02.02.2015 Views

ITIL - itSMF International

ITIL - itSMF International

ITIL - itSMF International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

servicetalk the journal of the it service management forum july 2008<br />

Is iTIL version 3<br />

connecting<br />

Green I.T.<br />

special: make<br />

the savings<br />

eToM TO<br />

JOIN THE<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> PARTY<br />

SOFTWARE AS<br />

A SERVICE -<br />

pros and CONS


contents<br />

CHIEF EXECUTIVE<br />

OFFICER<br />

KEITH ALDIS<br />

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT<br />

MANAGER<br />

BEN CLACY<br />

MARKETING MANAGER<br />

KIM MAY<br />

P.14 P.21<br />

Marketing ASSISTANT<br />

Lindsay Thomas<br />

EDITOR<br />

JAMES WEST<br />

DESIGNER<br />

CASSANDRA LEAR<br />

cassandralear.com<br />

All communications to:<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> UK, 150 Wharfedale<br />

Road, Winnersh Triangle,<br />

Wokingham, RG41 5RB<br />

Tel: 0118 918 6500<br />

Email: servicetalkeditor@<br />

itsmf.co.uk<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> is the registered<br />

trademark of the Office of<br />

Government Commerce (OGC).<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> is a registered word<br />

mark of the IT Service<br />

Management Forum Ltd<br />

Disclaimer<br />

Articles published reflect the<br />

opinions of the authors and<br />

not necessarily those of the<br />

publisher or his employees.<br />

While every reasonable effort<br />

is made to ensure that the<br />

contents of articles, editorial<br />

and advertising are accurate<br />

no responsibility can be<br />

accepted by the publisher for<br />

errors, misrepresentations<br />

and any resulting effects.<br />

ServiceTalk the Journal<br />

material within this<br />

publication may not be<br />

reproduced in whole or in part<br />

without the express<br />

permission of the <strong>itSMF</strong> UK.<br />

Printed by:<br />

AGI Thamesdown Limited<br />

Unit 1-2 Birch,<br />

Kembrey Park, Swindon,<br />

Wiltshire, SN2 8UU<br />

To subscribe please contact<br />

lindsay.thomas@itsmf.co.uk<br />

P.24<br />

july contents<br />

4 industry news<br />

• IT to feel the economic pinch<br />

• New name for Help Desk Institute<br />

• License tracking not automated<br />

6 itsmf News<br />

• Problem management SIG has new chair<br />

• Details of the next simulation event<br />

• <strong>ITIL</strong> Version 3 qualification update<br />

8 itsmf news<br />

• <strong>itSMF</strong> <strong>International</strong> states its intentions<br />

• The personal touch for <strong>itSMF</strong> UK members<br />

• <strong>itSMF</strong> UK Service Management<br />

Awards 2008<br />

11 Letters and opinions<br />

Letters and e-mails about the service<br />

management industry<br />

13 Comment<br />

Thoughts from the CEO<br />

14 <strong>ITIL</strong> Version 3 one year on<br />

One year on since <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 was unveiled, what<br />

is the feedback from the market This article<br />

draws opinions from a practitioner, a trainer,<br />

a consultant and a think tank to see how <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3 is being digested<br />

21 Best practice maturity<br />

The perception that <strong>ITIL</strong> is far more<br />

developed in the UK compared to the US is<br />

challenged in this article<br />

P.29<br />

24 SaaS or on-site<br />

Software as a Service (SaaS) has become<br />

a genuine alternative to buying enterprise<br />

software, this article compares the new and<br />

old ways of software delivery, offering pros<br />

and cons for both concepts<br />

29 Green I.T.<br />

Going green may become a necessity<br />

rather than choice in IT. Here we look at how<br />

big the problem is and how virtualisation<br />

may hold the key to stopping the drain<br />

on power<br />

34 etom<br />

Much like <strong>ITIL</strong>, eTOM is a best practice<br />

framework, but focused on telecoms. <strong>itSMF</strong><br />

is involved in a group which is aiming to<br />

bring the two frameworks into closer<br />

alignment; this article looks at the value and<br />

compatibility of eTOM alongside <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

38 Communications<br />

Is there any value in e-mail or has its<br />

usefulness as a business tool been fatally<br />

undermined by spam We look at the<br />

challenge that IT faces to get its message<br />

through to the rest of the business<br />

41 Publications<br />

An update on the publications arm of the<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> UK, including the first in a series of<br />

book reviews which will lift the lid on the real<br />

value of the publications available<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK


news<br />

news in brief<br />

Licensing not<br />

formally monitored<br />

More than one-third of<br />

attendees polled at the Service<br />

Desk and IT Support Show do<br />

not have a computerised<br />

system for monitoring<br />

software licenses, and of<br />

those who do have such a<br />

system, almost 40 per cent of<br />

staff have no confidence that it<br />

is doing its job.<br />

Another alarming statistic<br />

unearthed by House on the<br />

Hill software at the event<br />

in London’s Olympia is that<br />

53 per cent of IT support<br />

professionals are unsure<br />

whether software licenses<br />

are tracked automatically,<br />

manually or even at all.<br />

Right to improve<br />

The Strasbourg-based<br />

European Court of Human<br />

Rights (ECHR) has thrown<br />

out its previous service desk<br />

software in a move which has<br />

led to improved efficiencies<br />

and user-satisfaction.<br />

ECHR<br />

John Hunter, head of<br />

the ECHR IT Department,<br />

commented on the impact of<br />

e-Service Desk from ICCM.<br />

“We have seen a dramatic<br />

change in the department,<br />

resulting in both quantitative<br />

and qualitative efficiency.”<br />

Support locked down<br />

The European arm of Chubb<br />

Insurance has upgraded its<br />

service management software<br />

as it aims for compatibility<br />

with <strong>ITIL</strong> thinking and meet<br />

the requirements of<br />

Sarbanes Oxley.<br />

Keith Brewer, IT support<br />

manager at Chubb says that<br />

Hornbill’s Supportworks<br />

ITSM product offered far<br />

greater transparency of the<br />

services on offer than was<br />

previously possible.<br />

The time to save<br />

IT urged to self-impose budget cuts before<br />

savings are forced upon the department<br />

IT departments will need to fight<br />

off budget cuts and will struggle<br />

to maintain any efforts to improve<br />

service delivery if the current<br />

recession continues, according to<br />

The Helpdesk Institute’s name<br />

change reflects the shift towards<br />

the full professionalisation of the<br />

IT support industry, according to<br />

the organisation’s founder, Howard<br />

Kendall. The new name, Service<br />

Desk Institute (SDI), embodies the<br />

now commonly accepted notion<br />

that the term helpdesk is outdated,<br />

because it historically suggests a<br />

lack of strategic connections<br />

to the business.<br />

Speaking to ServiceTALK the<br />

Journal, Howard said, “IT service<br />

management is a profession now<br />

and the function is finally being<br />

taken seriously. This has been<br />

helped by key elements such as<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> and SOX (Sarbanes Oxley)<br />

three separate reports.<br />

Consultancy firm the Hackett<br />

Group urges that IT take the<br />

initiative and dramatically curb<br />

spending before it is forced to<br />

New name, new focus<br />

Service Desk Institute offers fresh thinking<br />

and focus on soft skills<br />

which have helped drive the issues<br />

we have been championing for<br />

years into the boardroom.”<br />

The service desk is focused<br />

on proactive service and trying to<br />

eliminate root causes of common<br />

problems. “The volume of calls<br />

to the service desk has increased<br />

exponentially, and we are seeing<br />

an increased use of self-service<br />

and techniques such as combining<br />

the first and second lines of<br />

support, particularly in cases<br />

where follow-the-sun support is<br />

required,” says Howard.<br />

The SDI reports continued<br />

success with its qualifications<br />

programme, having recently<br />

introduced its analyst and manager<br />

do so by the board. Back office<br />

departments within the leading<br />

multi-national firms could realise<br />

savings of as much as £200 million,<br />

representing a saving of almost<br />

half of the predicted fall in profits<br />

caused by the economic lull, by<br />

embarking on a programme of<br />

slashing outgoings.<br />

IT services are at greater risk<br />

of being outsourced than ever<br />

before, according to two documents<br />

produced by industry analyst<br />

Gartner. The first prediction will<br />

see offshoring of services to<br />

locations such as India increasing<br />

drastically, as businesses panic and<br />

forgo SIPs (Service Improvement<br />

Programmes) for the carrot of short<br />

term savings. If the recession<br />

continues towards 2009, Gartner<br />

says that all ‘discretionary IT<br />

spending will be cancelled’, putting<br />

massive pressure on bosses to<br />

offer bargain basement service.<br />

Gartner’s report into the growth<br />

of vendors offering IT services is<br />

also a strong indicator of falling<br />

confidence in internal operations,<br />

with 2007 seeing the sector grow<br />

by 11 per cent. IBM and Accenture<br />

were the big winners during this<br />

period, with the latter in particular<br />

winning new business to the tune<br />

of a 20 per cent year-on-year<br />

increase. 2008 could represent a<br />

far bigger windfall for the service<br />

management providers if the<br />

monetary dynamic refuses to<br />

deviate from its negative path. n<br />

Howard<br />

Kendall,<br />

SDI<br />

training to major new markets<br />

- India and the US. Howard says<br />

these qualifications are in no way<br />

designed to replace <strong>ITIL</strong> training,<br />

instead they focus on soft skills and<br />

the ‘practical side of the process’,<br />

and so should complement existing<br />

service management training. “Our<br />

aim is to bring the wording of best<br />

practice to life,” concludes Howard. n<br />

SERVICETALK july 2008


<strong>itSMF</strong> UK news<br />

Guiding hand for the SIG<br />

Group dedicated to discussing the finer points of problem management<br />

gets boost in the form of a experienced leader in the field<br />

Paul Offord, development director<br />

of troubleshooting company<br />

advance7, has been appointed<br />

chairman for the Problem<br />

Management Special Interest<br />

Group (SIG).<br />

Paul is keen to ensure that<br />

under his chairmanship the<br />

Problem Management SIG has a<br />

recognisable impact within the<br />

industry, and that it provides advice<br />

that delivers measurable benefits.<br />

“We have an impressive array of<br />

people in the SIG with a wealth of<br />

experience. I’m confident that we<br />

can and will make a difference,”<br />

said Paul.<br />

Megan Pendlebury, <strong>itSMF</strong> UK<br />

service management executive,<br />

commented on the appointment<br />

and the importance of quality<br />

guidance for the SIGs. “ Paul<br />

Offord has a wealth of expertise<br />

in problem management and we<br />

feel sure that his leadership will<br />

contribute greatly to the Problem<br />

Management SIG.<br />

“As organisations depend<br />

more and more on technology<br />

to promote and deliver their<br />

products to market, so the<br />

necessity of investing in IT<br />

service management becomes<br />

more apparent. Embracing best<br />

practice approaches and standards<br />

increases the chances of success.<br />

The Special Interest Groups hosted<br />

by the <strong>itSMF</strong> UK are designed to<br />

help members discuss, dissect and<br />

understand the key best practice<br />

industry issues.”<br />

According to Paul, the increased<br />

complexity of applications and<br />

the requirement for fast, stable<br />

systems throws a spotlight on the<br />

IT department’s ability to handle<br />

and solve problems. “Just as<br />

a new application can increase<br />

the productivity of a business, a<br />

chronic IT problem can reverse<br />

those gains. The IT team is coming<br />

under increasing pressure to fix<br />

problems quickly and permanently.<br />

IT best practice frameworks such<br />

as <strong>ITIL</strong> offer the potential benefits<br />

of consistent, predictable and faster<br />

problem resolution. The ultimate<br />

objective of the SIG is to help the IT<br />

team realise this potential.” n<br />

Hands-on expereince at <strong>itSMF</strong><br />

simulation events<br />

Simulation event back<br />

by popular demand<br />

Birmingham is the location for the next itsmf<br />

simulation event in September<br />

Following the runaway success<br />

of recent simulation events at the<br />

Service Desk and IT Support Show,<br />

a new session is to be held on the<br />

16th September at Birmingham’s<br />

Hilton Metropole.<br />

The interactive simulation game<br />

demonstrates how learning tools<br />

and a role play approach can<br />

assist in the development and<br />

understanding of <strong>ITIL</strong> and best<br />

practice within any organisation.<br />

The sessions put attendees in the<br />

middle of real-life scenarios and<br />

teaches them how <strong>ITIL</strong> thinking can<br />

solve problems in a pressurised<br />

environment. The simulation is<br />

appropriate for all levels of service<br />

management experience.<br />

For more information or to<br />

book a place please visit<br />

www.itsmf.co.uk/events n<br />

Qualfications<br />

coming into focus<br />

titles of itil V3 qualification released<br />

The <strong>ITIL</strong> Qualification Board<br />

has issued an update regarding<br />

the titles of the <strong>ITIL</strong> Version 3<br />

qualifications.<br />

Service Lifecycle and Service<br />

Capability modules and Managing<br />

Across the Lifecycle will be<br />

known officially as <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

Intermediate Certificates.<br />

A candidate who has achieved<br />

the minimum accumulation of<br />

22 credits across a selection of<br />

balanced V2 and V3 modules will be<br />

awarded the <strong>ITIL</strong> Expert Certificate.<br />

Candidates who satisfy the<br />

requirement of the currently titled<br />

‘Advanced’ level will be awarded<br />

the <strong>ITIL</strong> Master Certificate.<br />

The Qualification Board involved<br />

the ITSM community by surveying<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> members and Accredited<br />

