22.01.2015 Views

General Principles - VascularWeb

General Principles - VascularWeb

General Principles - VascularWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9/12/2011<br />

SVS Comprehensive Vascular Review Course<br />

September 9-10, 2011<br />

Intercontinental Chicago O’Hare<br />

Disclosure<br />

• I have no relationships to disclose.<br />

Endovascular Therapy<br />

-<strong>General</strong> <strong>Principles</strong>-<br />

Mark G Davies,<br />

MD, PhD, MBA<br />

• I have no unlabeled or unapproved uses of<br />

drugs or devices in my presentation.<br />

“If something can go wrong, it will”<br />

“If something can go wrong, it will”<br />

Murphy’s Law<br />

Murphy’s Law<br />

“Anything that can go wrong, will—at the<br />

worst possible moment”<br />

Finagle’s Law<br />

Develop skills with a narrow repertoire of<br />

catheters and wires<br />

80% of the problems will occur in 20% of<br />

the cases<br />

No fault in stopping<br />

• Pre-operative<br />

• Access<br />

• Platforms<br />

• Solutions<br />

• Complications<br />

• Followup<br />

1


9/12/2011<br />

• Pre-operative Imaging<br />

– CTA or MRA<br />

– Echolucency<br />

– Atherosclerosis vs. clot<br />

• Better access<br />

• Choice and availability of Platforms<br />

• Reduction in Radiation and Contrast<br />

A<br />

Supra-Renal<br />

Aorta<br />

Renal Arteries<br />

Iliac Arteries<br />

Aorto-Iliac<br />

Runoff<br />

Infra-Renal<br />

Aorta<br />

Femoral<br />

Arteries<br />

B<br />

CFA<br />

Femoro-popliteal<br />

Runoff<br />

C<br />

Popliteal<br />

Tibial Vessel<br />

runoff<br />

SFA<br />

Tibial<br />

Vessels<br />

Popliteal<br />

Pedal<br />

Vessels<br />

• Pre-operative Pharmacology<br />

– ASA, Plavix<br />

– Statins<br />

– Normal Saline<br />

• Mucomyst<br />

• Bicarbonate<br />

– Antibiotics<br />

2


9/12/2011<br />

• Pre-operative<br />

• Access<br />

• Platforms<br />

• Solutions<br />

• Complications<br />

– Prevention<br />

– Correcting<br />

• Followup<br />

Deep circumflex<br />

iliac<br />

Inferior<br />

epigastric<br />

CFA<br />

PFA<br />

SFA<br />

21 GA<br />

• Ultrasound access<br />

• Micropunctures kits<br />

• Direction<br />

– Retrograde Iliac<br />

– Antegrade UE<br />

– Antegrade LE<br />

– Retrograde Pop or Tibial ( DP or PT)<br />

• Length and redundancy<br />

3


9/12/2011<br />

Femoral Arterial Access With Ultrasound<br />

Trial [FAUST]<br />

• Routine real-time US guidance improved<br />

CFA cannulation only in patients with high<br />

CFA bifurcations but reduced the number<br />

of attempts, time to access, risk of<br />

venipunctures, and vascular complications<br />

in femoral arterial access<br />

Seto AH, Abu-Fadel MS, Sparling JM, Zacharias SJ, Daly TS, Harrison AT, Suh WM, Vera JA, Aston CE, Winters RJ, Patel PM,<br />

Hennebry TA, Kern MJ. Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates femoral arterial access and reduces vascular complications: FAUST<br />

(Femoral Arterial Access With Ultrasound Trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jul;3(7):751-8.<br />

