21.01.2015 Views

Artificial Insemination

Artificial Insemination

Artificial Insemination

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ch36-A03309.qxd 1/23/07 5:16 PM Page 548<br />

Section 6<br />

Infertility and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss<br />

45. Bedaiwy MA, Sharma RK, Alhussaini TK, et al: The use of novel semen<br />

quality scores to predict pregnancy in couples with male-factor infertility<br />

undergoing intrauterine insemination. J Androl 24:353–360, 2003.<br />

46. Hendin BN, Falcone T, Hallak J, et al: The effect of patient and semen<br />

characteristics on live birth rates following intrauterine insemination: A<br />

retrospective study. J Assist Reprod Genet 17:245–252, 2000.<br />

47. Zayed F, Lenton EA, Cooke ID: Comparison between stimulated in<br />

vitro fertilization and stimulated intrauterine insemination for the<br />

treatment of unexplained and mild male factor infertility. Hum Reprod<br />

12:2408–2413, 1997.<br />

48. Van Waart J, Kruger TF, Lombard CJ, Ombelet W: Predictive value of<br />

normal sperm morphology in intrauterine insemination (IUI): A<br />

structured literature review. Hum Reprod Update 7:495–500, 2001.<br />

49. van Noord-Zaadstra BM, Looman CW, Alsbach H, et al: Delaying childbearing:<br />

Effect of age on fecundity and outcome of pregnancy. BMJ<br />

302:1361–1365, 1991.<br />

50. Stone BA, Vargyas JM, Ringler GE, et al: Determinants of the outcome<br />

of intrauterine insemination: Analysis of outcomes of 9963 consecutive<br />

cycles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:1522–1534, 1999.<br />

51. Campana A, Sakkas D, Stalberg A, et al: Intrauterine insemination:<br />

Evaluation of the results according to the woman’s age, sperm quality,<br />

total sperm count per insemination and life table analysis. Hum Reprod<br />

11:732–736, 1996.<br />

52. Richthoff J, Spano M, Giwercman YL, et al: The impact of testicular<br />

and accessory sex gland function on sperm chromatin integrity as<br />

assessed by the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA). Hum Reprod<br />

17:3162–3169, 2002.<br />

53. Saleh RA, Agarwal A, Nada EA, et al: Negative effects of increased<br />

sperm DNA damage in relation to seminal oxidative stress in men<br />

with idiopathic and male factor infertility. Fertil Steril 79(Suppl 3):<br />

1597–1605, 2003.<br />

54. Bungum M, Humaidan P, Spano M, et al: The predictive value of sperm<br />

chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters for the outcome of<br />

intrauterine insemination, IVF and ICSI. Hum Reprod 19:1401–1408,<br />

2004.<br />

55. Duran EH, Morshedi M, Taylor S, Oehninger S: Sperm DNA quality<br />

predicts intrauterine insemination outcome: A prospective cohort study.<br />

Hum Reprod 17:3122–3128, 2002.<br />

56. Tartagni M, Schonauer MM, Cicinelli E, et al: Usefulness of the hypoosmotic<br />

swelling test in predicting pregnancy rate and outcome in<br />

couples undergoing intrauterine insemination. J Androl 23:498–502,<br />

2002.<br />

57. Ombelet W, Deblaere K, Bosmans E, et al: Semen quality and intrauterine<br />

insemination. Reprod Biomed Online 7:485–492, 2003.<br />

58. Ohl DA, Naz RK: Infertility due to antisperm antibodies. Urology<br />

46:591–602, 1995.<br />

59. McLachlan RI: Basis, diagnosis and treatment of immunological infertility<br />

in men. J Reprod Immunol 57:35–45, 2002.<br />

60. Lombardo F, Gandini L, Dondero F, Lenzi A: Antisperm immunity in<br />

natural and assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod Update 7:450–456,<br />