Training Organisations on their<br />

preference for the formal titles<br />

of <strong>ITIL</strong> Qualifications. The results<br />

of the survey were reviewed and<br />

endorsed by the Board. n<br />

SERVICETALK july 2008


<strong>itSMF</strong> UK news<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> global plans<br />

<strong>International</strong> meetings to decide focus<br />

The <strong>itSMF</strong> <strong>International</strong> Executive<br />

Board has a raft of ‘innovative<br />

initiatives’ planned for 2008,<br />

including the introduction of<br />

virtual meetings for chapter<br />

representatives.<br />

Meeting in April, the Board also<br />

scheduled its meetings for the<br />

year, with the dates of 30th July in<br />

Tokyo and 11th September in San<br />

Francisco following the respective<br />

Japanese and American<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> conferences.<br />

The first Chapter Leadership<br />

Conference (CLC) is scheduled to<br />

take place this November in the UK<br />

following the <strong>itSMF</strong> UK Conference<br />

and preceding the Annual General<br />

Meeting on 14th November. The<br />

CLC will provide support and<br />

resources for emerging, growing<br />

and established <strong>itSMF</strong> Chapters.<br />

There are several countries hoping<br />

to be approved as Chapters this<br />

year with many more individuals<br />

registering an interest within<br />

their country.<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> <strong>International</strong> is planning<br />

to produce a monthly update of<br />

news, developments, initiatives<br />

and service portfolios, which will<br />

be sent to all Chapters. n<br />

Competition begins<br />

for the ultimate<br />

prize: <strong>itSMF</strong> Awards<br />

The expansion of the <strong>itSMF</strong> Awards last year<br />

has added more prestige for the winners<br />

The race is on to see who will<br />

win the coveted 2008 <strong>itSMF</strong> UK<br />

Awards. The most prestigious<br />

award programme in the industry<br />

was expanded successfully last<br />

year, with the addition of two new<br />

accolades - Trainer of the Year and<br />

Submission of the Year - which<br />

were won by John Griffiths and<br />

Julie MacMillan respectively. With<br />

the standard of entries improving<br />

year-on-year, the fight for these and<br />

the other awards will be tough.<br />

For more information on the Trainer<br />

and Submission Awards, as well as<br />

the Service Management Champion,<br />

Project of the Year and Innovation<br />

of the year, conntact:<br />

Kim.May@<strong>itSMF</strong>.co.uk<br />

One, two and three day delegate<br />

packages are now available with<br />

and without accommodation for<br />

the 17th Annual Conference at the<br />

Birmingham Hilton Metropole,<br />

which opens on 10th November<br />

2008. The final presentations<br />

have now been chosen for the six<br />

streams and the full Conference<br />

program is available online at<br />

www.itsmf.co.uk/conference as<br />

well as the price list and booking<br />

forms for delegates, stands and<br />

sponsorship. Members are<br />

reminded to book soon to take<br />

advantage of member’s discount<br />

and to ensure they don’t miss out<br />

on this year’s premier event for IT<br />

service management. n<br />

What can<br />

we interest<br />

you with<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> gets personal with the membership<br />

The new online <strong>itSMF</strong> UK<br />

membership database offers<br />

users the chance to keep up to<br />

date on those areas of service<br />

management they most want to<br />

hear about. The service offers<br />

updates to <strong>itSMF</strong> members based<br />

on their interests in topics such<br />

as ISO/IEC 20000, outsourcing,<br />

and business continuity.<br />

Members can update their<br />

profile to ensure they don’t miss<br />

out on the latest news, by visiting<br />

www.itsmf.co.uk and logging on<br />

by using their e-mail address and<br />

password. Once logged on, users<br />

click on ‘Manage My Personal<br />

Details’ and select ‘Options’. This<br />

page lets members ensure that<br />

the information received from<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> UK is personalised to<br />

their needs. n<br />

SERVICETALK july 2008


opinions<br />

V3 or not V3<br />

Currently, there is a lot of debate in<br />

the industry about <strong>ITIL</strong> V3, its real<br />

value to business and the approach<br />

to adoption that organisations<br />

should take.<br />

The fact is that in today’s<br />

web-centric environment, where<br />

IT plays a crucial role not only in<br />

the success of businesses, but<br />

also as an agent that facilitates<br />

business transformation, effective<br />

service management has become<br />

a strategic asset. Organisations<br />

must continually adopt innovative<br />

techniques to in turn adopt best<br />

practice in the most efficient,<br />

painless and cost effective way.<br />

Therefore, the issue is not<br />

about adopting Version 2 or 3<br />

of <strong>ITIL</strong>, it’s about adopting and<br />

adapting the components of this<br />

best practice framework in order<br />

for organisations to meet their<br />

individual business needs. For<br />

instance, <strong>ITIL</strong> V2 continues to<br />

offer customers a comprehensive<br />

approach to service management,<br />

but for those customers whose<br />

businesses require a system that<br />

supports the complete lifecycle, the<br />

process definitions held within <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3 could prove invaluable.<br />

The key for organisations<br />

– irrespective of size and the<br />

technology they use – is that <strong>ITIL</strong>,<br />

if used strategically, can deliver<br />

business benefits in the form<br />

of reduced TCO (Total Cost of<br />

Ownership), increase the number<br />

of productive hours and help meet<br />

business objectives by aligning IT<br />

with business processes.<br />

James Gay, sales director, ICCM<br />

For more on the progress of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3,<br />

see our article on page 14<br />

UK leads the way<br />

with training<br />

With a growing demand for<br />

professionals in the service desk<br />

arena across the globe, it is<br />

imperative that individuals have<br />

access to training that will help<br />

them develop and perform. A lack<br />

of soft skills has been cited as<br />

one of the reasons for high stress,<br />

dissatisfaction and high attrition<br />

rate amongst the workforce in<br />

the IT industry. It is therefore<br />

important for organisations to<br />

invest in training and certifying their<br />

employees so that they are better<br />

equipped to handle the demanding<br />

nature of the work. Improved<br />

customer interaction skills, ability<br />

to work as a team and increased<br />

efficiency are essential to handle<br />

the demanding nature of these<br />

jobs. SDI’s recent entry into India,<br />

which has a huge untapped market<br />

for a global standard in training<br />

and certifications for soft skills,<br />

certainly signifies the beginning of a<br />

transformation within the industry.<br />

India is of utmost strategic<br />

importance for the service desk<br />

industry, with the majority of the<br />

world’s IT and business process<br />

outsourcing organisations located<br />

there. India has an amazing talent<br />

pool, and with the demand for<br />

skilled manpower increasing,<br />

the country really has<br />

acknowledged just how important<br />

it is to improve its skills to offer<br />

service delivery at a level that<br />

matches global standards.<br />

They are not alone. Other<br />

countries, like Malaysia, the<br />

Philippines and a number of East<br />

European and Middle Eastern<br />

countries are also investing in<br />

internationally recognised business<br />

and service orientated skills<br />

standards to ensure their ITSM<br />

offerings remain attractive on a<br />

global stage. Will our workforce,<br />

businesses and government realise<br />

we need to take the initiative<br />

here as well, before it’s too late<br />

to remain competitive Although<br />

there is lots of talk and quango-type<br />

organisations are starting to spring<br />

up, quite frankly, we are just not<br />

seeing a co-ordinated effort.<br />

Howard Kendall, founder<br />

The Service Desk Institute (SDI)<br />

Career in I.T. gets<br />

more attractive<br />

Not only is IT now routinely<br />

getting a place on the board, but<br />

also the service desk is seen as<br />

a great place to start a career in<br />

IT. That’s according to the latest<br />

survey commissioned by The<br />

Service Desk Institute (SDI) and<br />

Hornbill Systems. It appears that<br />

IT service departments are twice<br />

as involved in business planning<br />

with nearly double the number<br />

of IT departments now involved<br />

in the processes compared with<br />

five years ago. The increased<br />

dependence on technology in most<br />

organisations means that the<br />

status of IT has been raised with<br />

65 per cent of businesses having IT<br />

representation at board level.<br />

The research has also identified<br />

that the role of the service desk has<br />

grown to meet extended round the<br />

ServiceTalk the Journal is the voice of you, the <strong>itSMF</strong><br />

UK members. We want you to join in the<br />

conversation and spark off the debate<br />

Are you ready to<br />

turn green<br />

It seems most bizarre<br />

that any company<br />

would still drag their<br />

feet on going green<br />

even when they realise<br />

that they actually<br />

stand to increase profit<br />

from observing green<br />

measures. Of course<br />

IT companies need<br />

to conserve energy.<br />

However, we are in<br />

danger of forgetting<br />

that IT professionals<br />

need to acquire the<br />

skills to help them<br />

understand that green<br />

IT does not only make<br />

environmental sense but<br />

it also makes compelling<br />

business sense.<br />

Green does not mean expensive – quite the opposite. Indeed with<br />

the right approach and effective process management, an<br />

environmental policy across all IT implementations can and will deliver<br />

significant bottom line value.<br />

No number of strategies could possibly compensate for an IT<br />

department that is ignorant in the way of green practices. If an<br />

organisation wishes to drive down on its IT energy usage, the whole<br />

IT department, and indeed all employees, must buy into and be fully<br />

educated in the green policies put in place, both in terms of process<br />

and underlying ethos.<br />

This way, they will be able to identify clear opportunities for driving<br />

down overheads. Highlighting and communicating costs to staff will<br />

surely increase awareness and actually reduce consumption as<br />

individuals start to proactively monitor their actions and collectively<br />

take responsibility for their company’s activity.<br />

Rick Firth, managing director, Parity Training<br />

For more on the green IT issue, see our article on page 29<br />

clock, dedicated support demands.<br />

50 per cent of companies are using<br />

psychometric testing to identify<br />

the potential in recruits for the<br />

service desk which is now viewed<br />

very much as the start of a career<br />

path. There is also more emphasis<br />

on personal skills when recruiting<br />

than qualifications, reflecting the<br />

importance of the ‘human’ side of<br />

the modern day IT service desk.<br />

In the last five years we have<br />

seen IT change from being an<br />

outside function to one that<br />

is core to the business. The<br />

delivery of business goals is often<br />

underpinned by the success of<br />

the IT infrastructure, and while<br />

technology has enabled many<br />

service desks to run successful<br />

support functions, there has<br />

also been recognition that the<br />

human touch – service desk<br />

personnel – is what delivers<br />

customer satisfaction. Good<br />

systems and working practices<br />

must support service personnel<br />

and empower a personalised<br />

service – but interpersonal skills<br />

are what counts. The successful<br />

career opportunities that have<br />

opened up reflect this change,<br />

and about time too.<br />

Patrick Bolger, chief marketing<br />

officer, Hornbill Systems<br />

encompassing the issues which really impact you<br />

and your business objectives.<br />

Whether you have comments about the <strong>itSMF</strong> UK,<br />

the journal and its content, or the industry in general,<br />

please send us an e-mail.<br />

James West. servicetalkeditor@itsmf.co.uk<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 11


comment<br />

What<br />

is your<br />

vision<br />

Well, summer is well and truly here<br />

and it’s that time of the year again<br />

to take stock of the last business<br />

year’s performance for the industry<br />

as a whole. You will of course<br />

know that it’s also a year since <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

Version 3 was launched around the<br />

globe (see our article on page 14<br />

for a look at how it has impacted<br />

the market) and individuals have<br />

been waiting in eager anticipation<br />

for the training courses which<br />

followed the refresh so they could<br />

update their skills. I’m pleased<br />

to say that the delivery of training<br />

has now picked up a pace and<br />

APMG report a significant upturn in<br />

individuals undergoing the <strong>ITIL</strong> V2-<br />

V3 Foundation Bridge or the <strong>ITIL</strong> V3<br />

Foundation course itself. Hopefully<br />

a greater number of IT service<br />

managers are getting closer to the<br />

business as a result.<br />

Additionally, there has been<br />

much good and positive work<br />

undertaken with getting parity<br />

and mapping sorted out on <strong>ITIL</strong>’s<br />

linkages with other IT sourced<br />

systems being used in the service<br />

management world, including<br />

specifically eTOM and COBIT as well<br />

as ISO/IEC 20000. You will learn<br />

on page 34 about the work being<br />

carried out jointly by the <strong>itSMF</strong> and<br />

TeleManagement Forum (TMF) to<br />

help both customer bases of <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

and eTOM respectively to get to<br />

grips with the differences (which<br />

lie mostly in technical language)<br />

between the two frameworks.<br />

I’m pleased and encouraged<br />

also to see that the word<br />

‘complementary’ is being used<br />

rather than ‘competitive’ when<br />

it comes to talking about these<br />

other systems and <strong>ITIL</strong> and the<br />

service management world will<br />

be better for it. While <strong>ITIL</strong> might<br />

be the frontrunner and possibly<br />

the most advanced of all support<br />

infrastructures, <strong>itSMF</strong> needs now<br />

to engage on all fronts, particularly<br />

as our membership broadens and<br />

the shape of IT service management<br />

changes. Individuals and<br />

organisations now have a greater<br />

level of ability and understanding<br />

of all things IT and their wants<br />

and needs are so much more<br />

sophisticated. We need to adapt<br />

to this and also adapt our existing<br />

practices to de-mystify for them<br />

what we do to support businesses.<br />

If we don’t, then how can businesses<br />

continue to understand the<br />

enormous benefits that IT service<br />

management brings to them<br />

I read an article recently by Sharon<br />

Taylor, the chief architect of the <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3 refresh, which was titled: ‘Losing<br />

