J07288 - AFMA - AFMA Matrix - March 2012.indd
J07288 - AFMA - AFMA Matrix - March 2012.indd
J07288 - AFMA - AFMA Matrix - March 2012.indd
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
MARCH 2012<br />
Volume 21 Nr 1<br />
<strong>AFMA</strong><br />
A bumpy 2012 ahead<br />
<strong>Matrix</strong><br />
Quarterly magazine of the Animal Feed Manufacturers Association<br />
<br />
The BIOMIN solutions<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Established product range:<br />
® )<br />
® <br />
® )<br />
® ® )<br />
® <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Naturally ahead
www.graintech-makeway.com<br />
more than 100 years a reliable partner<br />
• Design<br />
• Engineering<br />
• Manufacturing<br />
• Completion<br />
• Feed mills<br />
•<br />
• Flour mills<br />
Pet Food plants<br />
• Aqua feedmills<br />
• Cereal Processing<br />
plants<br />
• Silos<br />
• Handling Systems<br />
• Electric control<br />
and automation<br />
Contact: Jan Kminek<br />
68 Fourth Street<br />
Booysens Reserve<br />
Johannesburg<br />
2091<br />
T +27 11 835-2064<br />
F +27 11 835-2816<br />
E jkminek@graintech-makeway.com<br />
CRAFTMANSHIP IN THE ANIMAL FEED AND FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRY
<strong>AFMA</strong><br />
<strong>Matrix</strong><br />
CONTENTS<br />
MARCH 2012<br />
Volume 21 Nr 1<br />
EDITORIAL OFFICE<br />
Embankment Park, 194 Kwikkie Crescent,<br />
Centurion 0157<br />
Tel: +27 12 663 9097<br />
Tel: +27 12 663 9361<br />
Fax: +27 12 663 9612<br />
E-mail: admin@afma.co.za<br />
Website: www.afma.co.za<br />
PUBLISHER<br />
<strong>AFMA</strong><br />
PO Box 8144 Centurion 0046<br />
Embankment Park, 194 Kwikkie Crescent,<br />
Centurion 0157<br />
Tel: +27 12 663 9097<br />
Tel: +27 12 663 9361<br />
Fax: +27 12 663 9612<br />
E-mail: admin@afma.co.za<br />
Website: www.afma.co.za<br />
ADVERTISEMENTS<br />
<strong>AFMA</strong><br />
PO Box 8144 Centurion 0046<br />
Embankment Park, 194 Kwikkie Crescent,<br />
Centurion 0157<br />
Tel: +27 12 663 9097<br />
Tel: +27 12 663 9361<br />
Fax: +27 12 663 9612<br />
E-mail: admin@afma.co.za<br />
Website: www.afma.co.za<br />
DESIGN & LAYOUT<br />
Gecko Communications<br />
PO Box 11436 Erasmuskloof 0048<br />
Centurion Office Park, Block A, Ground Floor,<br />
Embankment Road, Centurion 0157<br />
Tel: +27 12 683 0231<br />
Fax: +27 86 626 7701<br />
E-mail: studio@geckocom.co.za<br />
Website: www.geckocom.co.za<br />
PRINTERS<br />
Beria Printers<br />
PO Box 48079 Hercules 0030<br />
14 Jacaranda Street, Dirk Smit Industrial Park,<br />
Section 7 & 8, Hennopspark X35,<br />
Centurion 0157<br />
Tel: +27 12 653 2941<br />
Fax: +27 12 653 3487<br />
Opinions expressed in articles are not<br />
necessarily endorsed by <strong>AFMA</strong>.<br />
© Copyright. Articles may be used with the<br />
necessary acknow ledgement to the author<br />
and <strong>AFMA</strong> MATRIX.<br />
Roles of tryptophan<br />
in pig nutrition<br />
2 Preface: A bumpy 2012 ahead<br />
By Loutjie Dunn – <strong>AFMA</strong> Chairperson<br />
4 Advertorial: Mycotoxins. Challenges and<br />
solutions in modern agricultural operations<br />
6 Developing sustainable feed technologies:<br />
optimization of the gut microenvironment<br />
for improved animal production and health<br />
By David M. Bravo – Head of R&D, PANCOSMA<br />
14 Betaine, or Choline + Methionine<br />
What are the benefits<br />
By Tim Horne – Chemunique International and Janet Remus –<br />
Danisco Animal Nutrition, Malborough, Wiltshire, UK<br />
22 Roles of tryptophan in pig nutrition<br />
By Dr. J. Htoo and F. Crots – Evonik Industries<br />
26 Optimal grinding of barley-rich<br />
pig feed with hammers and rollers<br />
By Thorsten Lucht – Amandus Kahl, Reinbek, Germany<br />
34 • Coming Events<br />
• Industry News:<br />
- Meadow Feeds: New appointment<br />
- Astral Foods: New appointment<br />
- Taking mother nature’s lead<br />
35 Industry News: ADVIT Animal Nutrition celebrating<br />
a quarter of a century of making feed better<br />
<strong>March</strong> 2012 <strong>AFMA</strong> MATRIX 1
PREFACE<br />
A bumpy 2012 ahead<br />
By Loutjie Dunn – <strong>AFMA</strong> Chairperson<br />
In times of change people love to look<br />
into the crystal ball and attempt to<br />
predict whether things will improve<br />
or deteriorate. One such change is<br />
the advent of a new calendar year,<br />
and I am quite sure that in the animal<br />
feed industry there are quite a few<br />
very different opinions regarding the<br />
prospects for 2012. I gladly share my<br />
view.<br />
There are two things that are of great<br />
importance to the feed industry: the<br />
availability of sufficient raw materials,<br />
and a sustained demand for animal<br />
feed. Of course other factors such<br />
as price and raw material quality,<br />
the foreign exchange rate, current<br />
economic situation, political climate,<br />
food safety and security, etc., must all<br />
be taken into consideration.<br />
Manufacturers of animal feed are able<br />
to produce animal feed from expensive<br />
and poor quality raw materials, but<br />
without these raw materials there will<br />
be no feed production. This is why<br />
it is so important to look into this<br />
essential aspect of feed manufacturing.<br />
Maize, soybeans, sunflower and other<br />
by-products provide adequately for<br />
approximately 60-90% of the raw<br />
products used to manufacture animal<br />
feed.<br />
Local availability<br />
Locally produced raw materials<br />
benefit our country and ourselves.<br />
This is why the cultivation of<br />
protein sources, especially soya, has<br />
been encouraged for many years.<br />
We welcome the growth in soya<br />
production over the past few years.<br />
I expect more growth in the coming<br />
years. In respect of raw material<br />
supply, however, this is probably the<br />
only positive development in 2012.<br />
In the current season we are already<br />
experiencing a shortage of maize and<br />
at this stage we are not sure whether<br />
this shortage will be recovered in<br />
the coming season. Sunflower supply<br />
is already limited and I expect the<br />
availability of sunflower to decrease in<br />
the next season.<br />
Raw material prices are determined<br />
mostly by demand and supply, and<br />
this is exactly the reason for the<br />
sharp increase in the maize price over<br />
the past few months. The price is<br />
expected to remain high during the<br />
next season and in some cases, such<br />
as sunflower oilcake, the price may<br />
increase even more. Raw material<br />
prices are the strongest driver of<br />
animal feed prices, as it comprises<br />
more than 80% of the total cost.<br />
Further sharp increases in the price of<br />
feed can be expected during 2012.<br />
Poultry industry<br />
The biggest consumer of animal feed<br />
is the poultry industry, but even<br />
here the prospects are bleak. More<br />
than 20% of the broilers consumed<br />
in 2011 were imported. This trend<br />
will probably continue to haunt us<br />
in 2012. In addition, local poultry<br />
producers have been experiencing<br />
serious setbacks due to contagious<br />
bronchitis over the past two years.<br />
The disease had a negative effect on<br />
both performance and feed intake.<br />
Numerous poultry producers believe<br />
that this problem will be even greater<br />
in 2012 unless approval is granted for<br />
the importation of the correct<br />
vaccine.<br />
The price of broilers remain under<br />
pressure – a different scenario from<br />
red meat, which experienced major<br />
price hikes at the end of 2011. Imports<br />
will probably continue to put pressure<br />
on the local poultry meat price in<br />
2012.<br />
A positive outlook<br />
Fortunately all is not doom and<br />
gloom. We also have to look at those<br />
aspects that can help to improve the<br />
situation. A substantial maize crop<br />
during the next season, with lower<br />
maize exports than in 2011, can have<br />
a positive effect on both raw material<br />
and animal feed prices during the last<br />
quarter of 2012. The 2012 maize crop<br />
is far from over and it is way too early<br />
to talk of a large crop. However, a<br />
good harvest is still possible.<br />
Maize export contracts for the new<br />
season are already being entered into.<br />
It is still not clear what the effect of<br />
these contracts will be on our maize<br />
supplies by the end of the next season.<br />
Maize is not destined for animal feeds<br />
only – it remains a staple food in South<br />
Africa, which is why I am expecting<br />
the maize supply to improve.<br />
Exported maize is used to feed<br />
imported chickens (directly<br />
or indirectly). I trust that the<br />
government will react positively<br />
to the call to act on the dumping of<br />
cheap broiler meat in our market,<br />
as it will create an opportunity to<br />
improve local facilities. This will<br />
in turn relieve price pressure and<br />
create job opportunities. I also expect<br />
the correct vaccine for contagious<br />
bronchitis to become available some<br />
time during 2012.<br />
This is going to be a difficult year<br />
for the animal feed industry, with<br />
few or no prospects for volume<br />
growth during times of high raw<br />
material prices. It will put financial<br />
performance under great pressure.<br />
While 2012 started off on the difficult<br />
side, it can be expected that it will<br />
become even more difficult before<br />
improvements show their face during<br />
the last quarter.<br />
2 <strong>AFMA</strong> MATRIX <strong>March</strong> 2012
WHEN IT COMES TO HER SAFETY,<br />
WE TAKE A CLOSER LOOK<br />
ENSURING FEED SAFETY<br />
KEMIN FOOD SAFETY initiative<br />
For more information about Kemin’s Food Safety initiative, please contact :<br />
Kemin Industries South Africa (Pty.) Ltd.<br />
email: info.sa@kemin.com<br />
tel: 08610 KEMIN (08610 53646)<br />
© 2011 Kemin Industries, Inc. and it group of companies 2011 All rights reserved. ® Trademark Registered by Kemin Industries, Inc. USA
ADVERTORIAL<br />
Mycotoxins<br />
Challenges and solutions in<br />
modern agricultural operations<br />
Optimising productivity and health in dairy and beef cattle is a lot easier to talk about<br />
than to achieve.<br />
The challenges that cattle-managers are confronted with every day are many and<br />
diverse; from weather to mycotoxins to nutrition to housing and more. How well<br />
management handles these challenges determines the economical output of the farm.<br />
Today, managers can select a binder,<br />
if that is all what is needed, or they<br />
can select a product containing a<br />
mycotoxin de-activator together with<br />
a binder to ensure that whatever<br />
mycotoxin is in the ration it will be<br />
managed properly (Table 2).<br />
Mycofix ® product line represents a<br />
complex solution for the successful<br />
mycotoxin risk management. The<br />
biotransformation agents (biological<br />
constituent and inactivated protein)<br />
may become the technology of<br />
choice, as enzymatic reaction offer a<br />
specific, irreversible and very efficient<br />
way of detoxification that leaves<br />
neither toxic residues nor undesirable<br />
by-products. The elimination of<br />
adsorbable mycotoxins, such as<br />
aflatoxins and ergot alkaloids can be<br />
achieved through adsorption while<br />
selected plant and algae extracts that<br />