• Vascular complications associated with arterial access are<br />

recognized to occur during cardiac catheterization and<br />

percutaneous intervention procedures<br />

• Reported complication rates


9/12/2011<br />

• Pre-operative<br />

• Access<br />

• Platforms<br />

• Solutions<br />

• Complications<br />

– Prevention<br />

– Correcting<br />

• Followup<br />

• Wire<br />

– 0.035<br />

– 0.018<br />

– 0.014<br />

• Sheath<br />

–4Fr<br />

–5Fr<br />

–6Fr<br />

• Guide<br />

– 4Fr systems<br />

• Delivery<br />

–OTW<br />

– Monorail<br />

• Leading edge<br />

• Shaft strength<br />

Guidewires<br />

Wire Component<br />

• Wire tip<br />

• Mandrel<br />

• Cover<br />

28<br />

Wire Characteristics<br />

• Length<br />

• Thickness<br />

• Tip design<br />

• Stiffness<br />

• Hydrophilic coating<br />

• Unseen and Unguided Wire = Dissection<br />

• Push back on the wire = Dissection<br />

• Right of the Spine = Venous Stick<br />

• Lateral of the femur = Profunda<br />

29<br />

5


9/12/2011<br />

Torque Devices<br />

Catheters<br />

• Probe lesions<br />

• Avoid buckling or coiling<br />

the wire proximal to lesion<br />

• Platinum tips will deform<br />

and kink<br />

“Work the Wire!”<br />

Characteristics<br />

• Tip design<br />

• Stiffness<br />

• Tourqability<br />

• Hydrophilic coating<br />

• Radio‐opacity<br />

• Length<br />

• Diameter<br />

• Hole(s)<br />

Length<br />

• Depends of the distance of the work area<br />

from the access site<br />

• Short catheters (60‐65 cm), usually sued for<br />

iliac work or with antegrade femoral access.<br />

• Intermediate catheters (90‐110 cm) for<br />

contralateral femoral or popliteal work or<br />

carotid artery work<br />

• Long catheters (130‐150 cm) for contralateral<br />

tibial artery work<br />

33<br />

34<br />

• Bown MJ, Bolia A, Sutton AJ. Subintimal<br />

angioplasty: meta‐analytical evidence of<br />

clinical utility. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg.<br />

2009 Sep;38(3):323‐37.<br />

• Pooled estimates<br />

– technical success: 85.7%<br />

• (95% confidence interval: 83.3%‐87.7%, 2810 limbs),<br />

– primary patency at 12 months : 55.8%<br />

• (95% confidence interval: 47.9%‐63.4%, 1342 limbs)<br />

– limb salvage at 12 months: 89.3%<br />

• (95% confidence interval: 85.5%‐92.2%, 2810 limbs),<br />

6


9/12/2011<br />

Catheter diameter<br />

• Equal to the outer circumference of the<br />

catheter (French size)<br />

• Catheter size determines the wire size<br />

that can be used with it:<br />

– 2 –3 French use 0.018 or 0.014 inch wires<br />

– 4 –5 French use 0.035 or 0.038 inch wires<br />

• Larger sizes catheters are usually used<br />

as guiding catheters.<br />

37<br />

• Integrated dilator<br />

• Hemostatic valve<br />

• Side port<br />