IT and gaining a place in the team’.<br />

She said that ours is a maturing<br />

industry and that IT today is not<br />

so much aligned to the business,<br />

but is the business itself. I’m not<br />

for one minute suggesting that<br />

getting the hell out of IT might be the<br />

catchphrase for the future, but getting<br />

a hell of a lot out of IT, might be.<br />

So, we are in a global market,<br />

and service management is a<br />

global concept which ought to<br />

break down all barriers. It’s shared<br />

across all types of businesses and<br />

at almost every level. Providing<br />

and managing these services for<br />

the betterment of business must be<br />

the ultimate aim of our people and I<br />

believe that <strong>itSMF</strong> is key to acting as<br />

a gatekeeper for everything service<br />

management related. n<br />

Keith Aldis<br />

Chief executive officer<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 13


<strong>ITIL</strong> one year on FEATURE<br />

Has <strong>ITIL</strong> Version 3<br />

made the connection<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> Version 3 is one year old, and to mark the occasion, ServiceTALK the Journal<br />

asked a range of industry experts their views on what progress has been made. A<br />

practitioner, a trainer, a consultant and an industry think-tank all offer their<br />

opinions to create a snap shot of how the best practice framework has settled in.<br />

The<br />

practitioner.<br />

Diane Finn,<br />

service strategy<br />

consultant, BT<br />

Operate<br />

Telecoms giant BT<br />

was one of the first<br />

organisations to<br />

pursue <strong>ITIL</strong> Version 3<br />

when it was launched in June 2007. Diane Finn<br />

summarises the draw of the new framework.<br />

“BT is looking to deliver world class service<br />

to its customers and is therefore determined<br />

to apply best practice to underpin that. <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3 represented a more converged approach<br />

between IT and business, which was in tune<br />

with BT’s service agenda.”<br />

BT of course has the financial and staffing<br />

clout to mobilise a major project such as<br />

implementing <strong>ITIL</strong> V3, but as Diane explains,<br />

the effort was still significant, proving that <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3 has far more value than merely a badge<br />

of honour. “Our key challenge was rolling out<br />

training to large numbers of people at both<br />

Foundation and Manager level. Stakeholder<br />

management across the organisation to develop<br />

understanding and benefits of embracing <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3 was also vital.”<br />

As we have already touched on, BT knew <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3 was a large investment, but it could see the<br />

benefits when assessing the move and is<br />

already reaping rewards. “The new version<br />

has provided the opportunity to audit various<br />

parts of our business and brought to the surface<br />

areas where we were weak under Version 2.<br />

This in turn has driven service improvement<br />

activities and increased the momentum<br />

for service improvement.”<br />

In fact, the changes to <strong>ITIL</strong> in V3 which extend<br />

it into the wider service change and away from<br />

focusing purely on IT service management, have<br />

helped drive up the profile of <strong>ITIL</strong>, helping to<br />

make it a senior management issue. Several BT<br />

divisions are now using <strong>ITIL</strong>, as Diane explains.<br />

“It has been used to drive our overall operating<br />

model which in turn has provided greater<br />

visibility and momentum.”<br />

It is clear that BT has enjoyed success in<br />

employing <strong>ITIL</strong> V3, but there is some way to<br />

go before the new version of <strong>ITIL</strong> sees mass<br />

adoption throughout the business world. Diane<br />

is convinced the key to driving acceptance comes<br />

as the framework starts showing its worth,<br />

stating that ‘delivery of measurable benefits in<br />

business terms and clear improvements<br />

to service levels to the customer base’ will<br />

help potential users of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 overcome any<br />

fears they might have.<br />

The consultant.<br />

Mark O’Neill,<br />

senior principal<br />

consultant at<br />

QA-IQ<br />

“Like many others I<br />

decided to start on<br />

the first page, of the<br />

first book, Service<br />

Strategy. I soon<br />

settled into its prose, nodding sagely to myself<br />

in agreement with the latest view of a brave<br />

new world.<br />

Luckily, the Friday that my set of books arrived<br />

happened to coincide with the delivery of a case<br />

of mixed reds and whites from my Sunday paper<br />

wine club. As I perused my CD collection for<br />

the perfect listening companion to my drinking<br />

and reading companion, I began to question my<br />

actions. Surely this was one self-indulgent step<br />

too far It almost felt as if I was being filmed for<br />

a new reality TV programme to be called One<br />

Man and his Guilty Pleasures.<br />

However as I settled down and started to<br />

flick through the pages of Service Strategy, my<br />

decision to accompany my reading with a case<br />

of alcoholic beverage seemed like the most<br />

astute decision I had made that week.<br />

I had started off OK, a bit like a horse in the<br />

Grand National completing their first furlong at<br />

a comfortable canter, but as I got deeper into<br />

Strategy, my mood was starting to change and<br />

my concentration was starting to waiver, and<br />

it soon became apparent, this was not going<br />

to be the joyous evening I had planned. By the<br />

time I got to value composition and the agency<br />

principle, self doubt started to creep in and I<br />

started to get concerned that I was not going to<br />

complete my own personal Grand National.<br />

I told myself, this was a book that needed me<br />

to be on top of my game, my concentration and<br />

perception levels had to be 100 per cent. I closed<br />

the book, uncorked another bottle of red and left<br />

Service Strategy for another day. I had fallen at<br />

the first hurdle.<br />

It was not until the following Tuesday I<br />

plucked up the courage to have another go at<br />

Service Strategy; I was not going to let a bunch<br />

of academics from over the pond beat me, I<br />

was going to learn and understand this stuff.<br />

Accompanied that time with nothing stronger<br />

than a cup of tea, I bravely opened the book<br />

on page 31 to read about the principles of<br />

Service Strategy. Again I started off at a nice<br />

pace, agreeing with the book’s perception of<br />

perceptions and moving nicely onto market<br />

mindset and framing the value of services. In<br />

horse racing terms I was taking up a comfortable<br />

position on the rails. Unfortunately as with my<br />

first attempt I soon began to falter and was very<br />

quickly looking for something else to do, anything<br />

that would give me an excuse to put the book<br />

down again. All too quickly I gave up.<br />

Working for an organisation that employs<br />

service management consultants and lecturers,<br />

I decided I would canvass the views of my<br />

esteemed colleagues and ask them for their<br />

view of Service Strategy. I trawled the web,<br />

contacted other people who worked in the<br />

industry and it soon became apparent that<br />

we were all struggling to varying degrees to<br />

understand Strategy. More worryingly, seeing<br />

as I was working for a training and consultancy<br />

organisation, I had to know this stuff, as very<br />

quickly I would be teaching and implementing<br />

it for my customers.<br />

What followed was a series of sleepless<br />

nights, anxiety attacks and pure cold sweat<br />

panics. Then it hit me, as I was frantically<br />

thinking about how I was going to understand the<br />

complexities of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 and Strategy in particular,<br />

I had a thought - don’t start at the beginning of<br />

the lifecycle, start at the end. It had finally come<br />

to me, do what I’ve been telling others to do<br />

for as long as I can remember, get a baseline<br />

understanding of where are we now. I made a<br />

strategic decision; the first book I was going to<br />

read was not Service Strategy but Operation.<br />

Once I’d made that decision I was then able<br />

to properly plan my approach. First off, I set<br />

myself a vision, what did I want to get out of the<br />

new version, what were the advantages I was<br />

looking for I then thought, what do I want to<br />

gain a detailed understand of and what would I<br />

be happy with just an overview understanding of<br />

I also asked myself where I wanted to specialise.<br />

I then put together a timetable of what I could<br />

realistically fit into my working and personal<br />

time. As with all plans, mine needed assessing<br />

and correcting along the way, and my decision<br />

patterns were constantly reviewed, and still<br />

are as I write. Without even knowing it I had<br />

employed the four Ps of Strategy; perspective,<br />

positions, plans and patterns.<br />

Over the course of the last twelve months I<br />

have grown to understand and appreciate <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3 and my perception has changed with each<br />

passing month. I now have a much better<br />

understanding of the new version which has led<br />

to many of my initial concerns and protests being<br />

rendered illogical and unfounded.<br />

How did this turn around happen How did<br />

my initial disappointment turn into new found<br />

respect and appreciation Well quite simply<br />

I took a strategic approach to understanding<br />

the lifecycle. I realised my initial mistake was<br />

starting with something that was new and<br />

unfamiliar and I made the decision to start<br />

again by re-aligning myself with processes and<br />

functions that were as familiar to me as my old<br />

friends and family. Over the proceeding weeks, I<br />

followed a plan that enabled me to dip in and out<br />

of the books, move from one familiar aspect to<br />

a number of new and unfamiliar aspects, and I<br />

naturally fell into a cyclic approach of evaluation<br />

and re-evaluation.<br />

Twelve months on and I am embracing<br />

every element of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 (including Strategy).<br />

As a lecturer and consultant I am still called<br />

on to deliver <strong>ITIL</strong> V2 training courses or<br />

implementation workshops, and I get more than<br />

a little frustrated that (certainly from a training<br />

perspective) I am limited to articulate only ten<br />

processes and the service desk. There is so<br />

much more to <strong>ITIL</strong> V3, that admittedly did exist in<br />

some form or another in previous versions, that<br />

we can now promote, implement and improve<br />

on. It’s just finding the time (and will-power) to<br />

read it, understand it and appreciate it as the<br />

only way forward.”<br />

The trainer.<br />

John griffiths<br />

Client manager<br />

at Fox IT and<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> uk trainer<br />

of the year 2007<br />

“The <strong>ITIL</strong> refresh<br />

has generated a lot<br />

of differing views<br />

about the new look<br />

library. In the main, most people agree that it is<br />

an overall improvement and more accurately<br />

reflects the way businesses and IT work in the<br />

modern world. There is also a consensus that<br />

the ‘ideal world’ of <strong>ITIL</strong> has been repositioned<br />

closer to the ‘real world’ into which people have<br />

to implement what they have learned from the<br />

classroom.<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> V3 has given managers and practitioners<br />

of service management a lot more to consider. In<br />

these relatively early days, it has helped to clarify<br />

some of the anomalies of previous versions<br />

whilst at the same time introduced more things ➤<br />

14 SERVICETALK july 2008<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 15


<strong>ITIL</strong> one year on FEATURE<br />

that need to be considered. This includes a<br />

fundamental attitude shift of how the library is<br />

approached. With previous versions you simply<br />

went to the relevant chapter of the topic you<br />

were interested in. Now that topic is likely to be<br />

liberally spread around the lifecycle stages which<br />

is logical but also frustrating for some people<br />

who find it challenging when they cannot pigeon<br />

hole a process or activity. This is not surprising<br />

as the Foundation level exams (both old and<br />

new) are essentially an exercise in putting<br />

everything in its rightful place: ‘Which process is<br />

responsible for the following task What is the<br />

correct order of the incident stages’<br />

A common question from delegates attending<br />

both Foundation and Managers bridging courses<br />

is ‘Where does that (process/activity/task) live<br />

in the lifecycle’ It is important that people do<br />

not get too hung up about what lives where<br />

as the reality is that processes will feature<br />

throughout the lifecycle stages in several<br />

different manifestations. The application of<br />

a pragmatic and common sense approach to<br />

implementing the lifecycle will greatly assist in<br />

getting the right elements of each process<br />

into the appropriate places.<br />

Service Strategy contains virtually all new<br />

material and is the cause of much diverse<br />

debate. It has been variously described as a<br />

load of mumbo jumbo theory through to an<br />

insightful and useful tool for helping to integrate<br />

the business and IT. It also introduces for the<br />

first time in the classroom a lot of material that<br />

a large number of people have no perceived<br />

direct input to or personal association with.<br />

Many people sitting on a training course will<br />

have a view that they have no influence or<br />

control over the strategy of either the business<br />

or IT and therefore they will never really engage<br />

in the strategy either in the workplace or the<br />

classroom. Strategy does however take on<br />

more relevance for these individuals when they<br />

realise that the other stages of the lifecycle are<br />

all about the execution of that strategy. Another<br />

defining point is that Service Strategy asks the<br />

question ‘Why do we want to do something’<br />

before considering the question ‘How do we do<br />

it’ A long and sorry trail of projects or process<br />

implementations have failed to meet their goals<br />

by the simple failure to follow the sequence of<br />

how those two questions are asked. The Service<br />

Strategy book is likely to be a ‘slow burn’ where<br />

the value and relevance of it will take a little<br />

while to embed itself into the <strong>ITIL</strong> fraternity.<br />

Although the theme of this piece is <strong>ITIL</strong> V3<br />

one year on, the vast majority of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 training<br />

