02.02.2015 Views

ITIL - itSMF International

ITIL - itSMF International

ITIL - itSMF International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

servicetalk the journal of the it service management forum july 2008<br />

Is iTIL version 3<br />

connecting<br />

Green I.T.<br />

special: make<br />

the savings<br />

eToM TO<br />

JOIN THE<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> PARTY<br />

SOFTWARE AS<br />

A SERVICE -<br />

pros and CONS


contents<br />

CHIEF EXECUTIVE<br />

OFFICER<br />

KEITH ALDIS<br />

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT<br />

MANAGER<br />

BEN CLACY<br />

MARKETING MANAGER<br />

KIM MAY<br />

P.14 P.21<br />

Marketing ASSISTANT<br />

Lindsay Thomas<br />

EDITOR<br />

JAMES WEST<br />

DESIGNER<br />

CASSANDRA LEAR<br />

cassandralear.com<br />

All communications to:<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> UK, 150 Wharfedale<br />

Road, Winnersh Triangle,<br />

Wokingham, RG41 5RB<br />

Tel: 0118 918 6500<br />

Email: servicetalkeditor@<br />

itsmf.co.uk<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> is the registered<br />

trademark of the Office of<br />

Government Commerce (OGC).<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> is a registered word<br />

mark of the IT Service<br />

Management Forum Ltd<br />

Disclaimer<br />

Articles published reflect the<br />

opinions of the authors and<br />

not necessarily those of the<br />

publisher or his employees.<br />

While every reasonable effort<br />

is made to ensure that the<br />

contents of articles, editorial<br />

and advertising are accurate<br />

no responsibility can be<br />

accepted by the publisher for<br />

errors, misrepresentations<br />

and any resulting effects.<br />

ServiceTalk the Journal<br />

material within this<br />

publication may not be<br />

reproduced in whole or in part<br />

without the express<br />

permission of the <strong>itSMF</strong> UK.<br />

Printed by:<br />

AGI Thamesdown Limited<br />

Unit 1-2 Birch,<br />

Kembrey Park, Swindon,<br />

Wiltshire, SN2 8UU<br />

To subscribe please contact<br />

lindsay.thomas@itsmf.co.uk<br />

P.24<br />

july contents<br />

4 industry news<br />

• IT to feel the economic pinch<br />

• New name for Help Desk Institute<br />

• License tracking not automated<br />

6 itsmf News<br />

• Problem management SIG has new chair<br />

• Details of the next simulation event<br />

• <strong>ITIL</strong> Version 3 qualification update<br />

8 itsmf news<br />

• <strong>itSMF</strong> <strong>International</strong> states its intentions<br />

• The personal touch for <strong>itSMF</strong> UK members<br />

• <strong>itSMF</strong> UK Service Management<br />

Awards 2008<br />

11 Letters and opinions<br />

Letters and e-mails about the service<br />

management industry<br />

13 Comment<br />

Thoughts from the CEO<br />

14 <strong>ITIL</strong> Version 3 one year on<br />

One year on since <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 was unveiled, what<br />

is the feedback from the market This article<br />

draws opinions from a practitioner, a trainer,<br />

a consultant and a think tank to see how <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3 is being digested<br />

21 Best practice maturity<br />

The perception that <strong>ITIL</strong> is far more<br />

developed in the UK compared to the US is<br />

challenged in this article<br />

P.29<br />

24 SaaS or on-site<br />

Software as a Service (SaaS) has become<br />

a genuine alternative to buying enterprise<br />

software, this article compares the new and<br />

old ways of software delivery, offering pros<br />

and cons for both concepts<br />

29 Green I.T.<br />

Going green may become a necessity<br />

rather than choice in IT. Here we look at how<br />

big the problem is and how virtualisation<br />

may hold the key to stopping the drain<br />

on power<br />

34 etom<br />

Much like <strong>ITIL</strong>, eTOM is a best practice<br />

framework, but focused on telecoms. <strong>itSMF</strong><br />

is involved in a group which is aiming to<br />

bring the two frameworks into closer<br />

alignment; this article looks at the value and<br />

compatibility of eTOM alongside <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

38 Communications<br />

Is there any value in e-mail or has its<br />

usefulness as a business tool been fatally<br />

undermined by spam We look at the<br />

challenge that IT faces to get its message<br />

through to the rest of the business<br />

41 Publications<br />

An update on the publications arm of the<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> UK, including the first in a series of<br />

book reviews which will lift the lid on the real<br />

value of the publications available<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK


news<br />

news in brief<br />

Licensing not<br />

formally monitored<br />

More than one-third of<br />

attendees polled at the Service<br />

Desk and IT Support Show do<br />

not have a computerised<br />

system for monitoring<br />

software licenses, and of<br />

those who do have such a<br />

system, almost 40 per cent of<br />

staff have no confidence that it<br />

is doing its job.<br />

Another alarming statistic<br />

unearthed by House on the<br />

Hill software at the event<br />

in London’s Olympia is that<br />

53 per cent of IT support<br />

professionals are unsure<br />

whether software licenses<br />

are tracked automatically,<br />

manually or even at all.<br />

Right to improve<br />

The Strasbourg-based<br />

European Court of Human<br />

Rights (ECHR) has thrown<br />

out its previous service desk<br />

software in a move which has<br />

led to improved efficiencies<br />

and user-satisfaction.<br />

ECHR<br />

John Hunter, head of<br />

the ECHR IT Department,<br />

commented on the impact of<br />

e-Service Desk from ICCM.<br />

“We have seen a dramatic<br />

change in the department,<br />

resulting in both quantitative<br />

and qualitative efficiency.”<br />

Support locked down<br />

The European arm of Chubb<br />

Insurance has upgraded its<br />

service management software<br />

as it aims for compatibility<br />

with <strong>ITIL</strong> thinking and meet<br />

the requirements of<br />

Sarbanes Oxley.<br />

Keith Brewer, IT support<br />

manager at Chubb says that<br />

Hornbill’s Supportworks<br />

ITSM product offered far<br />

greater transparency of the<br />

services on offer than was<br />

previously possible.<br />

The time to save<br />

IT urged to self-impose budget cuts before<br />

savings are forced upon the department<br />

IT departments will need to fight<br />

off budget cuts and will struggle<br />

to maintain any efforts to improve<br />

service delivery if the current<br />

recession continues, according to<br />

The Helpdesk Institute’s name<br />

change reflects the shift towards<br />

the full professionalisation of the<br />

IT support industry, according to<br />

the organisation’s founder, Howard<br />

Kendall. The new name, Service<br />

Desk Institute (SDI), embodies the<br />

now commonly accepted notion<br />

that the term helpdesk is outdated,<br />

because it historically suggests a<br />

lack of strategic connections<br />

to the business.<br />

Speaking to ServiceTALK the<br />

Journal, Howard said, “IT service<br />

management is a profession now<br />

and the function is finally being<br />

taken seriously. This has been<br />

helped by key elements such as<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> and SOX (Sarbanes Oxley)<br />