counteract effects of non-degradable<br />
mycotoxins complete the picture for<br />
successful control of mycotoxins<br />
(Table 1).<br />
Mycotoxins<br />
The contamination of animal feed with<br />
mycotoxins is a worldwide problem<br />
in animal production and one of the<br />
challenges the modern herd manager<br />
faces. The complex diet of ruminants,<br />
consisting of forages and concentrates<br />
can be a source of diverse mixtures of<br />
mycotoxins that will influence animal<br />
performance negatively.<br />
A number of factors influence the<br />
incidence of mycotoxins in feedstuffs. The<br />
greatest contributor is weather. Different<br />
moulds favour different weather<br />
conditions to flourish and produce<br />
mycotoxins.<br />
Agricultural practices such as no-till<br />
and reduced crop rotation favour the<br />
overwintering of mould spores, which<br />
results in a greater mould infestation of<br />
plants, and significantly contributes to<br />
the incidence of mycotoxins.<br />
Identifying mycotoxicoses<br />
Unfortunately, unless the mycotoxicoses<br />
causes dramatic changes as a precipitous<br />
drop in milk production or average<br />
daily weight gain, lower feed intake or<br />
even sudden death it is usually difficult<br />
to know whether mycotoxins are the<br />
single factor causing the problems or a<br />
combination of factors, which are leading<br />
to decreased performance.<br />
Subclinical effects<br />
These subclinical effects appear as<br />
subtle increases in what may be<br />
considered common cow problems,<br />
especially in postpartum cows. It is well<br />
acknowledged that mycotoxins surpress<br />
the immune system, affect ruminal<br />
digestion and interfere in the hormonal<br />
balances of the animal, even at low levels<br />
of contamination.<br />
Growing cattle may have slightly<br />
lower daily weight gains, they may<br />
fail to develop the full immunity or<br />
may experience premature sexual<br />
development.<br />
These subclinical effects tend to lead<br />
to higher veterinary expenses, higher<br />
production costs and increased culling<br />
rates, just to mention a few.<br />
Cost of diseases in dairy<br />
Knowing the cost of common diseases<br />
can help dairy farmers and their<br />
veterinarians plan treatment and<br />
prevention strategies that are likely to<br />
improve the profitability of the dairy.<br />
Table 1: Cost of disease per incidence.<br />
Incidence/ Cost/<br />
lact (%) case ($)<br />
Milkfever 4 275<br />
Dystocia 21 228<br />
Retained placenta 15 315<br />
Ketosis 14 232<br />
Left displaced obamasum 4 494<br />
Mastitis 40 224<br />
Lameness 38 469<br />
Metritis 20 305<br />
Solutions<br />
Table 2: Binding possibilities of different<br />
mycotoxins.<br />
Mycotoxin Binding Deactivation<br />
Aflatoxins +++<br />
Ochratoxins +– +++<br />
Fumonisins +– +++<br />
Zearalenone* +– – +++<br />
DON (vomitoxin) +++<br />
Nivalenol +++<br />
T-2 toxin +++<br />
DAS, MAS +++<br />
Other trichothecenes +++<br />
(3-AcDON, 14-AcDon, Fus X, HT-2 toxin, etc)<br />
* Some zearalenone may be bound but most<br />
must be deactivated enzymatically.<br />
If the cost of the problem and the<br />
components of that cost are known, it<br />
is easier to judge whether allocation of<br />
resources can be expected to reduce that<br />
cost and return a net profit.<br />
The economical losses caused by<br />
diseases are enormous and therefore a<br />
careful strategy should be implemented.<br />
The focus should be on prevention rather<br />
than curing the animal. Implementing<br />
feeding and management strategies to<br />
help the animal during stressful periods<br />
will help to prevent the unnecessary<br />
occurrence of diseases.<br />
4 <strong>AFMA</strong> MATRIX <strong>March</strong> 2012
More than just feed<br />
Since 1942<br />
At Meadow Feeds, we know and care about your production animals as much as you do. That’s why we<br />
continue to develop, produce and deliver high quality feed for the Southern African animal feed industry.<br />
As the market leader, you can be sure that you’re in safe hands when farming with Meadow Feeds, because<br />
we understand that in order to get the best out, you need to put only the best in.<br />
www.meadowfeeds.co.za
NUTRITION<br />
Developing sustainable feed technologies:<br />
optimization of the gut microenvironment<br />
for improved animal production and health<br />
By David M. Bravo – Head of R&D, PANCOSMA<br />
Introduction<br />
For centuries, physiologists have viewed<br />
the gut as a simple organ whose primary<br />
role was to digest ingested food and<br />
absorb nutrients. Consequently, the<br />
gut has always been considered an<br />
unsophisticated organ when compared<br />
to other organ systems of the body.<br />
More recently, however, modern tools<br />
and technologies have vastly improved<br />
our knowledge of gut function and the<br />
factors that regulate it. Importantly,<br />
the presence of a complex microbial<br />
ecosystem in the gut has been described,<br />
and this “ecosystem” clearly has a<br />
symbiotic relationship with the host.<br />
Recent reports have shown that the gut<br />
ecosystem – the microbiota – contains<br />
many more microbial cells than the entire<br />
number of eukaryotic cells in the host,<br />
and DNA from the microbial cells encodes<br />
10 16 genes compared to 10 14 eukaryotic<br />
genes encoded by host DNA (Eberl,<br />
2010). In addition, the metabolic activity<br />
of the microbiota – which is capable of<br />
metabolic functions not encoded by the<br />
host genome (Salzman et al., 2007) – is<br />
similar to that of the liver (Sansonetti,<br />
2011). Interestingly, recent scientific<br />
developments have revealed that the<br />
DIGESTIVE<br />
LUMEN<br />
APICAL<br />
MEMBRANE<br />
WITH SENSE<br />
RECEPTORS<br />
ENTEROCYTE<br />
interactions between the host and the<br />
microbiota position the gut as a major<br />
immune organ which plays a critical role<br />
in determining the overall health of the<br />
host (Feng et Elson, 2011). An additional<br />
level of complexity was also revealed<br />
when Furness et al. (1999) proposed that<br />
the intestine is in fact a sensory organ,<br />
and data are still accumulating in support<br />
of this hypothesis. Because it exists in<br />
a constantly changing environment,<br />
the gut has highly specialized cells that<br />
inform the rest of the body about the<br />
environment to which it is being exposed.<br />
The ability of the gut to sense molecules<br />
in its environment plays a critical role in<br />
controlling multiple functions within the<br />
gut itself, and it also initiates hormonal<br />
or neuronal signals that control many<br />
systemic functions (Rozengurt, 2006).<br />
Therefore, in addition to being a sensory<br />
organ, the gut is a highly complex organ<br />
of communication, in constant dialogue<br />
with its environment and the rest of the<br />
body.<br />
The objective of this paper was to discuss<br />
the process of discovery and innovation<br />
in nutritional strategies – and the<br />
development of novel feed additives –<br />
ENTEROENDO-<br />
CRINE<br />
ENTEROCYTE<br />
LAMINA<br />
PROPRIA<br />
BASO<br />
LATERAL WITH<br />
EXOCYTOSIS<br />
VESICLES<br />
EXOCYTOSE<br />
VESICLES<br />
CONTAINING<br />
GUT<br />
HORMONES<br />
Figure 1: Schematization of an enteroendocrine cell surrounded by enterocytes Enteroendocrine cells,<br />
which constitute only 1% of gut cells, are specialised sensors of the gastrointertinal tract. Their apical<br />
membrane, which is in contact with the gut luminal content, expresses chemo sensory receptors. Their<br />
basolateral membrane, which is in contact with the lamina propria, is responsible for the release of gut<br />
hormones by exocytosis.<br />
based on our understanding of normal<br />
gut physiology. In particular, this paper<br />
will be focused on emphasizing the<br />
intestine as a highly complex organ with<br />
its own sensory system and apparent<br />
autonomy. Application of this new<br />
knowledge to animal nutrition can<br />
lead to the development of novel and<br />
sustainable feeding technologies. The<br />
use of an intense sweetener as a feed<br />
additive for promoting feed intake of the<br />
weaning piglet will be discussed.<br />
The role of the gut as an endocrine<br />
and sensory organ<br />
In addition to its role in digestion and<br />
absorption, the gut acts as a sensory<br />
organ with three functioning systems:<br />
neurons, endocrine cells and immune<br />
cells (Furness et al., 1999). Recently,<br />
the importance of the enteric nervous<br />
system has been re-discovered. It is a<br />
component of the peripheral nervous<br />
system, made up of some 500 hundred<br />
neurons, and can operate independently<br />
of the central nervous system (Wood,<br />
2011). Importantly, it directly controls the<br />
function of the gastro-intestinal tract. It<br />
has long been thought that the detection<br />
of the nutrients and non-nutrients in<br />
the gut lumen was mediated directly by<br />
enteric neurons (Furness et Poole, 2012).<br />
It was also though that the sole role of<br />
intestinal mucosal cells was to prevent<br />
bacteria from entering into the body and<br />
absorbing nutrients. However, tracing<br />
studies showed that intestinal nerves<br />
do not penetrate the epithelium, which<br />
excludes the possibility that they sense<br />
anything from the intestinal contents<br />
directly (Berthoud et al., 1995). This<br />
suggested that something in the mucosa<br />
should be the missing link between the<br />
gut lumen and the enteric neurons. Our<br />
understanding of the intestinal mucosa<br />
has changed considerably as new<br />
categories of cells have been described,<br />
among them the enteroendocrine cells<br />
(see figure 1, Dockray, 2003).<br />
><br />
6 <strong>AFMA</strong> MATRIX <strong>March</strong> 2012
Cargill operates on an integrated global basis to source, process,<br />
transport and distribute grain and oilseeds around the world. We also work<br />
closely with Cargill’s finance and risk management businesses to offer a<br />
range of hedging and financial products.<br />
We are committed to helping our customers succeed through collaboration<br />
and innovation and aspire to be your partner of choice.<br />
PO Box 864<br />
Sloane Park<br />
2152<br />
Building Number 2, Montagu Office Park<br />
Cnr Cedar Road & Cedar Lakes Boulevard<br />
Broadacres, Johannesburg, South Africa<br />
Tel +27 (11) 745 9600<br />
Fax +27 (86) 528 2600 up to 7<br />
www.cargill.co.za
NUTRITION<br />
Enteroendocrine cells are specialized<br />
epithelial cells originating from<br />
intestinal stem cells, and they are<br />
considered part of the secretory cell<br />
family, along with paneth and goblet<br />
cells (Moran et al., 2008). They are<br />
randomly distributed among mucosal<br />
cells of the gastro-intestinal tract and<br />
represent less than 1% of the entire<br />
gut epithelial cell population (Sternini<br />
et al., 2008). More than 10 known<br />
types of enteroendocrine cells are<br />
distributed along the gastro-intestinal<br />
tract (Sundler et al., 1988). Their main<br />
function is to sense the luminal contents<br />
and distinguish between nutrients and<br />
non-nutrients (Nozawa et al., 2009).<br />
For this reason, enteroendocrine cells<br />
are morphologically oriented cells<br />
