21.01.2015 Views

Milwaukee County WIser Choice Access to Recovery Project ... - NIATx

Milwaukee County WIser Choice Access to Recovery Project ... - NIATx

Milwaukee County WIser Choice Access to Recovery Project ... - NIATx

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>WIser</strong> <strong>Choice</strong> <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Recovery</strong> <strong>Project</strong>: Building a<br />

<strong>Recovery</strong>­oriented System of Care<br />

In 2007, the state of Wisconsin was awarded a three‐year<br />

<strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Recovery</strong> (ATR) grant of 4.83 million per year—the<br />

highest ATR grant awarded nationally. The award, the second<br />

for Wisconsin, was allocated <strong>to</strong> the <strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

Behavioral Health Division (BHD), <strong>to</strong> support its efforts <strong>to</strong><br />

develop a continuum of services that support the recovery of<br />

persons with substance use and/or co‐occurring mental health disorders.<br />

“We have been very fortunate that the ATR dollars have specifically come <strong>to</strong><br />

<strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong> for two ATR cycles <strong>to</strong> support the redesigned <strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

substance abuse treatment system,” says Janet Fleege, <strong>WIser</strong> <strong>Choice</strong> Coordina<strong>to</strong>r.<br />

“The <strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong> Behavioral Health Division was in the midst of a redesign<br />

upon receipt of the first ATR award, so it was perfect timing.’<br />

The redesign aims <strong>to</strong> create a recovery‐oriented system of care in <strong>Milwaukee</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong>. As the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Systems Administration states,<br />

“<strong>Recovery</strong>‐oriented systems of care include all sec<strong>to</strong>rs of society working <strong>to</strong>gether<br />

<strong>to</strong> support recovery for an individual and for members of that person’s family. “<br />

<strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Recovery</strong> (ATR) is a three‐year competitive discretionary grant program<br />

funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center<br />

for Substance Abuse Treatment. This presidential initiative provides vouchers <strong>to</strong><br />

clients for purchase of substance abuse clinical treatment and recovery support<br />

services. The goals of the program are <strong>to</strong> expand capacity, support client choice, and<br />

increase the array of faith‐based and community based providers for clinical<br />

treatment and recovery support services. The <strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>WIser</strong> <strong>Choice</strong> ATR<br />

funding ends in September 2010.<br />

The grant along with other funding sources comprises the <strong>to</strong>tal amount of money<br />

available for treatment and ancillary services in the Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse<br />

(AODA) voucher system in <strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong>, commonly referred <strong>to</strong> as <strong>WIser</strong><br />

<strong>Choice</strong>.<br />

The <strong>WIser</strong> <strong>Choice</strong> network includes nearly 100 sites operated by approximately 75<br />

organizations. Services provided by the network include residential, day treatment<br />

and outpatient AODA clinical treatment as well as non‐clinical services supporting<br />

recovery such as transportation, childcare, pre‐employment education/training,<br />

parenting assistance, life skills training and housing.


Fifteen <strong>Milwaukee</strong> county providers are participating in the project.<br />

The State of Wisconsin/<strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong> BHD application for the grant included a<br />

narrative description and budget line <strong>to</strong> work with <strong>NIATx</strong>.<br />

“We knew that the <strong>NIATx</strong> focus on the cus<strong>to</strong>mer and on improving systems was a<br />

good fit for our system,” comments Fleege. “We specifically wanted <strong>to</strong> work with a<br />

<strong>NIATx</strong> coach <strong>to</strong> examine the multiple hand‐offs between levels of care as well as<br />

from provider <strong>to</strong> provider.”<br />

<strong>NIATx</strong> process improvement model helps organizations minimize the work that<br />

results from multiple hand‐offs, with a goal of creating seamless transitions between<br />

levels of care. This simultaneously maximizes the resources available within each of<br />

the provider agencies.<br />

The key goals of the <strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong> Wiser <strong>Choice</strong> ATR project are <strong>to</strong>:<br />

• Meet or exceed the target of serving 7,626 clients over the three‐year grant<br />

period; and<br />

• Collect Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) information on<br />

each client enrolled in the system, with a goal of gathering data on 80 percent<br />

of clients for six months after intake.<br />

<strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>WIser</strong> <strong>Choice</strong> serves a highly mobile population, explains Fleege.<br />

“After discharge, some clients do not want <strong>to</strong> be contacted, for a variety of reasons.”<br />

Fleege and colleagues formed a change team and set about examining the processes<br />

in the ATR system that needed improvement. Guided by <strong>NIATx</strong> coach Tom<br />

Mosgaller, “We mapped out a process flow for what a typical client experiences from<br />

intake and assessment through the assignment of a <strong>Recovery</strong> Support Counselor,<br />

selection of a treatment approach, <strong>to</strong> discharge and follow up.” The team also<br />

developed a diagram of barriers in the process that impede the ability <strong>to</strong> track a<br />

client six months following intake.<br />

These activities helped the team identify early engagement as a key <strong>to</strong> a client’s<br />

successful journey <strong>to</strong> recovery through the <strong>WIser</strong><strong>Choice</strong> system. “We recognized<br />

that if we engage a client early in the process, we’re more likely <strong>to</strong> develop a<br />

relationship that will allow tracking six months after intake.” The change projects<br />

the teams began <strong>to</strong> work on in June 2008 focused on implementing strategies <strong>to</strong><br />

improve the first handoff from intake <strong>to</strong> treatment.<br />

Fleege’s team then developed a set of solutions <strong>to</strong> be piloted by each agency<br />

participating<br />

in the pilot, with an emphasis on early interactions that promote


engagement. “We felt that the emphasis on optimizing the whole experience would<br />

result in improved relationships and the ability <strong>to</strong> track clients more successfully.”<br />

The participating providers meet with Fleege’s team every six weeks <strong>to</strong> share<br />

progress, refine their rapid‐cycle testing projects, and share next steps.<br />

At a report‐out meeting in January 2009, the <strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>WIser</strong> <strong>Choice</strong> ATR<br />

project identified the following improvements:<br />

• An increase in the number of clients provided access or assured contact<br />

within 24 <strong>to</strong> 48 hours of first contact<br />

• Clear plans for each client scheduled within seven days of first meeting<br />

• Paperwork shortened <strong>to</strong> one page at initial intake<br />

“We also feel that we have a greater focus on the client as a result of ATR and our<br />

work with <strong>NIATx</strong>,” adds Fleege. “Communications improved between the Central<br />

Intake Units and the <strong>Recovery</strong> Support Coordina<strong>to</strong>rs, which also helped improve<br />

hand‐offs.” In addition, the group noted improved collaboration between providers<br />

and <strong>Recovery</strong> Support Coordina<strong>to</strong>rs.<br />

The project has maintained a 62 percent follow‐up rate and continues <strong>to</strong> work on<br />

meeting the 80 percent goal. “We have set up focus groups with <strong>Recovery</strong> Support<br />

Coordina<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> find out how we can improve given the current process for the<br />

collection of the follow up data,” says Fleege.<br />

Goals for the coming year include working on ways <strong>to</strong> diffuse the lessons learned<br />

from the initial 2008 pilot providers <strong>to</strong> other providers in the <strong>WIser</strong> <strong>Choice</strong> system.<br />

“This project is allowing <strong>Milwaukee</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>to</strong> integrate recovery support<br />

coordination in<strong>to</strong> substance abuse treatment,” concludes Fleege. “We now have a<br />

better<br />

opportunity <strong>to</strong> become a recovery‐oriented system of care.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!