• The size is the size of<br />

the lumen<br />

• 1 French size = 3.3mm<br />

Sheath<br />

38<br />

Guiding Catheters<br />

• Dilator is not always<br />

integrated<br />

• No hemostatic valve at the<br />

hub<br />

• Needs a hemostatic<br />

component e.g. Touhy‐Borst<br />

• The size is the outer<br />

circumference<br />

39<br />

• Pre-operative<br />

• Access<br />

• Platforms<br />

• Solutions<br />

• Complications<br />

– Prevention<br />

– Correcting<br />

• Followup<br />

• Balloons<br />

– 0.035<br />

– 0.018<br />

– 0.014<br />

• Pressure<br />

• Length<br />

• Conformable<br />

• Other Balloons<br />

–Cryo<br />

–Ultra HP<br />

– Cutting<br />

• Stents<br />

– Regular<br />

– Closed Cell<br />

–Flexible<br />

– Covered<br />

– Biodegradable<br />

• Atherectomy<br />

– Directional<br />

– Rotational<br />

– Remote<br />

endarterectomy<br />

• Laser<br />

7


9/12/2011<br />

Angioplasty Balloons<br />

44<br />

Balloon Angioplasty<br />

• Remains the most effective and widely used<br />

percutaneous technique<br />

• Controlled stretch injury:<br />

– Desquamation of endothelial cells<br />

– Splitting or dissection of plaque and intima<br />

– Stretching of the media<br />

– Platelets and fibrin cover the denuded area<br />

– Intima reendothelializes, artery remodels<br />

– If intimal healing is prolific, restenosis occurs<br />

Balloon Characteristics<br />

• Size<br />

• Platform size<br />

• Profile<br />

• Pushability<br />

• Tractability<br />

• Pressure rating<br />

• Compliance<br />

46<br />

• Sachs T, Pomposelli F, Hamdan A, Wyers M,<br />

Schermerhorn M. Trends in the national<br />

outcomes and costs for claudication and<br />

limb threatening ischemia: Angioplasty vs<br />

bypass graft.J Vasc Surg. 2011 Aug 29. [Epub<br />

ahead of print]<br />

• Mortality is slightly lower with PTA for all<br />

indications, amputation rates for limb‐threat<br />

patients appear higher, as does the average<br />

cost<br />

• E Y, He N, Wang Y, Fan H. Percutaneous<br />

transluminal angioplasty (PTA) alone<br />

versus PTA with balloon‐expandable stent<br />

placement for short‐segment<br />

femoropopliteal artery disease: a<br />

metaanalysis of randomized trials. J Vasc<br />

Interv Radiol. 2008 Apr;19(4):499‐503.<br />

• In the treatment of femoropopliteal artery<br />

occlusive disease (< or =10 cm), higher<br />

primary patency rates can be expected at 6<br />

months with PTA followed by implantation<br />

of balloon‐expandable stents versus PTA<br />

alone<br />

8


9/12/2011<br />

• Mwipatayi BP, Hockings A, Hofmann M,<br />

Garbowski M, Sieunarine K. Balloon<br />

angioplasty compared with stenting for<br />

treatment of femoropopliteal occlusive<br />

disease: a meta‐analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2008<br />

