27.01.2015 Views

Download PDF - Department of Navy Chief Information Officer - U.S. ...

Download PDF - Department of Navy Chief Information Officer - U.S. ...

Download PDF - Department of Navy Chief Information Officer - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CANES program<br />

manager Capt. D.J.<br />

LeG<strong>of</strong>f briefing the<br />

CANES program in<br />

the SPAWAR exhibit at<br />

the West Confence in<br />

January 2012. West is<br />

co-sponsored by AFCEA<br />

International and the<br />

U.S. Naval Institute.<br />

Photo by Rick Naystatt/<br />

SPAWAR audio visual<br />

production specialist.<br />

know that we have the industrial capacity<br />

to do that.<br />

Q: What yards are you going to use<br />

A. I’m going to use AITs (alteration installation<br />

teams); I’m not using the yards.<br />

We’re contracting installation services <strong>of</strong>f<br />

SPAWAR’s contracts. SPAWAR has a multiple<br />

award contract to do installation <strong>of</strong><br />

C4I gear. And we’ll go to whatever yard<br />

the platform happens to be for its availability.<br />

And that’s a typical strategy that<br />

we use in the C4I world.<br />

When a ship goes into an extended<br />

availability, however many months it happens<br />

to be, at one <strong>of</strong> the public yards,<br />

we contract these alteration installation<br />

teams to install our stuff.<br />

Q: Do you already have your schedule for<br />

deployment<br />

A: We have a schedule for deployment<br />

that identifies hull number and installation<br />

windows that change very frequently<br />

based on the ship’s schedule so<br />

if ships get surged or their deployment<br />

goes later, or they get sent to do something<br />

that was unexpected, that perturbs<br />

the rest <strong>of</strong> the schedule. But we use it<br />

for planning purposes, and we update it<br />

every quarter.<br />

Q: Which ships have priority<br />

A: I have multiple sets <strong>of</strong> priorities given<br />

to me by different leaders.<br />

Q: How do you rationalize your priorities<br />

A: Well, first and foremost, go as fast as<br />

you can. That is the direction I’ve been<br />

given by the <strong>Navy</strong> leadership at the highest<br />

levels. The faster we get the new infrastructure<br />

out there, the faster we have<br />

to stop supporting the legacy and stop<br />

spending all that money, right So first<br />

and foremost, don’t stop; go as fast as<br />

you can. While you do that, try to prioritize<br />

the older networks first.<br />

So I mentioned we have networks that<br />

have been on board ships for almost 15<br />

years. We still have ATM networks on<br />

ships, Asynchronous Transfer Mode on<br />

ships. Almost impossible to support at<br />

this point, can’t get parts for them, training<br />

is difficult, they’re hard to use and<br />

they’re old. So while I’m going as fast as I<br />

can, I’m going to keep an eye out. If I have<br />

more availabilities than I have ships and<br />

I have to choose between platforms, I’m<br />

going to choose the ones that have the<br />

oldest network first.<br />

It’s not a single legacy baseline that<br />

we’re replacing. I’m replacing 20 odd<br />

baselines that have grown over the years.<br />

The latest ones that we’re fielding now,<br />

we actually took a lot <strong>of</strong> the technology<br />

that we thought was going to come into<br />

CANES and we backed it into our legacy<br />

design. So the ones that we’re installing<br />

over the recent past are fairly modern<br />

networks and are in good shape. It’s the<br />

baselines that are 10, 15 years old that I’m<br />

really anxious to get out <strong>of</strong> operation.<br />

Q: You said you are using COTS equipment,<br />

but there is vibration on ships and other<br />

environmental factors. Is there a rugged<br />

spec for CANES<br />

A: We do have a fairly high specification<br />

for the commercial gear; it’s within industry’s<br />

capability and within their commer-<br />

CANES Delivers<br />

Systems Management<br />

✔ Performance, availability<br />

and service level managment;<br />

✔ Fault, problem, incident and<br />

service desk management;<br />

✔ Configuration, change<br />

and release management;<br />

✔ Security, information<br />

assurance and computer<br />

network defense; and<br />

✔ Capacity management.<br />

Data Services<br />

✔ Network support;<br />

✔ <strong>Information</strong> management;<br />

✔ Core infrastructure services;<br />

✔ Network access(IPv4/<br />

IPv6) capabable; and<br />

✔ <strong>Information</strong> delivery.<br />

Voice Services<br />

✔ IP telephony;<br />

✔ Mobile and stationary; and<br />

✔ Secure and unsecure.<br />

Video Services<br />

✔ Video teleconferencing; and<br />

✔ Video graphics distribution.<br />

cial <strong>of</strong>ferings. We don’t ask them to do<br />

anything special for us. However, we do<br />

integrate into racks, where the rack really<br />

takes up the bulk <strong>of</strong> the environmental<br />

protection. So we have to follow what we<br />

call 501D specification, which is grade A<br />

shock requirements for the system.<br />

We [CANES] are a mission critical system<br />

because we have mission critical applications<br />

that rely on us. So that means that<br />