with 2 different membranes. Their<br />
apical membrane expresses a variety of<br />
receptors, including many chemosensory<br />
receptors, for the detection of molecules<br />
in the digestive lumen. Receptors for<br />
cold sensation, odor, bile acid (Kidd et<br />
al., 2008), Toll-like receptors (Bogunovic<br />
et al., 2007; Palazzo et al., 2007), and a<br />
variety of others such as alpha2A, beta1<br />
adrenoreceptors, muscarinic M3 and<br />
the GABA-A receptors (Schäfermayer et<br />
al., 2004) have been described. Taste<br />
receptors, and in particular the dimeric<br />
sweet taste receptor T1R2 / T1R3,<br />
have also been detected on the apical<br />
membrane of the enteroendocrine cells<br />
in rodents and humans (Sutherland et<br />
al., 2007; Jang et al., 2007; Bezençon<br />
et al., 2007; Margolskee et al., 2007).<br />
In contrast to the apical membrane,<br />
the basolateral membrane of the<br />
enteroendocrine cell is an exocytosis<br />
membrane. When such a cell senses a<br />
particular component in the digestive<br />
lumen, it secretes into the lamina propria<br />
a peptide with endocrine properties<br />
called gut hormone (Konturek et al.,<br />
2004). Together, these cells compose the<br />
largest endocrine organ of the human<br />
body with hundreds of thousands of<br />
enteroendocrine cells, producing more<br />
than 20 hormones (Furness et al.,<br />
1999). Gastrin, ghrelin, somatostatin,<br />
cholecystokinin, serotonin, glucosedependant<br />
insulinotropic peptide,<br />
glucacon-like peptides, oxyntomodulin,<br />
and peptide Y are the main gut<br />
hormones secreted by enteroendocrine<br />
cells (Sternini et al., 2008). For a review<br />
of the gut peptides controlling intake<br />
and energy homeostasis the reader can<br />
refer to Murphy et al. (2006). These<br />
peptides then diffuse across the lamina<br />
propria to activate nearby vagal or<br />
spinal afferent neurons as well as enteric<br />
neurons, whereas others can enter into<br />
the bloodstream and act systemically<br />
as hormones (Cummings and Overduin,<br />
2007). In summary, the function of<br />
enteroendocrine cells is to act as sensors<br />
for distinguishing nutrients and nonnutrients<br />
within the luminal contents.<br />
They are specialized transepithelial<br />
transducers of physiochemical luminal<br />
signals, which result in basolateral<br />
exocytosis of biological mediators (Moran<br />
et al., 2008). These mediators then act<br />
on nerve fibres to influence other local or<br />
distant targets (Buchan, 1999; Hofer and<br />
Drenckhahn, 1999). Via their secreted<br />
peptides, the enteroendocrine cells<br />
regulate key physiological variables such<br />
as gut motility, feed intake (Savastano<br />
and Covasa, 2007), and others. For<br />
example, abnormal enteroendocrine cell<br />
function is associated with increased<br />
predisposition to gastrointestinal<br />
inflammatory disorders (Moran et<br />
al., 2008), and mice deficient in<br />
enteroendocrine cells have altered lipid<br />
and glucose metabolism (Mellitzer et al.,<br />
2010).<br />
It is unknown whether the function of<br />
enteroendocrine cells can be altered<br />
by functional feed additives. This is<br />
particularly relevant because of the<br />
nature of the hormones that the<br />
enteroendocrine cells produce and<br />
their control of digestive processes. In<br />
human nutrition and health, Sternini et<br />
al. (2008) suggested that modification<br />
in the secretion of hormones from<br />
enteroendocrine cells could provide<br />
novel approaches to develop therapeutic<br />
agents. This was also emphasized by<br />
Moran et al. (2008) who noticed that<br />
these cells play a major role in several<br />
gastrointestinal pathologies. Finally,<br />
Rozengurt (2006) presented taste<br />
receptors expressed in enteroendocrine<br />
cells as major potential for discovery and<br />
design of novel molecules that modify<br />
responses elicited by the activation of<br />
these receptors. The same could be<br />
theorized for animal feed technologies<br />
(see figure 2).<br />
Classical use of intense sweeteners in<br />
feed: altering the sense of taste<br />
Intense artificial sweeteners are nonnutritional<br />
molecules which elicit a strong<br />
sweet taste. The main sweeteners used<br />
in animal feed are sodium saccharin<br />
(SS), sodium cyclamate, aspartame,<br />
acesulfame K, and neohesperidine<br />
dihydrochalcone (NHDC). For a review<br />
of the different types of sweeteners<br />
the reader can refer to Yang (2010).<br />
><br />
ADDITIVE<br />
ENTEROCYTE<br />
ENTEROCYTE<br />
ENTEROCYTE<br />
CHEMOSENSORY<br />
RECEPTORS<br />
GUT<br />
HORMONE<br />
VAGUE<br />
NERVE<br />
CHEMOSENSORY<br />
RECEPTORS<br />
ADDITIVE<br />
GUT<br />
HORMONE<br />
CHEMOSENSORY<br />
RECEPTORS<br />
ADDITIVE<br />
GUT<br />
HORMONE<br />
VAGUE<br />
NERVE<br />
ENTEROENDOCRINE<br />
ENTEROENDOCRINE<br />
ENTEROENDOCRINE<br />
ENTERIC<br />
NEURON<br />
ADDITIVE<br />
ENTEROCYTE<br />
ENTERIC<br />
NEURON<br />
ENTEROCYTE<br />
GUT LOCAL<br />
RESPONSESE<br />
ENTEROCYTE<br />
ENTERIC<br />
NEURON<br />
AMPLIFICATION OF SIGNAL<br />
LEADING TO: CONTROL OF<br />
FEED INTAKE DIGESTIVE<br />
SECRETION IMPROVED<br />
ABSORPTION; GUT MOTILITY<br />
BETTER GUT MUCOSA; ETC.<br />
CHEMOSENSORY<br />
RECEPTORS<br />
ADDITIVE<br />
ENTEROCYTE<br />
GUT<br />
HORMONE<br />
ENTEROENDOCRINE<br />
ENTERIC<br />
NEURON<br />
GUT LOCAL<br />
RESPONSESE<br />
ENTEROCYTE<br />
CHEMOSENSORY<br />
RECEPTORS<br />
ADDITIVE<br />
ENTEROCYTE<br />
ENTEROENDOCRINE<br />
ENTEROCYTE<br />
GUT<br />
HORMONE<br />
GUT/BRAIN AXIS<br />
VAGUE<br />
NERVE<br />
CHEMOSENSORY<br />
RECEPTORS<br />
ADDITIVE<br />
ENTEROCYTE<br />
VAGUE<br />
NERVE<br />
GUT<br />
HORMONE<br />
ENTEROENDOCRINE<br />
ENTERIC<br />
NEURON<br />
ENTEROCYTE<br />
Figure 2: Possible effects of targeting chemosensory receptors on the apical membrane of the enteroendocrine cells, possible consequences and schematic mode<br />
of action.<br />
8 <strong>AFMA</strong> MATRIX <strong>March</strong> 2012
Unload up to 3 tonnes/minute
NUTRITION<br />
Interestingly, although the use of<br />
artificial sweeteners is practised in<br />
both animal and human nutrition,<br />
the desirable consequences are vastly<br />
different. Still, both applications rely on<br />
the fact that sweet taste and natural<br />
sweeteners are the main determinants<br />
of food palatability (Drewnowski 1999).<br />
It is interesting to note that in human<br />
nutrition, the addition of intense artificial<br />
sweeteners to a low-palatability diet<br />
should theoretically limit caloric intake.<br />
Because of this, both implicit and<br />
explicit messages from manufacturers<br />
have suggested that the use of artificial<br />
sweeteners would facilitate or even<br />
enhance weight loss, or, at least help<br />
prevent further gain (Fowler et al.,<br />
2008). However, research to critically<br />
examine whether or not intense artificial<br />
sweeteners promote food intake or body<br />
weight gain in humans has been limited<br />
by the lack of a physiologically-relevant<br />
model that describes the mechanistic<br />
basis for these outcomes, and it is still a<br />
long-standing controversial issue (Rolls,<br />
1991). However, there is considerable<br />
anecdotal and scientific evidence to<br />
suggest that the introduction of food<br />
and beverages sweetened with artificial<br />
sweeteners is not associated with weight<br />
losses but is clearly linked to increased<br />
caloric intake and weight gain(Bellisle<br />
and Drewnowski, 2007). In laboratory<br />
animals, the consumption of aspartame<br />
(Blundell and Hill, 1986) or saccharine<br />
(Tordoff and Friedman, 1989a, b, c and<br />
d) in drinking water was associated<br />
with increased feed intake. Therefore,<br />
it is consistently argued that the use of<br />
intense artificial sweeteners increases<br />
the appetite for sweet foods, promotes<br />
overeating, and may lead to weight gain<br />
and obesity (Bellisle et Drewnowski,<br />
2007; Mattes et Popkin, 2009). In<br />
agreement with this, supplementation of<br />
rats with saccharin on a fixed yogurt diet<br />
was associated with increased weight<br />
gain and impaired caloric compensation<br />
relative to rats given the same amount<br />
of yogurt mixed with glucose (Swithers<br />
and Davidson, 2008). Increased body<br />
weight gain was also observed when<br />
laboratory animals consumed a yogurt<br />
diet sweetened with either acesulfame<br />
K, or saccharine, that were calorically<br />
similar but nutritionally distinct from<br />
low-fat yogurt (Swithers et al., 2009).<br />
Moreover, the body weight differences<br />
persisted after saccharin-sweetened diets<br />
were discontinued and the animals were<br />
put on a diet sweetened with glucose<br />
(Swithers et al., 2009). In addition,<br />
rats first exposed to a diet sweetened<br />
with glucose still gained additional<br />
weight when subsequently exposed to<br />
a saccharin-sweetened diet (Swithers<br />
et al., 2009). Finally, the same research<br />
group showed that intake of feed or<br />
liquid containing an artificial sweetener<br />
increased feed intake, body weight<br />
gain, accumulation of body fat, and<br />
weaker caloric compensation compared<br />
to consumption of foods and fluids<br />
containing glucose (Swithers et al.,<br />
2010). Taken together, experiments in<br />
rodents have established a clear positive<br />
relationship between the use of artificial<br />
sweeteners in feed and body weight<br />
gain. These results are supported by<br />
epidemiological reports in humans, which<br />
revealed a correlation between negative<br />
health outcomes such as obesity,<br />
diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, and<br />
the consumption of beverages sweetened<br />
with intense artificial sweeteners.<br />
Specifically, Fowler et al. (2008) observed<br />
a positive dose–response relationship<br />
between the consumption of artificiallysweetened<br />
beverages and long-term<br />
weight gain. More recently, researchers<br />
have suggested that the reason behind<br />
the increase in energy balance and<br />
weight gain seen with the use of intense<br />
sweeteners could be due to a decrease<br />
in the ability of sweet tastes to evoke<br />
physiological responses that serve to<br />
regulate energy balance (Swithers et al.,<br />
2010).<br />
The reason for the use of intense<br />
artificial sweeteners in animal nutrition<br />
is to improve palatability and enhance<br />
feed intake of either low- or normalpalatability<br />
diets. It is for this reason<br />
that medicated weaning piglet diets,<br />
which usually have a low palatability,<br />
are often supplemented with intense<br />
artificial sweeteners (Hellal, 2003). The<br />
use of artificial sweeteners in feed has<br />
been described in published studies<br />
in domestic animal nutrition. Most of<br />
them refer to the commercial product<br />
SUC (PANCOSMA, Geneva, Switzerland),<br />
which is an SS and NHDC based artificial<br />
sweetener. The use of SUC has been<br />
shown to elicit dietary preference in<br />
dairy calves (Schlegel et al., 2006), and<br />
increased feed intake of steer calves<br />
(Ponce et al., 2007). In addition, SUC<br />
increased feed intake (+19%) and<br />
tended to increase body weight gain<br />
(+23%) when fed to calves during a 56-d<br />
