Letter dated 14 December 2012 - The International Criminal Law ...
Letter dated 14 December 2012 - The International Criminal Law ...
Letter dated 14 December 2012 - The International Criminal Law ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
e delivered to the Chief Justice, and required her to respond by 22 November <strong>2012</strong><br />
to the charges contained in it. A request for further time was refused.<br />
17. Meanwhile, several applications were filed in the Supreme Court and the Court of<br />
Appeal by various persons, including the Bar Association, challenging the<br />
constitutionality of the Standing Order under which the Select Committee was<br />
established. Notices served by the two Courts were not accepted either by Speaker<br />
Rajapakse or the members of the Select Committee. A “recommendation” of the<br />
Supreme Court that the proceedings of the Select Committee be deferred pending a<br />
determination on the matters referred to Court, was ignored by the Select<br />
Committee.<br />
Inquiry by the Select Committee<br />
18. On 4 <strong>December</strong> <strong>2012</strong>, the first day of inquiry, large placard-carrying crowds,<br />
believed to have been transported by certain members of the Government<br />
Parliamentary Group, shouted abusive, derogatory and defamatory slogans against<br />
the Chief Justice outside the premises of Parliament. On that day, and thereafter,<br />
the Government controlled media has continuously subjected the Chief Justice and<br />
Judges of the Supreme Court to virulent attacks.<br />
19. <strong>The</strong> Select Committee proceedings were conducted by the Chairman (a Cabinet<br />
Minister) and other Government Members in callous disregard of the rules of natural<br />
justice (which, according to the Chairman of the Select Committee, applied to the<br />
“people”, but not to “the people’s representatives”). When the Chief Justice objected<br />
to two Government Members continuing to serve on the Select Committee because<br />
she had recently heard and determined cases in which they were involved, these<br />
two Members overruled the objections stating that the rule against bias did not apply<br />
to Members of Parliament.<br />
20. On 20 November <strong>2012</strong>, the Chief Justice requested that relevant information be<br />
provided to enable her to respond to the allegations. This was not provided. On 23<br />
November <strong>2012</strong>, Counsel for the Chief Justice requested that a list of witnesses and<br />
a list of documents relied upon in support of the allegations be made available.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se were not provided. On 6 <strong>December</strong> <strong>2012</strong>, at about 4 pm, the Select<br />
Committee handed over a bundle of documents consisting of approximately 1000<br />
pages and required the Chief Justice to respond by 1.30 pm on the next day, i.e. in<br />
less than 24 hours. It was obvious that the Government Members of the Select<br />
Committee had no real intention to give the Chief Justice a fair hearing.<br />
21. <strong>The</strong> Select Committee was repeatedly requested by the Chief Justice to formulate<br />
the procedure that it intended to follow. <strong>The</strong>re was no response to this request. On<br />
Executive Committee members<br />
Majuka Fernandopulle-+9477344477,Achala Kumarasiri AAL-+94712080<strong>14</strong>1 ,Kelum Kumarsingha- +94772994951,Supun<br />
Wickramaratne-+94774810515 Sadamal Rajapaksha-+947<strong>14</strong>197650,Thanuka Madawa-+94715527766,<br />
Dasanta Ihalage-+94719081380,Nuwan Bopege-+94718403608