Biomin PEP_IRAN 2013.pdf
Biomin PEP_IRAN 2013.pdf
Biomin PEP_IRAN 2013.pdf
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P.<br />
Naturally ahead in phytogenics.
Challenges in Poultry Nutrition<br />
Gut microflora<br />
Feeding the bird<br />
Feeding the gut<br />
microflora<br />
Naturally ahead
Log 10 cells/g contents<br />
Gut Microflora: Bacterial Genera<br />
Pathogenic<br />
Beneficial<br />
11<br />
Bacteroides<br />
Bifidobacteria<br />
7<br />
Lactobacilli<br />
E. coli<br />
2<br />
Clostridia<br />
Campylobacter, Salmonella<br />
Naturally ahead
Phytogenics Background - Essential Oils<br />
Essential oils<br />
Flavour properties<br />
- Sensory effect<br />
- Palatability effect<br />
- Appetizing effect<br />
Biological activities<br />
- Anti-microbial<br />
- Fungicidal<br />
- Anti-viral<br />
- Anti-oxidant<br />
- Anti-inflammatory<br />
- Soothing<br />
- Anti-depressant<br />
Essential oils help to prevent intestinal disorders<br />
Naturally ahead
Naturally ahead<br />
Máthé (1996)<br />
Effects of Essential Oils<br />
Spice/herb<br />
Number of identified biologically active compounds<br />
Antioxidant Antiviral Antimicrobial<br />
Bay 3 5 5<br />
Cassia 3 3 3<br />
Cayenne 9 6 8<br />
Cumin 5 7 11<br />
Garlic 9 5 13<br />
Ginger 6 6 17<br />
Oregano 14 11 19<br />
Rosemary 12 10 19<br />
Sage 7 - 6<br />
Thyme 4 3 5
<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. - Product Composition<br />
Oregano<br />
oil<br />
Anis oil<br />
Citrus<br />
oil<br />
- Strong antimicrobial effect<br />
- Antioxidative efficacy<br />
- Appetizing effect<br />
- Antifungal<br />
- Enhances palatability<br />
- Antimicrobial<br />
Milos et al. (2000), Sivropoulou et al. (1996)<br />
Kubo et al. (2008), Çabuk et al. (2003)<br />
Deans (1991), Van Vuuren & Viljoen (2007)<br />
Functional carrier<br />
- Prebiotic effect (FOS)<br />
Xu et al. (2002), Roberfroid et al. (1998)<br />
Naturally ahead
Fructooligosaccharides (FOS)<br />
• Fructose and glucose units with -glycosidic bonds<br />
• Not digestible by endogenous enzymes<br />
• Selectively promote beneficial bacteria, mainly in the large<br />
intestine (“bifidogenic effect”)<br />
• Not utilized by pathogenic microbes<br />
Naturally ahead
Scientific Network<br />
Naturally ahead
Proven Mode of Action<br />
(Kroismayr et al., 2008)<br />
<strong>Biomin</strong> ®<br />
P.E.P.<br />
Livability &<br />
performance<br />
<br />
Gut microflora<br />
(nutrient<br />
competition)<br />
<br />
Naturally ahead<br />
Nutrient<br />
digestibility<br />
<br />
Intestinal challenge<br />
(microbial toxins)<br />
<br />
Immune<br />
demand
<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. in Broilers - Summary of Trials<br />
Trial group<br />
with<br />
Control group with<br />
Total no. of birds in<br />
trial<br />
%-change vs. Control<br />
Final BW FCR PI 1<br />
Austria P.E.P. 125 poultry - 1,024 +3.9 -7.3 +9.9<br />
Belgium P.E.P. 125 poultry - 32,950 +4.9 -1.4<br />
Czech Rep. P.E.P. 125 poultry - 116,160 +0.2 -5.0 +8.3<br />
Egypt P.E.P. 125 poultry - 135 +5.0 -4.9 +10.1<br />
France P.E.P. 125 poultry - 1,400 +1.3 -1.1 +3.7<br />
Germany P.E.P. 125 poultry - 84,000 +4.0 -3.6 +7.9<br />
Greece P.E.P. 125 poultry - 420 +2.6 -5.6 +7.4<br />
Italy P.E.P. 125 poultry - 240 +0.2 -1.1 +3.0<br />
Poland P.E.P. sol - 98,892 +1.8 -7.4 +15.1<br />
Serbia P.E.P. 125 poultry - 1,140 +3.5 -2.1 +4.3<br />
Serbia P.E.P. 125 poultry - 1,200 +3.6 -0.9 +4.4<br />
South Africa P.E.P. 125 poultry - 2,016 +5.2 -9.3 +15.1<br />
Turkey P.E.P. 1000 AGP 2 60,000 +6.3 -5.8 +11.7<br />
Thailand P.E.P. 125 poultry - 1,800 +4.2 -3.4 +8.5<br />
Thailand P.E.P. 1000 AGP 3 1,500 +1.5 -1.0 +0.9<br />
India P.E.P. 125 poultry - 1,000 -0.6 -1.6 +2.0<br />
Japan P.E.P. 1000 AGP 4 , Probiotic 136,200 +3.3 -3.0 +5.5<br />
China P.E.P. 125 poultry 600 +3.6 -0.6 ±0.0<br />
Taiwan P.E.P. 125 poultry 320 +5.1 -6.4 +12.0<br />
Vietnam P.E.P. 125 poultry AGP 5 360 +0.1 -5.6 +8.2<br />
Bolivia P.E.P. 125 poultry 900 +11.1 -2.3 +18.4<br />