2001.<br />

61. Dickey RP, Olar TT, Taylor SN, et al: Relationship of follicle number,<br />

serum estradiol, and other factors to birth rate and multiparity in human<br />

menopausal gonadotropin-induced intrauterine insemination cycles. Fertil<br />

Steril 56:89–92, 1991.<br />

62. Dickey RP, Olar TT, Taylor SN, et al: Relationship of follicle number and<br />

other factors to fecundability and multiple pregnancy in clomiphene<br />

citrate-induced intrauterine insemination cycles. Fertil Steril 57:613–619,<br />

1992.<br />

63. Mathieu C, Ecochard R, Bied V, et al: Cumulative conception rate<br />

following intrauterine artificial insemination with husband’s spermatozoa:<br />

Influence of husband’s age. Hum Reprod 10:1090–1097, 1995.<br />

64. Tomlinson MJ, Amissah-Arthur JB, Thompson KA, et al: Prognostic<br />

indicators for intrauterine insemination (IUI): Statistical model for IUI<br />

success. Hum Reprod 11:1892–1896, 1996.<br />

65. Steures P, van der Steeg JW, Mol BW, et al: Prediction of an ongoing<br />

pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 82:45–51, 2004.<br />

66. Haebe J, Martin J, Tekepety F, et al: Success of intrauterine insemination<br />

in women aged 40–42 years. Fertil Steril 78:29–33, 2002.<br />

67. Khalil MR, Rasmussen PE, Erb K, et al: Homologous intrauterine<br />

insemination. An evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of<br />

2473 cycles. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:74–81, 2001.<br />

68. Tsai HD, Chang CC, Hsieh YY, et al: <strong>Artificial</strong> insemination. Role of endometrial<br />

thickness and pattern, of vascular impedance of the spiral and<br />

uterine arteries, and of the dominant follicle. J Reprod Med 45:195–200,<br />

2000.<br />

69. Zollner U, Zollner KP, Blissing S, et al: Impact of three-dimensionally<br />

measured endometrial volume on the pregnancy rate after intrauterine<br />

insemination. Zentralbl Gynakol 125:136–141, 2003.<br />

70. Krediet CT, van Dijk N, Linzer M, et al: Management of vasovagal<br />

syncope: Controlling or aborting faints by leg crossing and muscle tensing.<br />

Circulation 106:1684–1689, 2002.<br />

71. Smith YR, Hurd WW, Menge AC, et al: Allergic reactions to penicillin<br />

during in vitro fertilization and intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril<br />

58:847–849, 1992.<br />

72. Sonenthal KR, McKnight T, Shaughnessy MA, et al: Anaphylaxis during<br />

intrauterine insemination secondary to bovine serum albumin. Fertil<br />

Steril 56:1188–1191, 1991.<br />

73. Moretti-Rojas I, Rojas FJ, Leisure M, et al: Intrauterine inseminations<br />

with washed human spermatozoa does not induce formation of antisperm<br />

antibodies. Fertil Steril 53:180–182, 1990.<br />

74. Valbuena D, Simon C, Romero JL, et al: Factors responsible for multiple<br />

pregnancies after ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination with<br />

gonadotropins. J Assist Reprod Genet 13:663–668, 1996.<br />

75. Goldfarb JM, Peskin B, Austin C, Lisbona H: Evaluation of predictive<br />

factors for multiple pregnancies during gonadotropin/IUI treatment.<br />

J Assist Reprod Genet 14:88–91, 1997.<br />

76. Tur R, Buxaderas C, Martinez F, et al: Comparison of the role of cervical<br />

and intrauterine insemination techniques on the incidence of multiple<br />

pregnancy after artificial insemination with donor sperm. J Assist Reprod<br />

Genet 14:250–253, 1997.<br />

77. Pasqualotto EB, Falcone T, Goldberg JM, et al: Risk factors for multiple<br />

gestation in women undergoing intrauterine insemination with ovarian<br />

stimulation. Fertil Steril 72:613–618, 1999.<br />

78. Lalich RA, Marut EL, Prins GS, Scommegna A: Life table analysis<br />

of intrauterine insemination pregnancy rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol<br />

158:980–984, 1988.<br />

79. Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI: Ovarian superstimulation in<br />

the treatment of infertility due to peritubal and periovarian adhesions.<br />

Fertil Steril 51:834–837, 1989.<br />

548

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!