has still to be released into the market. When<br />

that happens we will get a clearer view of how<br />

organisations position themselves with regard<br />

to training their staff. There has been evidence<br />

of organisations who are currently in the early<br />

days of <strong>ITIL</strong> adoption, agonising over whether<br />

they should adopt Version 2 or 3. In reality<br />

it is virtually a non-issue. Any organisation<br />

taking on <strong>ITIL</strong> right now would begin with the<br />

fundamentals, all of which are incorporated in<br />

both versions. It should be viewed as a pick<br />

and mix selection of working with the next<br />

appropriate process irrespective of which version<br />

it originates from. A key point that seems to<br />

have been overlooked is that most of the ‘new’<br />

processes of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 were around previously,<br />

they simply were not in the ‘core set’ of Service<br />

Support and Service Delivery which many people<br />

view as the sum of <strong>ITIL</strong>, overlooking publications<br />

such as Application Management or ICT.<br />

A key element of implementation is training<br />

staff to be able to adapt to the new processes.<br />

It is in this area that organisations will be<br />

presented with an array of options compared<br />

to earlier training programmes. It is going to<br />

be interesting to see which routes individuals<br />

take on their journey to the <strong>ITIL</strong> expert level.<br />

No doubt different routes will be adopted by<br />

both individuals and organisations based on<br />

their specific plans and objectives. Once they<br />

have arrived at the base camp by successfully<br />

completing the Foundation course, the view up<br />

the mountain shows the summit to be somewhat<br />

higher than it used to be. There are also more<br />

paths which can be followed and the trick will<br />

be working out which path best fits to an<br />

individual’s aspirations and capabilities. For<br />

some people, one or two more steps into a<br />

Lifecycle or Capability course may be sufficient,<br />

while others will doggedly march on up to the<br />

summit, gaining credits along the way. Maybe<br />

in another year’s time we will start to see how<br />

those paths are both defined and used. When<br />

that happens we will get a better understanding<br />

of just how much thing really have changed.”<br />

The industry think-tank.<br />

The Service Futures Group<br />

In January 2008, the Service Futures Group, the<br />

joint venture between The Service Desk Institute<br />

and <strong>itSMF</strong> UK, published a report looking at <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3 six months into its life. Although the story has<br />

moved on from that point, it is worth another look<br />

at the report because it highlights and ➤<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 17


FEATURE <strong>ITIL</strong> one year on<br />

pools much of the relevant praise and criticism<br />

that is commonly aired through the market.<br />

The key points of the research were this:<br />

- Small organisations are not ready for or are not<br />

interested at this time in the new material.<br />

- People still seem to have a fear of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3.<br />

- The adapt and adopt approach which was so<br />

well liked appears not to be so universally<br />

understood with the new version – but it<br />

absolutely still applies.<br />

- The concepts are new to IT service<br />

management best practices but have in the<br />

main been used successfully in other industries<br />

or other areas of the business for a long time.<br />

- People have reported that they are finding the<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> V3 material more difficult to navigate than<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> V2 – realistically this may be to do with<br />

familiarisation with the material but only<br />

time will tell.<br />

- People are deciding to stay with <strong>ITIL</strong> V2 at the<br />

current time (this is a generalisation but is<br />

true amongst the majority of respondents)<br />

and are waiting for others to try it first so<br />

they can learn from their experiences.<br />

- The understanding across the industry is still<br />

fairly low but this will change with time.<br />

- The qualifications are still in development –<br />

this point is key as before this area is bedded<br />

in and has been around for a while the other<br />

points raised above will continue to be true.<br />

It is interesting that many of these points<br />

are now being tackled, with our practitioner,<br />

consultant and trainer reporters all looking into<br />

the issues of proof of concept, absorbing the new<br />

information and qualifications respectively. Logic<br />

also dictates that all of these issues will be solved<br />

with time, as they all centre on fear, uncertainty<br />

and lack of familiarity with the source material<br />

(aside from the precise details surrounding<br />

qualifications, although yet again, this issue will<br />

be addressed and finalised in time).<br />

The report also highlighted the fact that many<br />

organisations had already developed much of<br />

what is in <strong>ITIL</strong> V3, which in the words of Megan<br />

Pendlebury, executive director of the Service<br />

Futures Group shows that: ‘<strong>ITIL</strong> V3 is indeed<br />

inline with where the industry was and is moving<br />

and is not the output of a group of people sitting<br />

in a room rather than looking at the real world.”<br />

There is criticism in the report however,<br />

particularly in the case of the Service Strategy<br />

book. There is a problem of perception with<br />

this title, with many IT practitioners considering<br />

that strategy is not part of their remit and the<br />

Service Futures Group suggests that the book be<br />

repositioned and further guidance should<br />

be offered. The report also aired concerns for<br />

the future of qualifications, with some<br />

Megan<br />

Pendlebury, Service<br />

Futures Group<br />

questioning the<br />

validity of an<br />

additional exam<br />

rather than gaining<br />

real-life experience<br />

with the new<br />

processes.<br />

Feedback for the<br />

other books and<br />

areas of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 was<br />

on the whole very<br />

positive, which suggests that the slightly slow<br />

uptake of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 may be less to do with any<br />

inherent weaknesses in the new version, and<br />

more to do with <strong>ITIL</strong> V2 being well understood<br />

and more comfortable for the businesses who<br />

have adopted it. Again, the passage of time<br />

will likely see a greater understanding of the<br />

benefits and compelling reasons to move to <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3, which when combined with clarification and<br />

guidance from the parties involved in promoting<br />

and working with <strong>ITIL</strong> will see the new version<br />

meeting the high expectations that have been<br />

attached to it.<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> Version 2 and 3 books and CDs are available<br />

online from www.itsmf.co.uk/shop<br />

Remember to login to receive your <strong>itSMF</strong> UK<br />

membership discount. n<br />

18 SERVICETALK july 2008


<strong>ITIL</strong> Maturity FEATURE<br />

Going around the<br />

world with <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

A report by PA Consulting into the maturity of <strong>ITIL</strong> practices in the market<br />

place included a look at the differences between the US and UK in terms of<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> Version 3 uptake. In this article, we look at the contents of the report,<br />

get the view from the US and learn that the perceived gap in terms of <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

development across the atlantic may not be as great as some think.<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 21


feature <strong>ITIL</strong> maturity<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> maturity FEATURE<br />

The PA Consulting report, ‘Avoiding the<br />

banana skins – How to make sure that<br />

your Service Improvement Programme<br />

(SIP) doesn’t slip-up’, was complied by sampling<br />

around 50 companies at the 2007 <strong>itSMF</strong> UK<br />

Conference and Exhibition and for comparison,<br />

including results to a similar survey conducted<br />

in the US. The questions simply asked those<br />

surveyed to rank the maturity of <strong>ITIL</strong> processes<br />

within their organisation, with a score of<br />

0 indicating that the process was absent, up<br />

to 5 which indicates fully implemented and<br />

optimised processes.<br />

The two graphs to the right show the relative<br />

scores of the US and UK respondents to the<br />

survey. Before looking in detail at the differences<br />

between the US and UK markets, the report<br />

looks at the overall meaning of the figures. The<br />

three most mature <strong>ITIL</strong> Version 2 processes are<br />

financial management, incident management<br />

and change management. These findings mirror<br />

results from the previous UK survey in 2006<br />

and the results from the US survey in 2007.<br />

Incident and change management are usually<br />

the first processes to be addressed by an <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

implementation programme and this would<br />

explain their higher scores. The relative maturity<br />

of financial management however, is most likely<br />

due to the rigorous corporate requirements for<br />

fiscal management that already exists in most<br />

businesses today, together with the additional<br />

focus brought to bear on this area by regulation<br />

such as Sarbanes-Oxley.<br />

The least mature process is availability<br />

management with well over 50 per cent of the<br />

companies surveyed scoring less than two.<br />

Worryingly, almost one in five companies do<br />

not measure availability at all, and a further<br />

third apply inconsistent measures to some of<br />

their applications or components. With little<br />

management focus or detailed availability data, it<br />

is very difficult to see how IT services will reliably<br />

be provided to the business in the future.<br />

The five new <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 processes covered in<br />

the survey are request fulfilment, supplier<br />

relationship, business relationship, service<br />

knowledge, and information security<br />

management. Results showed the most mature<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> V3 process to be information security<br />

management. However, there were still over<br />

a third of respondents who don’t have defined<br />

processes to manage the confidentiality, integrity<br />

and availability of information.<br />

The least mature process is knowledge<br />

management, specifically the use of available<br />

data to support other processes such as incident<br />

management and problem management. It<br />

would appear that, even though most service<br />

management toolsets contain functionality to<br />

support this process, the approach for capturing<br />

the right information, keeping it up-to-date and<br />

utilising it as part of the IT organisation’s day-today<br />

processes, is proving difficult to implement.<br />

Perhaps surprisingly, the overall average<br />

maturity score for the <strong>ITIL</strong> V2 processes and the<br />

selected <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 processes was identical. So,<br />

although these processes have only recently been<br />

differentiated as part of the latest version of <strong>ITIL</strong>, it<br />

is clear that they have been part of the IT operation<br />

all along and are at a similar level of maturity.<br />

However, the new and updated <strong>ITIL</strong> V3<br />

processes and functions do now enable<br />

IT managers to better articulate the exact<br />

changes that will deliver business benefit<br />

as part of a focused service improvement<br />

programme.<br />

Figure 1: Distribution of scores across the maturity range 1-5 for the UK in 2007<br />

Incident management<br />

problem management<br />

Change management<br />

Release management<br />

Configuration management<br />

Service level management<br />

Availability management<br />

Capacity management<br />

Financial management<br />

IT service continuity management<br />

Request fulfillment management<br />

Supplier relationship management<br />

Business relationship management<br />

Service knowledge management<br />

Information security management<br />

business case for <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

Stakeholder management<br />

Programme management of <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

Figure 2: Distribution of scores across the maturity range 1-5 for the US in 2007<br />

Incident management<br />

problem management<br />

Change management<br />

Release management<br />

Configuration management<br />

Service level management<br />

Availability management<br />

Capacity management<br />

Financial management<br />

IT service continuity management<br />

Request fulfillment management<br />

Supplier relationship management<br />

Business relationship management<br />

Service knowledge management<br />

Information security management<br />

6% 10% 50% 21% 10% 4%<br />

15% 29% 33% 12% 10% 2%<br />

10% 13% 33% 33% 10% 4%<br />

12% 37% 21% 21% 10% 2%<br />

10% 33% 50% 2% 4% 2%<br />

17% 17% 29% 23% 6% 8%<br />

15% 35% 33% 10% 10% 2%<br />

13% 6% 60% 13% 4% 4%<br />

4% 4% 29% 40% 17% 6%<br />

23% 19% 27% 23% 2% 6%<br />

10% 25% 40% 17% 6% 2%<br />

19% 15% 27% 17% 12% 10%<br />

21% 8% 48% 15% 6% 2%<br />

33% 37% 19% 10% 2%<br />

8% 27% 12% 17% 10% 23%<br />

33% 17% 6% 12% 13% 19%<br />

17% 17% 19% 25% 12% 10%<br />

25% 15% 17% 13% 10% 19%<br />

0 - Absence 1 - Awareness 2 - Repeatable 3 - Controlled 4 - Integrated 5 - Optimised<br />

11% 11 % 50% 15 % 11 % 4 %<br />

31 % 27 % 35 % 4 % 4 %<br />

13 % 8 % 58 % 4 % 13 % 4 %<br />

35 % 12 % 50 % 4 %<br />

38 % 27 % 19 % 4 % 12 %<br />

27 % 35 % 31 % 8 %<br />

50 % 23 % 23 % 4 %<br />

46 % 15 % 15 % 12 % 12 %<br />

32 % 24 % 8 % 24 % 12 %<br />

28 % 16 % 36 % 16 % 4 %<br />

28 % 32 % 40%<br />

44 % 8 % 32 % 4 % 12%<br />

52 % 16 % 20 % 4 % 8 %<br />

52 % 26 % 15 % 7 %<br />

8% 42 % 13% 8 % 13 % 17 %<br />

0 - Absence 1 - Awareness 2 - Repeatable 3 - Controlled 4 - Integrated 5 - Optimised<br />

