31.01.2015 Views

knowledge, science, and the universe chapter 1 - Physical Science ...

knowledge, science, and the universe chapter 1 - Physical Science ...

knowledge, science, and the universe chapter 1 - Physical Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SECTION 1–3 Six “Self-Evident Truths” 7<br />

physical systems. You will read about many<br />

models in this book. Models are often pictorial<br />

<strong>and</strong> may emphasize some concepts while<br />

neglecting o<strong>the</strong>rs. They may sometimes be<br />

expressed in terms of ma<strong>the</strong>matics. The predictions<br />

of models are tested against <strong>the</strong> outcome<br />

of experiments—using sensory data—<strong>and</strong> models<br />

that don’t work are revised or rejected. If<br />

successful models cannot be built upon <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ories,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ories <strong>the</strong>mselves are called<br />

into question. Models that work are kept <strong>and</strong><br />

tested again. As <strong>the</strong>y pass more tests, trust in<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir accuracy <strong>and</strong> truthfulness increases. The<br />

cycle is repeated with <strong>the</strong> trust that <strong>the</strong> process<br />

is progressing toward an enlarged, better underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

of nature’s truth.<br />

Scientific research is always a test of a<br />

hypo<strong>the</strong>sis, <strong>the</strong>ory, law, or model against <strong>the</strong><br />

behavior of nature. This is <strong>the</strong> critical feature,<br />

<strong>the</strong> hallmark of <strong>science</strong>— consistency with nature.<br />

Any idea that is not or cannot be tested against<br />

nature cannot properly be included in scientific<br />

<strong>knowledge</strong>. Some “pseudoscientific” <strong>the</strong>ories<br />

claim to be <strong>science</strong> but fail this test. Ideas rise<br />

<strong>and</strong> fall by this condition, <strong>and</strong> are always tentative<br />

to some degree because <strong>the</strong>re is always<br />

some possibility, however small, of disagreement<br />

with future experiment.<br />

The scientific method is a priceless tool,<br />

which, when powered by curiosity, helps us efficiently<br />

comprehend our complex world. It<br />

helps our curious minds formulate important<br />

“why” <strong>and</strong> “how” questions. It helps us sift<br />

through clouds of variables <strong>and</strong> possible answers<br />

to find <strong>the</strong> few laws <strong>and</strong> principles through<br />

which a broad range of phenomena can be<br />

understood.<br />

1–3 SIx “SELf-EVIdENT<br />

TRuThS”<br />

All reasoning rests upon assumptions. In<br />

<strong>science</strong> we use a set of assumptions or rules to<br />

evaluate our <strong>knowledge</strong>. These rules are so logical<br />

<strong>and</strong> basic that we present <strong>the</strong>m here as six<br />

“self- evident truths.”<br />

1. Existence: There exists a physical world separate<br />

<strong>and</strong> distinct from our minds that is<br />

comprehensible through our senses. This<br />

world is governed by certain generalities<br />

called <strong>the</strong> “laws of nature.”<br />

figure 1.6<br />

Existence: The <strong>universe</strong> is wonderful <strong>and</strong> real!<br />

Earlier in this <strong>chapter</strong> we discussed <strong>the</strong> limitations<br />

of information obtained through our<br />

senses because senses can be deceived. The<br />

Chinese philosopher Chuang Tsu illustrated<br />

<strong>the</strong> dilemma with <strong>the</strong> following story:<br />

Once upon a time, I, Chuang Tsu, dreamed I<br />

was a butterfly, flying happily here <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re,<br />

enjoying life without knowing who I was.<br />

Suddenly I woke up <strong>and</strong> I was indeed Chuang<br />

Tsu. Did Chuang Tsu dream he was a butterfly<br />

or did <strong>the</strong> butterfly dream he was Chuang<br />

Tsu 1<br />

Perhaps you, too, have had dreams that<br />

were so vivid that after awakening you were<br />

puzzled for a moment about what was real. In<br />

essence <strong>the</strong> assumption of existence asserts that<br />

Chuang Tsu is, indeed, a Chinese philosopher<br />

<strong>and</strong> not a butterfly, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> reality around him<br />

is <strong>the</strong> same as <strong>the</strong> reality that surrounds us. Each<br />

of us might see this reality a little differently<br />

because of who we are. But regardless of how<br />

we underst<strong>and</strong> it, a single, unique,<br />

reality is <strong>the</strong>re, existing independent<br />

of us.<br />

2. Causality: Events in <strong>the</strong> physical<br />

<strong>universe</strong> have natural causes.<br />

Causes precede <strong>the</strong> events in<br />

time <strong>and</strong> can be explained<br />

rationally in terms of <strong>the</strong> laws of<br />

nature.<br />

<strong>Science</strong> has never proven that it<br />

is impos sible to travel back in time.<br />

However, someone traveling to <strong>the</strong><br />

past could possibly kill <strong>the</strong>ir own par-<br />

Existence<br />

The fact or state of having<br />

actual or real being.<br />

Causality<br />

Cause must always precede<br />

<strong>the</strong> effect.<br />

figure 1.7<br />

Causality: The apple cannot burst before <strong>the</strong><br />

bullet strikes it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!