receiving period (Brown et al., 2004).<br />
This finding was confirmed by another<br />
experiment on newly received calves<br />
with a tendency for an increase in body<br />
weight at the end of the receiving period<br />
(McMeniman et al., 2006). In that study,<br />
the authors reported either significant<br />
or a tendency for improvement of the<br />
gain:feed ratio from day 1 to 28 and<br />
from day 1 to 56 after receiving. In a<br />
trial conducted on weaning piglets,<br />
Sterk et al. (2008) reported that the<br />
addition of SUC to the diet prevented<br />
digestive disorders, and they observed an<br />
improvement in fecal consistency. Finally,<br />
in piglets, the addition of SUC improved<br />
gut histology with an increase in the<br />
height of villi as well as the ratio of villi<br />
height to crypth depth (Da Silva et al.,<br />
2001). These described effects of artificial<br />
sweeteners on increased feed intake,<br />
increased body weight gain and other<br />
outcomes such as gut histology are not<br />
easily understandable due to the paucity<br />
of knowledge and experimental data<br />
(Mattes and Popkin, 2009). However,<br />
new research findings, discussed below,<br />
might provide insight.<br />
New use of intense sweeteners in<br />
swine feed: exploiting gut sensing to<br />
optimize production performance<br />
Modern piglets are weaned and exposed<br />
to solid feed at as early as 3 to 4 weeks<br />
of life. It has been known for decades<br />
that early weaning causes a decrease<br />
in feed intake and sub-optimal piglet<br />
growth (Leibrandt et al., 1975). This<br />
post-weaning dramatic drop in feed<br />
intake can last several hours or even<br />
days (Le Dividich and Seve, 2000). It<br />
does not only limit the amount of energy<br />
and nutrients that the piglets receive,<br />
but it also depletes the gut mucosa of<br />
nutrients at a time when its growth and<br />
development are critical. This, in turn,<br />
creates a vicious cycle: nutrient intake<br />
is decreased; gut mucosa growth and<br />
development is stunted; and therefore<br />
the area available for the absorption of<br />
nutrients is decreased so that whatever<br />
nutrients are taken in, are not absorbed<br />
efficiently (Kelly and Coutts, 2000). In<br />
addition, low enteric stimulation seen<br />
with low feed intake is the main cause<br />
for compromised mucosal integrity in the<br />
piglet (Spreeuwenberg et al., 2001). The<br />
negative impact of early weaning on gut<br />
development and nutrient absorption<br />
has several implications for producers.<br />
First, decreased feed intake after<br />
weaning is associated with an increase<br />
><br />
10 <strong>AFMA</strong> MATRIX <strong>March</strong> 2012
There is nothing like a challenge<br />
to bring out the best ...<br />
With nearly 1700 hours of fresh thinking, clean design and total re-engineering,<br />
the Wenger Drying Technology team has met unprecedented design parameters.<br />
The result Wenger’s all-new Enhanced Sanitary Dryer – featuring<br />
design innovations that:<br />
• increase sanitation<br />
• minimize cross-contamination risk<br />
• improve clean-out efficiency<br />
Get details now on this new standard in horizontal conveyor drying.<br />
info@wenger.com<br />
Enhanced Sanitary Dryer<br />
SABETHA, KANSAS USA 785-284-2133 INFO@WENGER.COM<br />
USA BELGIUM TAIWAN BRASIL CHINA TURKEY
NUTRITION<br />
in susceptibility to disease (Boudry et al.,<br />
2004), and is also considered a risk factor<br />
for diarrhea (Madec et al., 1998). During<br />
bouts of diarrhea, nutrient absorption<br />
is further impaired, and the lack of<br />
nutrients has a marked negative impact<br />
on the immune system. Therefore, the<br />
health of the gut and the strength of the<br />
immune system are intimately linked. In<br />
the case that nutrient absorption and<br />
immunity are compromised, growth of<br />
the animal becomes sub-optimal, and<br />
this has serious economic consequences<br />
(Morméde and Hay, 2003) since body<br />
weight around the time of weaning is<br />
highly correlated with body weight at<br />
finishing and there does not appear to<br />
be growth compensation when animals<br />
are thrifty just after weaning (Williams,<br />
2003). Although there are strategies<br />
available for counteracting postweaning<br />
stress, few of them consider the<br />
physiology of gut development or factors<br />
that might stimulate gastrointestinal<br />
development in the neonate (Zabielski<br />
et al., 2008). Therefore, new strategies<br />
that exploit the normal physiology<br />
and development of the gut should be<br />
developed. In addition, as emphasised<br />
recently by Millet and Maertens (2010),<br />
the discovery and development of new<br />
feed additives must be accompanied<br />
by basic research so that there is a<br />
mechanistic understanding of how the<br />
product influences animal growth and<br />
health.<br />
A glucose-sensing system, made of<br />
the heterodimeric sweet taste receptor<br />
T1R2 and T1R3 and its partner taste<br />
G-protein, gusducin, is located in the<br />
apical membrane of enteroendocrine<br />
cells in piglets at weaning (Moran et al.,<br />
2010; Shirazi-Beechey et al., 2011). This<br />
has already been reported in rodents<br />
(Dyer et al., 2007). In piglets at weaning,<br />
the sensing of SUC (intense sweetener)<br />
by T1R2 and T1R3 enteroendocrine cell<br />
receptors leads to the up-regulation of<br />
the intestinal glucose transporter (SGLT1)<br />
mRNA expression, as well as increased<br />
translation of the protein and glucose<br />
absorption capacity in piglets (Moran<br />
et al., 2010). Finally, Shirazi-Beechey et<br />
al. (2011) underlined the pivotal role<br />
of glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP2) in<br />
this mechanism. This gut hormone is<br />
released into the lamina propria by the<br />
enteroendocrine cells once activated, and<br />
is responsible for several downstream<br />
effects. The knowledge that SUC evokes<br />
GLP-2 release in the gut mucosa is<br />
highly relevant, especially with respect<br />
to weaning piglets. The intestinotrophic<br />
effects of GLP-2 are mainly due to<br />
mucosal growth mediated by an increase<br />
in intestinal crypt cell proliferation and a<br />
reduction in villous cell apoptosis (Wallis<br />
et al. 2011). Administration of feed using<br />
total parenteral nutrition leads to atrophy<br />
of the gut mucosa, and this was reversed<br />
by treatment with GLP-2, which rapidly<br />
activated intracellular signals involved in<br />
cell survival and proliferation followed<br />
by atrophic cellular kinetic effects in<br />
intestinal epithelial cells (Burrin et al.,<br />
2007). In addition, treatment with GLP-<br />
2 enhanced epithelial barrier capacity<br />
through decreases in transcellular and<br />
paracellular permeability, accelerated<br />
wound closure following injury, and<br />
stimulated intestinal blood flow and<br />
inhibited gastrointestinal motility (Dubé<br />
et Brubaker, 2007). Moreover, GLP-2 also<br />
regulates the size and integrity of the gut<br />
following insult, as well as in response<br />
to disease and altered nutrient status<br />
(Rowland et Brubaker, 2011). It plays<br />
a critical role in the adaptive intestinal<br />
growth that occurs in response to oral<br />
re-feeding after a period of nutrient<br />
deprivation (Rowland and Brubaker,<br />
2011). Finally, the interest in GLP-2 has<br />
recently been extended to ruminants<br />
with recent papers in ruminating calves<br />
(Taylor-Edwards et al., 2011) and on<br />
dairy cows (Connor et al., 2010). Among<br />
other responses to GLP-2, the improved<br />
glucose absorption is highly relevant<br />
with respect to weaning piglets (Moran<br />
et al., 2010). After being hydrolyzed by<br />
several enzymes (salivary and pancreatic<br />
amylases, brush-border membrane<br />
disaccharidases), complex dietary<br />
carbohydrates reach the gut absorption<br />
site under the form of monosaccharides.<br />
Among these, glucose is a major nutrient<br />
because it is the main energetic fuel for<br />
the brain and the cells of the body. The<br />
absorption of glucose from the gut is<br />
a critical step as it conditions the entry<br />
of the nutrient into the body and is the<br />
driving force behind energy homeostasis.<br />
Luminal glucose is mainly transported<br />
across the apical membrane of<br />
enterocytes by a specific protein: SGLT1.<br />
In fact, glucose per se plays a particularly<br />
critical role at weaning because it will be<br />
the major fuel for the gut mucosa, which<br />
uses glucose for growth. Moreover,<br />
glucose absorption decreases and<br />
reaches a minimum (-83%) on day 15<br />
post-weaning (Boudry et al., 2004). The<br />
absorption of glucose is very important<br />
because it is sodium dependant. This low<br />
absorptive capacity in the ileum could<br />
result in an increased risk of osmotic<br />
diarrhoea (Boudry et al., 2004). This<br />
suggests that active nutrient absorption<br />
in the piglet is not complete at weaning,<br />
and that when piglets are weaned<br />
earlier than at 3 weeks of age they are<br />
unable to sufficiently adapt to the new<br />
environment (Wijtten et al., 2011).<br />
Montagne et al. (2007) proposed that<br />
glucose absorption be used as a marker<br />
(together with others) for gut maturation<br />
in the postweaning piglet. Along these<br />
lines, the use of an intense sweetener<br />
in feed of weaning piglets presents an<br />
opportunity to potentially increase feed<br />
intake and growth efficiency.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Fundamental research on feed additives<br />
is essential for the development of<br />
efficient and innovative strategies to<br />
promote animal health and growth, and<br />
to provide us with a better understanding<br />
of the efficiency and mode of action<br />
of the product. The results of research<br />
on gut physiology revealed that<br />
the enteroendocrine cell of the gut<br />
itself acts as an extremely sensitive<br />
detection system, playing a critical<br />
role in the detection and the transfer<br />
of signals within the gut. However,<br />
the amplification of the signals by<br />
enteroendocrine cells is poor. In contrast,<br />
enteric neurons compose a highly<br />
efficient signal amplification system,<br />
but they are poor at signal detection.<br />
Therefore, enteroendocrine cells and the<br />
enteric neurons have a critical synergistic<br />
relationship which consists of signal<br />
detection by one and signal amplification<br />
by the other. Finally, enterocytes only<br />
know how to absorb nutrients. They obey<br />
to the signal which has been amplified<br />
sent by the enteric neurons following<br />
an order given by the enteroendocrine<br />
cells. Research in this area indicates<br />
that a potential opportunity, among<br />
many others, is the use of an intense<br />
sweetener for weaning piglets as a tool<br />
for improving feed intake and animal<br />
growth. Further elucidation of the<br />
interplay between gut cells, and how<br />
these react to signals from the diet could<br />
facilitate the discovery of novel feed<br />
additives and the design of sustainable<br />
technologies for improving production<br />
efficiency.<br />
For more information or references<br />
please contact the <strong>AFMA</strong> Office.<br />