the system has to be able to take a hit<br />

and continue operating through damage.<br />

That includes shock and vibration, high<br />

temperature, high humidity; all <strong>of</strong> those<br />

things are environmentally tested before<br />

we field.<br />

So that was part <strong>of</strong> our design criteria<br />

we gave to the vendors. They had to<br />

prove to us that their system would survive<br />

those environmental conditions and<br />

show us the test results.<br />

Interesting question, again, why are<br />

we different from shore We reject more<br />

products because <strong>of</strong> environmental<br />

shortfalls than we do because <strong>of</strong> performance.<br />

The environment drives different<br />

material conditions.<br />

Q: You mentioned mission critical. Is CANES<br />

going to run the ventilation system in the<br />

ship or other life support systems Could it<br />

combine with other shipboard systems Or<br />

is it just specifically for warfighting systems<br />

A: Currently in the installation <strong>of</strong> this<br />

design we’re not doing the mechanical<br />

[hull, mechanical and electrical (HM&E)]<br />

engineering type <strong>of</strong> functionalities.<br />

Q: Did you think you might take on those<br />

other things I mean, if CANES proves to be<br />

a good business case and design<br />

A: Right, so there is a lot <strong>of</strong> dialogue<br />

around that. I can’t predict right now<br />

where that dialogue is going to go<br />

because the functional owners <strong>of</strong> that<br />

capability are in NAVSEA (Naval Sea Systems<br />

Command) and not SPAWAR. There<br />

are some that advocate consolidating<br />

into a common design.<br />

There are some that advocate going<br />

further than that and consolidating to a<br />

common single network. I’m personally<br />

<strong>of</strong> the belief that we may in the near term<br />

get to a common design so that an HM&E<br />

network looks just like a C4 network, but<br />

I don’t think that we’re ready yet to converge<br />

the two into a single one.<br />

Q: On the LPDs (amphibious transport dock<br />

ship) and the flatbacks, does the CANES<br />

upgrade include the Marines’ spaces<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Marines on amphibs always feel they’re<br />

getting the short end <strong>of</strong> the network stick.<br />

A: It’s an ongoing discussion. I try to stay<br />

out <strong>of</strong> the middle because that’s an operational<br />

requirement issue. I do what the<br />

requirements folks tell me the need is.<br />

Fleet Forces works it out with the ACMC<br />

(Assistant Commandant <strong>of</strong> the Marine<br />

Corps) in terms <strong>of</strong> what the allocations are<br />

between blue and green.<br />

So the message that came out was not<br />

written by CANES, it was written by the<br />

fleet and it mentioned the Marines, here’s<br />

how things are. Now, that’s just from a<br />

critical perspective. The Marines also<br />

come on board with their own s<strong>of</strong>tware,<br />

so we provide hotel services for that infrastructure<br />

in both our legacy network and<br />

our new network.<br />

Q: Is there any exercise that you will be<br />

participating in once you have a sufficient<br />

number <strong>of</strong> ships that have CANES loaded to<br />

test it out in the fleet<br />

A: Not scheduled around the deployment<br />

<strong>of</strong> CANES. So there will be ships with<br />

CANES in fleet exercises because that’s<br />

how they’re going to deploy. However,<br />

my first test is going to be in-lab tests<br />

with COMOPTEVFOR (Commander, Operational<br />

Test and Evaluation Force). So the<br />

operational test community is going to<br />

do an operational assessment (OA) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

network in the lab. We’re getting our lab<br />

certified by a representative.<br />

We’re going to load the system and<br />

OPTEVFOR is going to do an evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

how well it performs. And that’s a gated<br />

function going into my Milestone C.<br />

Once we pass the OA, then we do our first<br />

installations. Once we complete our initial<br />

installations aboard a fleet destroyer,<br />

we’ll go into a formal at-sea operational<br />

evaluation.<br />

Go to the Space and Naval Warfare Systems<br />

Command website for more information at<br />

www.spawar.navy.mil.<br />

ATLANTIC OCEAN (March 21, 2012) The aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (CVN 65), the guided-missile cruiser USS Vicksburg (CG 69),<br />

and the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Porter (DDG 78) participate in an replenishment at sea with the Military<br />

Sealift Command fast combat support ship USNS Supply (T-AOE 6). Enterprise, Vicksburg, Porter, and Supply are deployed as part <strong>of</strong><br />

the Enterprise Carrier Strike Group supporting maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the U.S. 6th<br />

Fleet area <strong>of</strong> responsibility. U.S. <strong>Navy</strong> photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Daniel J. Meshel.<br />

14 CHIPS www.doncio.navy.mil/chips Dedicated to Sharing <strong>Information</strong> - Technology - Experience CHIPS April – June 2012 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!