Meeting Notes 1-30-02 V-03 approved.pdf - Structural Engineers ...
Meeting Notes 1-30-02 V-03 approved.pdf - Structural Engineers ...
Meeting Notes 1-30-02 V-03 approved.pdf - Structural Engineers ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SEAOSC Seismology Committee<br />
<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>Notes</strong><br />
January <strong>30</strong>, 20<strong>02</strong><br />
Page 1<br />
<strong>Structural</strong> <strong>Engineers</strong> Association of Southern California<br />
Seismology Committee<br />
<strong>Meeting</strong> notes<br />
January <strong>30</strong>, 20<strong>02</strong><br />
Approved June 26, 20<strong>02</strong><br />
Bob Lyons<br />
Martin Johnson<br />
Rami M. Elhassan<br />
Carl Sramec<br />
Peter Maranian<br />
Mehran Pourzanjani<br />
Attendees listed above<br />
Saiful Islam<br />
Saif M. Hussain<br />
Ajit Randhava<br />
Sampson Huang<br />
Attendees:<br />
Distribution:<br />
Martin B. Hudson<br />
Attila B. Beres<br />
John Kariotis<br />
Graeme Dick<br />
Said Hilmy<br />
Martin Graves<br />
Bill Nelson<br />
Bob Bachman<br />
David Nakaki<br />
John Whisenand<br />
Y. Henry Huang<br />
<strong>Meeting</strong> Location:<br />
<strong>Meeting</strong> Time:<br />
Law Crandall's office<br />
The Citadel, 200 Citadel Dr.<br />
Los Angeles, CA 90040-1554<br />
Tel: 323-889-5<strong>30</strong>0<br />
4:00 to 6:00 pm<br />
<strong>Notes</strong>:<br />
Open meeting at 4:15 p.m. with introductions. R. Lyons (RTL) Chair.<br />
1. 11-28-01 Draft <strong>Meeting</strong> Note reviewed. Following Corrections required:<br />
A. Item 6F - ASCE needs a major update<br />
B. Item 6G- Revise to “J. Kariotis suggest considering drift limit – major diff. Between IBC + UBC -<br />
IBC draft limits are larger than UBC.”<br />
C. Item 6J- Revise to “R. Lyons to ask John Lawson attend SC meeting. JL is SEAoC-SC Tilt-up<br />
subcommittee chair.”<br />
Kariotis moved to approve minutes with these corrections made. M. Johnson seconded.<br />
Minutes <strong>approved</strong> as corrected.
SEAOSC Seismology Committee<br />
<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>Notes</strong><br />
January <strong>30</strong>, 20<strong>02</strong><br />
Page 2<br />
2. Action Items from last meeting.<br />
A. In response to request for white paper topics, several topics were submitted.<br />
B. Subcommittee co-chairs.<br />
• Concrete subcommittee co-chair required. Martin Graves volunteered.<br />
• Wood – new chair, co-chair and members probably needed. Wood issues are<br />
considerable. R. Lyons will follow-up.<br />
• Masonry co-chair J. Kariotis has not found a co-chair yet. Will continue to look.<br />
C. NEHRP balloting. Comments sent in (R. Lyons). Unable to coordinate with State SC, but R.<br />
Lyons was able to discuss and coordinate with SEAoCC Seismology Committee.<br />
D. R. Lyons- Group email address is now available.<br />
3. Discussions concerning meeting minutes.<br />
A. R. Lyons proposed writing minutes citing the commentator. Also minutes will be posted to<br />
SEAoSC-SC web site once <strong>approved</strong>.<br />
B. S. Hilmy asked what are the reasons for citing commentator and posting on web site R. Lyons<br />
responded that activities of committee should be public. M. Johnson added that use of<br />
commentator’s names is the tradition of Seismology Committee. G. Dick noted that the minutes<br />
reflect the individual’s opinion unless voted upon by the Committee.<br />
4. White Paper<br />
A. R. Lyons- Seminar steering committee requests SC make PD&D and other presentations. We<br />
can then take 35 minute topics from each white paper.<br />
B. M.Johnson- The Blue Book may in the future be a series of white papers instead the<br />
traditional commentary on code point by point.<br />
C. R. Lyons- The white papers may go in Blue Book. They will be distributed on web site.<br />
D. M. Johnson- topics should be prioritized. RTL will prioritize and refine topic based on today’s<br />
discussions.<br />
5. White paper topics<br />
A. Steel, fireproofing on steel braced frames.<br />
• An approach was presented that would allow some braces not to be fireproofed.<br />
• After discussion, it was decided that SC would not address this topic. This topic might be<br />
good for the code committee and will be forwarded.
