Conrie Field Development Environmental Statement - Metoc
Conrie Field Development Environmental Statement - Metoc
Conrie Field Development Environmental Statement - Metoc
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ENQUEST DONS LTD<br />
CONRIE FIELD DEVELOPMENT<br />
The outcomes from each of the above factors were then tallied to decide an<br />
overall grading value of the severity of a particular impact. Where quantification<br />
of potential impacts is possible, the decision has been based on numerical<br />
values, representing regulatory limits, project standards or guidelines (e.g.,<br />
noise and air quality impacts).<br />
A number of environmental aspects such as ecology, landscape, visual and<br />
generally all human impacts require a more qualitative approach for<br />
determining severity. Semi-quantitative and/or qualitative methods have<br />
therefore been used whereby the criteria have been set according to severity<br />
factors as defined in Table 4-6 above. The severity factors have been scored<br />
with a numeric value from 1 to 4. The sum of values for each of the factors was<br />
used to determine the overall severity as summarised in the scale outlined<br />
below:<br />
Negligible (sum of values 4 - 6)<br />
Low (sum of values 7 - 9)<br />
Medium (sum of values 10 - 12)<br />
High (sum of values 13 - 16)<br />
4.1.4.6 Assessing Impact Significance<br />
For the potential impacts associated with the <strong>Conrie</strong> <strong>Field</strong>, the significance of<br />
each impact is determined by assessing the impact severity against the<br />
likelihood of the impact occurring as summarised in the impact significance<br />
assessment matrix provided in Table 4-7. It is important to emphasise that the<br />
resulting significance from these two elements is not the likelihood of the<br />
activity occurring, but rather it is the likelihood of that activity causing the impact<br />
described.<br />
Table 4-7: <strong>Environmental</strong> and human impact significance assessment<br />
matrix<br />
Likelihood<br />
Severity<br />
Unlikely Possible Probable Certain<br />
Negligible (4-6) Insignificant Minor Minor Minor<br />
Low (7-9) Minor Minor Moderate Moderate<br />
Medium (10-12) Minor Moderate Moderate Major<br />
High (13-16) Moderate Moderate Major Critical<br />
Based on the outcome of the significance assessment the following points need<br />
to be considered:<br />
Critical Significance<br />
It is not possible to manage or mitigate critical impacts. These require the<br />
identification of alternatives (elimination of source of potential impact).<br />
Such impacts are intolerable and could potentially result in abandonment<br />
of a project.<br />
REPORT REFERENCE: P1534_RN2574_REV1_S1-4 4-15 19/04/2011