Board of Appeals Minutes 02/28/2012 - Village of Caledonia
Board of Appeals Minutes 02/28/2012 - Village of Caledonia
Board of Appeals Minutes 02/28/2012 - Village of Caledonia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1. Roll Call<br />
MINUTES<br />
VILLAGE OF CALEDONIA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS BOARD MEETING<br />
East Side Community Center – 6156 Douglas Avenue, Racine, Wisconsin<br />
Tuesday, Feb. <strong>28</strong>, <strong>2012</strong> – 9:00 A.M.<br />
Rubinson called the meeting to order at 9:05 a.m. and explained the meeting process.<br />
<strong>Board</strong> Members in attendance were: Lisa Bell, Roseanne Kuemmel. Steve Rubinson. Not present<br />
Everette Fitch, Tom Spieker. Judy Tomachek was excused. There was a quorum present.<br />
Present: <strong>Village</strong> Administrator Tom Lebak.<br />
Staff present: Jarmen Czuta <strong>of</strong> Racine County Development Services to assist the <strong>Board</strong> on regulations<br />
and requirements. Brian Jensen <strong>of</strong> Racine County Development Services was present in the audience.<br />
2. Review and Possible Approval <strong>of</strong> <strong>Minutes</strong> from October 25, 2011.<br />
Rubinson asked for a motion to approve the minutes. Kuemmel made a motion to approve the minutes<br />
from the October 25, 2011 meeting. Seconded by Bell. Voice vote, 3/0. Motion carried unanimously.<br />
3. <strong>Board</strong> Meeting.<br />
A. Fritz’s <strong>of</strong> Racine, LLC Cost <strong>of</strong> past and proposed tavern additions<br />
4234 Douglas Avenue will exceed 50% <strong>of</strong> the fair market value <strong>of</strong><br />
Racine, WI 534<strong>02</strong><br />
the existing nonconforming structure/use, the<br />
104-04-23-29-599-000 entryway has an insufficient and nonaverage<br />
(LAID OVER ON 10/25/2011)<br />
street yard setback (no permit), and the<br />
detached garage has insufficient rear and side<br />
yard setbacks (not constructed per permit).<br />
Jarmen Czuta read the public hearing notice. At the 10/25/<strong>2012</strong>2 BOA meeting this was laid over with<br />
the objective to allow the applicant additional time to reevaluate the plans to become more code compliant. In<br />
February <strong>2012</strong>, Czuta met with the owner <strong>of</strong> Fritz’s and information was submitted to address the <strong>Board</strong>’s<br />
concerns. In Mr. Vernon’s letter dated 2/1/<strong>2012</strong> (rec’d 2/6/<strong>2012</strong> at Racine County Code Admin.) he indicates<br />
he did get the zoning changed from M-3 to B-3 at the 12/6/2011 <strong>Village</strong> <strong>Board</strong> Meeting. Second was the<br />
location <strong>of</strong> the garage. He would have the garage relocated in the summer <strong>of</strong> 2014 and if finances were in<br />
place, it would be moved sooner. Third was the question <strong>of</strong> when his front entrance was built. He could not<br />
find any pictures or documents to make that determination. He did obtain a statement dated 2/1/<strong>2012</strong> (rec’d<br />
2/6/<strong>2012</strong> at Racine County Code Admin.) from Gerald Exner who states it was there in the 1960s. Letters<br />
attached.<br />
Czuta read Julie Anderson, Director <strong>of</strong> Racine County Public Works and Development Services, dated<br />
2/22/<strong>2012</strong> outlining what issues the variance request would need to address.<br />
Rubinson stated the <strong>Board</strong> will address one issue at a time.<br />
First: Zoning has been changed from manufacturing to business (M-3 to B-3) at the <strong>Caledonia</strong> <strong>Village</strong><br />
<strong>Board</strong> meeting on 12/6/2011. Under the new zoning, the business is compliant. Issue in question now is the<br />
addition, because <strong>of</strong> exceeding 50% FMV limit. Czuta added that because <strong>of</strong> the past additions, the building<br />
1
already exceeds the 50% Fair Market Value limit and for any addition, a person will have to go before the<br />
<strong>Board</strong>.<br />
Bell made a motion to grant the variance for the addition to provide a smoking area. Kuemmel second.<br />
Voice vote, 3/0. Motion carried.<br />
Second: Existing Entrance. The issue was did the entrance exist before the current code was put into<br />
place on 9/17/1970. Vernon had a letter from Gerald Exner dated 2/1/<strong>2012</strong> and received at Racine County<br />
Code Administration on 2/6/<strong>2012</strong>. Exner stated he knew the front entrance was in place in the 1960s when the<br />
establishment was called Aw Come On In. The door was in the same location in around 1944 when he<br />
delivered newspapers.<br />
Kuemmel made a motion to approve the entry way as a nonconforming structure. Bell second. Voice<br />
vote, 3/0. Motion carried.<br />
Third: Detached garage. Vernon stated he will move the garage to a conforming location no later than<br />
the summer <strong>of</strong> 2014 and sooner if finances become available. If he cannot move the garage, he will tear it<br />
down. Czuta stated zoning can make sure that will be done.<br />