The UK scores versus the<br />

US scores<br />

On average, the US maturity scores were<br />

significantly lower that those measured in the<br />

UK (averages of 1.4 versus 2.0 across the <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V2 and selected <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 process). However,<br />

the patterns that emerged were very similar<br />

to those in the UK with incident management,<br />

change management and financial management<br />

being the most mature <strong>ITIL</strong> V2 processes, and<br />

availability being the least mature.<br />

Across the board, while some companies are<br />

at the top end of <strong>ITIL</strong> maturity (on average 15<br />

per cent of UK respondents rated themselves<br />

as a four or five for the <strong>ITIL</strong> V2 and V3<br />

processes), most still have some way to go<br />

to achieve their ambition (on average 35 per<br />

cent of UK respondents rated themselves a<br />

two or less).<br />

The final part of the UK company survey<br />

aimed to find out the maturity rating of the<br />

business case, stakeholder management and<br />

programme management processes. The<br />

analysis indicates that there remains a large<br />

proportion of companies which are embarking<br />

on SIPs (Service Improvement Programmes)<br />

without the necessary foundations for success<br />

being in place. For example, a third of<br />

organisations have no business case for <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

implementation and 25 per cent of organisations<br />

have no SIP in place at all.<br />

There was a significant difference between the<br />

responses from the public and private sectors.<br />

The response from the US<br />

Robert Stroud is part of the <strong>itSMF</strong> USA board of directors and sits on the <strong>itSMF</strong> <strong>International</strong><br />

executive board. Here he talks about how well <strong>ITIL</strong> is taking hold in the US.<br />

Do you see any areas<br />

where the US has an<br />

advantage over Europe in<br />

terms of <strong>ITIL</strong> adoption<br />

“Leveraging the<br />

implementation experience<br />

gained in Europe has allowed<br />

ITSM implementations<br />

to use the experience to<br />

implement faster. Attention<br />

in North America is typically<br />

on enterprise change<br />

management looking to<br />

deliver change with minimal<br />

impact to the business to<br />

assure service levels. In<br />

short, there is a strong<br />

focus on service levels, user<br />

experience and the supporting<br />

processes.”<br />

In the UK, <strong>ITIL</strong> awareness<br />

has taken many years<br />

to bed in, how quickly<br />

On average, the public sector respondents scored<br />

themselves 0.7 of a maturity point higher across<br />

these questions (2.8 versus 2.1). Experience<br />

would suggest that the reason for this lies<br />

is recognition of <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

occurring in the US<br />

“If you say <strong>ITIL</strong> to most CIOs<br />

they are aware of it and more<br />

than likely will direct you to<br />

either the VP operations or the<br />

VP ITSM who is responsible<br />

for the journey. The <strong>itSMF</strong>,<br />

vendors and practitioners<br />

have all worked together<br />

to communicate the value<br />

and benefits of IT service<br />

management. <strong>ITIL</strong> and ITSM<br />

has been timely for many<br />

US organisations as they<br />

look to automate their IT<br />

infrastructure in order to<br />

allow precious IT human<br />

resources to be allocated to<br />

value adding innovation.”<br />

What benefits are US<br />

businesses seeing<br />

from using <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

“US organisations are using<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> to deliver solutions that<br />

are aligned to the business.<br />

This value is derived through<br />

real operational cost savings<br />

in terms in conjunction with<br />

better service levels, quality<br />

through automation, and<br />

predictability of outcomes<br />

with repeatable processes.<br />

Additional benefits have been<br />

delivered with publicly traded<br />

companies with processes<br />

that are documented allowing<br />

compliance with their<br />

organisation’s Sarbanes<br />

Oxley implementations. In<br />

many cases <strong>ITIL</strong> is being<br />

implemented with the IT<br />

Governance Framework<br />

COBIT (Control Objectives<br />

for Information and related<br />

Technology) to deliver input to<br />

a balanced scorecard.”<br />

in the public sector’s policy of using project<br />

management best practices such as PRINCE2,<br />

more consistently than companies operating in<br />

the private sector. n<br />

22 SERVICETALK july 2008


feature software subject as a service<br />

software as a service subject feature FEATURE<br />

Renting<br />

application<br />

software<br />

may seem to<br />

contradict<br />

the control<br />

demanded<br />

by IT service<br />

management,<br />

but as James<br />

West, editor<br />

of ServiceTalk<br />

the Journal,<br />

learns, by<br />

not buying<br />

software,<br />

service<br />

managers<br />

may be able<br />

to exert more<br />

influence<br />

than ever<br />

before.<br />

In the late nineties, a company called Siebel<br />

became one of the fastest growing software<br />

business in history, selling Customer<br />

Relationship Management (CRM) suites globally.<br />

For a time, the business was unstoppable, with<br />

the likes of Oracle, SAP and IBM all launching<br />

software to compete with Siebel in an attempt to<br />

cut into its market share. All of these IT giants<br />

failed and Siebel continued to roll onwards.<br />

The key for ending Siebel’s dominance, in a<br />

surprising twist in the story, was not necessarily<br />

building better software as might be expected;<br />

it was about changing the delivery method. A<br />

company by the name of salesforce.com arrived<br />

on the scene, offering software with the same<br />

functionality as Siebel, but the differentiator was<br />

that its software was web based. This meant that<br />

buyers no longer needed to install software on<br />

every machine. Web based software only needs<br />

a browser to work, and so is available on pretty<br />

much every computer on earth. The reduction in<br />

installation times, the simplification of support<br />

(the system can be altered/fixed remotely), and<br />

the reduced upfront costs were a big draw to<br />

buyers, and salesforce.com gradually eroded<br />

Siebel’s market share and in doing so had<br />

toppled a giant.<br />

Web based software is often available as<br />

Software as a Service (SaaS), meaning that<br />

users don’t even buy the software, they simply<br />

pay a subscription (generally per user) to access<br />

and use the system. The rise of the SaaS has<br />

been rapid, despite there still being many<br />

downsides to SaaS - the article below looks in<br />

detail at the pros and cons associated with SaaS.<br />

Yet despite fears over losing control and the<br />

reliance on a web connection, the use of SaaS<br />

continues to increase. Industry analyst Gartner<br />

says that SaaS deployments will grow 17 per<br />

cent through to 2011, double the rate of growth<br />

for purchasing of enterprise application software<br />

as a whole.<br />

From an IT service management point of<br />

view, is this shift a good thing The answer to<br />

this question is obviously highly dependant on<br />

the type of application and nature of the business,<br />

but here are some universal issues that must<br />

be considered:<br />

Do you really need to ‘own’ a<br />

1 piece of software<br />

Surely the pre-requisite for any software is that<br />

it offers your business the functionality needed<br />

There is of course, a fear factor associated with<br />

not having the software on-site, but anytime you<br />

buy a piece of third party code, you are to some<br />

extent beheld to that organisation and reliant<br />

to some degree on the support offered by the<br />

supplier. SaaS is a relatively mature market<br />

now, so as long as the supplier can prove<br />

reliability, uptime, robustness of support, there<br />

should be little difference from physically<br />

purchasing the software.<br />

Does SaaS fit with<br />

2 <strong>ITIL</strong> processes<br />

There is nothing in <strong>ITIL</strong> which specifically<br />

demands that software must be held on each<br />

machine on which it will be used. SaaS should<br />

do nothing to alter any controls you have in<br />

place to govern processes. As long as change,<br />

configuration and release procedures are<br />

followed as usual, there should be no<br />

major issues.<br />

Can you work with<br />

3 the supplier<br />

SaaS is no different to outsourcing, or bringing<br />

in a contractor; the staff may not be employed<br />

directly by your business, but it is possible for<br />

all parties to work in harmony for the good of the<br />

business. SaaS suppliers are no different and<br />

should be evaluated in the same way.<br />

Would you be able to operate<br />

4 without a web connection<br />

The simple answer to this question is that most<br />

of us would struggle to work for long without<br />

access to email and the internet, SaaS or not. In<br />

reality, web connections are not always perfect,<br />

and web-based systems are close to, but not<br />

yet totally equal to on-machine installs of<br />

software, in terms of speed and functionality. A<br />

comprehensive pilot would be needed to see if<br />

the trade-off is too large within your organisation.<br />

The reason why SaaS is enjoying such rapid<br />

growth is that all of the problems relating to<br />

its use are gradually being solved and many<br />

of the objections to the model are slowly<br />

being removed, as the mental and cultural<br />

shift needed to get people trusting SaaS<br />

gains momentum.<br />

As a final point, the removal of the need for<br />

traditional in-house support for applications<br />

could prove to be the biggest plus for IT service<br />

management. With the host supplier dealing<br />

with user issues remotely, internal service desks<br />

will be able to afford more staff resource to<br />

proactive activities, such as project management,<br />

change control etc. For this reason alone, SaaS<br />

warrants a much closer look. ➤<br />

What service<br />

delivery choices<br />

will you make<br />

SaaS or on-site: the pros and cons<br />

Hosted software has many upsides, but there are negatives to<br />

consider. Russell Wiltshire, director at Vivantio, offers both<br />

sides of the argument.<br />

Continuing on the next page, we offer the case for on-site (where the customer buys the<br />

software, installs and supports it in the traditional manner) versus SaaS software deployment,<br />

with the intention of offering some guidance to those having to make this decision in the<br />

coming months and years.<br />

24 SERVICETALK july 2008<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 25


feature software as a service<br />

Software as a service FEATURE<br />

The case for on-site<br />

• One obvious reason for going for the<br />

on-site option is that you can’t find a SaaS<br />

service desk provider that has the application<br />

your business needs. It’s still an emerging<br />

market so there is more choice for those<br />

looking to buy software in the<br />

traditional way.<br />

• SaaS is still a relatively young method<br />

of delivering and supporting software and<br />

although it has gained massively in adoption<br />

in some software application areas such<br />

as CRM, it is still true to say that SaaS in<br />

service desk is not yet mature despite strong<br />

offerings being out there for some time.<br />

• There might be a specific element of the<br />

SaaS delivered service desk offering which<br />

doesn’t meet your servicing or after-care<br />

requirements. Perhaps the SaaS provider<br />

only offers support 9 to 5, Monday to Friday<br />

and your operation runs 24/7; or you<br />

specifically require SSL encryption but the<br />

SaaS provider doesn’t offer this yet. Make<br />

sure regardless of the delivery method, that<br />

the application itself meets the needs of your<br />

business in terms of both functionality and<br />

ease of use.<br />

• Data protection issues mean that some<br />

companies have specific legal requirements<br />

stipulating where they can store customer<br />

information or personal data. Perhaps this<br />

data must reside within a particular country<br />

but the SaaS provider might use offshore<br />

data centre operations. So questions along<br />

these lines need to be asked and satisfactory<br />

answers obtained.<br />

• Some organisations prefer to make<br />

upfront capital investment for financial<br />

reasons. The company may be geared to the<br />

purchase of IT assets such as servers and<br />

software licences.<br />

• If internet access is non-existent or highly<br />

restricted as is the case in some government<br />

departments including the Ministry of<br />

Defence and the police, then clearly SaaS<br />

isn’t easily deployed.<br />

The case for SaaS<br />

• A prime concern of some finance directors<br />

today is reducing capital expenditure (or<br />

capex), preferring to buy goods and services<br />

out of operational expenditure (or opex)<br />

budgets. Opex naturally favours SaaS<br />

deployment as you ‘pay as you go’, normally<br />

via monthly subscription instalments rather<br />

than paying up front, thereby creating<br />

uncertain costs of ownership.<br />

• In a situation involving mergers or<br />

acquisitions the software licences owned by<br />

the company being acquired may be nontransferable<br />

and rendered invalid. In most<br />

cases the software vendor will re-licence the<br />

software to the new company rather than<br />

lose a customer, but these license terms<br />

come into play if the purchasing company is a<br />

competitor for example.<br />

• The SaaS model means very little up front<br />

commitment (in contract term and financial<br />

outlay). SaaS providers are generally geared<br />

to very rapid customisation and automatic<br />

upgrading of their platforms.<br />

• In theory, IP-based standards help keep<br />

the entire organisation’s IT infrastructure<br />

working well together. With this back drop in<br />

place, managers can make decisions based<br />

purely on the quality and functionality of the<br />

services on offer, without getting tripped up<br />

by IT policies.<br />

• SaaS providers can also deliver<br />

significant economies of scale as server<br />

and infrastructure costs are reduced when<br />

serving one instance of an application to<br />

many customers.<br />

• Managers working within organisations<br />

with convoluted and time-consuming<br />

procurement processes can acquire<br />

new applications via relatively low cost<br />

subscriptions which affect revenue rather<br />

than capital budgets and come in ‘below the<br />

radar’. This means managers can introduce<br />

new systems at a departmental level<br />

without lengthy, multi-level, budgetary<br />

approval processes.<br />

Conclusion<br />

If you are looking seriously at SaaS in your business, there are some myths and cons that need<br />

examining. Some established on-site vendors have highlighted that integration with other on-site<br />

systems remains an issue. SaaS providers in many application areas have already proved beyond<br />

doubt that SaaS and on-site systems integration presents no genuine issues.<br />