three separate reports.<br />

Consultancy firm the Hackett<br />

Group urges that IT take the<br />

initiative and dramatically curb<br />

spending before it is forced to<br />

New name, new focus<br />

Service Desk Institute offers fresh thinking<br />

and focus on soft skills<br />

which have helped drive the issues<br />

we have been championing for<br />

years into the boardroom.”<br />

The service desk is focused<br />

on proactive service and trying to<br />

eliminate root causes of common<br />

problems. “The volume of calls<br />

to the service desk has increased<br />

exponentially, and we are seeing<br />

an increased use of self-service<br />

and techniques such as combining<br />

the first and second lines of<br />

support, particularly in cases<br />

where follow-the-sun support is<br />

required,” says Howard.<br />

The SDI reports continued<br />

success with its qualifications<br />

programme, having recently<br />

introduced its analyst and manager<br />

do so by the board. Back office<br />

departments within the leading<br />

multi-national firms could realise<br />

savings of as much as £200 million,<br />

representing a saving of almost<br />

half of the predicted fall in profits<br />

caused by the economic lull, by<br />

embarking on a programme of<br />

slashing outgoings.<br />

IT services are at greater risk<br />

of being outsourced than ever<br />

before, according to two documents<br />

produced by industry analyst<br />

Gartner. The first prediction will<br />

see offshoring of services to<br />

locations such as India increasing<br />

drastically, as businesses panic and<br />

forgo SIPs (Service Improvement<br />

Programmes) for the carrot of short<br />

term savings. If the recession<br />

continues towards 2009, Gartner<br />

says that all ‘discretionary IT<br />

spending will be cancelled’, putting<br />

massive pressure on bosses to<br />

offer bargain basement service.<br />

Gartner’s report into the growth<br />

of vendors offering IT services is<br />

also a strong indicator of falling<br />

confidence in internal operations,<br />

with 2007 seeing the sector grow<br />

by 11 per cent. IBM and Accenture<br />

were the big winners during this<br />

period, with the latter in particular<br />

winning new business to the tune<br />

of a 20 per cent year-on-year<br />

increase. 2008 could represent a<br />

far bigger windfall for the service<br />

management providers if the<br />

monetary dynamic refuses to<br />

deviate from its negative path. n<br />

Howard<br />

Kendall,<br />

SDI<br />

training to major new markets<br />

- India and the US. Howard says<br />

these qualifications are in no way<br />

designed to replace <strong>ITIL</strong> training,<br />

instead they focus on soft skills and<br />

the ‘practical side of the process’,<br />

and so should complement existing<br />

service management training. “Our<br />

aim is to bring the wording of best<br />

practice to life,” concludes Howard. n<br />

SERVICETALK july 2008


<strong>itSMF</strong> UK news<br />

Guiding hand for the SIG<br />

Group dedicated to discussing the finer points of problem management<br />

gets boost in the form of a experienced leader in the field<br />

Paul Offord, development director<br />

of troubleshooting company<br />

advance7, has been appointed<br />

chairman for the Problem<br />

Management Special Interest<br />

Group (SIG).<br />

Paul is keen to ensure that<br />

under his chairmanship the<br />

Problem Management SIG has a<br />

recognisable impact within the<br />

industry, and that it provides advice<br />

that delivers measurable benefits.<br />

“We have an impressive array of<br />

people in the SIG with a wealth of<br />

experience. I’m confident that we<br />

can and will make a difference,”<br />

said Paul.<br />

Megan Pendlebury, <strong>itSMF</strong> UK<br />

service management executive,<br />

commented on the appointment<br />

and the importance of quality<br />

guidance for the SIGs. “ Paul<br />

Offord has a wealth of expertise<br />

in problem management and we<br />

feel sure that his leadership will<br />

contribute greatly to the Problem<br />

Management SIG.<br />

“As organisations depend<br />

more and more on technology<br />

to promote and deliver their<br />

products to market, so the<br />

necessity of investing in IT<br />

service management becomes<br />

more apparent. Embracing best<br />

practice approaches and standards<br />

increases the chances of success.<br />

The Special Interest Groups hosted<br />

by the <strong>itSMF</strong> UK are designed to<br />

help members discuss, dissect and<br />

understand the key best practice<br />

industry issues.”<br />

According to Paul, the increased<br />

complexity of applications and<br />

the requirement for fast, stable<br />

systems throws a spotlight on the<br />

IT department’s ability to handle<br />

and solve problems. “Just as<br />

a new application can increase<br />

the productivity of a business, a<br />

chronic IT problem can reverse<br />

those gains. The IT team is coming<br />

under increasing pressure to fix<br />

problems quickly and permanently.<br />

IT best practice frameworks such<br />

as <strong>ITIL</strong> offer the potential benefits<br />

of consistent, predictable and faster<br />

problem resolution. The ultimate<br />

objective of the SIG is to help the IT<br />

team realise this potential.” n<br />

Hands-on expereince at <strong>itSMF</strong><br />

simulation events<br />

Simulation event back<br />

by popular demand<br />

Birmingham is the location for the next itsmf<br />

simulation event in September<br />

Following the runaway success<br />

of recent simulation events at the<br />

Service Desk and IT Support Show,<br />

a new session is to be held on the<br />

16th September at Birmingham’s<br />

Hilton Metropole.<br />

The interactive simulation game<br />

demonstrates how learning tools<br />

and a role play approach can<br />

assist in the development and<br />

understanding of <strong>ITIL</strong> and best<br />

practice within any organisation.<br />

The sessions put attendees in the<br />

middle of real-life scenarios and<br />

teaches them how <strong>ITIL</strong> thinking can<br />

solve problems in a pressurised<br />

environment. The simulation is<br />

appropriate for all levels of service<br />

management experience.<br />

For more information or to<br />

book a place please visit<br />

www.itsmf.co.uk/events n<br />

Qualfications<br />

coming into focus<br />

titles of itil V3 qualification released<br />

The <strong>ITIL</strong> Qualification Board<br />

has issued an update regarding<br />

the titles of the <strong>ITIL</strong> Version 3<br />

qualifications.<br />

Service Lifecycle and Service<br />

Capability modules and Managing<br />

Across the Lifecycle will be<br />

known officially as <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

Intermediate Certificates.<br />

A candidate who has achieved<br />

the minimum accumulation of<br />

22 credits across a selection of<br />

balanced V2 and V3 modules will be<br />

awarded the <strong>ITIL</strong> Expert Certificate.<br />

Candidates who satisfy the<br />

requirement of the currently titled<br />

‘Advanced’ level will be awarded<br />

the <strong>ITIL</strong> Master Certificate.<br />

The Qualification Board involved<br />

the ITSM community by surveying<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> members and Accredited<br />

Training Organisations on their<br />

preference for the formal titles<br />

of <strong>ITIL</strong> Qualifications. The results<br />

of the survey were reviewed and<br />

endorsed by the Board. n<br />

SERVICETALK july 2008


<strong>itSMF</strong> UK news<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> global plans<br />

<strong>International</strong> meetings to decide focus<br />

The <strong>itSMF</strong> <strong>International</strong> Executive<br />

Board has a raft of ‘innovative<br />

initiatives’ planned for 2008,<br />

including the introduction of<br />

virtual meetings for chapter<br />

representatives.<br />

Meeting in April, the Board also<br />

scheduled its meetings for the<br />

year, with the dates of 30th July in<br />

Tokyo and 11th September in San<br />

Francisco following the respective<br />

Japanese and American<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> conferences.<br />

The first Chapter Leadership<br />

Conference (CLC) is scheduled to<br />

take place this November in the UK<br />

following the <strong>itSMF</strong> UK Conference<br />

and preceding the Annual General<br />

Meeting on 14th November. The<br />

CLC will provide support and<br />

resources for emerging, growing<br />

and established <strong>itSMF</strong> Chapters.<br />

There are several countries hoping<br />

to be approved as Chapters this<br />

year with many more individuals<br />

registering an interest within<br />

their country.<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> <strong>International</strong> is planning<br />

to produce a monthly update of<br />

news, developments, initiatives<br />

and service portfolios, which will<br />

be sent to all Chapters. n<br />

Competition begins<br />

for the ultimate<br />

prize: <strong>itSMF</strong> Awards<br />

The expansion of the <strong>itSMF</strong> Awards last year<br />

has added more prestige for the winners<br />

The race is on to see who will<br />

win the coveted 2008 <strong>itSMF</strong> UK<br />

Awards. The most prestigious<br />

award programme in the industry<br />

was expanded successfully last<br />

year, with the addition of two new<br />

accolades - Trainer of the Year and<br />

Submission of the Year - which<br />

were won by John Griffiths and<br />

Julie MacMillan respectively. With<br />

the standard of entries improving<br />

year-on-year, the fight for these and<br />

the other awards will be tough.<br />

For more information on the Trainer<br />

and Submission Awards, as well as<br />

the Service Management Champion,<br />

Project of the Year and Innovation<br />

of the year, conntact:<br />

Kim.May@<strong>itSMF</strong>.co.uk<br />

One, two and three day delegate<br />

packages are now available with<br />

and without accommodation for<br />

the 17th Annual Conference at the<br />

Birmingham Hilton Metropole,<br />

which opens on 10th November<br />

2008. The final presentations<br />

have now been chosen for the six<br />

streams and the full Conference<br />

program is available online at<br />

www.itsmf.co.uk/conference as<br />

well as the price list and booking<br />

forms for delegates, stands and<br />

sponsorship. Members are<br />

reminded to book soon to take<br />

advantage of member’s discount<br />

and to ensure they don’t miss out<br />

on this year’s premier event for IT<br />

service management. n<br />

What can<br />

we interest<br />

you with<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> gets personal with the membership<br />

