s Injury

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!