22.01.2015 Views

Why human rights matter - Rio Tinto

Why human rights matter - Rio Tinto

Why human rights matter - Rio Tinto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Why</strong> <strong>human</strong><br />

<strong>rights</strong> <strong>matter</strong><br />

How to guide<br />

January 2013<br />

‘Transparent’ means we proactively share information<br />

with communities about how our decisions, activities<br />

and impacts may affect them throughout a project<br />

lifecycle. It also means making public in a general<br />

sense, the nature of their concerns, complaints<br />

and grievances.<br />

‘Accessible’ means information must be easily<br />

understood and readily available in formats,<br />

languages and locations that are convenient and<br />

non-threatening to diverse groups within each<br />

community. In communities where literacy is low,<br />

we may need to share information orally, rather<br />

than through written material.<br />

We may need to build the community’s capacity<br />

to understand what it is being told and to express<br />

informed views. This might require us to provide<br />

access to unbiased expert advice or engage a<br />

credible outside organisation to help the community<br />

understand what is being proposed. We may also<br />

need to build our own internal capacity to engage<br />

on these issues (see section 2.3.4).<br />

Right to self-determination<br />

Securing broad-based community support before<br />

the start of any project is important to honouring<br />

the right to self-determination. The right to selfdetermination<br />

allows all peoples to freely determine<br />

their political status and to advance their social,<br />

economic and cultural development within a<br />

sovereign context. It includes the right to manage<br />

their land’s wealth and natural resources without<br />

prejudice (ICCPR, ICESCR Article 1). The right to<br />

self-determination is considered a collective right<br />

held by ‘peoples’ and is most relevant to us in<br />

relation to Indigenous peoples (see Box 9).<br />

Rights of Indigenous peoples<br />

Indigenous peoples are entitled as individuals<br />

to all <strong>human</strong> <strong>rights</strong> enshrined in the Universal<br />

Declaration of Human Rights. In addition,<br />

international law recognises that they have<br />

collective <strong>rights</strong> to their land and its resources,<br />

including special and spiritual relationships,<br />

that warrant particular attention and protection.<br />

The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of<br />

Indigenous peoples (UNDRIP), which we support,<br />

recognises the right of Indigenous peoples to<br />

‘maintain and strengthen their distinctive spiritual<br />

relationship with their traditionally owned or<br />

otherwise occupied and used lands, territories,<br />

waters and coastal seas and other resources’<br />

(Article 25).<br />

Box 9: Individual and collective <strong>rights</strong><br />

When discussing <strong>human</strong> <strong>rights</strong> the question of<br />

‘individual <strong>rights</strong>’ and ‘collective <strong>rights</strong>’ often arises.<br />

The basic distinction is that collective <strong>rights</strong> protect<br />

a group of people, while individual <strong>rights</strong> protect<br />

the individual.<br />

Individual <strong>rights</strong> are <strong>rights</strong> held by the individual<br />

regardless of their membership or association to a<br />

group. For example, right to security of person is an<br />

individual right held by a person though shared in<br />

common by all people.<br />

Collective <strong>rights</strong> are <strong>rights</strong> held by individuals<br />

by virtue of being part of a particular group.<br />

The <strong>rights</strong> of Indigenous peoples are examples<br />

of collective <strong>rights</strong>.<br />

Though they are interlinked, collective <strong>rights</strong> and<br />

individual <strong>rights</strong> may sometimes be at odds with<br />

each other. Weighing the demands of the groups with<br />

the demands of the individuals can be complex. For<br />

example, some states uphold the <strong>rights</strong> of Indigenous<br />

groups to engage in traditional subsistence fishing,<br />

often allowing Indigenous groups to access a fishery<br />

before allowing commercial harvest. Non-Indigenous<br />

fishermen have argued that this ‘preferential’<br />

treatment for Indigenous groups infringes on<br />

individual livelihoods.<br />

Box 10: International Finance Corporation (IFC)<br />

Guidance on FPIC and Indigenous peoples<br />

Projects are required to achieve Free, Prior and<br />

Informed Consent (FPIC) with the affected<br />

communities of Indigenous peoples with regard to<br />

project design under the IFC’s Performance Standards<br />

on Environmental and Social Responsibility.<br />

These cover:<br />

— impacts on lands and natural resources subject to<br />

traditional ownership or under customary use;<br />

— relocation of Indigenous peoples from lands and<br />

natural resources they have traditionally owned<br />

or used;<br />

— significant impacts on critical cultural heritage<br />

that is essential to the identity and/or cultural,<br />

ceremonial, or spiritual aspects of Indigenous<br />

peoples’ lives, eg sacred groves, sacred bodies<br />

of water, sacred trees, and sacred rocks; and<br />

— use of cultural heritage, including knowledge,<br />

innovations or practices of Indigenous peoples<br />

for commercial purposes.<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!