30.01.2015 Views

BMR Edge-Tax & Regulatory Mont - BMR Advisors

BMR Edge-Tax & Regulatory Mont - BMR Advisors

BMR Edge-Tax & Regulatory Mont - BMR Advisors

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Step by step instructions for grant of refunds issued by income tax department<br />

With a view to reduce the problems raised due to mismatch of tax and tax withholding<br />

credits, the Income tax department has issued Instruction No 1 dated November 27,<br />

2012 which contains a step by step procedure for adjustment of refunds to be followed<br />

by the AOs and the centralized processing centre.<br />

Source: Instruction No 1 dated November 27, 2012, issued by Director of Income<br />

tax (Systems)<br />

Link: www.itatonline.org<br />

Ministry of Corporate Affairs notifies change in form DIN 4<br />

Ministry of Corporate Affairs (“MCA”) has added a paragraph in the certification<br />

requirement part of Form DIN 4 which is required to be filed to intimate change in the<br />

details of directors. Director Identification Number (“DIN”) is a unique identity number<br />

which is assigned to an individual who wishes to become a director of any Indian<br />

company.<br />

Source: Notification (F NO 5/80/2012 – CLV) dated December 24, 2012, issued by<br />

MCA<br />

Link: www.taxmann.com<br />

New form 18 and DIN 1 notified by MCA<br />

MCA has notified new Form 18 and DIN 1 which is required to be filed to intimate any<br />

change in registered office of the company and to obtain new DIN respectively.<br />

Source: Notification (F NO 5/80/2012 – CLV) dated December 24, 2012, issued by<br />

MCA<br />

Source: www.taxmann.com<br />

Indirect tax<br />

Value Added <strong>Tax</strong> (“VAT”) / Central Sales <strong>Tax</strong> (“CST”)<br />

Kora maal (brass ware) after polishing and engraving continues to be same<br />

commodity and there is no change in the identity of goods<br />

The taxpayer was engaged in purchase of kora maal (brass ware) from manufacturer<br />

and after engraving and polishing, selling the same to a dealer outside state who is<br />

stated to have exported the same. The Revenue Authorities raised demand of<br />

purchase tax under section 3AAAA of the Uttar Pradesh Trade <strong>Tax</strong> Act, 1948 (“UP<br />

Trade <strong>Tax</strong> Act, 1948”) against the taxpayer on the basis that engraving and polishing<br />

changes the identity of goods after its purchase. Aggrieved by it, the taxpayer filed an<br />

appeal before the first appellate authority.<br />

Snippet<br />

As a part of measures to shore up<br />

revenues, the Finance Ministry may<br />

reinstate import duty on crude oil in<br />

Budget 2013. In June 2011, customs<br />

duty on crude oil imports had been<br />

done away with.<br />

Source: The Economic Times<br />

The matter finally reached the HC where the Revenue Authorities contended that the<br />

inextricable link of purchase with the exports required for claiming the exemption has<br />

not been demonstrated in the present case and hence the matter should be remanded<br />

back to the sales tax tribunal for examination of this aspect.<br />

The HC held that even if the sale was not inextricably linked to export and the sale of<br />

polished kora maal was an independent sale of goods to a dealer outside state, the<br />

same would qualify as a sale in the course of inter- state trade or commerce and<br />

would be exempt from payment of purchase tax (proviso (iii) to section 3AAAA of the<br />

UP Trade <strong>Tax</strong> Act, 1948 inter alia exempts the levy of purchase tax on goods which<br />

the purchasing dealer resells in the same form and condition in the course of interstate<br />

trade). Accordingly, the HC dismissed the revision petition.<br />

Commissioner trade tax, UP, Lucknow v Pioneer India [2012-56-VST-323 (All)]<br />

‘Harpic’ and ‘Lizol’ classified under Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 but having the<br />

primary quality of disinfectant fall under the definition of pesticides liable to be taxed at<br />

4 percent and Mortein mosquito repellents are liable to be taxed at 12.5 per cent<br />

(rates applicable during the disputed period) in Andhra Pradesh<br />

The taxpayer was engaged in manufacture and sale of Lizol (floor cleaner), Harpic<br />

(toilet cleaner) and Mortein mosquito repellents. The Revenue Authorities contended<br />

that these goods were liable to be taxed at 12.5 percent by virtue of being covered<br />

under the exclusion of entry 88 of Schedule IV to the Andhra Pradesh Value Added<br />

<strong>Tax</strong>, 2005 (“AP VAT Act”) which covers drugs and medicines excluding products<br />

capable of being used as cosmetics and toilet preparations and mosquito repellents in<br />

any form.<br />

The taxpayer contended that though Lizol and Harpic are manufactured under drugs<br />

license but are disinfectants capable of destroying germs fall within the category of<br />

pesticides covered by entry 20 of Schedule IV to the AP VAT Act (which levies tax at 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!