SEAOSC Seismology Committee<br />
<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>Notes</strong><br />
January <strong>30</strong>, 20<strong>02</strong><br />
Page 3<br />
B. Steel, column moment magnification.<br />
• Issue relates to magnification of column moment owing to higher mode response and<br />
effect on assumed strong column-weak beam moment frames.<br />
• This is a systems issue related to materials other than steel as well.<br />
• M. Johnson- Beam-column moment magnification is the main issue. Is 1.5x stronger good<br />
enough Maybe ratio of 2 is better.<br />
• P. Maranian- Connections haven’t been tested sufficiently to understand column yielding<br />
behavior.<br />
• Proceed with abstract.<br />
C. Systems, considerations assessing R values for new systems.<br />
• M. Johnson- Should BSSC be involved They discussed recently, and they will review.<br />
Test criteria was also addressed. NEHRP has many different test criteria. An ATC report<br />
discussed components of R factor.<br />
• Proceed with abstract.<br />
D. Systems, Behavior of collector and boundary elements in rigid diaphragms..<br />
• Code doesn’t describe and many engineers don’t consider adequately. There are some<br />
papers. Maybe do FE analysis. Set simple rules.<br />
• Proceed with abstract.<br />
E. Foundations/ground motion, inconsistency between ASD and Strength design uplift<br />
calculations.<br />
• State foundation committee addressing this issue.<br />
• Support state effort.<br />
F. System and Foundations, slab-on-grade diaphragms.<br />
• Shear transfer from superstructure to foundations using slab-on-grade as a diaphragm.<br />
Design procedures not addressed by code.<br />
• Proceed with abstract.<br />
G. Systems, review irregularity provisions, tables and triggers for dynamic analysis.<br />
• UBC and Title 24 should be consistent, but the rules are very different.– don’t make<br />
same.<br />
• Proceed with abstract
SEAOSC Seismology Committee<br />
<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>Notes</strong><br />
January <strong>30</strong>, 20<strong>02</strong><br />
Page 4<br />
H. Systems, redundancy for mixed systems<br />
• SEAoSC Steel ad hoc committee is looking at this.<br />
•<br />
I. Seismic isolation, energy dissipation, Passive damping<br />
• NEHRP has simplified static procedure (Appendix) for chapters. It is being considered<br />
for chapter, but there are very few case studies.<br />
• Proceed with abstract.<br />
J. Light frame, definition of light frame and acceptable combinations of materials/systems.<br />
• A commentary on which combinations are acceptable.<br />
• As an example, can pneumatically driven “nails” be used to attach plywood to light steel<br />
• Proceed with abstract.<br />
K. Light frame, Definition of nominal strength and elastic stiffness.<br />
• ASCE-16 doesn’t have definition of nominal strength. The “nominal load” is defined.<br />
“reference strength,” “design strength” are defined. Suggestion for us to define “nominal<br />
strength” and “elastic stiffness.”<br />
• Proceed with abstract.<br />
L. Light frame, considerations for assessing φ - factors.<br />
• May depend on degree of inspection.<br />
• Proceed with abstract.<br />
M. Light frame, drift limits for various combinations of materials.<br />
• Expand on IBC 2000, Table 1617.3.<br />
• Proceed with abstract.<br />
N. Light frame, short shear walls and guidelines for deigning fixity at floor lines above foundation.<br />
• Shear not transferred into floor.<br />
• Proceed with abstract.<br />
O. Concrete, Coupling beams.<br />
• Difficulties associated with detailing and construction.
SEAOSC Seismology Committee<br />
<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>Notes</strong><br />
January <strong>30</strong>, 20<strong>02</strong><br />
Page 5<br />
• Testing last few years can be collated.<br />
• Proceed with abstract.<br />
P. Foundation/ground motion, load levels and soil lateral pressure.<br />
• This may be a state foundation subcommittee task, but can start with SEAoSC.<br />
• M Hudson to contact T. Hale of state Seismology Committee.<br />
Q. Foundation/ground motion, Seismic increment of earth pressure<br />
• How should this combined with code seismic design forces. Application to building and<br />
components.<br />
• M. Hudson to contact T. Hale of state Seismology Committee.<br />
R. Foundation/ground motion, subterranean levels, especially partially submerged.<br />
• Where is your seismic base Where is lateral load taken out<br />
• One story down is often used.<br />
• Proceed with abstract<br />
6. Code simplification task of the Building Code Committee, presented by C. Sramec - The<br />
code chair, Warren Minner , suggested the topic. Much positive response. People come<br />
up with bizarre and inconsistent interpretations. Two items are being looked into.<br />
1. Mel Greene with suggested a “code light” which is a manual for 3 stories and<br />
below. Cross out sections that don’t apply. This would be applied to UBC. It would be<br />
applied eventually to IBC.<br />
S. Hilmy- Perhaps examples should be in there.<br />
7. NEHRP 20<strong>03</strong> proposed changes – from state committee.<br />
M. Johnson- The ballot addressed formatting only. The document will be used as base<br />
document for 20<strong>03</strong> version. There are some problems with reformatted text. We should<br />
think about changes in provisions.<br />
8. Bob will make list of action items.<br />
9. <strong>Meeting</strong> adjourned at 6:<strong>30</strong> pm.<br />
O:\SEAoSC Seismology 2001-20<strong>02</strong>\mtg 1-<strong>30</strong>-<strong>02</strong>\<strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>Notes</strong> 1-<strong>30</strong>-<strong>02</strong> V-<strong>03</strong> <strong>approved</strong>.doc