29.01.2015 Views

Request for a Status Conference - Judicial Watch

Request for a Status Conference - Judicial Watch

Request for a Status Conference - Judicial Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT<br />

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA<br />

CARA ALEXANDER, et al., )<br />

)<br />

Plaintiffs, )<br />

)<br />

v. ) Civil Action Nos.<br />

) 96-2123/97-1288 (RCL)<br />

FEDERAL BUREAU OF )<br />

INVESTIGATION, et al., )<br />

)<br />

Defendants. )<br />

____________________________________)<br />

PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR A STATUS CONFERENCE<br />

Plaintiffs hereby respectfully request that a status conference be held in the above-captioned<br />

matter at the earliest practicable date. Plaintiffs wish to discuss generally with the Court the Notice<br />

filed by counsel <strong>for</strong> Defendant Executive Office of the President (“EOP”) on August 15, 2001. In<br />

particular, Plaintiffs wish to discuss with the Court the qualifications of the Alexandria, Virginiabased<br />

company Corbett Technologies (“Corbett”) to extract e-mail and other data from the back up<br />

tapes that Defendant EOP has been unable to restore, and the steps that will be taken by Corbett to<br />

ensure the security of the backup tapes while they are in Corbett’s possession. Plaintiffs note that<br />

Corbett has not played any role in these proceedings to date, and that Defendant EOP’s Notice,<br />

which is not accompanied by affidavit, contains virtually no description of Corbett’s qualifications<br />

to play such an important role in the Tape Restoration Project.<br />

Plaintiffs respectfully submit that time is of the essence in this matter, as according to<br />

Defendant EOP’s Notice, the transfer of original backup tapes to Corbett from the National Archives<br />

“will begin on August 27, 2001 or shortly thereafter.” See Notice at 4.<br />

In addition, Plaintiffs would like to discuss the Court’s timetable <strong>for</strong> completing the e-mail


proceedings, which began in February 2000, are almost 21 months old (nearly 2 years), and which<br />

have held up adjudication of this case, since crucial evidence has been suppressed and/or destroyed<br />

and thus was not produced. In addition, key witnesses have been threatened and justice has been<br />

obstructed.<br />

Finally, Plaintiffs ask <strong>for</strong> a status conference to discuss taking the deposition of Defendant<br />

Hillary Rodham Clinton, which has been deferred <strong>for</strong> five years. This case was filed on September<br />

12, 1996.<br />

Plaintiffs understand the Court’s busy schedule and has great respect <strong>for</strong> its diligence, hard<br />

work, and commitment to justice, and there<strong>for</strong>e requests only a hearing of one half hour in duration.<br />

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court hold a status conference in this<br />

matter at the earliest practicable date.<br />

Respectfully submitted,<br />

___________________<br />

Larry Klayman, Esq.<br />

DC Bar No. 334581<br />

JUDICIAL WATCH, INC<br />

501 School Street, S.W. Suite 725<br />

Washington, D.C. 20024<br />

(202) 646-5172<br />

Attorney <strong>for</strong> the Plaintiffs<br />

2


LOCAL RULE 7.1(m) CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL<br />

On August 28, 2001, I contacted James J. Gilligan, Esq., counsel <strong>for</strong> Defendants U.S.<br />

Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation, by telephone, to confer and to inquire<br />

whether his clients would consent to the relief requested herein. Mr. Gilligan stated that his clients<br />

would not take a position on Plaintiffs’ motion.<br />

On August 28, 2001, I also contacted Paul Gaffney, Esq., counsel <strong>for</strong> Defendant Hillary<br />

Rodham Clinton, by telephone, to inquire whether his client would consent to the relief requested<br />

herein. Mr. Gaffney stated that he opposes Plaintiffs’ request.<br />

__________________________<br />

Jason Aldrich, Esq.<br />

3


IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT<br />

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA<br />

CARA ALEXANDER, et al., )<br />

)<br />

Plaintiffs, )<br />

)<br />

v. ) Civil Action Nos.<br />

) 96-2123/97-1288 (RCL)<br />

FEDERAL BUREAU OF )<br />

INVESTIGATION, et al., )<br />

)<br />

Defendants. )<br />

____________________________________)<br />

[PROPOSED] ORDER<br />

Upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ <strong>Request</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Status</strong> <strong>Conference</strong>, and the entire record<br />

herein, it is hereby ORDERED that:<br />

A status conference will be held on _________________, 2001 at ________.<br />

DONE AND ORDERED this _____ day of ____________, 2001.<br />

_________________________<br />

Royce C. Lamberth<br />

United States District Judge<br />

4


Copies to:<br />

Larry Klayman, Esq.<br />

JUDICIAL WATCH, INC..<br />

501 School Street, S.W.<br />

Suite 725<br />

Washington, D.C. 20024<br />

Attorneys <strong>for</strong> Defendants Federal Bureau of Investigation and Executive Office of the President:<br />

James J. Gilligan, Esq.<br />

Elizabeth Shapiro, Esq.<br />

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE<br />

P.O. Box 883<br />

Washington D.C. 20044<br />

Attorneys <strong>for</strong> Defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton:<br />

David E. Kendall, Esq.<br />

Paul Gaffney, Esq.<br />

WILLIAMS AND CONNOLLY<br />

725 12 TH Street, N.W.<br />

Washington, D.C. 20005<br />

5


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE<br />

I hereby certify that on September 12, 2001, a true and correct copy of the <strong>for</strong>egoing<br />

PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR A STATUS CONFERENCE was served by first class U.S. mail on<br />

the following:<br />

Attorneys <strong>for</strong> Defendants Federal Bureau of Investigation and Executive Office of the President:<br />

James J. Gilligan, Esq.<br />

Elizabeth Shapiro, Esq.<br />

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE<br />

P.O. Box 883<br />

Washington D.C. 20044<br />

Attorneys <strong>for</strong> Defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton:<br />

David E. Kendall, Esq.<br />

Paul Gaffney, Esq.<br />

WILLIAMS AND CONNOLLY<br />

725 12 TH Street, N.W.<br />

Washington, D.C. 20005<br />

________________<br />

Jason Aldrich<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!