30.01.2015 Views

Bt Cotton Hybrids Evaluation Report – Central Zone (2006-07 ...

Bt Cotton Hybrids Evaluation Report – Central Zone (2006-07 ...

Bt Cotton Hybrids Evaluation Report – Central Zone (2006-07 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

iv<br />

<strong>Hybrids</strong> RCH 386 <strong>Bt</strong> and MRC 7351 BG II were superior in fibre length. Hybrid<br />

KDCHH 621 BG II recorded the lowest fibre strength. Micronaire showed variation<br />

across locations and RCH 138 <strong>Bt</strong> (Check) had the lowest Micronaire.<br />

<br />

Nine <strong>Bt</strong> cotton hybrids were evaluated for two successive years during 2005-06<br />

and <strong>2006</strong>-<strong>07</strong> in <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Zone</strong>. The hybrids were evaluated at five locations in Khandwa,<br />

Surat, Akola, Nanded and Nagpur. The crop at Surat during the second year was affected<br />

due to floods and was not taken for analysis.<br />

Jassids, Thrips and Aphids were the main sucking pests. All the <strong>Bt</strong> hybrids<br />

evaluated were susceptible to sucking pests at varying intensities and grades. Chemical<br />

intervention was required to control them. The <strong>Bt</strong> hybrids showed minimum damage to<br />

bollworm with reduced green boll and locule damage.<br />

The onset and severity of the foliar disease varied both years. The <strong>Bt</strong> hybrids<br />

have been found susceptible to these diseases. However, proper and timely plant<br />

protection measures can reduce the damage to the crop.<br />

In terms of mean seed cotton yield, under protected conditions, only two hybrids<br />

viz., RCH 386 <strong>Bt</strong> and JKCH 99 BT were found to be superior to the check hybrids.<br />

However, under unprotected conditions, apart from RCH 386 <strong>Bt</strong>, MRC 7351 BG II and<br />

ACH 155-2 BG II were also superior to the check hybrids. Fibre quality wise the <strong>Bt</strong> test<br />

hybrids were superior to the non <strong>Bt</strong> check hybrid NHH 44 and were on par with the <strong>Bt</strong><br />

check hybrids.<br />

***<br />

<br />

!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!