Thesis Proposal Grading Form - Department of Kinesiology - Boise ...
Thesis Proposal Grading Form - Department of Kinesiology - Boise ...
Thesis Proposal Grading Form - Department of Kinesiology - Boise ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY – DEPARTMENT OF KINESIOLOGY<br />
Master <strong>of</strong> Science in Exercise and Sport Studies Programs<br />
Master <strong>of</strong> Science in Physical Education Pedagogy<br />
<strong>Thesis</strong> <strong>Proposal</strong> <strong>Grading</strong> <strong>Form</strong><br />
Committee member:<br />
Student:<br />
Date:<br />
Presentation Skills: 2 points for each YES Total points: /18<br />
Yes No<br />
Poise<br />
Appropriate use <strong>of</strong> verbal language<br />
Appropriate use <strong>of</strong> non-verbal language<br />
Audience is able to read slides, tables, and graphs<br />
Appropriate media used<br />
Appropriate use <strong>of</strong> references<br />
Appropriate terminology used<br />
Transitions are smooth and appropriate<br />
Defense completed in allotted time.<br />
Content: 3 points for each YES Total points: /30<br />
Note: If the research paradigm or design does not fit this rubric, the committee is charged with adapting the<br />
checklist to meet the study design.<br />
Yes No<br />
Overview <strong>of</strong> the problem<br />
The purpose is clearly stated<br />
The study is well justified<br />
Hypothesis/es or Research question(s) is/are stated clearly and correctly<br />
The operational definitions are clear and appropriate<br />
Adequate explanation <strong>of</strong> how prior research supports need for this study<br />
Well explained research design (descriptive, prospective, developmental, etc)<br />
Appropriate description <strong>of</strong> subjects, including inclusion/exclusion criteria<br />
Data collection process and instruments to be used, well explained<br />
Procedures for the study are well explained<br />
Comments:
Critical Thinking: points as indicated ( ) for each YES Total points: /24<br />
Yes No<br />
Demonstrates knowledge <strong>of</strong> research topic (4)<br />
Significance <strong>of</strong> study (importance <strong>of</strong> problem) adequately addressed (4)<br />
Adequate critical analysis <strong>of</strong> prior studies (4)<br />
Addresses limitations and delimitations <strong>of</strong> study design (4)<br />
Answers questions from the audience with good explanations (4)<br />
Exhibits understanding <strong>of</strong> instrumentation used for the study (4)<br />
Written Document: points as indicated ( ) for each YES Total points: /20<br />
Yes No<br />
Quality <strong>of</strong> expression is appropriate for academic writing (e.g., structure and<br />
organization <strong>of</strong> document; clarity <strong>of</strong> expression; coherent, readable argument<br />
and progression <strong>of</strong> ideas) (5)<br />
Writing mechanics are sound with very few errors (e.g., sentence structure,<br />
grammar, punctuation, transitions) (5)<br />
Appropriate academic style for discipline (e.g., formatting <strong>of</strong> references,<br />
tables, etc.) (5)<br />
Appropriate and accurate referencing: citations in the text match those in the<br />
references list; every important point adequately referenced; does not overrely<br />
on a few references; references are reasonably up-to-date; references are<br />
in the appropriate format for the discipline (5)<br />
TOTAL POINTS: /92<br />
Letter grade: A = 83 - 92 pts B = 74 – 82 pts F = < 74 (please circle)<br />
Please note that the letter grade is here to assist you to determine if the student passed or failed.<br />
I DO - DO NOT (please circle) recommend that this thesis proposal be accepted.<br />
(student needs at least 74 points to pass)<br />
Faculty name:<br />
Faculty Signature:<br />
Comments: