28.01.2015 Views

Breeding sorghum for renewables – Dr. Bill Rooney, Texas A&M ...

Breeding sorghum for renewables – Dr. Bill Rooney, Texas A&M ...

Breeding sorghum for renewables – Dr. Bill Rooney, Texas A&M ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Considerations<br />

• Sorghum will be a key<br />

component in biomass<br />

production systems<br />

• The delineation between<br />

sweet and biomass is<br />

getting gray….<br />

• Yield and its defense<br />

must be primary<br />

objectives


Presentation Outline<br />

• Types of Sorghum/Considerations<br />

– Grain Sorghum<br />

– Sweet Sorghum<br />

– Biomass Sorghum<br />

• Composition<br />

• Interspersed with opinions on<br />

logistics, economics and items of a<br />

practical nature


Bioenergy Sorghum<br />

Biomass Sorghum<br />

Sweet<br />

Sorghum<br />

Grain Sorghum


Grain Sorghum<br />

• Utilizes the same conversion processes<br />

as <strong>for</strong> corn (starch to ethanol)<br />

• Breed <strong>for</strong> Grain Yield<br />

• Conversion efficiencies could be<br />

improved through selection of unique<br />

endosperm types<br />

– Waxy<br />

– High Protein Digestability


Sweet Sorghum<br />

• Lower Grain Yield<br />

• Juicy Stalk<br />

• Highest concentrations of soluble<br />

sugar<br />

• Highly variable <strong>for</strong><br />

– Maturities (photoperiod sensitivity)<br />

– Types of Sugar<br />

– Biomass and Sugar Yield


Sugar Yield is a function of both<br />

concentration and volume<br />

juice (lbs/acre)<br />

Sugar Content (g/100ml)<br />

40000.0<br />

35000.0<br />

30000.0 r 2 =.01<br />

25000.0<br />

20000.0<br />

15000.0<br />

10000.0<br />

5000.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 300.0<br />

ethanol (gallons/acre)<br />

18.0<br />

16.0<br />

14.0<br />

12.0<br />

10.0<br />

8.0<br />

6.0<br />

4.0<br />

r 2 =.66<br />

Sugar Yield (lbs/acre)<br />

3500.0<br />

3000.0<br />

2500.0<br />

2000.0<br />

1500.0<br />

r 2 =.96<br />

1000.0<br />

500.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 300.0<br />

Ethanol Yield (gallon/acre)<br />

2.0<br />

0.0<br />

0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 300.0<br />

Ethanol (gallons/acre)


