25.01.2015 Views

Does Inequality Matter? - CEPA

Does Inequality Matter? - CEPA

Does Inequality Matter? - CEPA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Good Practice in Poverty Measurement<br />

TAMING THE CORPORATE BEAST: CULTIVATING SOCIAL<br />

JUSTICE INITIATIVES FOR A MORE INCLUSIVE TRADING<br />

FRAMEWORK TO FLOURISH<br />

“…transnational corporations and other business enterprises, as organs of<br />

society, are also responsible for promoting and securing the human rights<br />

set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights…” (UN Economic<br />

and Social Council 2003)<br />

1 Introduction<br />

Countries in South Asia are entering into free trade agreements to build<br />

their trade repertoires and access larger markets. However, large-scale<br />

producers and Multi-National Corporations (MNCs) dominate global<br />

markets, making it more difficult for small-scale farmers and producers<br />

to determine the terms, conditions, and pricing of goods within their<br />

countries’ trading system. Under the current neo-liberal market framework,<br />

small-scale growers have difficulties accessing larger and export-oriented<br />

markets. Constrained access further impedes their ability to demand a fair<br />

price, and lack of a guaranteed fair pricing system compounds problems<br />

of poor wages and labour conditions. To ensure that everyone benefits<br />

from economic growth, present trade systems must offer space for<br />

people, living in poverty or socially marginalised, to become part of the<br />

decision-making processed that set the trajectory for positive, sustainable<br />

development.<br />

First, the paper discusses shortcomings of the current neo-liberal paradigm,<br />

which underline the collapse of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) Doha<br />

Development Round and the difficulties in achieving human development<br />

objectives. This section also examines how the multilateral trading system<br />

constrains policy space and impedes access to markets in the agricultural<br />

sector for developing countries, contributing to poverty and vulnerable<br />

livelihoods. It assesses the frenzy of free trade agreements and how<br />

distorted support disadvantaged small-scale producers.<br />

Next, examples from Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal and Sri<br />

Lanka explore ways that governments and non-state actors have tried to<br />

facilitate a more social economically just framework that is participatory<br />

and embodies fair trade, cooperativism and environmental sustainability<br />

principles. CSR ethical consultation for resources and benefit-sharing are<br />

245

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!