Topological Ontology and Logic of Qualitative quantity
Qualitative quantity and BFO (Basic Formal Ontology) of /Barry Smith/ and YAMATO (Yet Another More Advanced Top-level Ontology) of /Riichiro Mizoguchi/
Qualitative quantity and BFO (Basic Formal Ontology) of /Barry Smith/ and YAMATO (Yet Another More Advanced Top-level Ontology) of /Riichiro Mizoguchi/
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
only that between process <strong>and</strong> event but also that between a pulse <strong>and</strong> a sequence <strong>of</strong> pulses<br />
<strong>and</strong> that between to grow <strong>and</strong> to cut, etc.”<br />
The three theories <strong>of</strong> YAMATO are on:<br />
• (1) Quality <strong>and</strong> <strong>quantity</strong><br />
• (2) Representations(content-bearing things)<br />
• (3) Objects, processes <strong>and</strong> events<br />
According to Riichiro Mizoguchi “careful examination <strong>of</strong> them (the well-known “upper<br />
ontologies”) reveals some room for improvement in three respects: (1) Quality <strong>and</strong> <strong>quantity</strong>,<br />
(2) <strong>Ontology</strong> <strong>of</strong> representation, <strong>and</strong> (3) Distinction between processes <strong>and</strong> events.” 33 As<br />
Mizoguchi establishes “… quality <strong>and</strong> <strong>quantity</strong> need more careful investigation. One <strong>of</strong> the<br />
most sophisticated property ontologies is found in DOLCE. It specifies value space for each<br />
quality type under the name <strong>of</strong> Quality space(region). A remarkable feature <strong>of</strong> DOLCE’s<br />
conceptualization about it is the clear distinction between the quality an object possesses<br />
<strong>and</strong> the quality value(quale/qualia) itself.”<br />
For Mizoguchi “no existing upper ontology distinguishes between quality in reality <strong>and</strong><br />
quality description, which causes some confusion when talking about quality <strong>and</strong> <strong>quantity</strong>.”<br />
Mizoguchi believes that “quality ontology should contribute to facilitation <strong>of</strong> data<br />
interoperability as well as capturing quality ontologically.”<br />
The topological notion <strong>of</strong> quality <strong>and</strong> <strong>quantity</strong> is evident in the underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> definition<br />
<strong>of</strong> “quality” in ontology YAMATO. The definition <strong>of</strong> quality follows the threefold <strong>of</strong> concept<br />
in YAMATO - “basic concepts”, “role”, <strong>and</strong> “role holder”. Quality is dependent attribute <strong>of</strong><br />
the basic concept, which preserved its identity unchanged during the occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />
changes <strong>of</strong> its meaning with the time flow. Topology is concerned with properties or<br />
qualities that are preserved under continuous deformations <strong>of</strong> objects. The topological<br />
notion <strong>of</strong> quality <strong>and</strong> <strong>quantity</strong> in this ontology is demonstrated by the simultaneous <strong>of</strong> these<br />
two processes, first by the preservation <strong>of</strong> identity <strong>and</strong> second by the contiuous change <strong>of</strong><br />
the meaning.<br />
In YAMATO the notion <strong>of</strong> quality is divided in quality role <strong>and</strong> in quality role type. Richiro<br />
Mizoguchi illustrate this notions <strong>of</strong> quality with the example <strong>of</strong> the statement “John’s height<br />
<strong>of</strong> 160 im long”. Here this division <strong>of</strong> quality role <strong>and</strong> quality role type is presented in the<br />
parts <strong>of</strong> the statement, where John is the role holder (object/human), element John’s height<br />
is the quality role (particul dependent attribute) <strong>of</strong> height associated with particular role<br />
holder (John), <strong>and</strong> element height is the quality role type, not John’s hight but just the hight<br />
(dependent on the way <strong>of</strong> measuring). After measuring the hight will be length (generic<br />
quality type), in our example the length <strong>quantity</strong> is “160 cm long”, where “160” is number<br />
<strong>and</strong> “cm” is unit/dimension.<br />
33<br />
http://www.ei.sanken.osaka-u.ac.jp/hozo/onto_library/YAMATO101216.pdf<br />
11