12 <strong>AFMA</strong> MATRIX <strong>March</strong> 2012
NUTRITION<br />
Betaine, or Choline + Methionine<br />
What are the benefits<br />
By Tim Horne – Chemunique International and Janet Remus – Danisco Animal Nutrition,<br />
Malborough, Wiltshire, UK<br />
Introduction<br />
Betaine, the trimethyl derivative<br />
of the amino acid glycine, has long<br />
been known for its ability to provide<br />
significant performance benefits<br />
to commercial pig and poultry<br />
operations, particularly by allowing<br />
animals to maintain high levels of<br />
performance under times of heat and<br />
disease stress. These effects of betaine<br />
coupled with the ability of including<br />
it in diets at almost no additional cost<br />
through the replacement of added<br />
choline and methionine, has resulted<br />
in demand consistently outstripping<br />
supply of the product globally.<br />
However, recent investment in global<br />
betaine production facilities has<br />
allowed feed producers greater access<br />
to a more sustainable supply chain.<br />
This has in-turn resulted in renewed<br />
scientific and commercial interest in<br />
the benefits this molecule can provide<br />
to integrators.<br />
To understand the role of betaine in<br />
the feed, as well as its metabolism,<br />
an understanding of the molecular<br />
structure of the compound is required<br />
(Figure 1). Each betaine molecule has<br />
three methyl groups that are labile,<br />
and allow it to function as<br />
a methyl donor in metabolism.<br />
The second keypoint to consider is<br />
that the betaine molecule has both<br />
a positive and negative charge on<br />
the molecule, which means that it<br />
is non-perturbing to the cellular<br />
metabolism when accumulated to<br />
high levels. Along with other factors<br />
this lends it the characteristics of an<br />
osomlyte, meaning that the animal<br />
requires less water inside its cells,<br />
and consequently uses less energy to<br />
maintain osmotic balance. Although<br />
the benefits of betaine to the animal<br />
are numerous, essentially all of these<br />
have their origin in either the methyl,<br />
or the osmolytic capacities of the<br />
molecule.<br />
Betaine as a Methyl Donor<br />
As a methyl donor, betaine is more<br />
efficient than either methionine or<br />
choline, that are routinely added to<br />
broiler and pig diets. The greater<br />
efficacy of betaine is the result of<br />
choline chloride having to be first<br />
converted to betaine in metabolic<br />
processes to play a role as a methyl<br />
donor (Figure 2). Therefore, whilst<br />
there is a dietary specific minimum<br />
requirement for both choline and<br />
methionine to support non-methyl<br />
roles, directly adding betaine to the<br />
diet is more effective than adding<br />
synthetic choline. Several studies that<br />
have investigated the interchange of<br />
betaine and choline have concluded<br />
that supplemental choline chloride<br />
can, in most instances, be completely<br />
removed from the diet as the<br />
endogenous choline from the raw<br />
materials is usually sufficient to<br />
meet the animal’s choline-specific<br />
requirements (for non-methyl needs).<br />
This was illustrated by a study in<br />
Sweden with broilers using wheatbased<br />
diets, where the substitution of<br />
0,03% choline for a similar quantity<br />
of Betafin resulted in similar growth,<br />
but a significant reduction in FCR.<br />
A similar study at the Instituto<br />
Internacional de Investgacion Animal,<br />
Mexico confirmed these results using<br />
sorghum-based diets. In the case of<br />
methionine, dietary supplementation<br />
will still be required, although the<br />
levels may be significantly reduced.<br />
Trial work in Istanbul, Turkey<br />
showed that the replacement of 20%<br />
of total methionine and all added<br />
choline chloride by Betaine in broiler<br />
diets resulted in no significant<br />
reduction in performance relative to<br />
a positive control with maize-based<br />
diets.<br />
><br />
Cysteine<br />
Specific requirement<br />
3 methyl<br />
groups<br />
H<br />
H<br />
C<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
C<br />
N<br />
C<br />
H<br />
H<br />
H<br />
C<br />
H<br />
Osmolyte<br />
C<br />
O<br />
O<br />
Important functions:<br />
• DNA/RNA synthesis<br />
• Immunity functions<br />
• Protein synthesis<br />
• Choline synthesis<br />
• Other<br />
Methyl group<br />
Choline<br />
1<br />
Betaine<br />
4<br />
Homocysteine<br />
3<br />
CH 3<br />
2<br />
Methionine<br />
SAM<br />
H<br />
SAM = S-adenosyl methionine<br />
PP = pyrophosphate<br />
PI = inorganic phosphate<br />
ATP Protein synthesis<br />
PP + Pi<br />
Figure 1: Structure of the Betaine Molecule.<br />
Figure 2: The Methylation Cycle.<br />
14 <strong>AFMA</strong> MATRIX <strong>March</strong> 2012
NUTRITION<br />
Betaine reduces Osmotic Stress<br />
The osmolytic effects of betaine<br />
are well-documented, and provide<br />
substantially more benefits to poultry<br />
and swine than the simple role of<br />
betaine as a methyl donor. As a part of<br />
this function, betaine enables animals<br />
to maintain water balance in tissues<br />
and cells, whilst having no adverse<br />
effect on cell function. To appreciate<br />
the exact mechanism, it is necessary<br />
to understand what happens when<br />
animals are heat stressed, and as a<br />
result, marginally dehydrated. Cells<br />
are subjected to hyper-osmotic stress<br />
as a result of higher concentrations<br />
of ions outside of the cell. The loss of<br />
water from the cell and an increased<br />
concentration of ions inside the cell<br />
interfere with protein and enzyme<br />
structure, ATP production, and<br />
may ultimately cause cell death if<br />
uncorrected. In order to alleviate<br />
osmotic stress, cells activate Na / K<br />
pumps that attempt to rectify the ionic<br />
balance across the cell membrane.<br />
This is an energetically expensive<br />
process, as for every ion exchange<br />
one unit of ATP is used. By providing<br />
supplementary betaine and increasing<br />
intra-cellular betaine concentrations,<br />
there is a lower need for cells to pump<br />
ions to maintain osmotic balance, thus<br />
effectively reducing the maintenance<br />
energy requirements of the animal<br />
(Figure 3). This effect has been well<br />
demonstrated in pigs given betaine<br />
via feed where it was estimated that<br />
maintenance energy sparing due to<br />
dietary betaine was approximately<br />
10% of total maintenance energy,<br />
or 3,2% of total dietary energy<br />
(Partridge 2002). In situations<br />
where environmental heat stress is<br />
experienced, the beneficial effects of<br />
betaine’s osmotic properties become<br />
particularly apparent. Betaine can<br />
help maintain water balance in all<br />
cells but is used as a methyl source<br />
in the liver of farm animals, although<br />
some species can also use betaine<br />
methyl source in the kidney. So it is<br />
possible to obtain both methyl and<br />
osmotic benefits of betaine from the<br />
same inclusion.<br />
Work done by Mooney et al. (1998)<br />
demonstrated that water retention<br />
in broilers improved in diets<br />
supplemented with Betaine, and that<br />
the magnitude of this effect appeared<br />
to increase with environmental<br />
stress (Figure 4), either from heat<br />
or a coccidiosis challenge. Cronje<br />
(2006) suggested that exposure to<br />
heat results in the redistribution of<br />
blood to the periphery of the body and<br />
compensatory reduction in the blood<br />
supply to the gut, which damages<br />
the cell lining of the gut, permitting<br />
endotoxin to enter the body. This<br />
effect is potentially enhanced in<br />
production livestock where energy<br />
dense diets are known to cause<br />
damage to the gut lining. In summary,<br />
the osmolytic benefits of betaine not<br />
only ameliorate performance losses<br />
in heat-stressed animals, but also<br />
render them more resilient to episodes<br />
of heat stress. This effect is likely to<br />
be largely driven by the increased<br />
water-holding capacity of the cells<br />
at an intestinal level, reducing<br />
the overall maintenance energy<br />
requirement of the gut and improving<br />
its functionality.<br />
Osmolytic Effects of Betaine on<br />
Gut Health<br />
In addition to the functional<br />
properties of betaine as an osmolyte<br />
inside cells, multiple studies have<br />
shown improvements in the tensile<br />
strength of the gut following<br />
the addition of betaine to diets of<br />
broilers. This increased resilience<br />
of the gut wall can have extremely<br />
positive effects on its functionality<br />
to protect the animal from specific<br />
disease challenges. For example,<br />
work conducted at Colorado Quality<br />
Research, USA showed that dietary<br />
Betaine significantly increased<br />
gut tensile strength in Coccidiachallenged<br />
birds (Remus and Quarles,<br />
2000). This effect is further supported<br />
by work done on Coccidia-challenged<br />
broilers at PARC Institute, USA<br />
where it was shown that lesion scores<br />
at 21 days were reduced when betaine<br />
was supplemented to diets containing<br />
varying levels of Salinomycin.<br />
Similar positive effects on FCR were<br />
observed.<br />
These performance improvements<br />
from betaine are most likely<br />
driven by either a reduction in the<br />
maintenance requirement of the gut,<br />
or by improvements in the integrity<br />
of the intestine and an associated<br />
increase in the digestibility and<br />
absorption of dietary nutrients. For<br />
example, supplementing broiler diets<br />
with 1,5 kgs Betafin improved the<br />
digestibility of protein, lysine, fat,<br />
and carotenoids in broilers subjected<br />
to a cocci challenge (Figure 5, Remus<br />
et al. 1995). Other benefits related<br />
><br />
Water<br />
balance<br />
maintained<br />
Cell<br />
volume<br />
maintained<br />
Lower<br />
energy<br />
cost<br />
H +<br />
Na + Stable<br />
0<br />
K +<br />
electrolyte<br />
concentration<br />
in the cell<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
HCO<br />
Cl -<br />
3<br />
- Na + Stable<br />
metabolism<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
Ion pumps<br />
Betaine<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
No stress Heat stress Cocci stress Heat+Cocci<br />
Control<br />
Betafin<br />
Figure 3: The osmolytic effect of betaine reduces the energy<br />
requirements of the cells ion pumps<br />
Figure 4: Dietary betaine increases water retention in broilers<br />
(after Mooney et al. 1998)<br />
16 <strong>AFMA</strong> MATRIX <strong>March</strong> 2012
NUTRITION<br />
Digestibility %<br />
85<br />
80<br />
75<br />
70<br />
65<br />
60<br />
55<br />
b<br />
a<br />
Protein<br />
Figure 5: The effect of 1,5kg/t Betafin on nutrient digestibility during a cocci<br />
challenge, and in the presence of Salinomycin (Remus et al. 1995).<br />
to the role of betaine as an osmolyte<br />
have shown extremely positive<br />
effects on carcass composition,<br />
which is of significant importance<br />
to poultry and swine integrators<br />
that profit from supplying a leaner<br />
product. For example, Maghoul<br />
et al. (2009) found that replacing<br />
choline with betaine increased breast<br />
weight and reduced abdominal fat in<br />
