26.01.2015 Views

Biomin PEP_IRAN 2013.pdf

Biomin PEP_IRAN 2013.pdf

Biomin PEP_IRAN 2013.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P.<br />

Naturally ahead in phytogenics.


Challenges in Poultry Nutrition<br />

Gut microflora<br />

Feeding the bird<br />

Feeding the gut<br />

microflora<br />

Naturally ahead


Log 10 cells/g contents<br />

Gut Microflora: Bacterial Genera<br />

Pathogenic<br />

Beneficial<br />

11<br />

Bacteroides<br />

Bifidobacteria<br />

7<br />

Lactobacilli<br />

E. coli<br />

2<br />

Clostridia<br />

Campylobacter, Salmonella<br />

Naturally ahead


Phytogenics Background - Essential Oils<br />

Essential oils<br />

Flavour properties<br />

- Sensory effect<br />

- Palatability effect<br />

- Appetizing effect<br />

Biological activities<br />

- Anti-microbial<br />

- Fungicidal<br />

- Anti-viral<br />

- Anti-oxidant<br />

- Anti-inflammatory<br />

- Soothing<br />

- Anti-depressant<br />

Essential oils help to prevent intestinal disorders<br />

Naturally ahead


Naturally ahead<br />

Máthé (1996)<br />

Effects of Essential Oils<br />

Spice/herb<br />

Number of identified biologically active compounds<br />

Antioxidant Antiviral Antimicrobial<br />

Bay 3 5 5<br />

Cassia 3 3 3<br />

Cayenne 9 6 8<br />

Cumin 5 7 11<br />

Garlic 9 5 13<br />

Ginger 6 6 17<br />

Oregano 14 11 19<br />

Rosemary 12 10 19<br />

Sage 7 - 6<br />

Thyme 4 3 5


<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. - Product Composition<br />

Oregano<br />

oil<br />

Anis oil<br />

Citrus<br />

oil<br />

- Strong antimicrobial effect<br />

- Antioxidative efficacy<br />

- Appetizing effect<br />

- Antifungal<br />

- Enhances palatability<br />

- Antimicrobial<br />

Milos et al. (2000), Sivropoulou et al. (1996)<br />

Kubo et al. (2008), Çabuk et al. (2003)<br />

Deans (1991), Van Vuuren & Viljoen (2007)<br />

Functional carrier<br />

- Prebiotic effect (FOS)<br />

Xu et al. (2002), Roberfroid et al. (1998)<br />

Naturally ahead


Fructooligosaccharides (FOS)<br />

• Fructose and glucose units with -glycosidic bonds<br />

• Not digestible by endogenous enzymes<br />

• Selectively promote beneficial bacteria, mainly in the large<br />

intestine (“bifidogenic effect”)<br />

• Not utilized by pathogenic microbes<br />

Naturally ahead


Scientific Network<br />

Naturally ahead


Proven Mode of Action<br />

(Kroismayr et al., 2008)<br />

<strong>Biomin</strong> ®<br />

P.E.P.<br />

Livability &<br />

performance<br />

<br />

Gut microflora<br />

(nutrient<br />

competition)<br />

<br />

Naturally ahead<br />

Nutrient<br />

digestibility<br />

<br />

Intestinal challenge<br />

(microbial toxins)<br />

<br />

Immune<br />

demand


<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. in Broilers - Summary of Trials<br />