Feb;47(2):461‐9<br />

• Stent placement in the femoropopliteal<br />

occlusive disease does not increase the<br />

patency rate when compared with<br />

angioplasty alone at 1 year.<br />

• CochTwine CP, Coulston J, Shandall A,<br />

McLain ADAngioplasty versus stenting for<br />

superficial femoral artery lesions. rane<br />

Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD006767.<br />

• There is limited benefit to stenting lesions of<br />

the superficial femoral artery in addition to<br />

angioplasty.<br />

Specialty Balloons<br />

• Cryoplasty Balloons<br />

• Cutting Balloons<br />

• Scoring Balloons<br />

Cryoplasty Balloons<br />

• The PolarCath (Boston<br />

Scientific)<br />

• Employs cold therapy<br />

using nitrous oxide as<br />

the inflation material<br />

• The concept of inducing<br />

apoptosis via freezing<br />

to reduce intimal<br />

hyperplastic response<br />

51<br />

52<br />

• Lyden SP. Indications and results with<br />

cryoplasty in the treatment of infrainguinal<br />

arterial occlusive disease. Vascular. 2006<br />

Sep‐Oct;14(5):290‐6.<br />

• Cryoplasty yappears to improve patency over<br />

conventional angioplasty and to reduce the<br />

need for bailout stenting in femoropopliteal<br />

stenoses and occlusions < 10 cm in length.<br />

• Cutting Balloon<br />

(Boston Scientific).<br />

• The device has four<br />

longitudinal<br />

microsurgical blades<br />

attached to the<br />

balloon (atherotomes)<br />

• Allow for more<br />

controlled fracture<br />

and dilation of the<br />

vessel<br />

Cutting Balloons<br />

54<br />

9


9/12/2011<br />

• Angiosculpt<br />

(AngioScore, fremont,<br />

CA)<br />

• Similar to cutting<br />

balloons but instead of<br />

atherotomes, it uses a<br />

flexible nitinol scoring<br />

element with three<br />

rectangular spiral struts<br />

Scoring Balloons<br />

• Canaud L, Alric P, Berthet JP, Marty‐Ané C,<br />

Mercier G, Branchereau P. Infrainguinal<br />

cutting balloon angioplasty in de novo<br />

arterial lesions. J Vasc Surg. 2008<br />

Nov;48(5):1182‐8.<br />

• CB‐PTA is safe and feasible for the treatment<br />

of infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease,<br />

with relatively low mid‐term restenosis rates<br />

compared to other endovascular treatments<br />

• Lesions


9/12/2011<br />

Stents<br />

• It is said that the term Stent originated<br />

from Charles R Stent, a 19 th century<br />

British Dentist naming a dental<br />

apparatus used form making molds<br />

“Stent”<br />

• Dotter was the first to apply metallic<br />

stents to the human vascular tree.<br />

61<br />

• High radial force<br />

• Resistant to recoil<br />

• Minimal or no<br />

stimulation of intimal<br />

hyperplasia<br />

• Longitudinal<br />

flexibility<br />

• High radiopacity for<br />

visualization<br />

• Ability to conform to<br />

Ideal Stent<br />

• Low profile<br />

• Minimal or no<br />

foreshortening<br />

• Easy deployment<br />

system<br />

• Maintenance of side<br />

branch patency<br />

• Magnetic resonance<br />

imaging compatibility<br />

• Durability<br />

• Low price<br />

the vessel<br />

62<br />

Balloon Expanding<br />

Stent Types<br />

• Mechanism of deployment<br />

– Self‐Expanding stents<br />

– Balloon‐Expanding stents.<br />

• Bare metal stents or Covered stents<br />

(stent grafts)<br />

• Special types of stents<br />

– Drug eluting stents<br />

– Bio‐degradable stents<br />

Pros<br />

Balloon Expandable vs<br />

Self Expanding<br />

Balloon Expandable Stents Self Expanding Stents<br />

Accurate deployment<br />

Strong radial force<br />

Radio-opaque<br />

Flexible<br />

Long<br />

Crush resistant<br />

Cons<br />

Rigidid Insufficient i radial force<br />

Short<br />

Insufficient radio-opacity<br />

Crushable<br />

Less accurate deployment<br />

Uses<br />

Orificial lesions<br />

Calcific lesions<br />

Resistant lesions<br />

Superficial lesions<br />

Long lesions<br />

Tortuous lesions<br />

63<br />

64<br />

Balloon Expandable Stents<br />

• Slotted malleable<br />

metal tubes expanded<br />

by a coaxial balloon<br />

matched to target<br />

vessel diameter<br />

• Most are made of<br />

stainless steel alloy<br />

Self Expanding Stents<br />

• Have a natural shape that is based on<br />

their mechanical or thermo‐mechanical<br />

properties.<br />

• Walstents are the prototype of the<br />

mechanical self expanding stents.<br />

