31.01.2015 Views

Employers Face Significant New Challenges Under ... - Venable LLP

Employers Face Significant New Challenges Under ... - Venable LLP

Employers Face Significant New Challenges Under ... - Venable LLP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LABOR & EMPLOYMENT NEWS ALERT OCTOBER 16, 2007 2<br />

Article 49B (prior to<br />

October 1, 2007)<br />

Amended Article 49B (effective<br />

October 1, 2007)<br />

State Court Action Not available Available for claims accruing on or<br />

after October 1, 2007. The Maryland<br />

Commission on Human Relations<br />

(MCHR) or the individual may sue in<br />

state court.<br />

Relief Available Back pay (limited to 3<br />

years )<br />

Back pay<br />

Reinstatement<br />

Reinstatement<br />

Private Right of Action and the MCHR’s <strong>New</strong> Authority<br />

As of October 1, employees have two options for bringing a discrimination claim. Individuals may take the administrative<br />

route, subjecting employers to a quicker, more flexible, and likely less advantageous hearing process. However,<br />

individuals taking the administrative route can still file suit against their employers. <strong>Employers</strong> may feel pressured by<br />

individuals to settle cases earlier in the process and for more money to avoid a court battle. After 180 days, regardless of<br />

the outcome of the administrative process, individuals may file suit in circuit court. The individual must file suit in the<br />

circuit court of the county where the alleged discriminatory act took place.<br />

The MCHR’s powers include suing on behalf of an individual via the administrative process or suing in circuit court. Both<br />

venues give the MCHR the power to seek expanded damages as described above, and the Office of Administrative<br />

Hearing’s Administrative Law Judges have the power to award those damages. Employees always have the right to opt<br />

out of the administrative process even after that process has begun. Unlike the federal law, employees do not need a<br />

“right-to-sue” letter or any other form of permission from the MCHR to bring suit in Maryland’s circuit courts.<br />

<strong>Employers</strong> May <strong>Face</strong> a Bumpy Road in State Court<br />

Compensatory damages, including<br />

emotional distress and front pay, from<br />

$50,000 to $300,000 depending on<br />

employer size;<br />

Punitive damages if the employer<br />

engaged in an unlawful employment<br />

practice with malice (subject to the<br />

statutory cap from $50,000 to<br />

$300,000 depending on employer<br />

size)<br />

Attorneys’ fees, expert witness fees,<br />

and costs<br />

Jury Trial Not Available Available where an individual seeks<br />

compensatory or punitive damages.<br />

Employees will likely file most discrimination suits in state court under amended Article 49B. Maryland’s circuit courts and<br />

its judges are likely less familiar than their federal counterparts with the expansive body of discrimination law that has<br />

developed in federal courts since the passage of Title VII. For Maryland employers, this means that the employer-friendly<br />

stance of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit may not be what state court judges rely on to develop Maryland’s<br />

body of anti-discrimination law. Plaintiffs’ attorneys will likely seek to bring the best cases forward to Maryland’s court<br />

system to test the legal waters and develop law favorable to their clients. Additionally, employers may find themselves<br />

facing juries in state court because state court judges, for the most part, have not presided over as many discrimination<br />

cases as their counterparts have.<br />

VALUE ADDED, VALUES DRIVEN. ®

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!