25.01.2015 Views

CONNECTIONS - INSNA

CONNECTIONS - INSNA

CONNECTIONS - INSNA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CONNECTIONS</strong><br />

Configurations of Homophily<br />

Ibarra, H. 1992. “Homophily and Differential<br />

Returns: Sex Differences in Network<br />

Structure and Access in an Advertising<br />

Firm.” Administrative Science Quarterly<br />

37:422-47.<br />

Ibarra, H. 1995. “Race, Opportunity, and<br />

Diversity of Social Circles in Managerial<br />

Networks.” Academy of Management<br />

Review. 38: 673-703.<br />

Kalmijn, M. 1998. “Intermarriage and<br />

Homogamy: Causes, patterns and<br />

Trends.” Annual Review of Sociology. 24:<br />

395-421.<br />

Kalmijn, M. and H. Flap. 2001. “Assortative<br />

Meeting and Mating: Unintended<br />

Consequences of Organized Settings for<br />

Partner Choices.” Social Forces 79:1289-<br />

1312.<br />

Laumann, E.O. 1963. Bonds of Pluralism. New<br />

York: Wiley.<br />

Lin, N. 2001. Social Capital: A Theory of Social<br />

Structure and Action. Cambridge:<br />

Cambridge University Press.<br />

Louch H. 2000. “Personal Network Integration:<br />

Tranistivity and Homophily in Strong-Tie<br />

Relations.” Social Networks 22: 45-64.<br />

Marsden, P.V. 1981. “Models and Methods for<br />

Characterizing the Structural Parameters<br />

of Groups.” Social Networks 3:1-27.<br />

Marsden, P. 1987. “Core Discussion Networks of<br />

Americans.” American Sociological<br />

Review. 52: 122-131.<br />

Marsden, P. 1988. “Homogeneity in Confiding<br />

Relations.” Social Networks. 10: 57-76.<br />

Marsden, P. 1990. “Network Diversity,<br />

Substructures for Opportunity and<br />

Contact.” Pp 397-410 in Structures of<br />

Power and Constraint: Papers in Honor<br />

of Peter Blau, Ed. C Calhoun, M Meyer,<br />

and R Scott. New York: Cambridge.<br />

Mayhew, B.H., McPherson, M., Rotolo, T. and L.<br />

Smith-Lovin. 1995. “Sex and Ethnic<br />

Heterogeneity in Face-to-Face Groups in<br />

Public Places: An Ecological Perspective<br />

on Social Interaction.” Social Forces<br />

74:15-52.<br />

McPherson, J.M. and L. Smith-Lovin. 1986. “Sex<br />

Segregation in Voluntary Associations.”<br />

American Sociological Review 52:370-79.<br />

McPherson, M and L Smith-Lovin. 1987.<br />

“Homophily in Voluntary Organizations:<br />

Status Distance and the Composition of<br />

Face-to-Face Groups.” American<br />

Sociological Review. 52:370-9<br />

McPherson, M, L Smith-Lovin, and J Cook. 2001.<br />

“Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social<br />

Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology<br />

27: 415-44.<br />

Mouw, T., & Entwisle, B. (2006). Residential<br />

segregation and interracial friendship in<br />

schools. American Journal of Sociology,<br />

112, 394-441.<br />

Popielarz, P.A. and J.M. McPherson. 1995. “On<br />

the Edge or In Between: Niche Position,<br />

Niche Overlap, and the Duration of<br />

Voluntary Association Memberships.”<br />

American Journal of Sociology 101:698-<br />

720.<br />

Ragin, C. 1987. The Comparative Method:<br />

Moving Beyond Qualitative and<br />

Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley:<br />

University of California Press.<br />

Ragin, C. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science.<br />

Chicago: University of Chicago Press.<br />

Ragin, Charles C., Kriss A. Drass and Sean<br />

Davey. 2003. Fuzzy-Set/Qualitative<br />

Comparative Analysis 1.1. Tucson,<br />

Arizona: Department of Sociology,<br />

University of Arizona.<br />

Robins, G., Elliott P. and P. Pattison. 2001.<br />

“Network Models for Social Selection<br />

Processes.” Social Networks23: 1-30.<br />

Robins, Garry, Tom A.B. Snijders, Peng Wang,<br />

Mark Handcock, & Phillipa E Pattison.<br />

2007. Recent developments in<br />

exponential random graph (p*) models for<br />

social networks. Social Networks 29,<br />

192–215.<br />

Rogers, Everett M., and Phillip K. Bhomik.1970.<br />

“Homophily-heterophily: Relational<br />

concepts for communication research.”<br />

Public Opinion Quarterly 34: 523-538.<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!