01.02.2015 Views

Letter dated 14 December 2012 - The International Criminal Law ...

Letter dated 14 December 2012 - The International Criminal Law ...

Letter dated 14 December 2012 - The International Criminal Law ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

e delivered to the Chief Justice, and required her to respond by 22 November <strong>2012</strong><br />

to the charges contained in it. A request for further time was refused.<br />

17. Meanwhile, several applications were filed in the Supreme Court and the Court of<br />

Appeal by various persons, including the Bar Association, challenging the<br />

constitutionality of the Standing Order under which the Select Committee was<br />

established. Notices served by the two Courts were not accepted either by Speaker<br />

Rajapakse or the members of the Select Committee. A “recommendation” of the<br />

Supreme Court that the proceedings of the Select Committee be deferred pending a<br />

determination on the matters referred to Court, was ignored by the Select<br />

Committee.<br />

Inquiry by the Select Committee<br />

18. On 4 <strong>December</strong> <strong>2012</strong>, the first day of inquiry, large placard-carrying crowds,<br />

believed to have been transported by certain members of the Government<br />

Parliamentary Group, shouted abusive, derogatory and defamatory slogans against<br />

the Chief Justice outside the premises of Parliament. On that day, and thereafter,<br />

the Government controlled media has continuously subjected the Chief Justice and<br />

Judges of the Supreme Court to virulent attacks.<br />

19. <strong>The</strong> Select Committee proceedings were conducted by the Chairman (a Cabinet<br />

Minister) and other Government Members in callous disregard of the rules of natural<br />

justice (which, according to the Chairman of the Select Committee, applied to the<br />

“people”, but not to “the people’s representatives”). When the Chief Justice objected<br />

to two Government Members continuing to serve on the Select Committee because<br />

she had recently heard and determined cases in which they were involved, these<br />

two Members overruled the objections stating that the rule against bias did not apply<br />

to Members of Parliament.<br />

20. On 20 November <strong>2012</strong>, the Chief Justice requested that relevant information be<br />

provided to enable her to respond to the allegations. This was not provided. On 23<br />

November <strong>2012</strong>, Counsel for the Chief Justice requested that a list of witnesses and<br />

a list of documents relied upon in support of the allegations be made available.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se were not provided. On 6 <strong>December</strong> <strong>2012</strong>, at about 4 pm, the Select<br />

Committee handed over a bundle of documents consisting of approximately 1000<br />

pages and required the Chief Justice to respond by 1.30 pm on the next day, i.e. in<br />

less than 24 hours. It was obvious that the Government Members of the Select<br />

Committee had no real intention to give the Chief Justice a fair hearing.<br />

21. <strong>The</strong> Select Committee was repeatedly requested by the Chief Justice to formulate<br />

the procedure that it intended to follow. <strong>The</strong>re was no response to this request. On<br />

Executive Committee members<br />

Majuka Fernandopulle-+9477344477,Achala Kumarasiri AAL-+94712080<strong>14</strong>1 ,Kelum Kumarsingha- +94772994951,Supun<br />

Wickramaratne-+94774810515 Sadamal Rajapaksha-+947<strong>14</strong>197650,Thanuka Madawa-+94715527766,<br />

Dasanta Ihalage-+94719081380,Nuwan Bopege-+94718403608

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!