The new online <strong>itSMF</strong> UK<br />

membership database offers<br />

users the chance to keep up to<br />

date on those areas of service<br />

management they most want to<br />

hear about. The service offers<br />

updates to <strong>itSMF</strong> members based<br />

on their interests in topics such<br />

as ISO/IEC 20000, outsourcing,<br />

and business continuity.<br />

Members can update their<br />

profile to ensure they don’t miss<br />

out on the latest news, by visiting<br />

www.itsmf.co.uk and logging on<br />

by using their e-mail address and<br />

password. Once logged on, users<br />

click on ‘Manage My Personal<br />

Details’ and select ‘Options’. This<br />

page lets members ensure that<br />

the information received from<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> UK is personalised to<br />

their needs. n<br />

SERVICETALK july 2008


opinions<br />

V3 or not V3<br />

Currently, there is a lot of debate in<br />

the industry about <strong>ITIL</strong> V3, its real<br />

value to business and the approach<br />

to adoption that organisations<br />

should take.<br />

The fact is that in today’s<br />

web-centric environment, where<br />

IT plays a crucial role not only in<br />

the success of businesses, but<br />

also as an agent that facilitates<br />

business transformation, effective<br />

service management has become<br />

a strategic asset. Organisations<br />

must continually adopt innovative<br />

techniques to in turn adopt best<br />

practice in the most efficient,<br />

painless and cost effective way.<br />

Therefore, the issue is not<br />

about adopting Version 2 or 3<br />

of <strong>ITIL</strong>, it’s about adopting and<br />

adapting the components of this<br />

best practice framework in order<br />

for organisations to meet their<br />

individual business needs. For<br />

instance, <strong>ITIL</strong> V2 continues to<br />

offer customers a comprehensive<br />

approach to service management,<br />

but for those customers whose<br />

businesses require a system that<br />

supports the complete lifecycle, the<br />

process definitions held within <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3 could prove invaluable.<br />

The key for organisations<br />

– irrespective of size and the<br />

technology they use – is that <strong>ITIL</strong>,<br />

if used strategically, can deliver<br />

business benefits in the form<br />

of reduced TCO (Total Cost of<br />

Ownership), increase the number<br />

of productive hours and help meet<br />

business objectives by aligning IT<br />

with business processes.<br />

James Gay, sales director, ICCM<br />

For more on the progress of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3,<br />

see our article on page 14<br />

UK leads the way<br />

with training<br />

With a growing demand for<br />

professionals in the service desk<br />

arena across the globe, it is<br />

imperative that individuals have<br />

access to training that will help<br />

them develop and perform. A lack<br />

of soft skills has been cited as<br />

one of the reasons for high stress,<br />

dissatisfaction and high attrition<br />

rate amongst the workforce in<br />

the IT industry. It is therefore<br />

important for organisations to<br />

invest in training and certifying their<br />

employees so that they are better<br />

equipped to handle the demanding<br />

nature of the work. Improved<br />

customer interaction skills, ability<br />

to work as a team and increased<br />

efficiency are essential to handle<br />

the demanding nature of these<br />

jobs. SDI’s recent entry into India,<br />

which has a huge untapped market<br />

for a global standard in training<br />

and certifications for soft skills,<br />

certainly signifies the beginning of a<br />

transformation within the industry.<br />

India is of utmost strategic<br />

importance for the service desk<br />

industry, with the majority of the<br />

world’s IT and business process<br />

outsourcing organisations located<br />

there. India has an amazing talent<br />

pool, and with the demand for<br />

skilled manpower increasing,<br />

the country really has<br />

acknowledged just how important<br />

it is to improve its skills to offer<br />

service delivery at a level that<br />

matches global standards.<br />

They are not alone. Other<br />

countries, like Malaysia, the<br />

Philippines and a number of East<br />

European and Middle Eastern<br />

countries are also investing in<br />

internationally recognised business<br />

and service orientated skills<br />

standards to ensure their ITSM<br />

offerings remain attractive on a<br />

global stage. Will our workforce,<br />

businesses and government realise<br />

we need to take the initiative<br />

here as well, before it’s too late<br />

to remain competitive Although<br />

there is lots of talk and quango-type<br />

organisations are starting to spring<br />

up, quite frankly, we are just not<br />

seeing a co-ordinated effort.<br />

Howard Kendall, founder<br />

The Service Desk Institute (SDI)<br />

Career in I.T. gets<br />

more attractive<br />

Not only is IT now routinely<br />

getting a place on the board, but<br />

also the service desk is seen as<br />

a great place to start a career in<br />

IT. That’s according to the latest<br />

survey commissioned by The<br />

Service Desk Institute (SDI) and<br />

Hornbill Systems. It appears that<br />

IT service departments are twice<br />

as involved in business planning<br />

with nearly double the number<br />

of IT departments now involved<br />

in the processes compared with<br />

five years ago. The increased<br />

dependence on technology in most<br />

organisations means that the<br />

status of IT has been raised with<br />

65 per cent of businesses having IT<br />

representation at board level.<br />

The research has also identified<br />

that the role of the service desk has<br />

grown to meet extended round the<br />

ServiceTalk the Journal is the voice of you, the <strong>itSMF</strong><br />

UK members. We want you to join in the<br />

conversation and spark off the debate<br />

Are you ready to<br />

turn green<br />

It seems most bizarre<br />

that any company<br />

would still drag their<br />

feet on going green<br />

even when they realise<br />

that they actually<br />

stand to increase profit<br />

from observing green<br />

measures. Of course<br />

IT companies need<br />

to conserve energy.<br />

However, we are in<br />

danger of forgetting<br />

that IT professionals<br />

need to acquire the<br />

skills to help them<br />

understand that green<br />

IT does not only make<br />

environmental sense but<br />

it also makes compelling<br />

business sense.<br />

Green does not mean expensive – quite the opposite. Indeed with<br />

the right approach and effective process management, an<br />

environmental policy across all IT implementations can and will deliver<br />

significant bottom line value.<br />

No number of strategies could possibly compensate for an IT<br />

department that is ignorant in the way of green practices. If an<br />

organisation wishes to drive down on its IT energy usage, the whole<br />

IT department, and indeed all employees, must buy into and be fully<br />

educated in the green policies put in place, both in terms of process<br />

and underlying ethos.<br />

This way, they will be able to identify clear opportunities for driving<br />

down overheads. Highlighting and communicating costs to staff will<br />

surely increase awareness and actually reduce consumption as<br />

individuals start to proactively monitor their actions and collectively<br />

take responsibility for their company’s activity.<br />

Rick Firth, managing director, Parity Training<br />

For more on the green IT issue, see our article on page 29<br />

clock, dedicated support demands.<br />

50 per cent of companies are using<br />

psychometric testing to identify<br />

the potential in recruits for the<br />

service desk which is now viewed<br />

very much as the start of a career<br />

path. There is also more emphasis<br />

on personal skills when recruiting<br />

than qualifications, reflecting the<br />

importance of the ‘human’ side of<br />

the modern day IT service desk.<br />

In the last five years we have<br />

seen IT change from being an<br />

outside function to one that<br />

is core to the business. The<br />

delivery of business goals is often<br />

underpinned by the success of<br />

the IT infrastructure, and while<br />

technology has enabled many<br />

service desks to run successful<br />

support functions, there has<br />

also been recognition that the<br />

human touch – service desk<br />

personnel – is what delivers<br />

customer satisfaction. Good<br />

systems and working practices<br />

must support service personnel<br />

and empower a personalised<br />

service – but interpersonal skills<br />

are what counts. The successful<br />

career opportunities that have<br />

opened up reflect this change,<br />

and about time too.<br />

Patrick Bolger, chief marketing<br />

officer, Hornbill Systems<br />

encompassing the issues which really impact you<br />

and your business objectives.<br />

Whether you have comments about the <strong>itSMF</strong> UK,<br />

the journal and its content, or the industry in general,<br />

please send us an e-mail.<br />

James West. servicetalkeditor@itsmf.co.uk<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 11


comment<br />

What<br />

is your<br />

vision<br />

Well, summer is well and truly here<br />

and it’s that time of the year again<br />

to take stock of the last business<br />

year’s performance for the industry<br />

as a whole. You will of course<br />

know that it’s also a year since <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