The data centres and the server platforms that SaaS providers rely on are typically a great deal<br />

more secure and robust physically and technically, than any server sitting in an organisation’s own<br />

office. It is also clear that one of the largest threats to data security in any organisation is misuse by<br />

authorised personnel not unauthorised external attackers. Sensible security policies and an effective<br />

training programme are key. Recent high-profile stories in the press regarding lost CDs and laptops<br />

provide all the proof that is necessary. Although the misperception that SaaS means relinquishing<br />

control has reduced dramatically over the last three years, it remains an argument levelled against<br />

SaaS delivery. IT managers still worry about what will happen if the provider’s server goes down or<br />

there are problems with the internet connection. But on-site servers are probably more vulnerable<br />

to downtime in reality. The questions that really needs asking are ‘Is a typical IT department able to<br />

achieve the same levels of availability for the same price Is an organisation willing to fund constant<br />

upgrades to the hardware platform’ And by locking themselves in to a specific server platform on-site,<br />

an organisation has already placed a huge amount of control into the hands of the platform vendor<br />

- regularly having to deal with the headache of rolling out new versions of server operating systems,<br />

database engines and such like. n<br />

26 SERVICETALK july 2008<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 27


Green I.T special FEATURE<br />

Green I.T. special<br />

Approaching<br />

the green light<br />

If you think that energy shortages are years away, think again. I.T. is set to feel the<br />

initial brunt of the energy crisis and James West, editor of ServiceTalk the Journal,<br />

says the time has come to investigate alternatives before someone pulls the plug.<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 29


feature subject<br />

Green I.T. special FEATURE<br />

Virtualisation:<br />

overcoming the problems<br />

The promise of better use of resources, lower costs and potential reduction to<br />

both power costs and real estate is providing a compelling reason to move towards<br />

virtualisation. But the virtual data centre raises some significant new issues in areas<br />

of performance, compliance and security says Dwayne Melancon, VP corporate and<br />

business development, Tripwire.<br />

While the physical infrastructure<br />

provides a clear view of individual<br />

component performance, virtualisation<br />

removes that transparency. Without visibility of<br />

the virtualisation engine organisations cannot<br />

identify potential security loopholes, ensure<br />

system changes do not affect performance or<br />

be confident in compliance to regulations such<br />

as Sarbanes Oxley.<br />

Today, perhaps only 15 or 20 percent of<br />

applications being run on virtual infrastructures<br />

are production systems; the majority of<br />

organisations are using the technology only for<br />

test environments. But analysts believe that the<br />

number of production applications will grow to<br />

between 45 and 60 per cent of total deployments<br />

over the next two years as cost pressures bite.<br />

In the headlong rush to gain cost benefits<br />

there is a very real risk that companies are<br />

moving into virtualisation far ahead of their<br />

ability to understand and manage the technology.<br />

The benefits are compelling. But at what cost to<br />

business risk and security<br />

Virtualisation adds huge complexity to the<br />

IT infrastructure stack, pulling together large<br />

numbers of applications and services into one<br />

consolidated data centre. Traditional, silobased<br />

management tools provide no insight<br />

into operational performance of virtual systems,<br />

leaving an organisation completely blind to the<br />

impact of change, both planned and unplanned,<br />

on the overall infrastructure.<br />

Without a view into this virtual environment,<br />

how can any organisation ensure machines are<br />

tested and configured correctly or impose the<br />

required level of rigour over system changes<br />

To many of us, an energy shortage, similar to<br />

global warning, seems to be something of a<br />

abstract concept at the moment - it is hard<br />

to conceive of a time when the UK will have to<br />

ration its energy consumption. At worse, we can<br />

console ourselves with the knowledge that such<br />

a situation is years from coming to a head.<br />

It seems however that the Inconvenient Truth<br />

as popularised by Al Gore’s film concerning<br />

power usage is making itself felt today.<br />

John Windebank, <strong>itSMF</strong> UK’s <strong>International</strong><br />

representative comments. “If you’re a data<br />

centre in London, you can’t buy any more power<br />

because it’s not available. Power is becoming the<br />

biggest cost to IT, exacerbated by carbon taxes,<br />

and this is a problem that we must all face.”<br />

Whatever your politics, or whether you<br />

believe IT should take more responsibility for<br />

the environment, the facts will ensure that the<br />

green issue is a pertinent one for IT, becoming<br />

perhaps the biggest threat to the current use of<br />

IT we have ever faced.<br />

Part of the problem, according to John, is<br />

gross inefficiency, with data centres running<br />

at between 10 - 12 per cent of their potential.<br />

This leads to an obvious solution: if you can use<br />

this latent 90 per cent of processing power to<br />

run other tasks, you can reduce your energy<br />

consumption dramatically. This is how the<br />

concept of virtualisation was created and it is a<br />

hot topic, with industry analyst group Gartner<br />

calling it the biggest ‘impact trend’ for the IT<br />

infrastructure up to 2012. Virtualisation of<br />

servers - the main point of attack in terms of<br />

reducing energy consumption - is already having<br />

an effect, with Gartner stating that the market for<br />

selling new servers fell by four per cent in 2006.<br />

Moving on, Gartner also predicts that four million<br />

machines will be installed on servers by 2009, so<br />

the sale of new servers is sure to fall further still.<br />

“Virtualisation is hardly a new concept;<br />

storage has already been virtualised - albeit<br />

primarily within the scope of individual<br />

vendor architectures - and networking is also<br />

virtualised,” said Philip Dawson, vice president<br />

at Gartner. “However, as both server and PC<br />

virtualisation become more pervasive, traditional<br />

IT infrastructure orthodoxy is being challenged<br />

and is changing the way business works with IT.”<br />

As hinted by Philip, it is not just servers that<br />

are subject to the virtualisation push, with PCs<br />

increasingly becoming virtualised. In 2007,<br />

Gartner estimated five million virtualised PCs<br />

and predicts 660 million by 2011. This huge<br />

shift will see PCs becoming more like the dumb<br />

terminals of old, with business applications and<br />

even the operating system being offered to users<br />

over a virtual network.<br />

Thomas Bittman, lead analyst at Gartner,<br />

details what the shift could mean for the IT<br />

infrastructure. “Traditionally the operating<br />

system has been the centre of gravity for client<br />

and server computing, but new technologies,<br />

new modes of computing, and infrastructure<br />

virtualisation and automation are changing the<br />

architecture and role of the operating system.<br />

The days of the monolithic, general-purpose<br />

operating system will soon be over.”<br />

This is good news for IT service management<br />

because in theory at least, managing a virtual<br />

IT infrastructure eliminates many of the localised,<br />

user created IT support issues which plague<br />

the service desk, and make it much easier to<br />

manage change and upgrades etc.<br />

So, when you combine the expected benefits<br />

of a virtual infrastructure with the huge, and<br />

vital, cuts to energy usage, the time seems to<br />

be right for virtualisation. As always, such a<br />

push requires thorough research and planning<br />

and on the next page, we look at some of the<br />

issues that must be considered.<br />

30 SERVICETALK july 2008


feature subject<br />

The process becomes ever more complex<br />

when organisations accept the fact that virtual<br />

and physical worlds will co-exist for the<br />

foreseeable future. From the core infrastructure<br />

running the virtual middleware to legacy and<br />

in-house developed applications that are too<br />

complex to migrate to the virtual world, the<br />

physical infrastructure will continue to play a<br />

core role in any data centre.<br />

It is essential, therefore, that organisations<br />

put in place the policies, processes and<br />

monitoring tools required to support the entire<br />

physical and virtual IT infrastructure. Critically,<br />

organisations need to extend existing rigorous<br />

processes within the physical environment<br />

to also encompass a virtual implementation<br />

based on best practice implementation. This<br />

will ensure any business can immediately gain<br />

the cost benefits associated with a virtual world<br />

without undermining the reliability of the data<br />

centre or compromising regulatory compliance.<br />

Compliance pressure<br />

Indeed, the pros and cons of the virtual world<br />

are being taken very seriously by the regulatory<br />

bodies. The virtual environment, with its<br />

continual changes, poses huge new compliance<br />

challenges, especially in the area of audits. How<br />

can an organisation know if a virtual machine is<br />

compliant if it no longer exists How do you<br />

track change history for auditors in a virtual<br />

world Certainly these issues are now coming to<br />

the fore as increasing numbers of organisations<br />

look to virtualise critical production systems.<br />

The payment card industry, for example, has<br />

a number of development boards looking at the<br />

implications of virtualisation on its data security<br />

standard. The good news is that virtualisation<br />

adds some strong capabilities, especially for<br />

those organisations that have opted to run<br />

multiple services on a single system to minimise<br />

hardware costs, creating a high risk single<br />

point of entry.<br />

Running each of those services separately<br />

within the virtual machine will provide more<br />

security by creating disparate services. However,<br />

if the virtual middleware is compromised,<br />

these services are just as vulnerable; in effect<br />

the problem has simply been moved to the<br />

virtual machine. The PCI Standards Council is<br />

now beginning to define policies to include the<br />

virtualised infrastructure, and other regulatory<br />

bodies will undoubtedly follow suit.<br />

But the underlying principles remain unchanged:<br />

- Management taking responsibility for<br />

effective controls<br />

- Strong policies and process<br />

- Fact-based accountability supported by real<br />

time audit and control<br />

As in the physical environment, real time<br />

change monitoring is essential to ensure<br />

organisations remain compliant - or have<br />

early warning of incidents that may affect<br />

compliance status.<br />

Virtual confidence<br />

According to Gartner, 60 percent of production<br />

virtual machines will be less secure than<br />

their physical counterparts through 2009.<br />

And analysts fear that misconfigured and<br />

mismanaged virtual implementations will result<br />

in service interruptions and downtime that will<br />

undermine confidence in the technology and<br />

potentially stall wholesale adoption.<br />

Yet by continually monitoring the performance<br />

of the entire virtual and physical infrastructure<br />

organisations will not only reduce errors and<br />

drive up performance but also contribute to the<br />

incremental adoption of virtualisation across<br />

an organisation. Visibility ensures that all<br />

changes to the infrastructure, both physical and<br />

virtual, occur in full support of the business, in<br />

compliance with policies and procedures and<br />

that any exceptions are rapidly dealt with before<br />

they can cause business damage. n<br />

32 SERVICETALK july 2008


feature eTOM<br />

eTOM FEATURE<br />

The enhanced Telecoms Operations Map (eTOM) is a process-framework designed to<br />

manage the operations associated with telecoms. The owners of the framework<br />

are working with the <strong>itSMF</strong> to align its processes with <strong>ITIL</strong>. This article explores<br />

the meaning of eTOM, how it differs and complements <strong>ITIL</strong> and how the joint<br />

development is gathering pace.<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong>: opening<br />

more doors<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> and eTOM have similar backgrounds and<br />

perform similar roles in their respective fields<br />

and it is because of this that there have been<br />

suggestions in the past that the frameworks can<br />

conflict if running within the same organisation.<br />

As we will see from this article, this conflict is<br />

not a major issue in reality and moves are afoot<br />

to develop ways for the frameworks to work<br />

alongside each other in the most synergistic way<br />

possible.<br />

Matthew Burrows is head of consulting for<br />

TuringSMI telecoms division and is working<br />

with <strong>itSMF</strong> and the TeleManagement Forum (TM<br />

Forum) as part of a joint working party to align<br />

eTOM and <strong>ITIL</strong>.<br />

Matthew takes up the story, explaining the<br />

background and structure of eTOM, before<br />

moving onto examine the history of <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

and eTOM and how they are being brought<br />

closer together.<br />

eTOM is owned by the TM Forum, an industry<br />

association with over 650 global members.<br />

The aim of the TM Forum is to help members<br />

transform business processes, operations and<br />

systems for managing and monetising on-line<br />

information, communications and entertainment<br />

services. Part of this is delivered through the<br />

Next Generation Operational Support System<br />

(NGOSS) model, of which eTOM is a part. NGOSS<br />

is an initiative to improve efficiency and reduce<br />

the costs associated with operating telecom<br />

networks, allowing service providers to<br />

change the way they think about their<br />

business and operations.<br />

NGOSS is a comprehensive, integrated<br />

framework for developing, procuring and<br />

deploying operational and business support<br />

systems and software. It is available as a toolkit<br />

of industry-agreed specifications and guidelines<br />

that cover key business and technical areas.<br />

The enhanced Telecoms Operations<br />

Map provides a business centric view of a<br />

telecommunications company. Effectively, the<br />

eTOM model is a multi-level process model<br />

representing the complete set of business<br />

processes in use within a telecoms operator. The<br />

model starts at level 0, which consists of three<br />

sections; Strategy, Infrastructure and Product;<br />

Operations; and Enterprise Management, which<br />

underpin the full lifecycle of the products and<br />

services delivered to the customer (see Figure 1).<br />

The operations section is divided into four<br />

main lifecycle stages at level 1; looking at these<br />

sections in some detail helps understand what<br />

eTOM does and how it functions.<br />

Operations support and readiness: responsible<br />

for providing management,<br />

logistics and administrative support to the other<br />

process groupings, and for ensuring operational<br />

readiness in the fulfilment, assurance and<br />

billing areas.<br />

Fulfilment: operations for providing customers<br />

with their requested products and services in<br />

a timely and correct manner. It translates the<br />

customer’s business or personal need into<br />

a solution, which can be delivered using the<br />

specific products in the enterprise’s portfolio.<br />

This process informs the customers of the<br />

status of their purchase order and ensures<br />

completion on time.<br />

Assurance: includes all activities for the<br />

execution of proactive and reactive maintenance<br />

activities to ensure that services provided to<br />

customers are continuously available and<br />

working to service performance levels. It<br />

handles continuous resource status and<br />

performance monitoring to proactively detect<br />

possible failures. It collects performance data<br />

and analyses them to identify potential<br />

Figure 1. eTOM Levels 0, 1 and 2<br />

Strategy, infrastructure and product<br />

Strategy and<br />

comms<br />

Enterprise management<br />

Infrastructure<br />

lifecycle<br />

management<br />

Marketing and offer management<br />

Service development and management<br />

Product<br />

lifecycle<br />

management<br />

Resource development and management<br />

(Application computing and network)<br />

▲<br />

Supply chain development and management<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

