30.01.2015 Views

speakers - AGA

speakers - AGA

speakers - AGA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Session W105 – Managing<br />

Third Party Providers


Speakers<br />

• Adam Goldberg, Department of the Treasury<br />

• Dennis Coleman, Office of Personnel<br />

Management<br />

• Tim Soltis, Department of Education


Office of Personnel Management<br />

Approach to Managing Third Party Vendors<br />

Presented By:<br />

DENNIS COLEMAN, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER<br />

UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Topics<br />

• Background<br />

• Governance Structure<br />

• Relationship Overview<br />

• Commercial Vendor Governance<br />

• Oversight<br />

• Monitoring<br />

• Federal SSP Governance<br />

• Oversight and Monitoring<br />

• Conclusion<br />

• Contact Information


Background<br />

• OPM’s Blended Approach<br />

• Procurement of Commercial Systems Integrator<br />

in July 2008<br />

• Deployment of modernized Core accounting<br />

system in October 2009<br />

• Transition of AP Invoice and Disbursement<br />

Processing to Federal SSP in January 2013


Governance Structure<br />

• OPM Project Lead<br />

• OPM Systems<br />

Lead<br />

Management<br />

Governance<br />

• Systems Integrator,<br />

Commercial<br />

Vendor<br />

• Federal Shared<br />

Service Provider<br />

• OPM Executive<br />

Steering<br />

Committee<br />

• Government<br />

Executive Sponsor<br />

Execution<br />

OPM Executive Steering Committee – Made up of<br />

OPM Senior Executives<br />

Government Executive Sponsor – OPM, Chief<br />

Financial Officer<br />

OPM Project Lead - Works in partnership with<br />

systems integrator and Federal SSP on the overall<br />

project and its deliverables<br />

OPM Systems Lead – Responsible for managing<br />

the CBIS system.<br />

Federal Shared Service Provider – Responsible for<br />

OPM invoice processing<br />

Systems Integrator – Commercial Vendor<br />

responsible for IT hosting and administration,<br />

application management services and system<br />

implementation services for CBIS.


Relationship Overview<br />

Governance,<br />

Oversight &<br />

Monitoring<br />

IT Hosting &<br />

Administration<br />

Application<br />

Management<br />

Services<br />

System<br />

Implementation<br />

Services<br />

Business<br />

Transaction<br />

Processing<br />

OPM Chief<br />

Financial Office <br />

Systems Integrator<br />

(Commercial) <br />

Shared Service<br />

Center (Federal)


Commercial Vendor Governance<br />

Oversight<br />

• Agency Director-Endorsed Executive Steering Committee<br />

• Project Management Office<br />

• Quality Management Plan / Quality Assurance Evaluations<br />

(QAE)<br />

• Operational Level Agreement (OLA)<br />

• Service Level Agreement (SLA)<br />

• Authorization & Accreditation (A&A) and continuous monitoring<br />

for Security Assessments with dedicated DSO<br />

• SSAE16 (formerly SAS70) obtained as part of initial award


Commercial Vendor Governance<br />

Monitoring<br />

• CFO Executive Review Meetings<br />

• Investment Review Board (IRB)<br />

• Capital Investment Committee (CIC)<br />

• Change Control Board (CCB)<br />

• Team Core Status Meetings<br />

• Deliverables Management<br />

• Earned-Value Management (EVM) Reports


Federal SSP Governance<br />

Oversight and Monitoring<br />

• CFO Executive Review Meetings<br />

• Site visits<br />

• Recurring Status Meetings<br />

• Standardized Metrics<br />

• Prompt Payment<br />

• Cost Utilization Reports<br />

• Audit Reviews<br />

• Central CFO Correspondence E-mail Box<br />

• Earned-Value Management (EVM) planned for the future


Governance Framework


Conclusion<br />

• Lessons Learned<br />

• Use of hybrid shared service partnerships and a<br />

talented analytical workforce to deliver<br />

comprehensive work products cost effectively<br />

• Development of mutual performance indicators or<br />

standards between Agency and Vendor and Agency<br />

and Federal SSP<br />

• Phased approach to transition of any/all services<br />

• Benefits to using EVM to manage and control<br />

Federal SSP


Contact Information


Selecting and<br />

Monitoring a<br />

Shared Service<br />

Provider<br />

Tim Soltis<br />

Department of<br />

Education


Agenda<br />

• Entity Mission Objectives<br />

• Phased Approach to Shared Services<br />

• Factors to Consider<br />

• Inventory Current Services<br />

• Identify Feasible Shared Service Candidates<br />

• Recommended Course of Action<br />

• Recommended Conversion Strategy<br />

• Establish and Monitor Service Level Agreement<br />

• Common Issues and Impediments<br />

• Success Factors


SHARED SERVICES<br />

Shared Service<br />

Definitions<br />

Entity<br />

Mission<br />

Objectives<br />

Customer<br />

perspective<br />

Obtain costeffective<br />

and quality<br />

services consistent<br />

with organizational<br />

mission objectives<br />

Federal<br />

Shared<br />

Service<br />

Provider<br />

(FSSP)<br />

17


Phased Approach to Shared Services<br />

Data Source: Executive Office of the President - Federal Information Technology Shared<br />