Trial group<br />

with<br />

Control group with<br />

Total no. of birds in<br />

trial<br />

%-change vs. Control<br />

Final BW FCR PI 1<br />

Austria P.E.P. 125 poultry - 1,024 +3.9 -7.3 +9.9<br />

Belgium P.E.P. 125 poultry - 32,950 +4.9 -1.4<br />

Czech Rep. P.E.P. 125 poultry - 116,160 +0.2 -5.0 +8.3<br />

Egypt P.E.P. 125 poultry - 135 +5.0 -4.9 +10.1<br />

France P.E.P. 125 poultry - 1,400 +1.3 -1.1 +3.7<br />

Germany P.E.P. 125 poultry - 84,000 +4.0 -3.6 +7.9<br />

Greece P.E.P. 125 poultry - 420 +2.6 -5.6 +7.4<br />

Italy P.E.P. 125 poultry - 240 +0.2 -1.1 +3.0<br />

Poland P.E.P. sol - 98,892 +1.8 -7.4 +15.1<br />

Serbia P.E.P. 125 poultry - 1,140 +3.5 -2.1 +4.3<br />

Serbia P.E.P. 125 poultry - 1,200 +3.6 -0.9 +4.4<br />

South Africa P.E.P. 125 poultry - 2,016 +5.2 -9.3 +15.1<br />

Turkey P.E.P. 1000 AGP 2 60,000 +6.3 -5.8 +11.7<br />

Thailand P.E.P. 125 poultry - 1,800 +4.2 -3.4 +8.5<br />

Thailand P.E.P. 1000 AGP 3 1,500 +1.5 -1.0 +0.9<br />

India P.E.P. 125 poultry - 1,000 -0.6 -1.6 +2.0<br />

Japan P.E.P. 1000 AGP 4 , Probiotic 136,200 +3.3 -3.0 +5.5<br />

China P.E.P. 125 poultry 600 +3.6 -0.6 ±0.0<br />

Taiwan P.E.P. 125 poultry 320 +5.1 -6.4 +12.0<br />

Vietnam P.E.P. 125 poultry AGP 5 360 +0.1 -5.6 +8.2<br />

Bolivia P.E.P. 125 poultry 900 +11.1 -2.3 +18.4<br />

Peru P.E.P. 125 poultry AGP 2 50,000 +0.9 -2.4 +9.0<br />

Peru P.E.P. 125 poultry AGP 3 53,440 +0.4 -0.6 +1.4<br />

Peru P.E.P. 125 poultry AGP 4 23,680 +6.1 -2.8 +8.6<br />

1<br />

Production Index =Livability [%] x Live weight [kg] / age [d] / FCR x 100<br />

Naturally ahead<br />

2-5<br />

Positive Control with AGP (Antibiotic Growth Promoter): 2 Avilamycin, 3 Flavomycin, 4 Enramycin, 5 Chlortetracyclin


<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. in Poultry<br />

PERFORMANCE<br />

IMPROVEMENT<br />

Naturally ahead


<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. 125 poultry<br />

France<br />

Efficacy in poultry<br />

Naturally ahead


Performance in Broilers - Experimental Design<br />

Primex S.A.S., France, Experimental Station<br />

• 1400 day-old Ross broiler chicks<br />

• 14 replicates (pens) in total, 100 birds/replicate (50 male, 50 female)<br />

• 2 treatments:<br />

Treatment Pens Birds/treatment<br />

Control 7 700<br />

<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. (125 g/t) 7 700<br />

• Diets based on wheat, corn and soybean meal<br />

• 2 feeding phases:<br />

Starter (crumbled)<br />

+coccidiostat (Maxiban)<br />

Finisher (pellets)<br />

Naturally ahead<br />

Day 1 21 37


Performance in Broilers - Overall Results<br />

Control<br />

<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P.<br />

(125 g/t)<br />

Difference<br />

Mortality (%) 2.5 1.5 -1.0<br />

Final BW (g) 2059 A 2086 AB +27<br />

Daily weight gain (g) 54.5 A 55.2 AB +0.7<br />

Feed intake (g) 3669 3684 +15<br />

FCR 1.82 b 1.80 ab -0.02<br />

a,b Statistical significance (P


<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. 125 poultry<br />

USA<br />

Efficacy in poultry<br />

Naturally ahead


Proven Efficacy in Broilers<br />

Texas A&M University, USA<br />

• 940 day-old male Cobb and Ross broiler chicks<br />

• 10 pens (replications) per treatment with 47 birds/pen<br />

• 2 treatments (470 birds/treatment):<br />

1. Negative Control (no additives)<br />

2. Control + <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. 125 poultry (125 g/t) Day 1-21<br />

• 3 feeding phases:<br />

Starter Starter Finisher<br />

Day 1 15 30 40<br />

Naturally ahead


Development of Weight<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

Body weight (kg)<br />

2.283<br />

2.302<br />

1.5<br />

1.537<br />

1.549<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.515<br />

0.508<br />

0.0<br />

Day 15 Day 30 Day 40<br />

Control<br />

<strong>Biomin</strong>® P.E.P.<br />

Naturally ahead<br />

Texas A&M University, USA


Development of FCR<br />

FCR<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.28<br />

1.28<br />

1.66<br />

1.60<br />

2.20<br />

2.13<br />

1.75<br />

P < 0.05<br />

1.71<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

Day 1-15 Day 15-30 Day 30-40 Day 1-40<br />

Control<br />

<strong>Biomin</strong>® P.E.P.<br />

Naturally ahead<br />

Texas A&M University, USA


<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. in Poultry<br />

REDUCED INTESTINAL<br />

CHALLENGE<br />

Naturally ahead


<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. 125 poultry<br />

USA<br />

NE challenge in poultry<br />

Naturally ahead


Efficacy of <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. against Necrotic Enteritis<br />

USDA, Food & Feed Safety Research<br />

• 3 experiments with 3 treatments (n=50 birds per treatment):<br />

Treatment NE-challenge <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. 125<br />

poultry<br />

1 - Negative Control -<br />

2 - Positive Control + -<br />

3 - <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. + 125 g/t<br />

• Experimental groups 2 and 3 received 5 x dose of Bursa-Vac TM by ocular<br />

administration on day 14.<br />

• Birds were orally gavaged with Clostridium perfringens (CP) once daily for<br />

