28.01.2015 Views

Conrie Field Development Environmental Statement - Metoc

Conrie Field Development Environmental Statement - Metoc

Conrie Field Development Environmental Statement - Metoc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ENQUEST DONS LTD<br />

CONRIE FIELD DEVELOPMENT<br />

The outcomes from each of the above factors were then tallied to decide an<br />

overall grading value of the severity of a particular impact. Where quantification<br />

of potential impacts is possible, the decision has been based on numerical<br />

values, representing regulatory limits, project standards or guidelines (e.g.,<br />

noise and air quality impacts).<br />

A number of environmental aspects such as ecology, landscape, visual and<br />

generally all human impacts require a more qualitative approach for<br />

determining severity. Semi-quantitative and/or qualitative methods have<br />

therefore been used whereby the criteria have been set according to severity<br />

factors as defined in Table 4-6 above. The severity factors have been scored<br />

with a numeric value from 1 to 4. The sum of values for each of the factors was<br />

used to determine the overall severity as summarised in the scale outlined<br />

below:<br />

Negligible (sum of values 4 - 6)<br />

Low (sum of values 7 - 9)<br />

Medium (sum of values 10 - 12)<br />

High (sum of values 13 - 16)<br />

4.1.4.6 Assessing Impact Significance<br />

For the potential impacts associated with the <strong>Conrie</strong> <strong>Field</strong>, the significance of<br />

each impact is determined by assessing the impact severity against the<br />

likelihood of the impact occurring as summarised in the impact significance<br />

assessment matrix provided in Table 4-7. It is important to emphasise that the<br />

resulting significance from these two elements is not the likelihood of the<br />

activity occurring, but rather it is the likelihood of that activity causing the impact<br />

described.<br />

Table 4-7: <strong>Environmental</strong> and human impact significance assessment<br />

matrix<br />

Likelihood<br />

Severity<br />

Unlikely Possible Probable Certain<br />

Negligible (4-6) Insignificant Minor Minor Minor<br />

Low (7-9) Minor Minor Moderate Moderate<br />

Medium (10-12) Minor Moderate Moderate Major<br />

High (13-16) Moderate Moderate Major Critical<br />

Based on the outcome of the significance assessment the following points need<br />

to be considered:<br />

Critical Significance<br />

It is not possible to manage or mitigate critical impacts. These require the<br />

identification of alternatives (elimination of source of potential impact).<br />

Such impacts are intolerable and could potentially result in abandonment<br />

of a project.<br />

REPORT REFERENCE: P1534_RN2574_REV1_S1-4 4-15 19/04/2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!