Version 3 was launched around the<br />

globe (see our article on page 14<br />

for a look at how it has impacted<br />

the market) and individuals have<br />

been waiting in eager anticipation<br />

for the training courses which<br />

followed the refresh so they could<br />

update their skills. I’m pleased<br />

to say that the delivery of training<br />

has now picked up a pace and<br />

APMG report a significant upturn in<br />

individuals undergoing the <strong>ITIL</strong> V2-<br />

V3 Foundation Bridge or the <strong>ITIL</strong> V3<br />

Foundation course itself. Hopefully<br />

a greater number of IT service<br />

managers are getting closer to the<br />

business as a result.<br />

Additionally, there has been<br />

much good and positive work<br />

undertaken with getting parity<br />

and mapping sorted out on <strong>ITIL</strong>’s<br />

linkages with other IT sourced<br />

systems being used in the service<br />

management world, including<br />

specifically eTOM and COBIT as well<br />

as ISO/IEC 20000. You will learn<br />

on page 34 about the work being<br />

carried out jointly by the <strong>itSMF</strong> and<br />

TeleManagement Forum (TMF) to<br />

help both customer bases of <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

and eTOM respectively to get to<br />

grips with the differences (which<br />

lie mostly in technical language)<br />

between the two frameworks.<br />

I’m pleased and encouraged<br />

also to see that the word<br />

‘complementary’ is being used<br />

rather than ‘competitive’ when<br />

it comes to talking about these<br />

other systems and <strong>ITIL</strong> and the<br />

service management world will<br />

be better for it. While <strong>ITIL</strong> might<br />

be the frontrunner and possibly<br />

the most advanced of all support<br />

infrastructures, <strong>itSMF</strong> needs now<br />

to engage on all fronts, particularly<br />

as our membership broadens and<br />

the shape of IT service management<br />

changes. Individuals and<br />

organisations now have a greater<br />

level of ability and understanding<br />

of all things IT and their wants<br />

and needs are so much more<br />

sophisticated. We need to adapt<br />

to this and also adapt our existing<br />

practices to de-mystify for them<br />

what we do to support businesses.<br />

If we don’t, then how can businesses<br />

continue to understand the<br />

enormous benefits that IT service<br />

management brings to them<br />

I read an article recently by Sharon<br />

Taylor, the chief architect of the <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3 refresh, which was titled: ‘Losing<br />

IT and gaining a place in the team’.<br />

She said that ours is a maturing<br />

industry and that IT today is not<br />

so much aligned to the business,<br />

but is the business itself. I’m not<br />

for one minute suggesting that<br />

getting the hell out of IT might be the<br />

catchphrase for the future, but getting<br />

a hell of a lot out of IT, might be.<br />

So, we are in a global market,<br />

and service management is a<br />

global concept which ought to<br />

break down all barriers. It’s shared<br />

across all types of businesses and<br />

at almost every level. Providing<br />

and managing these services for<br />

the betterment of business must be<br />

the ultimate aim of our people and I<br />

believe that <strong>itSMF</strong> is key to acting as<br />

a gatekeeper for everything service<br />

management related. n<br />

Keith Aldis<br />

Chief executive officer<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 13


<strong>ITIL</strong> one year on FEATURE<br />

Has <strong>ITIL</strong> Version 3<br />

made the connection<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> Version 3 is one year old, and to mark the occasion, ServiceTALK the Journal<br />

asked a range of industry experts their views on what progress has been made. A<br />

practitioner, a trainer, a consultant and an industry think-tank all offer their<br />

opinions to create a snap shot of how the best practice framework has settled in.<br />

The<br />

practitioner.<br />

Diane Finn,<br />

service strategy<br />

consultant, BT<br />

Operate<br />

Telecoms giant BT<br />

was one of the first<br />

organisations to<br />

pursue <strong>ITIL</strong> Version 3<br />

when it was launched in June 2007. Diane Finn<br />

summarises the draw of the new framework.<br />

“BT is looking to deliver world class service<br />

to its customers and is therefore determined<br />

to apply best practice to underpin that. <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3 represented a more converged approach<br />

between IT and business, which was in tune<br />

with BT’s service agenda.”<br />

BT of course has the financial and staffing<br />

clout to mobilise a major project such as<br />

implementing <strong>ITIL</strong> V3, but as Diane explains,<br />

the effort was still significant, proving that <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3 has far more value than merely a badge<br />

of honour. “Our key challenge was rolling out<br />

training to large numbers of people at both<br />

Foundation and Manager level. Stakeholder<br />

management across the organisation to develop<br />

understanding and benefits of embracing <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3 was also vital.”<br />

As we have already touched on, BT knew <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3 was a large investment, but it could see the<br />

benefits when assessing the move and is<br />

already reaping rewards. “The new version<br />

has provided the opportunity to audit various<br />

parts of our business and brought to the surface<br />

areas where we were weak under Version 2.<br />

This in turn has driven service improvement<br />

activities and increased the momentum<br />

for service improvement.”<br />

In fact, the changes to <strong>ITIL</strong> in V3 which extend<br />

it into the wider service change and away from<br />

focusing purely on IT service management, have<br />

helped drive up the profile of <strong>ITIL</strong>, helping to<br />

make it a senior management issue. Several BT<br />

divisions are now using <strong>ITIL</strong>, as Diane explains.<br />

“It has been used to drive our overall operating<br />

model which in turn has provided greater<br />

visibility and momentum.”<br />

It is clear that BT has enjoyed success in<br />

employing <strong>ITIL</strong> V3, but there is some way to<br />

go before the new version of <strong>ITIL</strong> sees mass<br />

adoption throughout the business world. Diane<br />

is convinced the key to driving acceptance comes<br />

as the framework starts showing its worth,<br />

stating that ‘delivery of measurable benefits in<br />

business terms and clear improvements<br />

to service levels to the customer base’ will<br />

help potential users of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 overcome any<br />

fears they might have.<br />

The consultant.<br />

Mark O’Neill,<br />

senior principal<br />

consultant at<br />

QA-IQ<br />

“Like many others I<br />

decided to start on<br />

the first page, of the<br />

first book, Service<br />

Strategy. I soon<br />

settled into its prose, nodding sagely to myself<br />

in agreement with the latest view of a brave<br />

new world.<br />

Luckily, the Friday that my set of books arrived<br />

happened to coincide with the delivery of a case<br />

of mixed reds and whites from my Sunday paper<br />

wine club. As I perused my CD collection for<br />

the perfect listening companion to my drinking<br />

and reading companion, I began to question my<br />

actions. Surely this was one self-indulgent step<br />

too far It almost felt as if I was being filmed for<br />

a new reality TV programme to be called One<br />

Man and his Guilty Pleasures.<br />

However as I settled down and started to<br />

flick through the pages of Service Strategy, my<br />

decision to accompany my reading with a case<br />

of alcoholic beverage seemed like the most<br />

astute decision I had made that week.<br />

I had started off OK, a bit like a horse in the<br />

Grand National completing their first furlong at<br />

a comfortable canter, but as I got deeper into<br />

Strategy, my mood was starting to change and<br />

my concentration was starting to waiver, and<br />

it soon became apparent, this was not going<br />

to be the joyous evening I had planned. By the<br />

time I got to value composition and the agency<br />

principle, self doubt started to creep in and I<br />

started to get concerned that I was not going to<br />

complete my own personal Grand National.<br />

I told myself, this was a book that needed me<br />

to be on top of my game, my concentration and<br />

perception levels had to be 100 per cent. I closed<br />

the book, uncorked another bottle of red and left<br />

Service Strategy for another day. I had fallen at<br />

the first hurdle.<br />

It was not until the following Tuesday I<br />

plucked up the courage to have another go at<br />

Service Strategy; I was not going to let a bunch<br />

of academics from over the pond beat me, I<br />

was going to learn and understand this stuff.<br />

Accompanied that time with nothing stronger<br />

than a cup of tea, I bravely opened the book<br />

on page 31 to read about the principles of<br />

Service Strategy. Again I started off at a nice<br />

pace, agreeing with the book’s perception of<br />

perceptions and moving nicely onto market<br />

mindset and framing the value of services. In<br />

horse racing terms I was taking up a comfortable<br />

position on the rails. Unfortunately as with my<br />

first attempt I soon began to falter and was very<br />

quickly looking for something else to do, anything<br />

that would give me an excuse to put the book<br />

down again. All too quickly I gave up.<br />

Working for an organisation that employs<br />

service management consultants and lecturers,<br />

I decided I would canvass the views of my<br />

esteemed colleagues and ask them for their<br />

view of Service Strategy. I trawled the web,<br />

contacted other people who worked in the<br />

industry and it soon became apparent that<br />

we were all struggling to varying degrees to<br />

understand Strategy. More worryingly, seeing<br />

as I was working for a training and consultancy<br />

organisation, I had to know this stuff, as very<br />

quickly I would be teaching and implementing<br />

it for my customers.<br />

What followed was a series of sleepless<br />

nights, anxiety attacks and pure cold sweat<br />

panics. Then it hit me, as I was frantically<br />

thinking about how I was going to understand the<br />

complexities of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 and Strategy in particular,<br />