Juice Composition<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

Fructose<br />

Glucose<br />

Sucrose<br />

Sugar (g/L)<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0


Sweet Sorghum<br />

• Cultivars<br />

– Traditional sweet <strong>sorghum</strong>s<br />

• Commercial scale production requires<br />

development of sweet <strong>sorghum</strong> hybrids<br />

– Increased seed yield, easier harvest<br />

– Capture heterosis <strong>for</strong> biomass, sugar and<br />

grain yield


Sweet Sorghum<br />

Hybrids<br />

• Higher Seed<br />

Yield<br />

• Mechanical<br />

Harvest<br />

• Height and<br />

Maturity<br />

Manipulation<br />

• High sugar yields<br />

• High brix


Sweet Sorghum Testing<br />

High Parent Heterosis (Corn, 2009)<br />

Trait mean range<br />

----------------- % -----------------<br />

Fresh Weight 27.4 -17 to 136<br />

Juice Weight 27.1 -20 to 129<br />

Brix -4.6 -15 to 13<br />

Sugar Yield 24.2 -22 to 127<br />

Plant Height 7.5 1 to 23<br />

High Parent (HP) Heterosis (%) = (F1 hybrid – HP)/HP * 100


Sweet Sorghum <strong>Breeding</strong><br />

• Seed Parents<br />

– Short Stature<br />

– Acceptable seed<br />

yield<br />

– High brix and juicy<br />

stalk<br />

• Pollinator Parent<br />

– Complementary<br />

Height and maturity<br />

– Juicy stalk and<br />

hHigh brix<br />

• Either or both<br />

– Disease<br />

Resistance<br />

– <strong>Dr</strong>ought<br />

Tolerance<br />

– Lodging<br />

resistance<br />

– Heterosis


Sweet Sorghum Maturity is Critical<br />

• Sugars are not shelf stable ….<br />

• Requires long harvest windows<br />

• Long harvest windows require<br />

– differential maturities in sweet <strong>sorghum</strong><br />

– planting and harvest plan to depoy them around<br />

a mill.<br />

• Photoperiod sensitivity influences<br />

– Days to maturity<br />

• Maturity influences<br />

– Yield and ratoon potential


Photoperiod Sensitivity/Insensitivity<br />

• In PI, reproductive growth is initiated without the<br />

influence of daylength<br />

• In PS, reproductive growth is initiated based on<br />

defined changes in daylength


Sweet Sorghum Cultivars/Hybrids<br />

• Many sweet <strong>sorghum</strong>s have some PS<br />

– Photoperiod Insensitive (PI)<br />

• 85-105 days regardless of planting date<br />

– Mod. Photoperiod Sensitive (MPS)<br />

• 85 (short days) - 140 (long days)<br />

– Photoperiod Sensitive (VPS)<br />

• 85 (short days) - 160 (long days)<br />

• Later maturity equals greater yields<br />

• In regions producing two crops a year,<br />

yield potential will depend on season.


Gulf Coast Sugar Production System<br />

Jan<br />

Feb<br />

Mar<br />

Apr<br />

May<br />

Jun<br />

Jul<br />

Aug<br />

Sep<br />

Oct<br />

Nov<br />

Dec<br />

Sweet Sorghum p p p h h h<br />

Sugarcane h h p p h h<br />

• Combined harvest results in a seven month<br />

harvest window.<br />

• Different maturity <strong>sorghum</strong>s are critical


2010 Per<strong>for</strong>mance - Maturity<br />

Maturity<br />

Group<br />

Sugar yield<br />

(MT/ha)<br />

Fresh yield<br />

(MT/ha)<br />

<strong>Dr</strong>y yield<br />

(MT/ha)<br />

Brix<br />

%<br />

VPS 4.2a 59.7a 21.6a 13.4ab<br />

MPS 3.8a 52.3b 17.3b 13.3b<br />

PI 2.8b 36.1c 10.9c 14.1a


2010 Per<strong>for</strong>mance - Planting Date<br />

Month<br />

planted<br />

Sugar yield<br />

(MT/ha)<br />

Fresh yield<br />

(MT/ha)<br />

<strong>Dr</strong>y yield<br />

(MT/ha)<br />

Brix<br />

%<br />

April 3.8a 49.8a 16.8a 14.7a<br />

May 3.5ab 48.6a 16.4a 13.7b<br />

June 3.0b 43.5b 13.3b 12.4c


Optimum Yields by Harvest Date<br />

July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov.<br />

Days …… (15-31) (1-16) (15-31) (1-16) (15-31) (1-16) (15-31) (1-16) ……<br />

Sugar<br />

(MT/ha -1 )<br />

Fresh Yield<br />

(MT/ha -1 )<br />

Maturity<br />

Group<br />

Planting<br />

Date<br />

2.9 2.9 4.3 4.7 3.9 4.2 3.8 2.8<br />

34.3 35.4 56.9 69 59.1 61.2 55.7 39.8<br />

PI PI MPS VPS MPS VPS MPS VPS<br />

April May April April May May June June


Projected Planting Plan<br />

Month<br />

Maturity<br />

Group<br />

Fresh Weight<br />

MT/ha -1<br />

Hectares Harvest Date<br />

April<br />

May<br />

PI 34.3 470 July 15-31<br />

MPS 56.9 280 Aug. 15-31<br />

VPS 69 231 Sep. 1-15<br />

PI 35.4 451 Aug. 1-16<br />

MPS 59.1 271 Sep. 15-31<br />

VPS 61.2 262 Oct. 1-16<br />

June MPS 55.7 287 Oct. 15-31<br />

• Assumes that biomass is supplied at a rate of<br />

1,000 tons/day<br />

• Scenario considers soluble sugar only and does<br />

not include starch from the panicle.


Sweet Sorghum Final Thoughts<br />

• Economic feasibility<br />

• Capturing starch <br />

• Mill season duration <br />

• Ratoon Cropping <br />

• <strong>Breeding</strong> must improve<br />

– Yield<br />

– Composition<br />

– Lodging (stalk and root)<br />

– <strong>Dr</strong>ought tolerance<br />

– Pest Resistance (anthracnose, ergot,<br />

borers, etc….)


