22.01.2015 Views

Why human rights matter - Rio Tinto

Why human rights matter - Rio Tinto

Why human rights matter - Rio Tinto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Why</strong> <strong>human</strong><br />

<strong>rights</strong> <strong>matter</strong><br />

Case study 2<br />

January 2013<br />

Levie Moyo in the kraal<br />

built by Murowa Diamond<br />

Mine, which was a part<br />

of the resettlement<br />

farm facilities. These<br />

were provided to ensure<br />

resettled families could<br />

maintain their traditional<br />

livelihoods after<br />

resettlement.<br />

Negotiating and securing land<br />

Following negotiations, <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Tinto</strong> identified and<br />

purchased six blocks of land totalling 15,000<br />

hectares, known as the ‘Shashe Block’, in the<br />

nearby Masvingo Province to develop a new<br />

resettlement community. However, due to the<br />

Zimbabwe Government’s ‘Land Reform and<br />

Resettlement Programme’, a large number of<br />

Masvingo families had already commenced settling<br />

on the same blocks of land <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Tinto</strong> had intended<br />

for the Murowa resettlement. Although <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Tinto</strong><br />

needed to uphold its commitments to the Murowa<br />

resettlers, <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Tinto</strong> did not want to evict the<br />

Masvingo families living on the Shashe Block or<br />

adversely impact upon their right to land. <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Tinto</strong><br />

recognised that the resettlement plan would need<br />

to be revised in order to address potential adverse<br />

impacts on all stakeholders, including the Masvingo<br />

families. As a result <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Tinto</strong> undertook two years<br />

of extensive negotiations and achieved a common<br />

solution which allowed for both Masvingo and<br />

Murowa families to resettle in the Shashe Block.<br />

Throughout the process of securing land, <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Tinto</strong><br />

maintained transparency with the government,<br />

the communities and the landowners and ensured<br />

that all perspectives were heard. Though the<br />

successful resettlement of the Murowa community<br />

was a priority, <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Tinto</strong> also recognised the <strong>rights</strong><br />

of other nearby communities and the impact<br />

resettlement would have on them. As a result,<br />

a mutually-agreed resettlement solution was<br />

achieved that minimised impacts on the <strong>human</strong><br />

<strong>rights</strong> of all affected stakeholders.<br />

Outcome<br />

By 2003, <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Tinto</strong> had relocated all Murowa families’<br />

moveable assets to Shashe and compensated them<br />

for any additional losses. To improve the livelihoods<br />

of the resettled community, <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Tinto</strong> also built a<br />

school, a rural health centre, housing for teachers<br />

and nurses, a church, roads and water provision<br />

in Shashe for the benefit of all stakeholders living<br />

there. Within one year of resettlement, farmers<br />

reported better harvests in Shashe than those<br />

achieved at their original community in Murowa.<br />

At the handover of the resettlement scheme to<br />

the government at the end of 2003, <strong>Rio</strong> <strong>Tinto</strong><br />

committed to a ‘Communities Action Plan’ working<br />

with local authorities to provide health, training and<br />

agricultural capacity building programmes for ten<br />

years after resettlement.<br />

2<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!