I had a thought - don’t start at the beginning of<br />

the lifecycle, start at the end. It had finally come<br />

to me, do what I’ve been telling others to do<br />

for as long as I can remember, get a baseline<br />

understanding of where are we now. I made a<br />

strategic decision; the first book I was going to<br />

read was not Service Strategy but Operation.<br />

Once I’d made that decision I was then able<br />

to properly plan my approach. First off, I set<br />

myself a vision, what did I want to get out of the<br />

new version, what were the advantages I was<br />

looking for I then thought, what do I want to<br />

gain a detailed understand of and what would I<br />

be happy with just an overview understanding of<br />

I also asked myself where I wanted to specialise.<br />

I then put together a timetable of what I could<br />

realistically fit into my working and personal<br />

time. As with all plans, mine needed assessing<br />

and correcting along the way, and my decision<br />

patterns were constantly reviewed, and still<br />

are as I write. Without even knowing it I had<br />

employed the four Ps of Strategy; perspective,<br />

positions, plans and patterns.<br />

Over the course of the last twelve months I<br />

have grown to understand and appreciate <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3 and my perception has changed with each<br />

passing month. I now have a much better<br />

understanding of the new version which has led<br />

to many of my initial concerns and protests being<br />

rendered illogical and unfounded.<br />

How did this turn around happen How did<br />

my initial disappointment turn into new found<br />

respect and appreciation Well quite simply<br />

I took a strategic approach to understanding<br />

the lifecycle. I realised my initial mistake was<br />

starting with something that was new and<br />

unfamiliar and I made the decision to start<br />

again by re-aligning myself with processes and<br />

functions that were as familiar to me as my old<br />

friends and family. Over the proceeding weeks, I<br />

followed a plan that enabled me to dip in and out<br />

of the books, move from one familiar aspect to<br />

a number of new and unfamiliar aspects, and I<br />

naturally fell into a cyclic approach of evaluation<br />

and re-evaluation.<br />

Twelve months on and I am embracing<br />

every element of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 (including Strategy).<br />

As a lecturer and consultant I am still called<br />

on to deliver <strong>ITIL</strong> V2 training courses or<br />

implementation workshops, and I get more than<br />

a little frustrated that (certainly from a training<br />

perspective) I am limited to articulate only ten<br />

processes and the service desk. There is so<br />

much more to <strong>ITIL</strong> V3, that admittedly did exist in<br />

some form or another in previous versions, that<br />

we can now promote, implement and improve<br />

on. It’s just finding the time (and will-power) to<br />

read it, understand it and appreciate it as the<br />

only way forward.”<br />

The trainer.<br />

John griffiths<br />

Client manager<br />

at Fox IT and<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> uk trainer<br />

of the year 2007<br />

“The <strong>ITIL</strong> refresh<br />

has generated a lot<br />

of differing views<br />

about the new look<br />

library. In the main, most people agree that it is<br />

an overall improvement and more accurately<br />

reflects the way businesses and IT work in the<br />

modern world. There is also a consensus that<br />

the ‘ideal world’ of <strong>ITIL</strong> has been repositioned<br />

closer to the ‘real world’ into which people have<br />

to implement what they have learned from the<br />

classroom.<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> V3 has given managers and practitioners<br />

of service management a lot more to consider. In<br />

these relatively early days, it has helped to clarify<br />

some of the anomalies of previous versions<br />

whilst at the same time introduced more things ➤<br />

14 SERVICETALK july 2008<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 15


<strong>ITIL</strong> one year on FEATURE<br />

that need to be considered. This includes a<br />

fundamental attitude shift of how the library is<br />

approached. With previous versions you simply<br />

went to the relevant chapter of the topic you<br />

were interested in. Now that topic is likely to be<br />

liberally spread around the lifecycle stages which<br />

is logical but also frustrating for some people<br />

who find it challenging when they cannot pigeon<br />

hole a process or activity. This is not surprising<br />

as the Foundation level exams (both old and<br />

new) are essentially an exercise in putting<br />

everything in its rightful place: ‘Which process is<br />

responsible for the following task What is the<br />

correct order of the incident stages’<br />

A common question from delegates attending<br />

both Foundation and Managers bridging courses<br />

is ‘Where does that (process/activity/task) live<br />

in the lifecycle’ It is important that people do<br />

not get too hung up about what lives where<br />

as the reality is that processes will feature<br />

throughout the lifecycle stages in several<br />

different manifestations. The application of<br />

a pragmatic and common sense approach to<br />

implementing the lifecycle will greatly assist in<br />

getting the right elements of each process<br />

into the appropriate places.<br />

Service Strategy contains virtually all new<br />

material and is the cause of much diverse<br />

debate. It has been variously described as a<br />

load of mumbo jumbo theory through to an<br />

insightful and useful tool for helping to integrate<br />

the business and IT. It also introduces for the<br />

first time in the classroom a lot of material that<br />

a large number of people have no perceived<br />

direct input to or personal association with.<br />

Many people sitting on a training course will<br />

have a view that they have no influence or<br />

control over the strategy of either the business<br />

or IT and therefore they will never really engage<br />

in the strategy either in the workplace or the<br />

classroom. Strategy does however take on<br />

more relevance for these individuals when they<br />

realise that the other stages of the lifecycle are<br />

all about the execution of that strategy. Another<br />

defining point is that Service Strategy asks the<br />

question ‘Why do we want to do something’<br />

before considering the question ‘How do we do<br />

it’ A long and sorry trail of projects or process<br />

implementations have failed to meet their goals<br />

by the simple failure to follow the sequence of<br />

how those two questions are asked. The Service<br />

Strategy book is likely to be a ‘slow burn’ where<br />

the value and relevance of it will take a little<br />

while to embed itself into the <strong>ITIL</strong> fraternity.<br />

Although the theme of this piece is <strong>ITIL</strong> V3<br />

one year on, the vast majority of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 training<br />

has still to be released into the market. When<br />

that happens we will get a clearer view of how<br />

organisations position themselves with regard<br />

to training their staff. There has been evidence<br />

of organisations who are currently in the early<br />

days of <strong>ITIL</strong> adoption, agonising over whether<br />

they should adopt Version 2 or 3. In reality<br />

it is virtually a non-issue. Any organisation<br />

taking on <strong>ITIL</strong> right now would begin with the<br />

fundamentals, all of which are incorporated in<br />

both versions. It should be viewed as a pick<br />

and mix selection of working with the next<br />

appropriate process irrespective of which version<br />

it originates from. A key point that seems to<br />

have been overlooked is that most of the ‘new’<br />

processes of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 were around previously,<br />

they simply were not in the ‘core set’ of Service<br />

Support and Service Delivery which many people<br />

view as the sum of <strong>ITIL</strong>, overlooking publications<br />

such as Application Management or ICT.<br />

A key element of implementation is training<br />

staff to be able to adapt to the new processes.<br />

It is in this area that organisations will be<br />

presented with an array of options compared<br />

to earlier training programmes. It is going to<br />

be interesting to see which routes individuals<br />

take on their journey to the <strong>ITIL</strong> expert level.<br />

No doubt different routes will be adopted by<br />

both individuals and organisations based on<br />

their specific plans and objectives. Once they<br />

have arrived at the base camp by successfully<br />

completing the Foundation course, the view up<br />

the mountain shows the summit to be somewhat<br />

higher than it used to be. There are also more<br />

paths which can be followed and the trick will<br />

be working out which path best fits to an<br />

individual’s aspirations and capabilities. For<br />

some people, one or two more steps into a<br />

Lifecycle or Capability course may be sufficient,<br />

while others will doggedly march on up to the<br />

summit, gaining credits along the way. Maybe<br />

in another year’s time we will start to see how<br />

those paths are both defined and used. When<br />

that happens we will get a better understanding<br />

of just how much thing really have changed.”<br />

The industry think-tank.<br />

The Service Futures Group<br />

In January 2008, the Service Futures Group, the<br />

joint venture between The Service Desk Institute<br />

and <strong>itSMF</strong> UK, published a report looking at <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3 six months into its life. Although the story has<br />

moved on from that point, it is worth another look<br />

at the report because it highlights and ➤<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 17