2 consecutive days with 1.5 ml of 10 7 CFU/mL.<br />

• On day 25 the experiment was terminated and necropsy was performed.<br />

McReynolds et al. (2009) USDA, Agricultural Research Service<br />

Naturally ahead


Efficacy of <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. against Necrotic Enteritis<br />

Lesion score<br />

(USDA)<br />

% birds with lesions (Uni- Gent)<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

2.15<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

59%<br />

50%<br />

1.5<br />

1.33 1.28<br />

1.2<br />

40%<br />

1<br />

0.96<br />

30%<br />

28%<br />

0.5<br />

0.58<br />

0.29 0.32 0.3<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0<br />

Exp. 1 Exp. 2 Exp. 3<br />

0%<br />

0%<br />

No challenege<br />

NE-challenge<br />

NE-challenge + <strong>PEP</strong> 125 poultry<br />

McReynolds et al. (2009) Poultry Science 88: 2075–2080<br />

No challenege<br />

NE-challenge<br />

NE-challenge + <strong>PEP</strong> sol<br />

Naturally ahead


<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. in Poultry<br />

AGP REPLACEMENT<br />

Naturally ahead


<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. 125 poultry<br />

Greece<br />

Efficacy in poultry<br />

Naturally ahead


<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. in Broilers<br />

Experimental Design<br />

Effects of <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. on broiler performance, digestibility, microflora and<br />

oxidative status in comparison with an AGP<br />

• Location: University of Athens, Greece<br />

• Birds: 420 one-day-old male Cobb broiler chicks<br />

• Housing: Floor pens, 3 replications/treatment<br />

Naturally ahead<br />

with 35 birds/replication (105 birds/treatment)<br />

• Treatments:<br />

1. Negative Control (no additives)<br />

2. Control + <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. 125 poultry (125 g/t)<br />

3. Control + <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. 125 poultry (250 g/t)<br />

4. Positive Control (Avilamycin, 25 g/t)<br />

• Feed: Corn-soy bean meal based diets<br />

• Feeding program:<br />

Starter Grower Finisher<br />

Day 1 14 28 42<br />

Mountzouris et al. (2009) University of Athens, Greece


<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. in Broilers - Feed Conversion Ratio<br />

1.85<br />

1.80<br />

1.80 a 1.70 b 1.71 b 1.72 b<br />

1.75<br />

-5.6%<br />

1.70<br />

1.65<br />

1.60<br />

NC <strong>Biomin</strong>® P.E.P. (125<br />

g/t)<br />

Mountzouris et al. (2009) University of Athens, Greece<br />

<strong>Biomin</strong>® P.E.P. (250<br />

g/t)<br />

PC (Avilamycin)<br />

Naturally ahead


90<br />

<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. in Broilers – Ileal Digestibility<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

P=0.08<br />

P=0.007<br />

0<br />

Dry matter Crude protein Crude fat<br />

NC <strong>Biomin</strong>® P.E.P. (125 g/t) <strong>Biomin</strong>® P.E.P. (250 g/t) PC (Avilamycin)<br />

Mountzouris et al. (2009) University of Athens, Greece<br />

Naturally ahead


<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. 1000 poultry<br />

France<br />

Efficacy in layer<br />

breeders<br />

Naturally ahead


Efficacy in Layer Breeders - Experimental Design<br />

Experimental farm, France (2010)<br />

• 1800 Novogen layer breeders per group<br />

• Laying house with floor system (½ slatted, ½ litter)<br />

• hens assigned to 2 groups:<br />

Group A<br />

Group B<br />

18-44 wk Control <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P.<br />

45-65 wk <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. Control<br />

• Basal corn-SBM diet, crumb<br />

• Duration: entire production cycle (18–65 wk of age)<br />

Naturally ahead


Efficacy in Layer Breeders - Results 18-65 Wk<br />

Control<br />

<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P.<br />

Mortality (%) 11.1 9.2<br />

Cum. egg no./HH 250.1 255.4<br />

Cum. 1 st quality eggs/HH 234.7 241.5<br />

1 st quality eggs (%) 93.8 94.6<br />

Cum. egg mass (kg) 15049 15434<br />

Cum. feed consumption (kg) 36210 36705<br />

FCR 2.41 2.38<br />

Naturally ahead


The natural way…<br />

Benefits of <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P.:<br />

• Cost-efficient performance enhancer<br />

• High profitability due to improved FCR, feed intake,<br />

weight gains, egg production.<br />

• No negative side effects, no withdrawal periods<br />

Naturally ahead

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!