Strategic and<br />

enterprise planning<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

Enterprise risk<br />

management<br />

Customer<br />

problems and resolve them without impact to<br />

the customer. This process manages the SLAs<br />

and reports service performance to the customer.<br />

It receives trouble reports from the customer,<br />

informs the customer of the trouble status, and<br />

ensures restoration and repair.<br />

Billing: involves everything necessary for<br />

the collection of appropriate usage records,<br />

production of timely and accurate bills, for<br />

providing pre-bill usage information, for<br />

processing their payments, and performing<br />

payment collections. In addition, it handles<br />

customer enquiries, provides billing enquiry<br />

status and is responsible for resolving problems<br />

to the customer’s satisfaction in a timely manner.<br />

This process grouping also supports<br />

prepayment for services.<br />

eTOM and <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

eTOM is effectively a process framework<br />

designed to support the telecoms product/service<br />

lifecycle, which is almost identical to the service<br />

lifecycle principle used as the basis for <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

Version 3. <strong>ITIL</strong> has traditionally focused ➤<br />

Operations<br />

Operations<br />

support and<br />

rediness<br />

Fullfillment<br />

Customer relationship management<br />

Service management and operations<br />

Resource management and operations<br />

(Application computing and network)<br />

Reassurance Billing<br />

Supplier partner relationship management<br />

▲<br />

Entersprise<br />

effectiveness<br />

management<br />

Knowledge<br />

and research<br />

management<br />

Financial and asset<br />

management<br />

Stakeholder and<br />

external relations<br />

Human resources<br />

management<br />

▲ management ▲ ▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

34 SERVICETALK july 2008<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 35


feature subject<br />

Working<br />

together<br />

As we have seen, the link<br />

between <strong>itSMF</strong> UK and the TMF<br />

has been formalised and here<br />

is a joint statement from the<br />

respective CEOs of the two<br />

organisations, Keith Aldis and<br />

Keith Willetts.<br />

Both the <strong>itSMF</strong> and the TM Forum recognise that<br />

both frameworks have strengths and weaknesses<br />

that, if combined, would have major benefits for<br />

all the industry sectors involved with delivering<br />

convergent services to market. So, we are<br />

actively co-operating to put <strong>ITIL</strong> and eTOM on<br />

a converging course; address any interworking<br />

issues and ensure that more integrated support<br />

is available to users.<br />

A good deal of work has already been done. The<br />

TM Forum is in the final stages of completing its<br />

own major review of eTOM to bring it into closer<br />

alignment with <strong>ITIL</strong> and the two organisations<br />

are undertaking a joint program to identify<br />

further opportunities for closer inter-working<br />

- initial fruits of this work are expected to begin<br />

to roll out by this summer.<br />

There is a good deal of momentum within the<br />

memberships of both organisations for this<br />

to happen, and for us to see a clear position<br />

on using <strong>ITIL</strong> and eTOM as supportive of the<br />

needs of businesses. This builds on the affinity<br />

between the two frameworks, and their real<br />

complementary strengths, so that each can<br />

benefit when they are brought together.<br />

on the activity of providing and managing IT<br />

infrastructure and systems to support the<br />

business processes. eTOM is the business<br />

process framework for telecoms, and <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

could therefore be considered a subset of these<br />

processes, covering the ones that are owned and<br />

operated by the technology or IT function.<br />

There is overlap, but it is possible for eTOM<br />

and <strong>ITIL</strong> processes to coexist and support each<br />

other as part of a mature process framework<br />

for telecoms operators. Unfortunately, in many<br />

organisations there has been conflict between<br />

network operations, who tend to use eTOM, and<br />

IT operations who would usually be more <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

aligned. The reasons for this conflict include<br />

inconsistent terminology between these two<br />

best practices, and a lack of knowledge and<br />

experience of both frameworks. For example,<br />

eTOM refers to ‘faults’ which are almost identical<br />

to an ‘incident’ in <strong>ITIL</strong> terminology. There are<br />

overlaps and synergies with the increasing<br />

convergence at a technology level, where<br />

telecoms products and services are dependent<br />

on telecoms network and IT capabilities, systems<br />

and infrastructure. When a service failure or<br />

degradation occurs, the operational teams<br />

often need to work together to restore service.<br />

Complex hand-offs, inconsistent terminology<br />

Matthew Burrows, TuringSMI<br />

and independent processes often result in the<br />

service taking longer than necessary to restore.<br />

Some organisations have addressed these<br />

issues by consolidating around a single set of<br />

processes and tools, usually opting to either go<br />

for eTOM or <strong>ITIL</strong>, or sometimes creating a<br />

hybrid model. n<br />

How do eTOM and<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> compare<br />

Mike Kelly, who works on the<br />

eTOM and NGOSS compliance<br />

programme at TMF, offers a<br />

comparison of <strong>ITIL</strong> and eTOM.<br />

eTOM<br />

- Telco enterprise model<br />

- ITU (<strong>International</strong> Telecommunication<br />

Union) international standard<br />

- Prescriptive catalogue<br />

- Hierarchy of processes<br />

- Process framework<br />

- Blueprint for process direction for<br />

service providers<br />

- Common language of processes<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong><br />

- IT/ICT service management<br />

- Non-prescriptive guidelines<br />

- Best practice framework<br />

- Methods to deliver controlled and<br />

optimised services<br />

- Standardised vocabulary<br />

Mike’s summary is this: eTOM and <strong>ITIL</strong> are<br />

not in conflict - eTOM can be used to build<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong>-compliant processes, using eTOM<br />

process elements.<br />

36 SERVICETALK july 2008


feature communications<br />

communications FEATURE<br />

In June 2006 the Financial Times ran an<br />

editorial discussing the effectiveness of<br />

communications within the enterprise.<br />

The article looked primarily at the digital<br />

communication channels available such as<br />

e-mail, intranets, Instant Messenger (IM), SMS,<br />

and the conclusion was stark:<br />

“In the attention economy the value of e-mail<br />

is rapidly approaching zero”.<br />

Goodbye e-mail<br />

E-mail is often the primary method that the I.T. department uses to<br />

communicate with business users. But abuse of the communication<br />

channel has impacted its effectiveness; is the damage irreparable<br />

asks Pat Geary, chief marketing officer for Skinkers<br />

What does this mean And if this is true,<br />

what does this mean to the effectiveness<br />

of organisations that rely on e-mail for<br />

communications What value do the other<br />

channels provide and how can they be managed<br />

How does the enterprise service desk offer<br />

the best possible service at low cost when<br />

important notifications cannot cut through this<br />

communication fog<br />

To understand these issues, we first have to<br />

understand how we came to rely on<br />

e-mail and understand what the limitations<br />

of this channel are. The reliance on e-mail, as<br />

the main communication mechanism within<br />

organisations, has steadily and stealthily been<br />

on the increase over many years. Until the<br />

computer era truly came of age, which has<br />

been relatively recently, businesses used to<br />

run to a very structured format: the minutes for<br />

meetings would be transcribed by secretaries,<br />

who would also manage diaries, write up notes,<br />

distribute memorandums and chase actions.<br />

Managers structured their day by dealing with<br />

correspondence at the start of the day, with<br />

every letter opened, read by the secretary and<br />

important ones given priority.<br />

When e-mail arrived it was firstly used by<br />

academics and early technology adopters;<br />

businesses viewed e-mail with suspicion and<br />

it is only recently that e-mail has become<br />

acknowledged, by law, as a permissible form<br />

of correspondent evidence. Very rapidly e-mail<br />

became the business communication tool of<br />

choice and the speed with which correspondence<br />

could be sent and received was almost<br />

instantaneous, compared to the multi-day<br />

turnaround that physical mail required, which<br />

lead to the coining of the term ‘snail mail’ to<br />

describe written and typed correspondence.<br />

The impact was dramatic; typing pools<br />

disappeared almost overnight, secretaries<br />

became personal assistants to only the very<br />

top level managers and middle management<br />

came to rely on e-mails with the volume of<br />

electronic communications growing at an<br />

ever-increasing rate.<br />

This all sounded encouraging; efficiencies<br />

were created within the enterprise through rapid<br />

communications; deals could be concluded in a<br />

much shorter timeframe; lengthy and protracted<br />

correspondence chains could be compressed<br />

into hours rather than days; and the flow of<br />

information within the enterprise continued to<br />

increase. So what happened to sour the picture<br />

In one word: spam.<br />

Not the processed ham beloved of Monty<br />

Python of course but the unsolicited e-mails<br />

spuriously filling the internet and offering<br />

all manner of life enhancing surgery and<br />

opportunities to improve our love lives. In<br />

October 2007 Postini, an e-mail filtering specialist<br />

claimed that 10 in 11 e-mails are spam - over 90<br />

per cent. The traditional definition of this type<br />

of spam referred to messages from outside of<br />

the enterprise. Today we also have to contend<br />

with ‘enterprise spam’ caused by people sending<br />

internal e-mails that are neither relevant nor<br />

important. During the days of memos if someone<br />

found some keys on the floor they would not<br />

get a memo sent round to all the employees<br />

in the company.<br />

We have become e-mail junkies which is<br />

one of the main reasons that enterprises are<br />

finding it increasingly difficult to get important<br />

information through to their employees<br />

through the white noise of e-mail.<br />

The ‘attention economy’ highlights the<br />

problem of information overload, we have<br />

become information-rich, but attention-poor;<br />

our days are filled with different types of<br />

information that may require action, some vital,<br />

some trivial and we are finding it increasing hard<br />

to sort the wheat from the chaff, to get to the<br />

actionable and important information. A Gartner<br />

report on effective electronic communications<br />

(August 2007), stated that an organisation of<br />

10,000 employees could be losing as much<br />

as £20 million per annum from ineffective<br />

communication within the enterprise.<br />

Enterprises today have tried many approaches<br />

to punch through the communication fog;<br />

satellite broadcast networks, newsletters, round<br />

table discussions, canteen briefings etc. and<br />

these do offer value. However, in today’s<br />

digital world, the direct to desktop<br />

communication is still through e-mail, or<br />

via elaborate intranets that provide valuable<br />

information but tend to become disorganised<br />

dumping grounds for information. Intranets<br />

today are akin to putting an important notice<br />

up in a cupboard, but you would only see the<br />

notice if you open the door, and know where the<br />

cupboard is in the first place.<br />

Perhaps the solution is a new approach to<br />

business to employee (B2E) communications that<br />

offers the best attributes of the existing digital<br />

channels, but in addition delivers new high<br />

impact direct ‘push’ channels that can punch<br />

through to employees’ desktops and/or handheld<br />

devices when really critical information needs to<br />

delivered. Skinkers, for example, has developed<br />

a live desktop alert system which sends vital<br />

information to the desktop, mobile phone or<br />

Blackberry. Skinkers has seen a reduction of<br />

calls through to the service desk of between 10<br />

and 20 per cent for clients using this system.<br />

This is one possible solution to the problem of<br />

information overload, but there is no doubt that<br />

IT departments must be much more selective in<br />

the information they deliver to users, otherwise it<br />

will be lost in the din of communications that all<br />

businesses currently contend with. n<br />

38 SERVICETALK july 2008<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 39


Publications FEATURE<br />

IT INFRASTRUCTURE LIBRARY (<strong>ITIL</strong> ® ) V3<br />

SERVICE MANAGEMENT<br />

MICROSOFT OPERATIONS FRAMEWORK (MOF)<br />

COMPLIANCE AND RISK<br />

ISO/IEC 20000<br />

PROJECT, PROGRAM & PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT<br />

G2G3.COM<br />

People are the driving force of business.<br />

With this in mind, G2G3 create Propulsion. Our world-renowned simulations<br />

and communication solutions are designed to create energy and forward<br />

motion, propelling your enterprise to faster results. We work closely with<br />

our clients and partners, using innovative experiential learning techniques<br />

to create positive cultural change.<br />

Over one million people who have participated in our simulations can’t be<br />

wrong. Be forward thinking.<br />

To learn more email INFO@G2G3.COM<br />

SPREADING<br />

THE WORD<br />

The <strong>ITIL</strong> pocket guides have done a superb job getting<br />

the word of best practice into the heart of the<br />

business world and Mark Lillycrop (pictured), manager,<br />

publications and translations, <strong>itSMF</strong> UK, looks at the<br />

creation of the Version 3 incarnations of the guides.<br />

They say that small is beautiful, and that<br />

sentiment certainly applies to books. You<br />

can load your bookcase with weighty<br />

reference works or surf Wikipedia for pages<br />

of dubious information on the latest hot topic.<br />

But nothing compares with the convenience of<br />

slipping a miniature volume into your pocket for<br />

perusal when you are sitting on a plane, waiting<br />

for a bus, or on your way to an exam.<br />

It’s generally agreed that the growth of <strong>itSMF</strong><br />

has been built on the success of one pocket<br />

guide in particular. Tens of thousands of copies<br />

of the ‘Little <strong>ITIL</strong>’ (or ‘IT Service Management – a<br />

Companion to the IT Infrastructure Library’ to<br />

give it its full title) have been sold as a concise<br />

summary of the Service Support and Service<br />

Delivery books in <strong>ITIL</strong> V2, while the follow-on<br />

series of UK pocket guides now reaches into<br />

every corner of service management, from<br />

security management to business perspective.<br />

With <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 the focus has moved to The<br />