Peru P.E.P. 125 poultry AGP 2 50,000 +0.9 -2.4 +9.0<br />
Peru P.E.P. 125 poultry AGP 3 53,440 +0.4 -0.6 +1.4<br />
Peru P.E.P. 125 poultry AGP 4 23,680 +6.1 -2.8 +8.6<br />
1<br />
Production Index =Livability [%] x Live weight [kg] / age [d] / FCR x 100<br />
Naturally ahead<br />
2-5<br />
Positive Control with AGP (Antibiotic Growth Promoter): 2 Avilamycin, 3 Flavomycin, 4 Enramycin, 5 Chlortetracyclin
<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. in Poultry<br />
PERFORMANCE<br />
IMPROVEMENT<br />
Naturally ahead
<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. 125 poultry<br />
France<br />
Efficacy in poultry<br />
Naturally ahead
Performance in Broilers - Experimental Design<br />
Primex S.A.S., France, Experimental Station<br />
• 1400 day-old Ross broiler chicks<br />
• 14 replicates (pens) in total, 100 birds/replicate (50 male, 50 female)<br />
• 2 treatments:<br />
Treatment Pens Birds/treatment<br />
Control 7 700<br />
<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. (125 g/t) 7 700<br />
• Diets based on wheat, corn and soybean meal<br />
• 2 feeding phases:<br />
Starter (crumbled)<br />
+coccidiostat (Maxiban)<br />
Finisher (pellets)<br />
Naturally ahead<br />
Day 1 21 37
Performance in Broilers - Overall Results<br />
Control<br />
<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P.<br />
(125 g/t)<br />
Difference<br />
Mortality (%) 2.5 1.5 -1.0<br />
Final BW (g) 2059 A 2086 AB +27<br />
Daily weight gain (g) 54.5 A 55.2 AB +0.7<br />
Feed intake (g) 3669 3684 +15<br />
FCR 1.82 b 1.80 ab -0.02<br />
a,b Statistical significance (P
<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. 125 poultry<br />
USA<br />
Efficacy in poultry<br />
Naturally ahead
Proven Efficacy in Broilers<br />
Texas A&M University, USA<br />
• 940 day-old male Cobb and Ross broiler chicks<br />
• 10 pens (replications) per treatment with 47 birds/pen<br />
• 2 treatments (470 birds/treatment):<br />
1. Negative Control (no additives)<br />
2. Control + <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. 125 poultry (125 g/t) Day 1-21<br />
• 3 feeding phases:<br />
Starter Starter Finisher<br />
Day 1 15 30 40<br />
Naturally ahead
Development of Weight<br />
2.5<br />
2.0<br />
Body weight (kg)<br />
2.283<br />
2.302<br />
1.5<br />
1.537<br />
1.549<br />
1.0<br />
0.5<br />
0.515<br />
0.508<br />
0.0<br />
Day 15 Day 30 Day 40<br />
Control<br />
<strong>Biomin</strong>® P.E.P.<br />
Naturally ahead<br />
Texas A&M University, USA
Development of FCR<br />
FCR<br />
2.5<br />
2.0<br />
1.5<br />
1.28<br />
1.28<br />
1.66<br />
1.60<br />
2.20<br />
2.13<br />
1.75<br />
P < 0.05<br />
1.71<br />
1.0<br />
0.5<br />
0.0<br />
Day 1-15 Day 15-30 Day 30-40 Day 1-40<br />
Control<br />
<strong>Biomin</strong>® P.E.P.<br />
Naturally ahead<br />
Texas A&M University, USA
<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. in Poultry<br />
REDUCED INTESTINAL<br />
CHALLENGE<br />
Naturally ahead
<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. 125 poultry<br />
USA<br />
NE challenge in poultry<br />
Naturally ahead
Efficacy of <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. against Necrotic Enteritis<br />
USDA, Food & Feed Safety Research<br />
• 3 experiments with 3 treatments (n=50 birds per treatment):<br />
Treatment NE-challenge <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. 125<br />
poultry<br />
1 - Negative Control -<br />
2 - Positive Control + -<br />
3 - <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. + 125 g/t<br />
• Experimental groups 2 and 3 received 5 x dose of Bursa-Vac TM by ocular<br />
administration on day 14.<br />
• Birds were orally gavaged with Clostridium perfringens (CP) once daily for<br />
2 consecutive days with 1.5 ml of 10 7 CFU/mL.<br />
• On day 25 the experiment was terminated and necropsy was performed.<br />
McReynolds et al. (2009) USDA, Agricultural Research Service<br />
Naturally ahead
Efficacy of <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. against Necrotic Enteritis<br />
Lesion score<br />
(USDA)<br />
