23.01.2015 Views

First report on the reliability and validity of speech handicap index in ...

First report on the reliability and validity of speech handicap index in ...

First report on the reliability and validity of speech handicap index in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

measure to estimate that <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>struct or dimensi<strong>on</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g assessed is stable over time.<br />

The values <strong>of</strong> Total SHI scores, SHI <strong>speech</strong> doma<strong>in</strong>, SHI psycho-social doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

overall <strong>speech</strong> quality were found to be highly significant by us<strong>in</strong>g Spearman’s rank<br />

correlati<strong>on</strong> coefficient.<br />

Validity is <strong>of</strong>ten seen as <strong>the</strong> most important c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> a measure. 37,38<br />

However, it must be remembered here that <strong>validity</strong> does not refer to any <strong>in</strong>herent<br />

characteristic <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> measure; measures <strong>the</strong>mselves are never valid or <strong>in</strong>valid. 37 Although<br />

several types <strong>of</strong> <strong>validity</strong> have been described <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> literature, <strong>the</strong> most comm<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

important types are c<strong>on</strong>struct <strong>validity</strong>, group <strong>validity</strong>, c<strong>on</strong>tent <strong>validity</strong> <strong>and</strong> criteri<strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>validity</strong>. 35 C<strong>on</strong>struct <strong>validity</strong> refers to <strong>the</strong> extent to which a measure assesses <strong>the</strong> specific<br />

doma<strong>in</strong> or c<strong>on</strong>struct <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest. 35 A widely used method <strong>of</strong> assess<strong>in</strong>g c<strong>on</strong>struct <strong>validity</strong> is<br />

to exam<strong>in</strong>e how hypo<strong>the</strong>tical relati<strong>on</strong>ships are c<strong>on</strong>firmed. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> more <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>the</strong><br />

hypo<strong>the</strong>tical relati<strong>on</strong>ships are c<strong>on</strong>firmed, <strong>the</strong> greater <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>struct <strong>validity</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> survey<br />

variables is assumed to be. 41,42 Different doma<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> SHI were compared with similar<br />

doma<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g st<strong>and</strong>ard, validated UWQOL questi<strong>on</strong>naire with <strong>the</strong> help <strong>of</strong><br />

Spearman’s rank correlati<strong>on</strong> coefficient. Total SHI score, <strong>the</strong> SHI <strong>speech</strong> doma<strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong><br />

SHI psycho-social doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> overall SHI <strong>speech</strong> assessment questi<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>speech</strong><br />

doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> UWQOL were found to be highly significant. The correlati<strong>on</strong>s between Total<br />

SHI score, <strong>the</strong> SHI <strong>speech</strong> doma<strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong> SHI psycho-social doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> overall SHI <strong>speech</strong><br />

assessment questi<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> social doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> UWQOL showed moderate correlati<strong>on</strong>. The<br />

relatively low values <strong>of</strong> SHI psycho-social doma<strong>in</strong> when compared with social doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

UWQOL may be because <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>corporati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> two grossly different sub-doma<strong>in</strong>s (pa<strong>in</strong><br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!