broilers. A further trial conducted at<br />
Colorado Quality Research, USA also<br />
confirmed improved broiler FCR and<br />
increased breast yield where betaine<br />
replaced Choline without sparing<br />
methionine. In a trial done on pigs<br />
(Partridge 2002), supplementary<br />
betaine improved or maintained<br />
daily gain whilst improving lean<br />
meat percentage, meat thickness,<br />
and reducing drip loss. In layer hens,<br />
betaine tended to reduce the incidence<br />
of over-sized eggs in older hens<br />
(Castaing et al. 2002).<br />
Therefore, although enzymes have<br />
been shown for many years to have a<br />
proven record of improving nutrient<br />
digestibility, bird performance, and<br />
uniformity, other feed additives<br />
b<br />
a<br />
a<br />
a<br />
Fat Lysine Phosphorus Carotenoids<br />
b<br />
a<br />
b<br />
a<br />
Control<br />
Betafin<br />
a,b<br />
P
WM/78/ALPCOCC/2011/11/07/ADD<br />
1
NUTRITION<br />
Roles of tryptophan in pig nutrition<br />
By Dr. J. Htoo and F. Crots – Evonik Industries<br />
Key important functions associated<br />
with Tryptophan:<br />
• Required for protein synthesis<br />
• Precursor for serotonin<br />
• Maximizing feed intake and growth<br />
performance<br />
• Required in the immune response<br />
system<br />
Introduction<br />
Tryptophan (Trp) is one of the most<br />
complex essential amino acids (AA),<br />
and this complexity is due to the many<br />
different metabolic roles that Trp has<br />
in the body, despite the fact that the<br />
concentration of Trp is the lowest of all<br />
AAs in the body of the pig. In addition<br />
to its role as a building block of body<br />
protein, Trp is needed for the synthesis<br />
of serotonin, a neurotransmitter, which<br />
is known to be involved in the regulation<br />
of feed intake, aggression and stress<br />
response behaviour. A metabolite of<br />
serotonin degradation, melatonin, may<br />
act as a free radical scavenger and have<br />
antioxidant properties. Another pathway<br />
of Trp metabolism, quantitatively more<br />
important, is the kynurenine pathway<br />
which is associated with the immune<br />
response mechanism.<br />
In addition to its involvement in different<br />
roles in the body, Trp also is complex due<br />
to its low concentrations in several of the<br />
feedstuffs used in swine feed, apart from<br />
the difficulty associated with analyzing<br />
for Trp content. Unlike other AAs that are<br />
isolated by acid hydrolysis, Trp content<br />
has to be measured separately following<br />
alkaline hydrolysis, since it is destroyed<br />
during acidic hydrolysis with hydrochloric<br />
acid. The content and digestibility of Trp<br />
moreover varies widely among common<br />
feedstuffs. Ingredients that contain a<br />
relatively high Trp content include blood<br />
meal, casein, fish meal, whole egg,<br />
potato protein, and soybean meal. The<br />
tryptophan content is extremely low in<br />
corn, tapioca, and sorghum. Tryptophan<br />
is usually considered the 4 th limiting AA in<br />
typical cereal-based swine diets.<br />
There is considerable variation in the<br />
Trp requirements of the pig as well<br />
as ideal dietary Trp:Lys ratios among<br />
published data. Undoubtedly, the<br />
reasons for these inconsistencies may be<br />
attributed to many factors highlighted<br />
above. The aim of this review is not<br />
to give Trp requirement or ideal ratio<br />
recommendations (which will be<br />
addressed in another paper), but rather<br />
to focus on the following objectives:<br />
1) to describe metabolic pathways<br />
and roles of Trp besides that in body<br />
protein synthesis, 2) to review the<br />
effects of dietary Trp on brain serotonin<br />
concentration and its mechanisms<br />
in regulating feed intake and stress<br />
response, and 3) to review the effect of<br />
dietary Trp on immune response and<br />
related mechanisms.<br />
Role of tryptophan for serotonin<br />
synthesis<br />
As one of the dietary essential AAs, Trp<br />
plays an important role in body protein<br />
synthesis. A stimulatory effect of Trp<br />
on protein synthesis in the liver, muscle<br />
and skin of pigs has been demonstrated<br />
(Ponter et al., 1994).<br />
In addition to protein synthesis, Trp is<br />
also involved in many complex metabolic<br />
pathways. Once absorbed in the small<br />
intestine, Trp enters the portal vein and<br />
passes into the liver; a portion is used<br />
for protein synthesis and the remaining<br />
Trp not utilized for protein synthesis can<br />
follow two major metabolic pathways.<br />
Firstly, a small proportion of it is used<br />
to synthesize a neurotransmitter,<br />
serotonin, mainly in the gut, platelets<br />
and brain, while the second pathway,<br />
known as the kynurenine pathway,<br />
leads to the formation of various<br />
products including 3-hydroxykynurenine,<br />
3-hydroxyanthranilic acid, quinolinic acid,<br />
kynurenic acid, and niacin (Brown, 1995).<br />
N<br />
H<br />
H<br />
C<br />
H<br />
H<br />
C COOH<br />
NH 2<br />
Figure 1: Chemical structure of tryptophan.<br />
In the brain, serotonin synthesis<br />
mainly occurs in serotonergic nerves,<br />
enterochromaffinic cells, thrombocytes,<br />
and mast cells. It is also widely<br />
distributed in the hypothalamus<br />
(Saavedra et al., 1974). In mammals<br />
about 90 % of total plasma Trp is<br />
bound to albumin. The remaining Trp,<br />
which is in a free form, can enter the<br />
brain through the blood-brain barrier<br />
(BBB; Madras, et al., 1974) to be<br />
converted by the enzyme tryptophan<br />
hydroxylase in the pinealocytes into<br />
5-hydroxytryptophan, which is then<br />
converted by decarboxylation to<br />
serotonin (Figure 2).<br />
As a neurotransmitter, serotonin is<br />
involved in regulating a variety of<br />
behavioural processes such as appetite,<br />
feeding, impulsivity, aggression, sexual<br />
behavior, temperature regulation, pain<br />
perception, and mood control. As a<br />
neurohormone, melatonin plays a role in<br />
the control of the day-night rhythm, and<br />
serves as an intracellular scavenger of<br />
hydroxyl and peroxide radicals (Reiter et<br />
al., 1994).<br />
Role of tryptophan on appetite and<br />
feed intake regulation<br />
Voluntary feed intake determines nutrient<br />
intake levels and as such it is very<br />
important for efficient pig production<br />
especially in weaned piglets and lactating<br />
sows for which adequate feed intake<br />
is normally challenging. Due to its<br />
specific role in serving as a precursor of<br />
brain serotonin, Trp is involved in the<br />
regulation of feed intake. Many studies<br />
have demonstrated that feeding Trp<br />
deficient diets typically reduced feed<br />
intake and growth performance in piglets<br />
in growing-finishing pigs and in lactating<br />
sows. In these studies, the impact of<br />
dietary Trp was more marked for growth<br />
rate than for feed efficiency, suggesting<br />
that a portion of the enhanced growth<br />
was due to increased feed intake.<br />
A few theories have been postulated to<br />
explain the control of feed intake. First,<br />
dietary Trp content is closely correlated<br />
to brain serotonin concentration.<br />
><br />
22 <strong>AFMA</strong> MATRIX <strong>March</strong> 2012
Would you be happy with less<br />
Expect the best Methionine source with<br />
100 % quality and reliability, backed by decades<br />
of experience. And more profit in your pocket.<br />
You know what really counts.<br />
Evonik Degus ssa Africa (Pty) Ltd. | IBG Business Park | Cnr. New & 6th Road<br />
Midridge Office<br />
Estate (South) | Cnr. Pioneer and Atlantis Road | Midrand | South Africa<br />
www.evonik.com/feed-additives | feed-additives@evonik.com
NUTRITION<br />
Although the mechanisms responsible for<br />
reduced feed intake induced by low brain<br />
serotonin are not fully understood, it<br />
has been proposed that serotonin might<br />
influence in selecting between protein<br />
and carbohydrate by acting as a sensor<br />
to detect the proportions of energy from<br />
protein and carbohydrate in the diet.<br />
The second theory is the role of Trp<br />
in modulating insulin secretion. It has<br />
been demonstrated that a Trp-adequate<br />
diet increased both plasma insulin and<br />
glucose concentrations compared with<br />
a Trp-deficient diet in piglets. This was<br />
supported by Ponter et al. (1994) who<br />
also observed increased plasma insulin<br />
in weaned pigs fed a Trp-adequate diet<br />
and concluded that higher levels of Trp<br />
increased the rate of glucose absorption<br />
and gastric emptying, thus stimulating<br />
feed intake.<br />
Thirdly, feed intake can be influenced by<br />
AA imbalances – a fast and marked drop<br />
in feed intake being a typical sign. In the<br />
event of AA imbalance, i.e., Trp nonspecific<br />
mechanism, the concentration<br />
of the limiting AA declines in both<br />
blood plasma and muscle. A change in<br />
the plasma AA pattern may provide the<br />
metabolic signal to appetite-regulating<br />
regions of the brain for suppressing feed<br />
intake (D’Mello, 2000).<br />
Role of tryptophan in immune<br />
response<br />
There is no doubt that the health<br />
status of animals greatly influences<br />
the efficiency of nutrient utilization<br />
and growth performance. Several AAs<br />
including Trp play important roles in<br />
the functioning of the immune system.<br />
Melchior et al. (2004) reported a decline<br />
in plasma Trp concentration in pigs<br />
suffering from inflammation and disease,<br />
suggesting an increased utilization of Trp<br />
in such situations.<br />
In addition to being involved in protein<br />
synthesis and serotonin regulation, Trp<br />
is also metabolized through a specific<br />
kynurenine pathway initiated by two<br />
enzymes. The enzyme tryptophan-2,<br />
3-dioxygenase in the liver regulates<br />
homeostatic plasma Trp concentration<br />
and is induced by glucocorticoids and<br />
Trp. The second enzyme, indoleamine-2,<br />
3-dioxygenase, is present in a variety<br />
of body tissues including the intestine,<br />
stomach, lungs and brain as well as<br />
in macrophages, and is induced by<br />
Tryptophan<br />
5 hydroxy tryptophan<br />
5 hydroxy tryptamine<br />
(Serotonin)<br />
N-acetylserotonin<br />
Melatonin<br />
Tryptophan<br />
hydroxylase<br />
Decarboxylase<br />
N-acetyl<br />
transferase<br />
Quinolinate<br />
transphosphoribosylase<br />
Figure 2: Metabolic pathway of serotonin and<br />
melatonin synthesis.<br />
interferon gamma during immune system<br />
stimulation, and during infection and<br />
tissue inflammation. The mechanisms<br />
that mediate immune tolerance are<br />
complex, and the role of Trp in the<br />
kynurenine metabolic pathway has been<br />
proposed as one of the mechanisms<br />
involved in the control of immune<br />
response (Takikawa et al. 1986; Moffett<br />
and Namboodiri, 2003).<br />
It has been estimated that only about<br />
1% of dietary Trp not utilized for protein<br />
synthesis is converted to serotonin, while<br />
more than 95% is metabolized via the<br />
kynurenine pathway. Thus, Trp metabolism<br />
through the kynurenine pathway is<br />
quantitatively the most important function<br />
after protein synthesis.<br />
Melchior et al. (2004) reported that<br />
plasma Trp levels were consistently lower<br />
in pigs induced with a lung inflammation<br />