• Nitinol stents are the prototype of the<br />

thermo‐mechanical stents.<br />

66<br />

11


9/12/2011<br />

Nitinol Stents<br />

• Nickel and titanium alloy (50‐55% Nickel –<br />

45‐50% Titanium).<br />

• It possesses thermal memory<br />

• Memory is set at high temperature (1,000° F)<br />

• At the transition point (90° F) the alloy<br />

regains its shape<br />

• Below the transition point, the metal is pliable<br />

Nitinol Stents<br />

Lifestent<br />

67<br />

Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Balloon<br />

Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral<br />

Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery - Twelve-Month<br />

Results From the RESILIENT Randomized Trial<br />

• At 12 months, freedom from target lesion<br />

revascularization was 87.3% for the stent group<br />

compared with 45.1% for the angioplasty group<br />

(P


9/12/2011<br />

Covered Stents<br />

• "ideal indications" for stent graft<br />

– segments with a length of ≥1 cm proximal and<br />

distal without any obstruction,<br />

– no lesions in the popliteal artery<br />

– one open tibial vessel<br />

– no severe calcifications<br />

– adequate antiplatelet therapy or<br />

anticoagulation),<br />

• McQuade K, Gable D, Pearl G, Theune B, Black S.<br />

Four-year randomized prospective comparison of<br />

percutaneous ePTFE/nitinol self-expanding stent<br />

graft versus prosthetic femoral-popliteal bypass in<br />

the treatment of superficial femoral artery<br />

occlusive diseaseJ Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep;52(3):584-<br />

90; discussion 590-1, 591.e1-591.e7.<br />

• Management of superficial femoral artery<br />

occlusive disease with percutaneous stent<br />

grafts exhibits similar primary patency at 4-year<br />

(48 month) follow up when compared with<br />

conventional femoral-popliteal artery bypass<br />

grafting with synthetic conduit<br />

To debulk or not…<br />

Device Advantages Limitations<br />

Famiarity to IC<br />

Effective with calcium<br />

Heat Generation<br />

Larger particle sizes than OA<br />

• Rotational<br />

• Excimer Laser<br />

• Directional<br />

Atherectomy<br />

• Orbital Atherectomy<br />

• Pathway Athectomy<br />

No wire exchange<br />

Eliminates thrombus<br />

Effective on soft plaque<br />

Challenged with Calciuc<br />

Effective on calcium<br />

Lumen size varies by<br />

speed of rotation<br />

Aspiration included<br />

Blades up increases lumen<br />

size<br />

Limited with calcium<br />

Contact ablation only<br />

Distal embolization risk<br />

Prolonged procedure time<br />

Potential for complications with poor<br />

technique or large crown size<br />

Unable to treat


9/12/2011<br />

• Distal Embolization<br />

– Emboli occur during wire crossing,<br />

angioplasty, stent deployment and<br />

atherectomy<br />

– 55% of patients can be shown to have<br />

macroembolism (PROTECT registry)<br />

– ~1% have been reported to result in<br />

angiographic loss of runoff<br />

• Distal Embolization<br />

– PROTECT registry angiographic criteria:<br />

• moderate or severe calcification of any length<br />

• total occlusions of any length<br />

• a filling defect<br />

• irregular (ulcerated) lesions at least 30 mm in<br />

length,<br />

• smooth, non-ulcerated lesions at least 50 mm<br />

in length<br />

– Collected particles consisted primarily of<br />

platelets and fibrin conglomerates, trapped<br />

erythrocytes, inflammatory cells, and<br />

extracellular matrix<br />

Incidence<br />

Processes Leading to Restenosis<br />

In situ<br />

Thrombosis<br />

Distal<br />

Embolization<br />

3.5% 3.8%<br />

• Pre-operative<br />

• Access<br />

• Platforms<br />

• Solutions<br />

• Complications<br />

– Prevention<br />

– Correcting<br />

• Follow up<br />

14


9/12/2011<br />

Reporting Standards<br />

• Primary Patency<br />

• Assisted Primary<br />

Patency<br />

• Secondary Patency<br />

• Survival<br />

• Limb Salvage<br />

• Target Lesion<br />

Revascularization<br />

• Target Extremity<br />

Revascularization<br />

• Symptom Free<br />

• Clinical Efficacy<br />

• Amputation Free<br />

Survival<br />

• MACE, MALE, 30d<br />

Amp<br />

• “Keep it simple”<br />

• “Do not do the economic patient”<br />

• “Do not attempt the impossible!”<br />

• “First, do no harm”<br />

• “If Plan A does not work, do not try plan A<br />

again”<br />

• “There is always bypass”<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!