- Page 1: Breaking through the Equity Barrier
- Page 5 and 6: Executive Summary The issue Environ
- Page 7 and 8: The review on fairness and equity w
- Page 9 and 10: 3 Factors that did not affect equit
- Page 11 and 12: 1 The experiments have clearly demo
- Page 13 and 14: The key findings from the experimen
- Page 15 and 16: 4.3 Equity criteria 42 4.3.1 Focus
- Page 17 and 18: List of tables Table 2.1 Number of
- Page 19 and 20: 1 Introduction 1.1 Issue Environmen
- Page 21 and 22: 1.5 Acknowledgements Our appreciati
- Page 23 and 24: Table 2.1 Number of ‘Google Schol
- Page 25 and 26: In our view, the language would be
- Page 27 and 28: Perceptions of fairness divide betw
- Page 29 and 30: 2.2.4 Equity and context Dependency
- Page 31 and 32: In the 1930s and 1940s, social psyc
- Page 33 and 34: eflect a collective (or social) pre
- Page 35 and 36: trade-off. The problem is couched i
- Page 37 and 38: International water policy has been
- Page 39 and 40: Bakker (2001) documents three oppos
- Page 41 and 42: one of the wettest parts of Western
- Page 43 and 44: Step 1 The foremost task was to cle
- Page 45 and 46: 3.2 Theoretical underpinnings 3.2.1
- Page 47 and 48: certain patterns or regularities. W
- Page 49 and 50: Prior expectations introduce a new
- Page 51 and 52: Group 3: Process equity principles
- Page 53 and 54:
Correlates are auxiliary or seconda
- Page 55 and 56:
It is our intention to develop a me
- Page 57 and 58:
Increasing population As a populati
- Page 59 and 60:
Policies to realise these savings a
- Page 61 and 62:
3 The format chosen did not pit one
- Page 63 and 64:
4.3.3 Implementing equity criteria
- Page 65 and 66:
4.3.4 Information gathered on equit
- Page 67 and 68:
Figure 4.1 Ex-house scheme water us
- Page 69 and 70:
The total number of ‘returns to s
- Page 71 and 72:
Figure 4.2 Geographical boundaries
- Page 73 and 74:
Education level The metropolitan an
- Page 75 and 76:
5.1.2 Water use characteristics Wat
- Page 77 and 78:
Calculating an overall water consum
- Page 79 and 80:
Figure 5.2 Distribution of rankings
- Page 81 and 82:
Figure 5.4 Distribution of rankings
- Page 83 and 84:
The equity criteria that face the s
- Page 85 and 86:
Results also show that for those po
- Page 87 and 88:
In summary, the equity criteria cho
- Page 89 and 90:
As a result, knowledge of the incom
- Page 91 and 92:
5.4.3 Age and equity judgments Age
- Page 93 and 94:
Table 5.10 Students and non-student
- Page 95 and 96:
To summarise metropolitan versus co
- Page 97 and 98:
Table 5.15 Reasons for ‘Bore wate
- Page 99 and 100:
5.5 Influence of policy context on
- Page 101 and 102:
Considering then the ability to pay
- Page 103 and 104:
Having said that, there are factors
- Page 105 and 106:
as a benchmark; in this case, we ne
- Page 107 and 108:
6.2.2 Three stages in equity-based
- Page 109 and 110:
is that we do not yet have rigorous
- Page 111 and 112:
Ability to pay principles w w w Pro
- Page 113 and 114:
Table 6.1 Equity principle Egal Max
- Page 115 and 116:
Table 6.3 Full factorial treatment
- Page 117 and 118:
7 Experimental results and discussi
- Page 119 and 120:
order of the X-axis: this is meant
- Page 121 and 122:
Figure 7.3 The same distributions a
- Page 123 and 124:
7.3 The role of the experimental co
- Page 125 and 126:
In absolute terms: (2a) DP (K) > DP
- Page 127 and 128:
7.4 Sensitivity of equity judgments
- Page 129 and 130:
To say more about the sensitivity o
- Page 131 and 132:
Figure 7.5 Equity preferences for t
- Page 133 and 134:
7.5 Policy dimensions of equity jud
- Page 135 and 136:
7.6 Electricity pricing and water p
- Page 137 and 138:
7.7 Experimental and survey results
- Page 139 and 140:
As Table 7.16 shows, a number of th
- Page 141 and 142:
8 Conclusions The main hypothesis u
- Page 143 and 144:
From the results of this study obta
- Page 145 and 146:
Cowell & Cruces, 2003, Perceptions
- Page 147 and 148:
Perrenoud, P. 1999, The Key to Soci
- Page 149 and 150:
Appendix 1 Scheme water survey Brea
- Page 151 and 152:
3 How do you rate the threat of com
- Page 153 and 154:
Water is restricted using prices 4
- Page 155 and 156:
PART C ABOUT YOURSELF Information f
- Page 157 and 158:
9 How much scheme water does your h
- Page 159 and 160:
Appendix 2 Bore water survey Breaki
- Page 161 and 162:
4 How do you rate the threat of com
- Page 163 and 164:
PART B HOUSEHOLD BORE WATER A numbe
- Page 165 and 166:
Market determines prices 12 Assumin
- Page 167 and 168:
6 How would you best describe the d
- Page 169 and 170:
Appendix 3 Bore survey follow up le
- Page 171 and 172:
Appendix 5 Electricity pricing surv