FEATURE <strong>ITIL</strong> one year on<br />

pools much of the relevant praise and criticism<br />

that is commonly aired through the market.<br />

The key points of the research were this:<br />

- Small organisations are not ready for or are not<br />

interested at this time in the new material.<br />

- People still seem to have a fear of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3.<br />

- The adapt and adopt approach which was so<br />

well liked appears not to be so universally<br />

understood with the new version – but it<br />

absolutely still applies.<br />

- The concepts are new to IT service<br />

management best practices but have in the<br />

main been used successfully in other industries<br />

or other areas of the business for a long time.<br />

- People have reported that they are finding the<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> V3 material more difficult to navigate than<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> V2 – realistically this may be to do with<br />

familiarisation with the material but only<br />

time will tell.<br />

- People are deciding to stay with <strong>ITIL</strong> V2 at the<br />

current time (this is a generalisation but is<br />

true amongst the majority of respondents)<br />

and are waiting for others to try it first so<br />

they can learn from their experiences.<br />

- The understanding across the industry is still<br />

fairly low but this will change with time.<br />

- The qualifications are still in development –<br />

this point is key as before this area is bedded<br />

in and has been around for a while the other<br />

points raised above will continue to be true.<br />

It is interesting that many of these points<br />

are now being tackled, with our practitioner,<br />

consultant and trainer reporters all looking into<br />

the issues of proof of concept, absorbing the new<br />

information and qualifications respectively. Logic<br />

also dictates that all of these issues will be solved<br />

with time, as they all centre on fear, uncertainty<br />

and lack of familiarity with the source material<br />

(aside from the precise details surrounding<br />

qualifications, although yet again, this issue will<br />

be addressed and finalised in time).<br />

The report also highlighted the fact that many<br />

organisations had already developed much of<br />

what is in <strong>ITIL</strong> V3, which in the words of Megan<br />

Pendlebury, executive director of the Service<br />

Futures Group shows that: ‘<strong>ITIL</strong> V3 is indeed<br />

inline with where the industry was and is moving<br />

and is not the output of a group of people sitting<br />

in a room rather than looking at the real world.”<br />

There is criticism in the report however,<br />

particularly in the case of the Service Strategy<br />

book. There is a problem of perception with<br />

this title, with many IT practitioners considering<br />

that strategy is not part of their remit and the<br />

Service Futures Group suggests that the book be<br />

repositioned and further guidance should<br />

be offered. The report also aired concerns for<br />

the future of qualifications, with some<br />

Megan<br />

Pendlebury, Service<br />

Futures Group<br />

questioning the<br />

validity of an<br />

additional exam<br />

rather than gaining<br />

real-life experience<br />

with the new<br />

processes.<br />

Feedback for the<br />

other books and<br />

areas of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 was<br />

on the whole very<br />

positive, which suggests that the slightly slow<br />

uptake of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 may be less to do with any<br />

inherent weaknesses in the new version, and<br />

more to do with <strong>ITIL</strong> V2 being well understood<br />

and more comfortable for the businesses who<br />

have adopted it. Again, the passage of time<br />

will likely see a greater understanding of the<br />

benefits and compelling reasons to move to <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3, which when combined with clarification and<br />

guidance from the parties involved in promoting<br />

and working with <strong>ITIL</strong> will see the new version<br />

meeting the high expectations that have been<br />

attached to it.<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> Version 2 and 3 books and CDs are available<br />

online from www.itsmf.co.uk/shop<br />

Remember to login to receive your <strong>itSMF</strong> UK<br />

membership discount. n<br />

18 SERVICETALK july 2008


<strong>ITIL</strong> Maturity FEATURE<br />

Going around the<br />

world with <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

A report by PA Consulting into the maturity of <strong>ITIL</strong> practices in the market<br />

place included a look at the differences between the US and UK in terms of<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> Version 3 uptake. In this article, we look at the contents of the report,<br />

get the view from the US and learn that the perceived gap in terms of <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

development across the atlantic may not be as great as some think.<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 21


feature <strong>ITIL</strong> maturity<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> maturity FEATURE<br />

The PA Consulting report, ‘Avoiding the<br />

banana skins – How to make sure that<br />

your Service Improvement Programme<br />

(SIP) doesn’t slip-up’, was complied by sampling<br />

around 50 companies at the 2007 <strong>itSMF</strong> UK<br />

Conference and Exhibition and for comparison,<br />

including results to a similar survey conducted<br />

in the US. The questions simply asked those<br />

surveyed to rank the maturity of <strong>ITIL</strong> processes<br />

within their organisation, with a score of<br />

0 indicating that the process was absent, up<br />

to 5 which indicates fully implemented and<br />

optimised processes.<br />

The two graphs to the right show the relative<br />

scores of the US and UK respondents to the<br />

survey. Before looking in detail at the differences<br />

between the US and UK markets, the report<br />

looks at the overall meaning of the figures. The<br />

three most mature <strong>ITIL</strong> Version 2 processes are<br />

financial management, incident management<br />

and change management. These findings mirror<br />

results from the previous UK survey in 2006<br />

and the results from the US survey in 2007.<br />

Incident and change management are usually<br />

the first processes to be addressed by an <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

implementation programme and this would<br />

explain their higher scores. The relative maturity<br />

of financial management however, is most likely<br />

due to the rigorous corporate requirements for<br />

fiscal management that already exists in most<br />

businesses today, together with the additional<br />

focus brought to bear on this area by regulation<br />

such as Sarbanes-Oxley.<br />

The least mature process is availability<br />

management with well over 50 per cent of the<br />

companies surveyed scoring less than two.<br />

Worryingly, almost one in five companies do<br />

not measure availability at all, and a further<br />

third apply inconsistent measures to some of<br />

their applications or components. With little<br />

management focus or detailed availability data, it<br />

is very difficult to see how IT services will reliably<br />

be provided to the business in the future.<br />

The five new <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 processes covered in<br />

the survey are request fulfilment, supplier<br />

relationship, business relationship, service<br />

knowledge, and information security<br />

management. Results showed the most mature<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> V3 process to be information security<br />

management. However, there were still over<br />

a third of respondents who don’t have defined<br />

processes to manage the confidentiality, integrity<br />

and availability of information.<br />

The least mature process is knowledge<br />

management, specifically the use of available<br />

data to support other processes such as incident<br />

management and problem management. It<br />

would appear that, even though most service<br />

management toolsets contain functionality to<br />

support this process, the approach for capturing<br />

the right information, keeping it up-to-date and<br />

utilising it as part of the IT organisation’s day-today<br />

processes, is proving difficult to implement.<br />

Perhaps surprisingly, the overall average<br />

maturity score for the <strong>ITIL</strong> V2 processes and the<br />

selected <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 processes was identical. So,<br />

although these processes have only recently been<br />

differentiated as part of the latest version of <strong>ITIL</strong>, it<br />

is clear that they have been part of the IT operation<br />

all along and are at a similar level of maturity.<br />

However, the new and updated <strong>ITIL</strong> V3<br />

processes and functions do now enable<br />

IT managers to better articulate the exact<br />

changes that will deliver business benefit<br />

as part of a focused service improvement<br />

programme.<br />

Figure 1: Distribution of scores across the maturity range 1-5 for the UK in 2007<br />

Incident management<br />

problem management<br />

Change management<br />

Release management<br />

Configuration management<br />

Service level management<br />

Availability management<br />

Capacity management<br />

Financial management<br />

IT service continuity management<br />

Request fulfillment management<br />

Supplier relationship management<br />

Business relationship management<br />

Service knowledge management<br />

Information security management<br />

business case for <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

Stakeholder management<br />

Programme management of <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

Figure 2: Distribution of scores across the maturity range 1-5 for the US in 2007<br />

