8 THE FOURFOLD OFFICE PETER (Pastoral Care) PAUL (Adaptation) JAMES (Tradition) JOHN (Love)
9 The structur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Marian <strong>Church</strong> emerges later, dur<strong>in</strong>g Jesus‟ m<strong>in</strong>istry when he appo<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>Peter</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Twelve to apostolic authority <strong>in</strong> his name, <strong>and</strong> is completed when <strong>the</strong> Risen Christ calls Paul to apostolic service. With<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> complex, multi-dimensional network <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> church, <strong>Balthasar</strong> identifies a smaller network which bear upon <strong>the</strong> exercise <strong>of</strong> authority, what he calls „<strong>the</strong> Apostolic Foursome‟ represented by <strong>Peter</strong>, John, James <strong>and</strong> Paul, <strong>the</strong> „four who dom<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> force <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Church</strong>‟ (309). Each pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Foursome represents a clearly def<strong>in</strong>ed mission with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, necessarily <strong>in</strong>volved with each o<strong>the</strong>r. Here <strong>the</strong>re is a particular <strong>in</strong>teraction among <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciples which shapes how <strong>the</strong> Petr<strong>in</strong>e/collegial mission is to be conducted. Petr<strong>in</strong>e authority, <strong>of</strong> course, is to be exercised <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> collegial authority <strong>in</strong>vested <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Twelve („a symbolic, solemn found<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Israel‟ (139)): <strong>the</strong>re has to be a „breath<strong>in</strong>g toge<strong>the</strong>r‟ (conspiratio) if Petr<strong>in</strong>e authority is to function with a respect for collegiality <strong>and</strong> if collegial authority is to have a concrete centre <strong>of</strong> unity. Petr<strong>in</strong>e authority is called upon to respect <strong>the</strong> dem<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r pr<strong>in</strong>ciples: <strong>the</strong>se may be thought <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> as „checks‟ on unrestra<strong>in</strong>ed Petr<strong>in</strong>e power, but <strong>the</strong> Petr<strong>in</strong>e m<strong>in</strong>istry sets a framework with<strong>in</strong> which each pr<strong>in</strong>ciple can function most effectively. Each pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, like each human be<strong>in</strong>g, has its own particular way <strong>of</strong> go<strong>in</strong>g wrong, <strong>the</strong> Johann<strong>in</strong>e, Jamesian <strong>and</strong> Paul<strong>in</strong>e, no less than <strong>the</strong> Petr<strong>in</strong>e. (Only <strong>the</strong> Marian gets it right.) Separated from <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs, each pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fourfold <strong>Office</strong> can become distorted: Johann<strong>in</strong>e love can weaken to a „universal humanitarian benevolence‟; Paul<strong>in</strong>e flexibility can become a fashionable assimilation to cultural mores; <strong>the</strong> tradition <strong>of</strong> James can give rise to an „anxiously <strong>in</strong>tegralist, reactionary cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g to obsolete forms‟ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> distortions to which <strong>the</strong> Petr<strong>in</strong>e m<strong>in</strong>istry is subject need „no fur<strong>the</strong>r mention here‟ (328-9). The whole po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> <strong>Balthasar</strong>‟s account is that <strong>the</strong>se equal but differentiated foundational pr<strong>in</strong>ciples must affect one ano<strong>the</strong>r if <strong>the</strong>re is to be genu<strong>in</strong>e Catholicity. (Remember Congar‟s def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> Catholicity as „<strong>the</strong> dynamic universality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciples which yield her unity‟.) A brief outl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> features <strong>of</strong> each pr<strong>in</strong>ciple: <strong>Peter</strong> exercises <strong>the</strong> pastoral <strong>of</strong>fice. The sc<strong>and</strong>al <strong>of</strong> <strong>Peter</strong> is that he is given „s<strong>in</strong>gular participation <strong>in</strong> Jesus‟ authority‟ which obliges him to „participate especially <strong>in</strong> Jesus‟ spirit <strong>of</strong> service <strong>and</strong> his read<strong>in</strong>ess to suffer‟ (142). A s<strong>in</strong>ful man, he is to hold <strong>the</strong> keys <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>and</strong> feed <strong>the</strong> sheep <strong>and</strong> lambs <strong>of</strong> Jesus <strong>the</strong> Good Shepherd. In his weakness he is appo<strong>in</strong>ted as <strong>the</strong> Rock/Shepherd who is to exemplify Christ‟s own position as <strong>the</strong> cornerstone (Eph 2.20) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> true shepherd (Jn 10.11). His denial <strong>of</strong> Christ places him closest to Judas <strong>in</strong> his betrayal, yet he is called to streng<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> faith <strong>of</strong> his brethren <strong>and</strong> be <strong>the</strong> unify<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciple with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong>. The authority given to <strong>Peter</strong> is „social <strong>and</strong> universal, affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> entire flock‟ (62). John, <strong>the</strong> Beloved Disciple, exercises <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> love, <strong>the</strong> dimension <strong>of</strong> reciprocal love between Christ <strong>and</strong> his <strong>Church</strong>, an <strong>of</strong>fice exercised by <strong>the</strong>