Bangladesh - Independent Evaluation Group - World Bank
Bangladesh - Independent Evaluation Group - World Bank
Bangladesh - Independent Evaluation Group - World Bank
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Summary<br />
<strong>Bangladesh</strong> is one of the world’s poorest and most densely populated countries, and subject<br />
to annual cyclones and flooding. Despite these challenges, it benefits from strong economic<br />
growth, good performance on health and education, and poverty reduction— alongside weak<br />
governance and pervasive corruption. The reasons include strong macroeconomic policy,<br />
pro-poor spending, credible elections, export growth and remittances, improved capacity for<br />
managing natural disasters, and a stronger civil society than comparable countries.<br />
After over a decade of intense engagement with the <strong>Bank</strong> on governance, <strong>Bangladesh</strong><br />
adopted in 2006 a governance-oriented Country Assistance Strategy (CAS) with four main<br />
objectives: to improve implementation capacity; to “tackle corruption” by fully<br />
operationalizing the Anti-Corruption Commission; to lay the foundation for comprehensive<br />
legal and judicial reform; and to strengthen “voice, empowerment and participation.” The<br />
choice of a wide range of instruments and areas of intervention was appropriate, given the<br />
political instability at the time of 2006 CAS preparation. The <strong>Bank</strong> signaled it was ready to<br />
engage in all areas, and could scale up or pull back depending on emerging political and<br />
bureaucratic commitment. The 2006 CAS yielded mixed results, and the subsequent Country<br />
Partnership Strategy (CPS) has been more selective on GAC issues. At the project level,<br />
governance has been a key priority, in line with the South Asia region’s heavy emphasis on<br />
GAC-in-Projects. Investments in GAC-in-primary education, a local government project,<br />
anti-corruption efforts in the power sector, and projects strengthening the investment climate<br />
have yielded positive results. Investments in GAC-in-roads projects have had mixed results<br />
in terms of effectiveness. GAC activities were mainly adopted prior to the 2007 GAC<br />
Strategy. Although <strong>Bangladesh</strong> was a Country Governance and Anticorruption (CGAC)<br />
country, the country team chose not to use CGAC funds because the country had already<br />
been intensively using GAC approaches well before the GAC strategy was adopted.<br />
ix