Bell made a motion to give Vernon until 11/1/2014 to rectify the location <strong>of</strong> the garage. Kuemmel<br />
second. Voice vote, 3/0. Motion carried.<br />
Vernon stated he tried to locate pictures to show when the front entrance was added. He went to the<br />
Racine Journal Times newspaper and they sent him to the library. At the library he was told unless he had a<br />
date, it would take years to locate a picture.<br />
Rubinson asked the <strong>Board</strong> if there was anything else they would like to discuss. There was not.<br />
Czuta read conditions:<br />
The <strong>Board</strong> granted approval as:<br />
1) The Racine Co. Development Services staff, who is contracted by the <strong>Village</strong> to review Zoning<br />
matters had no objection to this request per content in the Feb. 22, <strong>2012</strong> correspondence.<br />
2) Submitted documentation and <strong>Board</strong> Meeting testimony established a need for:<br />
a) the tavern addition, and<br />
b) a garage <strong>of</strong> this size to protect the owner’s belonging from the effects <strong>of</strong> the outdoor<br />
environment and the need to preserve the substantial property rights <strong>of</strong> the owner.<br />
3) The variance does not appear to be contrary to the purpose and spirit <strong>of</strong> the ordinance as:<br />
a) the proposed addition is consistent with the existing development in this area, and<br />
b) per a written statement from a <strong>Caledonia</strong> resident the existing covered entryway was built<br />
prior to the adoption <strong>of</strong> the revised Racine County Zoning Ordinance and the proposed addition will not<br />
encroach further into the required street setback.<br />
4) The request does not appear to create substantial detriment to adjacent property as:<br />
a) there was no significant opposition shown at the meeting,<br />
b) area property owner submitted oral support for this proposal and the public interest does not<br />
appear to be negatively impacted by this proposal.<br />
5) to comply with the ordinance would render conformity with such restrictions as unnecessarily<br />
burdensome.<br />
6) The applicant is responsible for abiding by required performance standards listed in Article VII,<br />
Division 4, <strong>of</strong> Chapter 20 <strong>of</strong> the Racine County Code <strong>of</strong> Ordinances.<br />
2
Standard Conditions:<br />
• The applicant must allow full and unlimited access to the project site at a reasonable time to any<br />
Development Services Department employee who is investigating the project’s construction,<br />
operation, or maintenance.<br />
• Before beginning this project, the applicant must obtain a zoning permit card from this <strong>of</strong>fice<br />
after paying the required fee <strong>of</strong> $1070, an additional $15 to revise the 1995 zoning permit for<br />
relocating the detached garage. This card must be displayed in a prominent location at the<br />
project site. Also, a copy <strong>of</strong> these conditions must be kept at a proposed project site at all times<br />
until the project has been completed.<br />
• This variance approval will expire on August <strong>28</strong>, <strong>2012</strong>, unless substantial work has commenced<br />
pursuant to such grant. No construction may begin after such time unless an extension is granted<br />
in writing by the Racine County Zoning <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Adjustment.<br />
• This applicant is responsible for obtaining all necessary federal, state, and local permits,<br />
approvals, and licenses and for abiding by all applicable codes and regulations.<br />
• No additions, deletions, or changes may be made to these conditions without the prior approval<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Zoning <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Adjustment.<br />
• Failure to comply with the terms and conditions stated herein may result in the issuance <strong>of</strong><br />
citation(s) and/or revocation <strong>of</strong> this approval/permit.<br />
• Your accepting this variance approval and beginning the project means that you have read,<br />
understand, and agree to follow all conditions <strong>of</strong> this approval. Therefore, Fritz’s <strong>of</strong> Racine,<br />
LLC, their heirs, successors, and assigns are responsible for full compliance with the above<br />
conditions. It is the property owner’s responsibility to inform any subsequent owner or operator<br />
<strong>of</strong> these conditions.<br />
There were no additional comments from the <strong>Board</strong>.<br />
Rubinson called for a vote approving the conditions as stated. Voice vote, 3/0. Motion carried.<br />
B. Other business as authorized by law.<br />
No other business<br />
C. Adjourn<br />
Bell made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Kuemmel second. Voice Vote. Motion carried<br />
unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 9:58 a.m.<br />
Respectfully submitted,<br />
Mary Jo Schmidt<br />
Eng./Bldg. Adm. Asst. II<br />
<strong>Village</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Caledonia</strong><br />
3