Biomass<br />

Sorghums<br />

• Strongly PS<br />

– Long Canopy<br />

Duration<br />

– Enhanced <strong>Dr</strong>ought<br />

Tolerance<br />

– Higher Yields<br />

• Structural<br />

Carbohydrates<br />

– Minimal Starch<br />

– Lower Sugar


PS Hybrid Seed Production


Development of<br />

Biomass<br />

Sorghum<br />

• Evaluation of<br />

Germplasm<br />

– High Yield<br />

– No Lodging<br />

– Composition<br />

• Selection/<strong>Breeding</strong><br />

– Conversion (to make<br />

seed production<br />

feasible)<br />

– Adaptation<br />

– Hybrid Development<br />

– Composition


Biomass Sorghum <strong>Breeding</strong><br />

• Seed Parents<br />

– Short Stature<br />

– Acceptable seed<br />

yield<br />

• Pollinator Parent<br />

– Complementary<br />

Height<br />

– Complementary<br />

Maturity<br />

– Combining Ability<br />

• Either (or both)<br />

– Disease<br />

Resistance<br />

– <strong>Dr</strong>ought<br />

Tolerance<br />

– Lodging<br />

resistance<br />

– Composition<br />

– Heterosis


Heterosis in Energy Sorghum<br />

Environment<br />

College Station<br />

2007<br />

College Station<br />

2008-1<br />

College Station<br />

2008-2<br />

Pollinator<br />

<strong>Dr</strong>y Yield<br />

(Mg ha)<br />

Hybrid<br />

<strong>Dr</strong>y Yield<br />

(Mg ha) Average High Low<br />

36.3 a 41.4 a 29.4 208.6 -49.8<br />

21.3 a 26.4 b 38.6 154.0 -15.8<br />

14.8 a 23.3 b 49.8 111.1 12.5<br />

Halfway 19.9 a 24.2 a 52.9 95.7 -27.4<br />

Combined 27.6 a 31.6 a 40.9 208.6 -49.8<br />

77.5% of the hybrids had positive HP heterosis


Biomass Sorghum Final Thoughts<br />

• Select Forage PS Sorghums<br />

• Biomass PS Sorghums are now<br />

available<br />

– Optimized <strong>for</strong> energy production<br />

– Higher yield and different composition<br />

• Harvest and Storage Logistics<br />

– High moisture at Harvest<br />

• Pest and Stress Tolerances are<br />

somewhat similar to sweet <strong>sorghum</strong><br />

• CONVERSION


Composition - Summary<br />

• Highly variable due to<br />

– Genotype (2)<br />

– Environment (1)<br />

– Maturity ()<br />

• Like corn stover, correlations between<br />

<strong>for</strong>age and fiber composition are not<br />

good.<br />

• As expected, <strong>sorghum</strong> types and tissue<br />

types vary in composition


Composition Range (NIR estimates)<br />

Dietary Dietary Dietary<br />

Lignin Cellulose Hemicellulose<br />

Total 9.5 - 20.6 14.7 - 43.4 13.8 – 25<br />

<strong>Breeding</strong> 13.7 - 20.6 26.1 - 37.1 18.7 - 24.6<br />

Forage PI 9.5 - 17.4 18.8 - 43.4 15.8 – 25<br />

Forage PS 13.9 - 15.9 31 - 32.7 19.9 - 20.9<br />

Grain 14.4 - 17.8 31.9 - 33.2 18.2 - 18.7<br />

Sweet Sorghum 10.8 - 11.6 24.4 - 32.8 15.6 - 21.3<br />

• Significant variation <strong>for</strong> composition<br />

– 2X range lignin composition<br />

– 2.5X range in cellulose<br />

– 1.5X range in hemicellulose<br />

• Most Variation in breeding germplasm


Summary<br />

• Sweet and biomass <strong>sorghum</strong><br />

phenotypes are merging<br />

• Moisture is an issue, so use it to<br />

your advantage<br />

• Grain maybe important<br />

• Yield is directly correlated with<br />

maturity which inversely influences<br />

other attributes<br />

• Sorghum is one crop in a system


• Collaborators/Cooperators<br />

– John Mullet<br />

– Jurg Blumenthal<br />

– Brent Bean<br />

– Gary Odvody<br />

– Gary Peterson<br />

– Patricia Klein<br />

– Dirk Hays<br />

– Stephen Kresovich<br />

– Donghai Wang<br />

– Scott Staggenborg<br />

– Roy Parker<br />

– Ed Wolfrum<br />

– Jeff Dahlberg<br />

– Ken Moore<br />

– Bissondat Macoon<br />

– Ron Heiniger<br />

– Michael Barrett<br />

• Thanks to those who work<br />

– Delroy Collins<br />

– Vickie Marriott<br />

– Dustin Borden<br />

– Rebecca Corn<br />

– Dan Packer<br />

– Stephen Labar<br />

– Terry Felderhoff<br />

– Payne Burks<br />

– Leo Hoffman<br />

– Thomas Stefaniak<br />

– Nilesh Dighe<br />

• Funding<br />

– DOE<br />

– Agrilife Research<br />

– Ceres<br />

– Chevron<br />

– USCP<br />

– SunGrant

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!