Incident management<br />

problem management<br />

Change management<br />

Release management<br />

Configuration management<br />

Service level management<br />

Availability management<br />

Capacity management<br />

Financial management<br />

IT service continuity management<br />

Request fulfillment management<br />

Supplier relationship management<br />

Business relationship management<br />

Service knowledge management<br />

Information security management<br />

6% 10% 50% 21% 10% 4%<br />

15% 29% 33% 12% 10% 2%<br />

10% 13% 33% 33% 10% 4%<br />

12% 37% 21% 21% 10% 2%<br />

10% 33% 50% 2% 4% 2%<br />

17% 17% 29% 23% 6% 8%<br />

15% 35% 33% 10% 10% 2%<br />

13% 6% 60% 13% 4% 4%<br />

4% 4% 29% 40% 17% 6%<br />

23% 19% 27% 23% 2% 6%<br />

10% 25% 40% 17% 6% 2%<br />

19% 15% 27% 17% 12% 10%<br />

21% 8% 48% 15% 6% 2%<br />

33% 37% 19% 10% 2%<br />

8% 27% 12% 17% 10% 23%<br />

33% 17% 6% 12% 13% 19%<br />

17% 17% 19% 25% 12% 10%<br />

25% 15% 17% 13% 10% 19%<br />

0 - Absence 1 - Awareness 2 - Repeatable 3 - Controlled 4 - Integrated 5 - Optimised<br />

11% 11 % 50% 15 % 11 % 4 %<br />

31 % 27 % 35 % 4 % 4 %<br />

13 % 8 % 58 % 4 % 13 % 4 %<br />

35 % 12 % 50 % 4 %<br />

38 % 27 % 19 % 4 % 12 %<br />

27 % 35 % 31 % 8 %<br />

50 % 23 % 23 % 4 %<br />

46 % 15 % 15 % 12 % 12 %<br />

32 % 24 % 8 % 24 % 12 %<br />

28 % 16 % 36 % 16 % 4 %<br />

28 % 32 % 40%<br />

44 % 8 % 32 % 4 % 12%<br />

52 % 16 % 20 % 4 % 8 %<br />

52 % 26 % 15 % 7 %<br />

8% 42 % 13% 8 % 13 % 17 %<br />

0 - Absence 1 - Awareness 2 - Repeatable 3 - Controlled 4 - Integrated 5 - Optimised<br />

The UK scores versus the<br />

US scores<br />

On average, the US maturity scores were<br />

significantly lower that those measured in the<br />

UK (averages of 1.4 versus 2.0 across the <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V2 and selected <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 process). However,<br />

the patterns that emerged were very similar<br />

to those in the UK with incident management,<br />

change management and financial management<br />

being the most mature <strong>ITIL</strong> V2 processes, and<br />

availability being the least mature.<br />

Across the board, while some companies are<br />

at the top end of <strong>ITIL</strong> maturity (on average 15<br />

per cent of UK respondents rated themselves<br />

as a four or five for the <strong>ITIL</strong> V2 and V3<br />

processes), most still have some way to go<br />

to achieve their ambition (on average 35 per<br />

cent of UK respondents rated themselves a<br />

two or less).<br />

The final part of the UK company survey<br />

aimed to find out the maturity rating of the<br />

business case, stakeholder management and<br />

programme management processes. The<br />

analysis indicates that there remains a large<br />

proportion of companies which are embarking<br />

on SIPs (Service Improvement Programmes)<br />

without the necessary foundations for success<br />

being in place. For example, a third of<br />

organisations have no business case for <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

implementation and 25 per cent of organisations<br />

have no SIP in place at all.<br />

There was a significant difference between the<br />

responses from the public and private sectors.<br />

The response from the US<br />

Robert Stroud is part of the <strong>itSMF</strong> USA board of directors and sits on the <strong>itSMF</strong> <strong>International</strong><br />

executive board. Here he talks about how well <strong>ITIL</strong> is taking hold in the US.<br />

Do you see any areas<br />

where the US has an<br />

advantage over Europe in<br />

terms of <strong>ITIL</strong> adoption<br />

“Leveraging the<br />

implementation experience<br />

gained in Europe has allowed<br />

ITSM implementations<br />

to use the experience to<br />

implement faster. Attention<br />

in North America is typically<br />

on enterprise change<br />

management looking to<br />

deliver change with minimal<br />

impact to the business to<br />

assure service levels. In<br />

short, there is a strong<br />

focus on service levels, user<br />

experience and the supporting<br />

processes.”<br />

In the UK, <strong>ITIL</strong> awareness<br />

has taken many years<br />

to bed in, how quickly<br />

On average, the public sector respondents scored<br />

themselves 0.7 of a maturity point higher across<br />

these questions (2.8 versus 2.1). Experience<br />

would suggest that the reason for this lies<br />

is recognition of <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

occurring in the US<br />

“If you say <strong>ITIL</strong> to most CIOs<br />

they are aware of it and more<br />

than likely will direct you to<br />

either the VP operations or the<br />

VP ITSM who is responsible<br />

for the journey. The <strong>itSMF</strong>,<br />

vendors and practitioners<br />

have all worked together<br />

to communicate the value<br />

and benefits of IT service<br />

management. <strong>ITIL</strong> and ITSM<br />

has been timely for many<br />

US organisations as they<br />

look to automate their IT<br />

infrastructure in order to<br />

allow precious IT human<br />

resources to be allocated to<br />

value adding innovation.”<br />

What benefits are US<br />

businesses seeing<br />

from using <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

“US organisations are using<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> to deliver solutions that<br />

