Milwaukee County WIser Choice Access to Recovery Project ... - NIATx
Milwaukee County WIser Choice Access to Recovery Project ... - NIATx
Milwaukee County WIser Choice Access to Recovery Project ... - NIATx
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>WIser</strong> <strong>Choice</strong> <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Recovery</strong> <strong>Project</strong>: Building a<br />
<strong>Recovery</strong>oriented System of Care<br />
In 2007, the state of Wisconsin was awarded a three‐year<br />
<strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Recovery</strong> (ATR) grant of 4.83 million per year—the<br />
highest ATR grant awarded nationally. The award, the second<br />
for Wisconsin, was allocated <strong>to</strong> the <strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />
Behavioral Health Division (BHD), <strong>to</strong> support its efforts <strong>to</strong><br />
develop a continuum of services that support the recovery of<br />
persons with substance use and/or co‐occurring mental health disorders.<br />
“We have been very fortunate that the ATR dollars have specifically come <strong>to</strong><br />
<strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong> for two ATR cycles <strong>to</strong> support the redesigned <strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />
substance abuse treatment system,” says Janet Fleege, <strong>WIser</strong> <strong>Choice</strong> Coordina<strong>to</strong>r.<br />
“The <strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong> Behavioral Health Division was in the midst of a redesign<br />
upon receipt of the first ATR award, so it was perfect timing.’<br />
The redesign aims <strong>to</strong> create a recovery‐oriented system of care in <strong>Milwaukee</strong><br />
<strong>County</strong>. As the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Systems Administration states,<br />
“<strong>Recovery</strong>‐oriented systems of care include all sec<strong>to</strong>rs of society working <strong>to</strong>gether<br />
<strong>to</strong> support recovery for an individual and for members of that person’s family. “<br />
<strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Recovery</strong> (ATR) is a three‐year competitive discretionary grant program<br />
funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center<br />
for Substance Abuse Treatment. This presidential initiative provides vouchers <strong>to</strong><br />
clients for purchase of substance abuse clinical treatment and recovery support<br />
services. The goals of the program are <strong>to</strong> expand capacity, support client choice, and<br />
increase the array of faith‐based and community based providers for clinical<br />
treatment and recovery support services. The <strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>WIser</strong> <strong>Choice</strong> ATR<br />
funding ends in September 2010.<br />
The grant along with other funding sources comprises the <strong>to</strong>tal amount of money<br />
available for treatment and ancillary services in the Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse<br />
(AODA) voucher system in <strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong>, commonly referred <strong>to</strong> as <strong>WIser</strong><br />
<strong>Choice</strong>.<br />
The <strong>WIser</strong> <strong>Choice</strong> network includes nearly 100 sites operated by approximately 75<br />
organizations. Services provided by the network include residential, day treatment<br />
and outpatient AODA clinical treatment as well as non‐clinical services supporting<br />
recovery such as transportation, childcare, pre‐employment education/training,<br />
parenting assistance, life skills training and housing.
Fifteen <strong>Milwaukee</strong> county providers are participating in the project.<br />
The State of Wisconsin/<strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong> BHD application for the grant included a<br />
narrative description and budget line <strong>to</strong> work with <strong>NIATx</strong>.<br />
“We knew that the <strong>NIATx</strong> focus on the cus<strong>to</strong>mer and on improving systems was a<br />
good fit for our system,” comments Fleege. “We specifically wanted <strong>to</strong> work with a<br />
<strong>NIATx</strong> coach <strong>to</strong> examine the multiple hand‐offs between levels of care as well as<br />
from provider <strong>to</strong> provider.”<br />
<strong>NIATx</strong> process improvement model helps organizations minimize the work that<br />
results from multiple hand‐offs, with a goal of creating seamless transitions between<br />
levels of care. This simultaneously maximizes the resources available within each of<br />
the provider agencies.<br />
The key goals of the <strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong> Wiser <strong>Choice</strong> ATR project are <strong>to</strong>:<br />
• Meet or exceed the target of serving 7,626 clients over the three‐year grant<br />
period; and<br />
• Collect Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) information on<br />
each client enrolled in the system, with a goal of gathering data on 80 percent<br />
of clients for six months after intake.<br />
<strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>WIser</strong> <strong>Choice</strong> serves a highly mobile population, explains Fleege.<br />
“After discharge, some clients do not want <strong>to</strong> be contacted, for a variety of reasons.”<br />
Fleege and colleagues formed a change team and set about examining the processes<br />
in the ATR system that needed improvement. Guided by <strong>NIATx</strong> coach Tom<br />
Mosgaller, “We mapped out a process flow for what a typical client experiences from<br />
intake and assessment through the assignment of a <strong>Recovery</strong> Support Counselor,<br />
selection of a treatment approach, <strong>to</strong> discharge and follow up.” The team also<br />
developed a diagram of barriers in the process that impede the ability <strong>to</strong> track a<br />
client six months following intake.<br />
These activities helped the team identify early engagement as a key <strong>to</strong> a client’s<br />
successful journey <strong>to</strong> recovery through the <strong>WIser</strong><strong>Choice</strong> system. “We recognized<br />
that if we engage a client early in the process, we’re more likely <strong>to</strong> develop a<br />
relationship that will allow tracking six months after intake.” The change projects<br />
the teams began <strong>to</strong> work on in June 2008 focused on implementing strategies <strong>to</strong><br />
improve the first handoff from intake <strong>to</strong> treatment.<br />
Fleege’s team then developed a set of solutions <strong>to</strong> be piloted by each agency<br />
participating<br />
in the pilot, with an emphasis on early interactions that promote
engagement. “We felt that the emphasis on optimizing the whole experience would<br />
result in improved relationships and the ability <strong>to</strong> track clients more successfully.”<br />
The participating providers meet with Fleege’s team every six weeks <strong>to</strong> share<br />
progress, refine their rapid‐cycle testing projects, and share next steps.<br />
At a report‐out meeting in January 2009, the <strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>WIser</strong> <strong>Choice</strong> ATR<br />
project identified the following improvements:<br />
• An increase in the number of clients provided access or assured contact<br />
within 24 <strong>to</strong> 48 hours of first contact<br />
• Clear plans for each client scheduled within seven days of first meeting<br />
• Paperwork shortened <strong>to</strong> one page at initial intake<br />
“We also feel that we have a greater focus on the client as a result of ATR and our<br />
work with <strong>NIATx</strong>,” adds Fleege. “Communications improved between the Central<br />
Intake Units and the <strong>Recovery</strong> Support Coordina<strong>to</strong>rs, which also helped improve<br />
hand‐offs.” In addition, the group noted improved collaboration between providers<br />
and <strong>Recovery</strong> Support Coordina<strong>to</strong>rs.<br />
The project has maintained a 62 percent follow‐up rate and continues <strong>to</strong> work on<br />
meeting the 80 percent goal. “We have set up focus groups with <strong>Recovery</strong> Support<br />
Coordina<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> find out how we can improve given the current process for the<br />
collection of the follow up data,” says Fleege.<br />
Goals for the coming year include working on ways <strong>to</strong> diffuse the lessons learned<br />
from the initial 2008 pilot providers <strong>to</strong> other providers in the <strong>WIser</strong> <strong>Choice</strong> system.<br />
“This project is allowing <strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>to</strong> integrate recovery support<br />
coordination in<strong>to</strong> substance abuse treatment,” concludes Fleege. “We now have a<br />
better<br />
opportunity <strong>to</strong> become a recovery‐oriented system of care.”