compared to pair-fed healthy<br />
piglets. Interestingly, Trp was the only AA<br />
exhibiting such a response. This was supported<br />
by Le Floc’h et al. (2004) who also<br />
reported that pigs suffering from lung<br />
inflammation had higher IDO activity in<br />
lungs and associated lymph nodes than<br />
pair-fed healthy piglets. Furthermore,<br />
they observed that piglets fed a low Trp<br />
diet had a higher plasma concentration<br />
of a major acute phase protein haptoglobin<br />
(indicator of inflammation) compared<br />
with pigs fed a Trp-adequate diet.<br />
These results suggest that Trp catabolism<br />
via the kynurenine pathway is increased<br />
after immune challenge, and dietary Trp<br />
seems to alleviate the negative effect of<br />
lung inflammation in piglets. Thus, the<br />
Trp requirement for pigs may increase<br />
during inflammatory and immune system<br />
stimulation, e.g. during the period immediately<br />
after weaning or during lactation.<br />
Interestingly, feeding high dietary Trp<br />
(0,5%, total basis) diets to weaned piglets<br />
increased the intestinal villus to crypt<br />
ratio, which is an indication of improved<br />
gut health (Koopmans et al., 2006).<br />
In a review paper, Le Floc’h and Seve<br />
(2007) mentioned 3 major mechanisms<br />
that involve in the immune response via<br />
the kynurenine pathway. The first one<br />
is related to the antimicrobial effects by<br />
IDO induction, i.e., inhibiting the growth<br />
of pathogens, possibly through the<br />
ability of IDO to reduce Trp availability<br />
for the pathogens in the infected cell<br />
area. Secondly, cells expressing IDO such<br />
as macrophages and dendrite cells are<br />
capable of inhibiting T cell proliferation<br />
in response to antigenic challenge<br />
by reducing the supply of Trp. The<br />
third theory suggests that several Trp<br />
metabolites produced not only along the<br />
kynurenine pathway such as 3-hydroxy<br />
kynurenine and 3-hydroxy anthranilic<br />
acid, but also melatonin, a metabolite of<br />
the serotonin pathway, may act as free<br />
radical scavengers and have antioxidant<br />
properties.<br />
In addition, poor sanitary status of<br />
pig housing can induce a moderate<br />
inflammatory response in weaned<br />
piglets. Recently, Le Floc’h et al. (2007)<br />
demonstrated that weaned piglets kept<br />
under poor sanitary housing conditions<br />
resulted in reduced feed intake and<br />
growth rate, but the magnitude of<br />
responses in terms of feed intake and<br />
weight gain to increasing levels of Trp<br />
were higher compared with those kept<br />
under good sanitary conditions. These<br />
results suggest that the Trp requirement<br />
for optimum growth performance may<br />
be higher when pigs are kept under poor<br />
sanitary conditions.<br />
Overall, Trp plays a key role in swine<br />
nutrition. The multi-purpose roles of<br />
Trp in the body, in addition to protein<br />
deposition, such as serotonin synthesis,<br />
feed intake regulation, immune response,<br />
coping with stress and the impact of<br />
dietary Trp to LNAA ratio on serotonin<br />
should be considered in supplying dietary<br />
Trp for optimum growth and economic<br />
performance.<br />
For more information or references<br />
please contact the <strong>AFMA</strong> Office.<br />
24 <strong>AFMA</strong> MATRIX <strong>March</strong> 2012
PROCESSING<br />
Optimal grinding of barley-rich pig<br />
feed with hammers and rollers<br />
By Thorsten Lucht – Amandus Kahl, Reinbek, Germany<br />
Particle size in pig feed matters. This article describes how the particle size structure of a pig<br />
feed mixture with a high barley content can be optimised by means of stage grinding with a<br />
hammer mill and a downstream crushing roller mill.<br />
Animal nutrition research findings<br />
have shown that an increased content<br />
of fines in the pig feed meal can have<br />
a negative influence on the health<br />
and performance of the animals. This<br />
is caused by the formation of gastric<br />
ulcers in the animals, by a nonoptimal<br />
pH-regime in the stomach,<br />
and by health problems caused by<br />
pathogens in the gastrointestinal<br />
tract. From the technical point of<br />
view, a non-uniform particle size<br />
spectrum leads to segregation, and<br />
a high fines percentage to poor flow<br />
properties in the silo.<br />
Almost all feed mills are traditionally<br />
equipped with hammer mills which<br />
are mainly used in mixed grinding.<br />
Despite the use of stage grinding<br />
with pre-/post-mill and intermediate<br />
screening it is not possible to keep the<br />
fines content at an acceptable level.<br />
In flour (roller) milling, crushing<br />
of wheat and rye with a low fines<br />
content in the first grinding stage is<br />
customary. If, however, only roller<br />
mills are used for grinding pig feed,<br />
problems arise when crushing the<br />
husks of barley or oats. Very early it<br />
was realised that stage grinding with<br />
a roller mill in the second grinding<br />
stage is more suitable for the grinding<br />
of barley.<br />
For this reason it is necessary to find<br />
a compromise that combines grinding<br />
with a low fines content by means<br />
of rollers, and crushing by means of<br />
a hammer mill suitable for crushing<br />
husks. To this end, a compound<br />
feed manufacturer and German feed<br />
equipment builder, Amandus Kahl,<br />
Table 1: Grinding machines characteristics.<br />
Type of grinder<br />
Double Crushing<br />
roller mill<br />
initiated a project that was conducted<br />
by students of the German Milling<br />
School Braunschweig with the aim of<br />
producing pig feed rich in barley with<br />
a low fines content (max. 25%
Complete Plants and Machines<br />
for the Feed Industry<br />
Continuous mixer<br />
Annular gap expander<br />
Extruder OEE<br />
Flat die pelleting presses<br />
Reactor<br />
Rotospray ®<br />
High-capacity crumbler<br />
Special Plants for:<br />
Compound Feed, Shrimp and Fish Feed, Petfood, Premix/Concentrate,<br />
Roughage Feed, Untraditional Feed Mills.<br />
AMANDUS KAHL GmbH & Co. KG<br />
Dieselstrasse 5, D-21465 Reinbek / Hamburg, Germany<br />
Phone: +49 (0)40 727 71-0, Fax: +49 (0)40 727 71-100<br />
info@amandus-kahl-group.de<br />
www.akahl.de<br />
Johannes Schuback & Sons<br />
(S.A.) PTY Limited<br />
Johannesburg / RSA<br />
Phone: +27 11 7062270<br />
Fax: +27 11 7069236<br />
jsssa@mweb.co.za
PROCESSING<br />
Figure 1: Fast running (left) and slowly running roller (right).<br />
Figure 2: Undersize cumulative distribution curve BWS versus<br />
HM+HM versus HM+BWS<br />
firmly adjusted, although speed<br />
modification and a change of the lead<br />
during operation would be ideal.<br />
The particle size obtained with the<br />
crushing roller mill (Figure 2) is<br />
determined among other factors by<br />
the corrugation /circumference, the<br />
lead and the grinding gap. If the<br />
formulae are frequently changed, an<br />
automatic grinding gap measurement<br />
and remote adjustment of the<br />
roller distance are advantageous.<br />
It is important for the rollers to<br />
be fed over their entire width by a<br />
suitable feeding device to achieve a<br />
uniform load of the rollers and the<br />
highest possible throughput. The<br />
grinding machines that were used are<br />
illustrated in Table 1.<br />
Four variants were chosen for the<br />
study:<br />
1. BWS = Crushing roller mill, (two<br />
stages/twice) without intermediate<br />
screening<br />
2. HM + HM = Stage grinding:<br />
hammer mill, with pre-mill / postmill<br />
and intermediate screening<br />
3. HM + BWS = Stage grinding:<br />
hammer mill + crushing roller mill<br />
(single stage) with intermediate<br />
screening<br />
4. HM + LMW = Stage grinding:<br />
hammer mill + laboratory grinder<br />
with intermediate screening<br />
The variant crushing roller mill<br />
+ hammer mill with intermediate<br />
screening (BWS+HM) was not<br />
included in the comparison.<br />
Preliminary tests gave similar results<br />
for the crushing of husks using the<br />
arrangement hammer mill +crushing<br />
roller mill (HM+BWS), having a<br />
sequence that provides better results<br />
than the reverse order. A hammer mill<br />
in the second grinding stage produces<br />
more fines than a hammer mill in the<br />
first grinding stage.<br />
All tests were conducted under<br />
practice conditions and with high<br />
throughputs, excepting the test with<br />
the combination HM + LMW.<br />
In this case, the product was crushed<br />
at a high capacity in the first stage,<br />
and subsequently part of the material<br />
was post-crushed on a laboratory<br />
grinder.<br />
Results<br />
To assess the crushing results,<br />
particle sizes were rated fine ( 2,0 mm). The aim was to obtain<br />
a maximum accumulation in the<br />
medium range with a medium grain<br />
size of 1,0 – 1,1 mm. The percentage<br />
of fine particles should be as low as<br />
possible and not exceed 25 %. In this<br />
context it has to be pointed out that<br />
the indication “medium particle size”<br />
does not imply any information on<br />
the percentage of fines <br />
28 <strong>AFMA</strong> MATRIX <strong>March</strong> 2012
PROCESSING<br />
Figure 1: Fast running (left) and slowly running roller (right).<br />
Figure 2: Undersize cumulative distribution curve BWS versus<br />
HM+HM versus HM+BWS<br />
firmly adjusted, although speed<br />
modification and a change of the lead<br />
during operation would be ideal.<br />
The particle size obtained with the<br />
crushing roller mill (Figure 2) is<br />
determined among other factors by<br />
the corrugation /circumference, the<br />
lead and the grinding gap. If the<br />
formulae are frequently changed, an<br />
automatic grinding gap measurement<br />
and remote adjustment of the<br />
roller distance are advantageous.<br />
It is important for the rollers to<br />
be fed over their entire width by a<br />
suitable feeding device to achieve a<br />
uniform load of the rollers and the<br />
highest possible throughput. The<br />
grinding machines that were used are<br />
illustrated in Table 1.<br />
Four variants were chosen for the<br />
study:<br />
1. BWS = Crushing roller mill, (two<br />
stages/twice) without intermediate<br />
screening<br />
2. HM + HM = Stage grinding:<br />
hammer mill, with pre-mill / postmill<br />
and intermediate screening<br />
3. HM + BWS = Stage grinding:<br />
hammer mill + crushing roller mill<br />
(single stage) with intermediate<br />
screening<br />
4. HM + LMW = Stage grinding:<br />
hammer mill + laboratory grinder<br />
with intermediate screening<br />
The variant crushing roller mill<br />
+ hammer mill with intermediate<br />
screening (BWS+HM) was not<br />
included in the comparison.<br />
Preliminary tests gave similar results<br />
for the crushing of husks using the<br />
arrangement hammer mill +crushing<br />
roller mill (HM+BWS), having a<br />
sequence that provides better results<br />
than the reverse order. A hammer mill<br />
in the second grinding stage produces<br />
more fines than a hammer mill in the<br />
first grinding stage.<br />
All tests were conducted under<br />
practice conditions and with high<br />
throughputs, excepting the test with<br />
the combination HM + LMW.<br />
In this case, the product was crushed<br />
at a high capacity in the first stage,<br />
