Toby Cadman – Bangladesh – In Search Of Fairness copy - The ...
Toby Cadman – Bangladesh – In Search Of Fairness copy - The ...
Toby Cadman – Bangladesh – In Search Of Fairness copy - The ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
9 Bedford Row <strong>In</strong>ternational <strong>Toby</strong> M. <strong>Cadman</strong>
Adjudicating Crimes From <strong>The</strong> 1971 War <strong>Of</strong> Liberation
<strong>The</strong> <strong>In</strong>ternational Crimes Tribunal <strong>Bangladesh</strong>:!<br />
A Journey <strong>In</strong> <strong>Search</strong> <strong>Of</strong> <strong>Fairness</strong><br />
A Wolf <strong>In</strong> Sheeps Clothing
<strong>Bangladesh</strong> Governments Statement of <strong>In</strong>tent<br />
<strong>Bangladesh</strong> has established an <strong>In</strong>ternational Crimes Tribunal to<br />
try persons responsible for war crimes and crime against<br />
humanity, including genocide, arson and rape committed during<br />
our war of liberation in 1971, and immediately thereafter. This<br />
action is in accord with the rule of law as reflected in the Rome<br />
Statute of the <strong>In</strong>ternational Criminal Court (ICC), which we have<br />
ratified and which aims at bringing perpetrators of war crimes,<br />
genocide, and crimes against humanity, to justice. I believe that<br />
only justice can heal the unforgivable, deadly wrongs of the<br />
past.<br />
Prime Minister, Sheik Hasina. Address to the UN General Assembly, 65th Session<br />
(2010)
A Brief History<br />
• War <strong>Of</strong> Liberation 1971<br />
• <strong>In</strong>ternational Crimes (Tribunals) Act 1973<br />
• First Constitutional Amendment<br />
• Presidential Decree No. 16 of 1974<br />
• Tripartite Agreement 1974<br />
• <strong>In</strong>ternational Crimes (Tribunals) (Amendment) Act 2009<br />
• Establishment of <strong>The</strong> <strong>In</strong>ternational Crimes Tribunal March 2010<br />
• Arrest <strong>Of</strong> Political Opposition July-December 2010<br />
• Amended Rules <strong>Of</strong> Procedure June 2011<br />
• Fifteenth Constitutional Amendment<br />
• Start <strong>Of</strong> First Trial November 2011<br />
• End <strong>Of</strong> Awami League Mandate December 2013
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Bangladesh</strong> Government's Position<br />
• Trials Will Uphold <strong>The</strong> Highest <strong>In</strong>ternational Standards - Foreign Minister<br />
• Tribunal Will Be A Model For <strong>The</strong> World - State Minister For Law<br />
• Tribunal Is A Defence Charter - Tribunal Registrar<br />
• <strong>The</strong>re Is A Distinction Between <strong>The</strong> Rights <strong>Of</strong> Ordinary Citizens And <strong>The</strong> Rights <strong>Of</strong> War Criminals - Supreme Court<br />
Justice<br />
• <strong>The</strong>se Men Killed And Raped Throughout Our Country - Minister for Law, Justice & Parliamentary Affairs<br />
• <strong>The</strong> Laws Are <strong>The</strong> Best War Crimes Laws <strong>In</strong> <strong>The</strong> World - Numerous<br />
• <strong>The</strong> Tribunal Provides Greater Protection Than Nuremberg - Minister for Law, Justice & Parliamentary Affairs<br />
• <strong>The</strong> Tribunal Will Uphold <strong>In</strong>ternational Standards <strong>Of</strong> <strong>Fairness</strong> & Due Process - Tribunal Judges<br />
• <strong>The</strong> Tribunal Is Not Bound By <strong>In</strong>ternational Standards<br />
• <strong>The</strong> Tribunal Is An <strong>In</strong>ternational Court<br />
• <strong>The</strong> Tribunal Is Not An <strong>In</strong>ternational Court
<strong>The</strong> Criticisms<br />
• Domestic Procedural Laws Are Excluded<br />
• <strong>In</strong>ternational Procedural Laws Are Excluded<br />
• No Right <strong>Of</strong> Challenge Or <strong>In</strong>terlocutory Appeal<br />
• No Jurisdictional Challenge Allowed<br />
• Constitutional Protection <strong>Of</strong> Fundamental Rights Removed<br />
• No Rules <strong>Of</strong> Evidence<br />
• No Privileged Client Communications<br />
• <strong>In</strong>vestigations Conducted <strong>In</strong> A Shroud <strong>Of</strong> Secrecy<br />
• <strong>In</strong>terrogations Conducted <strong>In</strong> <strong>The</strong> Absence <strong>Of</strong> Counsel<br />
• Foreign Counsel Thrown Out <strong>Of</strong> <strong>The</strong> Country And Barred From Reentering<br />
• All Criticism Curtailed By Threat <strong>Of</strong> Contempt Or Sedition Charges<br />
• Government Ministers Dictate Proceedings<br />
• Chairman <strong>Of</strong> <strong>The</strong> Tribunal Previously Served On An <strong>In</strong>vestigative Body <strong>In</strong>to War Crimes Allegations<br />
• Death Penalty
<strong>In</strong>ternational Condemnation<br />
• United States Ambassador-At-Large For War Crimes Issues<br />
• <strong>In</strong>ternational Bar Association, War Crimes Committee<br />
• Amnesty <strong>In</strong>ternational<br />
• Human Rights Watch<br />
• <strong>In</strong>ternational Center For Transitional Justice<br />
• House of Lords<br />
• Members of European Parliament<br />
• Members <strong>Of</strong> United States' Congress
A Journey <strong>In</strong> <strong>Search</strong> of <strong>Fairness</strong><br />
• United Nations Human Rights Council<br />
• United Nations Special Rapporteurs<br />
• Parliamentary Committees<br />
• United States Congress<br />
• European Parliament<br />
• European Commission<br />
• Council of Europe<br />
• <strong>In</strong>ternational Human Rights Monitoring Bodies
A Model For <strong>The</strong> Future Let Us Hope Not!<br />
• Politically selected targets for prosecution<br />
• No <strong>In</strong>dependence from the executive<br />
• No objective impartiality<br />
• <strong>In</strong>vestigations conducted under a cloud of secrecy<br />
• Suppression of media comment<br />
• <strong>In</strong>terrogations conducted in secret<br />
• Widespread allegation of ill treatment of detainees<br />
• No privileged communications<br />
• Foreign counsel prevented from entering the country<br />
• Defence lawyers and witnesses subject to threats of false arrest and intimidation