29.01.2015 Views

April 18-19, 2012 - Nevada State Board of Pharmacy

April 18-19, 2012 - Nevada State Board of Pharmacy

April 18-19, 2012 - Nevada State Board of Pharmacy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

efore allowing CII prescriptions to be electronically transmitted. He indicated that there<br />

really weren’t fields that would state specific requirements such as the controlled<br />

substance registration number, date <strong>of</strong> the last physical examination by the patient and<br />

a diagnosis code. Mr. Whitamore did indicate that they do have the capability <strong>of</strong> turning<br />

<strong>of</strong>f the prescriber’s privileges if they are suspected <strong>of</strong> transmitting unlawful prescriptions.<br />

Mr. Palmer indicated that there would have to be enhancements to the current<br />

SureScripts s<strong>of</strong>tware to allow for the requirements in the proposed language.<br />

Liz Macmenamin asked if the <strong>Nevada</strong> <strong>Board</strong> was trying to set a new standard and she<br />

was told that they were to ensure patient safety.<br />

It was noted that the DEA had still not announced a final ruling on the certification<br />

entities.<br />

Dan Luce advised the <strong>Board</strong> that other states had tried to require diagnosis codes,<br />

however the attempt had failed throughout the country.<br />

Dennis McAllister, representing Medco Health Solutions and a member <strong>of</strong> the Arizona<br />

<strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pharmacy</strong>, highly recommended that the <strong>Board</strong> not delay the regulatory<br />

process and approve electronic prescribing <strong>of</strong> CII’s.<br />

President Foster asked SureScripts for information on timelines for them to make the<br />

necessary s<strong>of</strong>tware changes to include the proposed requirements in this amendment.<br />

The <strong>Board</strong>’s staff was directed to bring the language back after they obtained more<br />

information.<br />

C. Amendment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nevada</strong> Administrative Code 453.510 Schedule I.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> abuse <strong>of</strong> un-regulated products containing synthetic<br />

cannabinoids being sold in head shops, law enforcement has requested<br />

that the <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pharmacy</strong> to schedule AM-2201, JWH-081, JWH-122,<br />

JWH-250, JWH-210 and AM-694 to Schedule 1.<br />

Mr. Pinson noted that this language was adopted as a emergency regulation<br />

amendment at a special meeting held on February 28 th . He drove it down to Governor<br />

Sandoval’s <strong>of</strong>fice for signature and it was time stamped by the Secretary <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong>’s<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice on February 29 th . The <strong>Board</strong> has 120 days to complete the process, beginning<br />

with this Workshop and a final Public Hearing for it to become permanent, but it is<br />

effective now.<br />

Carrie Heward and Bill Anderson appeared to support adding the synthetic<br />

cannabinoids compounds listed in Schedule I because <strong>of</strong> the serious harmful effects<br />

they are seeing when people use these products.<br />

Larry Matheis came forward and supports the addition <strong>of</strong> these compounds to Schedule<br />

I.<br />

Posted 4/27/<strong>2012</strong><br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!