% birds with lesions (Uni- Gent)<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
2.15<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
59%<br />
50%<br />
1.5<br />
1.33 1.28<br />
1.2<br />
40%<br />
1<br />
0.96<br />
30%<br />
28%<br />
0.5<br />
0.58<br />
0.29 0.32 0.3<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0<br />
Exp. 1 Exp. 2 Exp. 3<br />
0%<br />
0%<br />
No challenege<br />
NE-challenge<br />
NE-challenge + <strong>PEP</strong> 125 poultry<br />
McReynolds et al. (2009) Poultry Science 88: 2075–2080<br />
No challenege<br />
NE-challenge<br />
NE-challenge + <strong>PEP</strong> sol<br />
Naturally ahead
<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. in Poultry<br />
AGP REPLACEMENT<br />
Naturally ahead
<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. 125 poultry<br />
Greece<br />
Efficacy in poultry<br />
Naturally ahead
<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. in Broilers<br />
Experimental Design<br />
Effects of <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. on broiler performance, digestibility, microflora and<br />
oxidative status in comparison with an AGP<br />
• Location: University of Athens, Greece<br />
• Birds: 420 one-day-old male Cobb broiler chicks<br />
• Housing: Floor pens, 3 replications/treatment<br />
Naturally ahead<br />
with 35 birds/replication (105 birds/treatment)<br />
• Treatments:<br />
1. Negative Control (no additives)<br />
2. Control + <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. 125 poultry (125 g/t)<br />
3. Control + <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. 125 poultry (250 g/t)<br />
4. Positive Control (Avilamycin, 25 g/t)<br />
• Feed: Corn-soy bean meal based diets<br />
• Feeding program:<br />
Starter Grower Finisher<br />
Day 1 14 28 42<br />
Mountzouris et al. (2009) University of Athens, Greece
<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. in Broilers - Feed Conversion Ratio<br />
1.85<br />
1.80<br />
1.80 a 1.70 b 1.71 b 1.72 b<br />
1.75<br />
-5.6%<br />
1.70<br />
1.65<br />
1.60<br />
NC <strong>Biomin</strong>® P.E.P. (125<br />
g/t)<br />
Mountzouris et al. (2009) University of Athens, Greece<br />
<strong>Biomin</strong>® P.E.P. (250<br />
g/t)<br />
PC (Avilamycin)<br />
Naturally ahead
90<br />
<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. in Broilers – Ileal Digestibility<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
P=0.08<br />
P=0.007<br />
0<br />
Dry matter Crude protein Crude fat<br />
NC <strong>Biomin</strong>® P.E.P. (125 g/t) <strong>Biomin</strong>® P.E.P. (250 g/t) PC (Avilamycin)<br />
Mountzouris et al. (2009) University of Athens, Greece<br />
Naturally ahead
<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. 1000 poultry<br />
France<br />
Efficacy in layer<br />
breeders<br />
Naturally ahead
Efficacy in Layer Breeders - Experimental Design<br />
Experimental farm, France (2010)<br />
• 1800 Novogen layer breeders per group<br />
• Laying house with floor system (½ slatted, ½ litter)<br />
• hens assigned to 2 groups:<br />
Group A<br />
Group B<br />
18-44 wk Control <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P.<br />
45-65 wk <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P. Control<br />
• Basal corn-SBM diet, crumb<br />
• Duration: entire production cycle (18–65 wk of age)<br />
Naturally ahead
Efficacy in Layer Breeders - Results 18-65 Wk<br />
Control<br />
<strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P.<br />
Mortality (%) 11.1 9.2<br />
Cum. egg no./HH 250.1 255.4<br />
Cum. 1 st quality eggs/HH 234.7 241.5<br />
1 st quality eggs (%) 93.8 94.6<br />
Cum. egg mass (kg) 15049 15434<br />
Cum. feed consumption (kg) 36210 36705<br />
FCR 2.41 2.38<br />
Naturally ahead
The natural way…<br />
Benefits of <strong>Biomin</strong> ® P.E.P.:<br />
• Cost-efficient performance enhancer<br />
• High profitability due to improved FCR, feed intake,<br />
weight gains, egg production.<br />
• No negative side effects, no withdrawal periods<br />
Naturally ahead