Services Strategy - May 2012 18


Good Reasons<br />

•OMB Mandate –Consider<br />

shared solutions for future IT<br />

modernization efforts<br />

•Aligns with entity strategic<br />

goals and objectives<br />

•Achieves benefits such as:<br />

o Lower costs<br />

o<br />

Reduced complexity of<br />

business processes<br />

o Improved/more<br />

predictable data quality<br />

•Addresses other challenges<br />

such as:<br />

o Hard to hire /sustain staff<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Heavy reliance on<br />

contractors<br />

Rapidly changing<br />

technology<br />

Factors to Consider<br />

Not‐So‐Good Reasons<br />

•Everyone else is doing it<br />

•Service provider will fix<br />

problems<br />

•Avoid the need for a<br />

reorganization or personnel<br />

changes<br />

•Advances in technology<br />

alone in business segment<br />

o Technology should be<br />

seen as a mission enabler<br />

19


Inventory Current<br />

Services<br />

1. Define<br />

business<br />

operations<br />

into horizontal<br />

lines of<br />

business 2. Break lines of<br />

business into<br />

specific activities<br />

and identify:<br />

• Organizations and people<br />

• Legacy systems and interfaces<br />

• Manual processes<br />

• Other related activities<br />

3. Determine<br />

Resource<br />

Requirements<br />

• Identify cost drivers<br />

4. Determine<br />

Performance<br />

Requirements<br />

5. Identify<br />

known<br />

deficiencies<br />

• Current performance metrics<br />

• Define acceptable level of<br />

service<br />

• Identify related must‐have<br />

requirements<br />

20


Identify Feasible Shared Service Candidates<br />

Identify list of best shared<br />

service candidates<br />

• Don’t try to “boil the<br />

ocean” –focus on the<br />

best feasible candidates<br />

and seek win‐win<br />

Involve key stakeholders<br />

• Listen and act on valid<br />

concerns<br />

• Avoid parochialism<br />

Benchmark against other<br />

Federal organizations<br />

• Focus on success stories and<br />

details of execution<br />

• Lessons learned<br />

21


Recommended Course of Action<br />

Identify potential matches<br />

• Fully understand service provider capabilities and past performance (‘track record’)<br />

• Ensure service provider understands your requirements and expectations<br />

• Determine the extent of internal change required and willingness to change<br />

Narrow list to most suitable candidates<br />

• Select best win‐win situation<br />

• “Red team” potential issues and concerns<br />

Build the business case to support the decision<br />

• Be fully transparent about risks, costs and intended benefits<br />

• Fully document the “is‐is” and proposed “to‐be” models<br />

o Define impact on people and organizational structure<br />

o Identify changes in the budget<br />

• Define change management requirements<br />

o Get leadership support and stakeholder buy‐in<br />

• Make go/no‐go decision<br />

• Identify accountable officials<br />

22


SHARED SERVICES<br />

Recommended Conversion Strategy<br />

1<br />

Develop detailed implementation plan with timelines<br />

2<br />

Appoint implementation team and establish governance process<br />

3<br />

Establish budget – reallocate funds as needed<br />

4<br />

Execute plan<br />

5<br />

Implement change management and communication plans<br />

6<br />

Monitor transition progress and post-implementation performance<br />

7<br />

Ensure intended benefits are realized<br />

23


Establish Service Level Agreement (SLA)<br />

• Negotiate Terms of Agreement – Agreement<br />

should define the following:<br />

• Customer requirements – level of service, quality, and<br />

other expectations<br />

• Interoperability requirements – open standards<br />

• Costs and funding requirements<br />

• Audit expectations (SSAE16)<br />

• Performance standards (range, if appropriate)<br />

• Period of performance<br />

• Governance and dispute resolution process<br />

• Sign Agreement<br />

24


Monitor Service Level Agreement (SLA)<br />

• Active Management<br />

• Assign accountability – contractual perspective<br />

• Communicate regularly – consider on-site presence<br />

• Hold service provider to terms of agreement<br />

• Resolve issues quickly or elevate them<br />

• Consider evolving requirements<br />

• Other Considerations<br />

• Transition support requirements<br />

• Retain knowledge of entire business process<br />

• Have an exit strategy<br />

25


Customer<br />

People<br />

Internal processes<br />

Organizational<br />

structure<br />

Data<br />

System Architecture<br />

Legacy systems<br />

Interfaces/controls<br />

Data standards<br />

Approach to changing<br />

technology<br />

Common<br />

Issues and<br />

Impediments<br />

Service Provider<br />

Quality<br />

Costs<br />

Transparency<br />

Adaptability<br />

Governance<br />

Audit requirements<br />

Dispute resolution<br />

Metrics<br />

Achieving intended<br />

benefits<br />

26


SHARED SERVICES<br />

Success Factors<br />

• Pick the right team –“win‐win”<br />

• Customer support/continuous improvement culture<br />

• Tone at the top with cascaded accountability<br />

• Robust governance<br />

• Performance monitoring/dispute resolution<br />

• People first strategy in change management<br />

• Communicate with staff and stakeholders<br />

27


Q&A

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!