28.01.2015 Views

Frontier Tanzania Environmental Research - Frontier-publications ...

Frontier Tanzania Environmental Research - Frontier-publications ...

Frontier Tanzania Environmental Research - Frontier-publications ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ba Na Nature Reserve 1996<br />

6.0 INVERTEBRATE SURVEYS<br />

6.1 Aims and Methods<br />

The aim of the invertebrate survey was to compare the invertebrate communities of the forest<br />

transects outlined above, and thus to assess relative diversity of invertebrate groups in the habitats<br />

represented in the Ba Na reserve.<br />

Two methods were used in order to quantitatively sample invertebrates in the forest transects:<br />

sweep-netting and pitfall trapping. Both are commonly used methods of insect collection, and the<br />

principles and drawbacks associated with each are discussed by Southwood (1978), Biological<br />

Survey of Canada (1994), and other authors.<br />

6.1.1 Sweep-netting<br />

In each transect, 100 sweeps were made with a sweep-net and the invertebrates captured were<br />

removed using a pooter. Once caught, the animals were preserved in ethanol and sorted into<br />

Recognisible Taxonomic Units (RTUs), or morphospecies (morphologically distinct types). The<br />

efficiency of sorting to RTU varies between different animal groups, depending on the degree of<br />

inter- and intraspecific variation found. However, Oliver and Beattie (1993) have found that the<br />

number of RTUs correlate closely to the number of actual species for most orders, even when<br />

unskilled labour is involved. The use of RTUs allows diversity indices to be calculated, and,<br />

therefore, the faunas of different sites can be compared. Unfortunately, however, the possibility<br />

of comparison to other surveys is limited, as the taxonomic and ecological data conveyed by the<br />

RTU is limited (Biological Survey of Canada, 1994).<br />

Sweep netting is a difficult technique to standardise, and the catch depends on the nature of the<br />

habitat being sampled and the individual carrying out the sampling, as well as many other factors<br />

(Biological Survey of Canada, 1994).<br />

6.1.2 Pitfall trapping<br />

Pitfall traps were laid out for two nights at each of the forest transects. On each occasion, four<br />

traps were placed in an array which covered approximately 3.14m 2 . Salt water was used in the<br />

traps as this does not cause bias in the final catch, as do other preservatives such as ethanol.<br />

Invertebrates were removed from the salt solution and placed in ethanol for preservation, and<br />

sorted to orders, and RTUs, as for sweep net catches.<br />

Two indices were calculated to describe the insect assemblages caught; Fisher's α, a measure of<br />

diversity which takes account of the number of species (here, RTUs) and individuals in a sample<br />

(Fisher et al, 1943), and the dominance measure d (Berger and Parker, 1970), the proportion of<br />

the total number of individuals in the sample which belong to the most abundant species.<br />

Methods follow Magurran (1988).<br />

<strong>Frontier</strong>- Vietnam Environment <strong>Research</strong> Report 7 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!