and subsequently part of the material<br />
was post-crushed on a laboratory<br />
grinder.<br />
Results<br />
To assess the crushing results,<br />
particle sizes were rated fine ( 2,0 mm). The aim was to obtain<br />
a maximum accumulation in the<br />
medium range with a medium grain<br />
size of 1,0 – 1,1 mm. The percentage<br />
of fine particles should be as low as<br />
possible and not exceed 25 %. In this<br />
context it has to be pointed out that<br />
the indication “medium particle size”<br />
does not imply any information on<br />
the percentage of fines <br />
28 <strong>AFMA</strong> MATRIX <strong>March</strong> 2012
PROCESSING<br />
Variant 1: Crushing using a crushing roller mill, BWS two stages<br />
The result shows that the fines content is lower than 25%. Yet there is a<br />
percentage of about 20 % in the “very coarse range” although this does not<br />
have to be considered negative. The structure is relatively broad. As there is<br />
no intermediate screening and no post-crushing, the coarse fraction mainly<br />
consists of husks.<br />
Stage grinding with crushing roller mill<br />
Variant 2: Crushing with hammer mill stage grinding, HM + HM<br />
Though a large screen perforation in the pre-mill and a low circumferential<br />
speed have been selected, a very high fines content is produced.<br />
Stage grinding with hammer mill<br />
Crushing roller<br />
mill, two stage<br />
First<br />
grinding stage<br />
Batch mixer<br />
Sampling<br />
Second<br />
grinding stage<br />
Batch mixer<br />
Result of stage grinding with crushing roller mill<br />
60<br />
Result of stage grinding with hammer mill<br />
60<br />
(%)<br />
30<br />
(%)<br />
30<br />
0<br />
fine medium coarse very coarse<br />
(mm)<br />
0<br />
fine medium coarse very coarse<br />
(mm)<br />
Variant 3: Stage grinding with hammer mill and crushing roller<br />
mill, HM + BWS<br />
With this variant a very good result is achieved which meets the objective<br />
in every respect. The percentage of fines
NAMIBIA<br />
VACANCY:FINANCIAL MANAGER<br />
An excellent career opportunity exists for interested and qualified<br />
candidates to apply for the above mentioned position at Feedmaster<br />
(Pty) Ltd in Windhoek.<br />
The candidate will form part of the company’s senior management team.<br />
KEY FUNCTIONS AND<br />
RESPONSIBILITIES<br />
• Coordinates financial and management<br />
accounting, and supplies statistical data.<br />
• Prepares and compiles annual IFRS financial<br />
statements and the annual budget.<br />
• Approves and authorises payments to service<br />
providers, verify assets and inventory register.<br />
• Releases and verifies salary payments to<br />
employees and the board of directors.<br />
• Responsible for the coordination, estimation,<br />
and calculation of all statutory tax returns.<br />
• Participates and reports on all financial matters.<br />
• Performs due-diligence exercises for any new<br />
investment opportunities.<br />
• Identify profit enhancement opportunities.<br />
• Stock control.<br />
• Raw material and final product costing.<br />
• Gross profit management.<br />
• Reconciliation of supplier contracts.<br />
• Compiles month-end journals.<br />
• Drafts monthly management statements.<br />
• Reconciles GL accounts on a monthly basis.<br />
• Conducts viability studies.<br />
• Compile board motivations.<br />
COMPETENCIES REQUIRED<br />
• Ability to work under pressure.<br />
• Interpersonal skills.<br />
• Problem solving skills.<br />
• Presentation skills.<br />
• Knowledge about SAFEX markets, and the<br />
functioning thereof.<br />
• Trading on SAFEX markets (maize).<br />
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS<br />
POSITION<br />
• B.Comm Hons. with articles and preferably CA/<br />
MBA.<br />
• Industry knowledge and at least five years’<br />
experience in a similar position.<br />
• Strong general business/commercial acumen<br />
with the ability to enhance profitability.<br />
• Computer literate with a good mastering of<br />
Microsoft Word, Excel, Outlook, and PowerPoint.<br />
• Accpac experience will be an added advantage.<br />
• Namibian Citizen.<br />
The company offers a competitive salary and<br />
a range of employee benefits which are market<br />
related.<br />
CV’S WITH FULL DETAILS CAN BE<br />
DELIVERED OR FORWARDED TO:<br />
Sonja van der Hoven<br />
Feedmaster (Pty) Ltd, P.O. Box 20276, Windhoek<br />
Tel: +264 (0)61 290 1000<br />
Fax: +264 (0)61 290 1080<br />
E-mail: hr@namibmills.com.na<br />
ONLY SHORTLISTED CANDIDATES WILL BE<br />
CONTACTED FOR INTERVIEWS<br />
CLOSING DATE FOR APPLICATIONS:<br />
15 APRIL 2012<br />
FEEDMASTER (PTY) LTD<br />
Co. Reg. No: 83/052<br />
c/o Iscor & Dortmund St<br />
P.O. Box 20276<br />
Windhoek<br />
Tel: +264 61 218 713<br />
Fax: +264 61 262 056<br />
Siding 941875<br />
Windhoek<br />
info@feedmaster.com.na
PROCESSING<br />
• Grinding using a BWS or<br />
HM+BWS causes a significantly<br />
lower fines content compared to<br />
crushing using HM+HM. The<br />
intended set point value of max.<br />
25%
COMING EVENTS<br />
DATE EVENT VENUE ENQUIRIES<br />
15 - 18 May 2012 NAMPO Harvest Day NAMPO Park<br />
Bothaville<br />
South Africa<br />
29 - 31 May 2012 AVI Africa 2012 Emperors Palace<br />
Gauteng<br />
South Africa<br />
1 August 2012 <strong>AFMA</strong> / AFRI<br />
COMPLIANCE<br />
Annual Golf day<br />
Meadow Feeds<br />
New appointment<br />
Centurion Residential Estate<br />
and Country Club<br />
Highveld<br />
South Africa<br />
Wim Venter<br />
Tel: +27 56 515 2145<br />
Fax: +27 86 509 7274<br />
E-mail: wim@grainsa.co.za<br />
Website: www.nampo.co.za<br />
Hendrien Erasmus<br />
Tel: +27 11 795 2051<br />
Fax: +27 86 500 4149<br />
E-mail: hendrien@sapoultry.co.za<br />
Website: www.sapoultry.co.za<br />
Teresa Struwig<br />
Tel: +27 12 663 9097<br />
Fax: +27 12 663 9612<br />
E-mail: admin@afma.co.za<br />
Website: www.afma.co.za<br />
Andy Crocker was appointed as Managing<br />
Director, Meadow Feeds on 2 February 2012.<br />
Having previously farmed in the KwaZulu-Natal<br />
midlands, Andy joined Meadow Feeds as a<br />
Technical Adviser in 1998 as part of the team that<br />
established the Eastern Cape operations. He holds<br />
a BSc. Agriculture (University of KZN) and a Masters<br />
in Business Management (Henley Management<br />
College, UK), and is a Registered Professional<br />
Scientist with the South African Council for Natural<br />
Scientific Professions. In 2000 he became the<br />
Technical Support Manager for the Eastern Cape<br />
before moving to Meadow Paarl as Sales Manager<br />
in 2002. Originally appointed as General Manager<br />
of the Port Elizabeth mill in <strong>March</strong> 2005 he became<br />
Chief Operating Officer of the Eastern Cape region<br />
in July 2006 before heading the formation of the<br />
Cape Region in November 2010 as Chief Operating<br />
Officer responsible for the Paarl, Ladismith and<br />
Port Elizabeth operations. Andy will serve as<br />
an Executive Director on the Board of Astral<br />
Operations from <strong>March</strong> 2012.<br />
Astral Foods<br />
New appointment<br />
Taking mother nature’s lead<br />
ADDCON Africa is proud to announce<br />
the arrival of PHYTOBIOTICS GmbH of<br />
Germany into the Southern African<br />
market. Both companies have just<br />
entered into an exclusive distribution<br />
agreement and ADDCON has already<br />
started the registration process of the<br />
new products becoming available to<br />
Roedolf Steenkamp was appointed to the<br />
position of Managing Director: Africa Operations<br />
for Astral Foods in February 2012.<br />
Roedolf is responsible for all the current feed<br />
and poultry operations in Africa and for all new<br />
developments in Africa.<br />
the local feed market. The well known<br />
product SANGROVIT ® will be the first to<br />
be introduced to South Africa. A 100%<br />
plant based product that is derived<br />
He joined the company on 2 April 2002 as General<br />
Manager of the Group’s feed milling operations<br />
in Zambia and Zimbabwe. In November 2005, he<br />
was promoted to Chief Operating Officer – Africa.<br />
In June 2009 he was promoted to the position<br />
of Managing Director: Feed Division of Astral<br />
Operations.<br />
from an extraordinary disease resistant<br />
perennial plant, which in turn produces<br />
the active substances used as protective<br />
agents to shield against various<br />
infections and diseases. The product is<br />
highly effective for all type of animals.<br />
For further information, please contact<br />
Johann@tega.co.za or 082 780 5240.<br />
34 <strong>AFMA</strong> MATRIX <strong>March</strong> 2012
INDUSTRY NEWS<br />
ADVIT Animal Nutrition<br />
Celebrating a quarter of a<br />
century of making feed better<br />
ADVIT Animal Nutrition is<br />
celebrating its 25 th anniversary<br />
in 2012. There have been a lot of<br />
changes and improvements since the<br />
company was first registered in 1987,<br />
but their vision still remains the same,<br />
to be the preferred supplier of vitamin<br />
and mineral premixes to the South<br />
African feed industry. ADVIT opened<br />
two depots in the last 2 years, one in<br />
Howick, Kwa-Zulu Natal (2010) and<br />
one in Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape<br />
(2011) to enable them to ensure even<br />
better service to their clients in those<br />
areas.<br />
To celebrate their 25 th anniversary,<br />
ADVIT has a few exciting projects<br />
lined up for this year. They aim<br />
to expand their existing product<br />
portfolio with a few new ranges of<br />
premixes specifically designed for the<br />
ruminant industry. They will also be<br />
improving their quality system by<br />
implementing HACCAP and<br />
ISO 22000 in addition to their<br />
ISO 9001 certification. They are<br />
in the process of upgrading their<br />
production system by installing<br />
micro-bins which will be an<br />
integral part of their aim to<br />
have a fully automated production<br />
system.<br />
ADVIT sees this anniversary as<br />
merely the beginning of a new era<br />
of producing high quality research<br />
driven vitamin and mineral premixes<br />
to the animal feed industry and look<br />
forward to the next 25 years.<br />
A Partnership<br />
that makes a difference<br />
Healthy animals result in healthy people<br />
and ultimately a healthy, sustainable planet.<br />
Globally, approximately 60 million ton animal feed is produced annually;<br />
making the role of the animal feed manufacturer such a vital one.<br />
KK Animal Nutrition would like to join you in contributing to a sustainable<br />
planet. Therefore, enter into a partnership with us and experience the<br />
difference our top quality products and service can make.<br />
We specialise in the following products:<br />
Kynofos 21 – Reg. No. V2851<br />
Kimtrafos 12 Grandé – Reg. No. V18670<br />
PhosSure 12 – Reg. No. V12858<br />
PhosSure 6 – Reg. No. V11350<br />
Feed Grade Urea – Reg. No. V15681<br />
Kalorie 3000 – Reg. No. V2809<br />
Feed Grade Sulphur – Reg. No. V16738<br />
(All products are registered under Act 36 of 1947)<br />
Advanced solutions in animal nutrition!<br />
A04309/AM<br />
KK Animal Nutrition (Pty) Ltd. Reg. No. 2001/025850/07 • PO Box 449, Umbogintwini, 4120<br />
Tel: +27 (0)31 910-5100 • Fax: +27 (0)31 904-3741 • E-mail: kk@kkan.com<br />
www.kkan.com
8 to 12 April 2013<br />
Sun City, South Africa<br />
www.gffc2013.com