Stationary Office’s (TSO) Key Element Guides<br />

(KEGs), co-branded with <strong>itSMF</strong> <strong>International</strong>, a<br />

decidedly bijou companion set to the core books.<br />

The KEGs have had a great deal of input from<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> UK through authorship and review, and are<br />

now selling extremely well. For those who need<br />

to capture the essence of the core books, the<br />

KEGs are definitely a good way to go.<br />

Continuing with the diminutive theme,<br />

there are plenty of pocket-sized publications<br />

on a broad range of topics available. Titles<br />

devoted to ISO/IEC 20000, IT governance<br />

based on COBIT, IT service Capability Maturity<br />

Model, Six Sigma and <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 are all available<br />

in the six-inch format, complemented by<br />

more detailed management guides and<br />

introductions for those seeking in-depth<br />

information. Visit www.itsmf.co.uk/shop for<br />

more information on our available publications.<br />

Don’t forget to log in to take advantage of<br />

your membership discount. ➤<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 41


feature publications<br />

Theory into practice<br />

There are one or two new titles on the horizon<br />

for all those trying to put service management<br />

theory into practice. An update of TSO’s popular<br />

‘<strong>ITIL</strong> Small-scale Implementation’ by Sharon<br />

Taylor and Ivor Macfarlane will shortly be<br />

available to bring the book into line with <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

Version 3, while ‘Building an <strong>ITIL</strong> Based Service<br />

Management Department’ by Malcolm Fry<br />

(again from TSO) takes a refreshing look at the<br />

practicalities of creating a service management<br />

operation that adheres to <strong>ITIL</strong> processes and<br />

guidelines. Meanwhile, BCS has launched a<br />

new edition of David Miller’s ‘Business Focused<br />

IT and Service Excellence’, which examines the<br />

perception gap between IT and the business;<br />

and a new work entitled ‘Effective IT Service<br />

Management’ by Rob Addy, published by<br />

Springer, provides practical guidance on IT<br />

services by extending the <strong>ITIL</strong> approach to deliver<br />

proactive and pragmatic IT service management.<br />

The IT service management library is also<br />

going strong. Recent additions have included<br />

‘Implementing ISO/IEC 20000 Certification<br />

– the Roadmap’ for those aiming for corporate<br />

adoption of the standard, complemented by a<br />

more detailed ‘Introduction’ to the subject. Along<br />

with <strong>itSMF</strong> UK’s highly regarded ‘Planning and<br />

Achieving ISO/IEC 20000 Certification’, these<br />

books offer just about everything you need to<br />

know about getting started with the international<br />

service management standard. Over the<br />

coming weeks, the library will see the launch<br />

of ‘ITSM Global Best Practices’, a substantial<br />

compendium of more than 50 contributions<br />

from opinion formers across the industry,<br />

and also ‘Implementing Metrics for IT Service<br />

Management’, which provides an <strong>ITIL</strong>-oriented<br />

measurement framework based on a continuous<br />

improvement lifecycle.<br />

Moving forward, <strong>itSMF</strong> UK will be launching<br />

some new titles later this year, with two Special<br />

Interest Groups (SIGs) pooling their experience<br />

to provide practical guidance on service level<br />

management and change, configuration and<br />

release management respectively. These are<br />

just the first of a number of titles that will be<br />

published by the UK chapter in the months<br />

ahead, reflecting the commitment and expertise<br />

of the UK membership. Watch the website for<br />

further details.<br />

Publications news<br />

By now you should have received the first<br />

few issues of our informative new electronic<br />

newsletter, Publications News. This is the ideal<br />

way to find out about new titles, special offers<br />

and what’s coming next in between issues of<br />

ServiceTalk the Journal. If you haven’t seen<br />

it, and want to receive it please contact<br />

joanne.cooper@itsmf.co.uk<br />

Everyone’s a critic<br />

If you’ve ever fancied giving your views on new<br />

publications, now’s your chance to get your<br />

opinions into print. Starting on the right of this<br />

page, ServiceTalk the Journal will be publishing<br />

independent reviews of publications, to compare<br />

the best (and worst) features of the growing<br />

number of books that are emerging in the service<br />

management space. If this appeals to you, please<br />

get in touch with ServiceTalkEditor@itsmf.co.uk<br />

and we’ll give you the chance to have your say. n<br />

Book review<br />

Laura Jay offers her thoughts on ‘The Official<br />

Introduction to the <strong>ITIL</strong> Service Lifecycle’ book<br />

Did you find the Official Introduction<br />

interesting and insightful<br />

When <strong>ITIL</strong> Version 3 was delivered in 2007,<br />

I was looking forward to reading the new<br />

books with eager anticipation. However,<br />

having received the five core books last year<br />

(all approximately 250 pages each), I found<br />

them rather daunting and despite repeated<br />

attempts to read them from cover to cover,<br />

my enthusiasm for the new version started to<br />

wane.<br />

After several unsuccessful attempts to<br />

read through all five, I was therefore delighted<br />

when this ‘all-in-one’ book came out. I<br />

thought this edition might be a better<br />

approach – especially as the whole book<br />

was less than 250 pages and I was pleasantly<br />

surprised because it was.<br />

The facts are set out in an easy-to-read<br />

layout and written with a busy working<br />

person in mind; you don’t need a degree to<br />

understand the terminology either.<br />

What was new to you about the facts<br />

introduced in the book<br />

As an old hand at <strong>ITIL</strong> V2, it was difficult to<br />

understand in advance just what the new<br />

version was going to come up with. <strong>ITIL</strong> V3<br />

now has five stages: Service Strategy,<br />

Service Design, Service Transition,<br />

Service Operation and Continual Service<br />

Improvement and the key word is lifecycle.<br />

The stages show that <strong>ITIL</strong> has no beginning<br />

or end, just one continuous cycle of defining<br />

strategies, designing new/changed services,<br />

implementing them, improving them,<br />

re-defining them and so on.<br />

There are some other key changes,<br />

for example:<br />

- The importance of how IT services and<br />

business demands need to be aligned<br />

- The inclusion of new processes (some<br />

from ISO/IEC 20000 - previously outside<br />

the scope of <strong>ITIL</strong> V2)<br />

- Some long-overdue amendments such as<br />

incidents and requests now separated out<br />

into two different processes<br />

- More information on areas such as<br />

service catalogue management<br />

How has this book changed your<br />

opinion of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3<br />

Although excited about <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 I wasn’t sure<br />

just how practical it would be. This book<br />

helps explain the increased scope of <strong>ITIL</strong> from<br />

V2 to V3 and how the new existing processes<br />

all work together.<br />

How has the Official Introduction<br />

increased your interest in <strong>ITIL</strong> V3<br />

Using <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 both internally and with our<br />

customers is already a direction that Atos<br />

Origin are engaging in, and the condensed<br />

information in this book certainly makes <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3 look appealing.<br />

I also firmly believe that for anyone coming<br />

straight to the new version of <strong>ITIL</strong>, this would<br />

be an excellent starting point for them.<br />

Did the Official Introduction fulfil<br />

your needs and expectations<br />

Yes and no. The problem is how do you<br />

introduce all of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 in one book With<br />

great difficulty is the answer. This book does<br />

sum up everything you need to know to start,<br />

but then leaves you wanting more. Which is<br />

what it’s supposed to do I guess.<br />

How would you improve the book<br />

One thing that is difficult to understand in the<br />

book is just where the <strong>ITIL</strong> V2 ‘Ten processes<br />

and a function’ now fit into <strong>ITIL</strong> V3. There<br />

is a diagram in the book which shows this<br />

in a simplified form but further detailed<br />

explanation would definitely make life easier.<br />

Laura is currently the Central London <strong>itSMF</strong><br />

UK regional chair and is working as part of<br />

the BSI standards committee reviewing<br />

ISO/IEC 20000.<br />

October’s issue will be comparing the<br />

different <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 complementary titles<br />

available such as the ‘Official Introduction to<br />

the <strong>ITIL</strong> Service Lifecycle’, ‘the Key Element<br />

Guide Suite’, ‘IT Service Management based<br />

on <strong>ITIL</strong> V3’ and ‘An Introductory Overview<br />

of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3’ available from:<br />

www.itsmf.co.uk/shop<br />

VENDOR DIRECTORY<br />

consulting 6<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

@<br />

®<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong><br />

MANAGED SERVICES 6 RECRUITMENT 6<br />

PRODUCT 6<br />

PRODUCT CONTINUED 6<br />

baleit.co.uk<br />

Capacity Management<br />

SOFTWARE TRAINING CONSULTANCY<br />

training providers 6<br />

®<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong><br />

www.metron.co.uk<br />

Looking for that<br />

®<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> bit extra from your<br />

recruitment agency<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

@<br />

Capacity Management<br />

SOFTWARE TRAINING CONSULTANCY<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

www.metron.co.uk<br />

We are looking for contributors....<br />

if you would like to advertise or submit an article to ServiceTalk<br />

the Journal contact lindsay.thomas@itsmf.co.uk for more information<br />

In the next<br />

issue...<br />

• In-sourcing<br />

versus<br />

out-sourcing<br />

• Incident<br />

management<br />

processes<br />

• Service<br />

portfolio<br />

management<br />

• Book reviews<br />

• Conference<br />

Supplement<br />

due 14th<br />

october<br />

2008<br />

42 SERVICETALK july 2008 july 2008 SERVICETALK 43


conference & exhibition<br />

10th - 12th November 2008<br />

H I lT o N M E T R o P o l E , B I R M I N g H a M<br />

The premier 3 day IT Service Management Event that offers a packed<br />

conference full of seminars, workshops, interactive sessions and<br />

exhibition, plus *evening entertainment.<br />

This year’s theme is based on organisations “ real experiences” and not<br />

just based on the theory as so many conferences focus on. This will<br />

include the pitfalls that have been encountered along the way along with<br />

the successfully implemented stories.<br />

“Thoroughly enjoyed the whole<br />

conference - found the vendor stands<br />

very informative. <strong>itSMF</strong> folk could not<br />

have been more accommodating.”<br />

“A very enjoyable and enlightening<br />

experience. A lot was learned and some<br />

will be put into practice shortly”<br />

“An excellent Conference - many thanks<br />

to everyone involved in organising such<br />

a successful event!”<br />

The event is geared to satisfy all levels of IT Service Management needs.<br />

There is an extensive exhibition with experts from the service management<br />

world to talk you through the latest products and services that are available<br />

to make best practice and its processes easier to implement.<br />

Each year the <strong>itSMF</strong> hold the largest IT Service Management event with<br />

over 1000 delegates and 80+ exhibitors. We try and choose locations that<br />

are easily accessible for both the delegates and the exhibitors.<br />

Packages now on sale:-<br />

1 Day Delegate at Members Rate £260.00<br />

1 Day Delegate at Non-Member Rate £360.00<br />

2 Day Delegate at Members Rate £515.00<br />

2 Day Delegate at Non-Members Rate £715.00<br />

3 Day Delegate at Members Rate £640.00<br />

3 Day Delegate at Non-Members Rate £860.00<br />

2 Days/1 Night at Members Rate £750.00<br />

2 Days/1 Night at Non-Members Rate £960.00<br />

ALL PRICES ARE EXCLUSIVE OF VAT<br />

*evening entertainment is only available when overnight packages are booked<br />

To b o o k t o c o m e t o t h e e v e n t g o t o :<br />

www.itsmf.co.uk

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!