are aligned to the business.<br />

This value is derived through<br />

real operational cost savings<br />

in terms in conjunction with<br />

better service levels, quality<br />

through automation, and<br />

predictability of outcomes<br />

with repeatable processes.<br />

Additional benefits have been<br />

delivered with publicly traded<br />

companies with processes<br />

that are documented allowing<br />

compliance with their<br />

organisation’s Sarbanes<br />

Oxley implementations. In<br />

many cases <strong>ITIL</strong> is being<br />

implemented with the IT<br />

Governance Framework<br />

COBIT (Control Objectives<br />

for Information and related<br />

Technology) to deliver input to<br />

a balanced scorecard.”<br />

in the public sector’s policy of using project<br />

management best practices such as PRINCE2,<br />

more consistently than companies operating in<br />

the private sector. n<br />

22 SERVICETALK july 2008


feature software subject as a service<br />

software as a service subject feature FEATURE<br />

Renting<br />

application<br />

software<br />

may seem to<br />

contradict<br />

the control<br />

demanded<br />

by IT service<br />

management,<br />

but as James<br />

West, editor<br />

of ServiceTalk<br />

the Journal,<br />

learns, by<br />

not buying<br />

software,<br />

service<br />

managers<br />

may be able<br />

to exert more<br />

influence<br />

than ever<br />

before.<br />

In the late nineties, a company called Siebel<br />

became one of the fastest growing software<br />

business in history, selling Customer<br />

Relationship Management (CRM) suites globally.<br />

For a time, the business was unstoppable, with<br />

the likes of Oracle, SAP and IBM all launching<br />

software to compete with Siebel in an attempt to<br />

cut into its market share. All of these IT giants<br />

failed and Siebel continued to roll onwards.<br />

The key for ending Siebel’s dominance, in a<br />

surprising twist in the story, was not necessarily<br />

building better software as might be expected;<br />

it was about changing the delivery method. A<br />

company by the name of salesforce.com arrived<br />

on the scene, offering software with the same<br />

functionality as Siebel, but the differentiator was<br />

that its software was web based. This meant that<br />

buyers no longer needed to install software on<br />

every machine. Web based software only needs<br />

a browser to work, and so is available on pretty<br />

much every computer on earth. The reduction in<br />

installation times, the simplification of support<br />

(the system can be altered/fixed remotely), and<br />

the reduced upfront costs were a big draw to<br />

buyers, and salesforce.com gradually eroded<br />

Siebel’s market share and in doing so had<br />

toppled a giant.<br />

Web based software is often available as<br />

Software as a Service (SaaS), meaning that<br />

users don’t even buy the software, they simply<br />

pay a subscription (generally per user) to access<br />

and use the system. The rise of the SaaS has<br />

been rapid, despite there still being many<br />

downsides to SaaS - the article below looks in<br />

detail at the pros and cons associated with SaaS.<br />

Yet despite fears over losing control and the<br />

reliance on a web connection, the use of SaaS<br />

continues to increase. Industry analyst Gartner<br />

says that SaaS deployments will grow 17 per<br />

cent through to 2011, double the rate of growth<br />

for purchasing of enterprise application software<br />

as a whole.<br />

From an IT service management point of<br />

view, is this shift a good thing The answer to<br />

this question is obviously highly dependant on<br />

the type of application and nature of the business,<br />

but here are some universal issues that must<br />

be considered:<br />

Do you really need to ‘own’ a<br />

1 piece of software<br />

Surely the pre-requisite for any software is that<br />

it offers your business the functionality needed<br />

There is of course, a fear factor associated with<br />

not having the software on-site, but anytime you<br />

buy a piece of third party code, you are to some<br />

extent beheld to that organisation and reliant<br />

to some degree on the support offered by the<br />

supplier. SaaS is a relatively mature market<br />

now, so as long as the supplier can prove<br />

reliability, uptime, robustness of support, there<br />

should be little difference from physically<br />

purchasing the software.<br />

Does SaaS fit with<br />

2 <strong>ITIL</strong> processes<br />

There is nothing in <strong>ITIL</strong> which specifically<br />

demands that software must be held on each<br />

machine on which it will be used. SaaS should<br />

do nothing to alter any controls you have in<br />

place to govern processes. As long as change,<br />

configuration and release procedures are<br />

followed as usual, there should be no<br />

major issues.<br />

Can you work with<br />

3 the supplier<br />

SaaS is no different to outsourcing, or bringing<br />

in a contractor; the staff may not be employed<br />

directly by your business, but it is possible for<br />

all parties to work in harmony for the good of the<br />

business. SaaS suppliers are no different and<br />

should be evaluated in the same way.<br />

Would you be able to operate<br />

4 without a web connection<br />

The simple answer to this question is that most<br />

of us would struggle to work for long without<br />

access to email and the internet, SaaS or not. In<br />

reality, web connections are not always perfect,<br />

and web-based systems are close to, but not<br />

yet totally equal to on-machine installs of<br />

software, in terms of speed and functionality. A<br />

comprehensive pilot would be needed to see if<br />

the trade-off is too large within your organisation.<br />

The reason why SaaS is enjoying such rapid<br />

growth is that all of the problems relating to<br />

its use are gradually being solved and many<br />

of the objections to the model are slowly<br />

being removed, as the mental and cultural<br />

shift needed to get people trusting SaaS<br />

gains momentum.<br />

As a final point, the removal of the need for<br />

traditional in-house support for applications<br />

could prove to be the biggest plus for IT service<br />

management. With the host supplier dealing<br />

with user issues remotely, internal service desks<br />

will be able to afford more staff resource to<br />

proactive activities, such as project management,<br />

change control etc. For this reason alone, SaaS<br />

warrants a much closer look. ➤<br />

What service<br />

delivery choices<br />

will you make<br />

SaaS or on-site: the pros and cons<br />

Hosted software has many upsides, but there are negatives to<br />

consider. Russell Wiltshire, director at Vivantio, offers both<br />

sides of the argument.<br />

Continuing on the next page, we offer the case for on-site (where the customer buys the<br />

software, installs and supports it in the traditional manner) versus SaaS software deployment,<br />

with the intention of offering some guidance to those having to make this decision in the<br />

coming months and years.<br />

24 SERVICETALK july 2008<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 25


feature software as a service<br />

Software as a service FEATURE<br />

The case for on-site<br />

• One obvious reason for going for the<br />

on-site option is that you can’t find a SaaS<br />

service desk provider that has the application<br />

your business needs. It’s still an emerging<br />

market so there is more choice for those<br />

looking to buy software in the<br />

traditional way.<br />

• SaaS is still a relatively young method<br />

of delivering and supporting software and<br />

although it has gained massively in adoption<br />

in some software application areas such<br />

as CRM, it is still true to say that SaaS in<br />

service desk is not yet mature despite strong<br />

offerings being out there for some time.<br />

• There might be a specific element of the<br />

SaaS delivered service desk offering which<br />

doesn’t meet your servicing or after-care<br />

requirements. Perhaps the SaaS provider<br />

only offers support 9 to 5, Monday to Friday<br />

and your operation runs 24/7; or you<br />

specifically require SSL encryption but the<br />

SaaS provider doesn’t offer this yet. Make<br />

sure regardless of the delivery method, that<br />

the application itself meets the needs of your<br />

business in terms of both functionality and<br />

ease of use.<br />

• Data protection issues mean that some<br />

companies have specific legal requirements<br />

stipulating where they can store customer<br />

information or personal data. Perhaps this<br />

data must reside within a particular country<br />

but the SaaS provider might use offshore<br />

data centre operations. So questions along<br />

these lines need to be asked and satisfactory<br />

answers obtained.<br />

• Some organisations prefer to make<br />

upfront capital investment for financial<br />

reasons. The company may be geared to the<br />

purchase of IT assets such as servers and<br />

software licences.<br />

• If internet access is non-existent or highly<br />

restricted as is the case in some government<br />

departments including the Ministry of<br />

Defence and the police, then clearly SaaS<br />

isn’t easily deployed.<br />

The case for SaaS<br />

• A prime concern of some finance directors<br />

today is reducing capital expenditure (or<br />

capex), preferring to buy goods and services<br />

out of operational expenditure (or opex)<br />

budgets. Opex naturally favours SaaS<br />

deployment as you ‘pay as you go’, normally<br />

via monthly subscription instalments rather<br />

than paying up front, thereby creating<br />

uncertain costs of ownership.<br />

• In a situation involving mergers or<br />

acquisitions the software licences owned by<br />

the company being acquired may be nontransferable<br />

and rendered invalid. In most<br />

cases the software vendor will re-licence the<br />

software to the new company rather than<br />

lose a customer, but these license terms<br />

come into play if the purchasing company is a<br />

competitor for example.<br />

• The SaaS model means very little up front<br />

commitment (in contract term and financial<br />

outlay). SaaS providers are generally geared<br />

to very rapid customisation and automatic<br />

upgrading of their platforms.<br />

• In theory, IP-based standards help keep<br />

the entire organisation’s IT infrastructure<br />

working well together. With this back drop in<br />

place, managers can make decisions based<br />

purely on the quality and functionality of the<br />

services on offer, without getting tripped up<br />

by IT policies.<br />

• SaaS providers can also deliver<br />

significant economies of scale as server<br />

and infrastructure costs are reduced when<br />

serving one instance of an application to<br />

many customers.<br />

• Managers working within organisations<br />

with convoluted and time-consuming<br />

procurement processes can acquire<br />

new applications via relatively low cost<br />

subscriptions which affect revenue rather<br />

than capital budgets and come in ‘below the<br />

radar’. This means managers can introduce<br />

new systems at a departmental level<br />

without lengthy, multi-level, budgetary<br />

approval processes.<br />

Conclusion<br />

If you are looking seriously at SaaS in your business, there are some myths and cons that need<br />

examining. Some established on-site vendors have highlighted that integration with other on-site<br />

systems remains an issue. SaaS providers in many application areas have already proved beyond<br />

doubt that SaaS and on-site systems integration presents no genuine issues.<br />

The data centres and the server platforms that SaaS providers rely on are typically a great deal<br />

more secure and robust physically and technically, than any server sitting in an organisation’s own<br />

office. It is also clear that one of the largest threats to data security in any organisation is misuse by<br />

authorised personnel not unauthorised external attackers. Sensible security policies and an effective<br />

training programme are key. Recent high-profile stories in the press regarding lost CDs and laptops<br />

provide all the proof that is necessary. Although the misperception that SaaS means relinquishing<br />

control has reduced dramatically over the last three years, it remains an argument levelled against<br />

SaaS delivery. IT managers still worry about what will happen if the provider’s server goes down or<br />

there are problems with the internet connection. But on-site servers are probably more vulnerable<br />

to downtime in reality. The questions that really needs asking are ‘Is a typical IT department able to<br />

achieve the same levels of availability for the same price Is an organisation willing to fund constant<br />

upgrades to the hardware platform’ And by locking themselves in to a specific server platform on-site,<br />

an organisation has already placed a huge amount of control into the hands of the platform vendor<br />

- regularly having to deal with the headache of rolling out new versions of server operating systems,<br />

database engines and such like. n<br />

26 SERVICETALK july 2008<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 27


Green I.T special FEATURE<br />

Green I.T. special<br />

Approaching<br />

the green light<br />

If you think that energy shortages are years away, think again. I.T. is set to feel the<br />

initial brunt of the energy crisis and James West, editor of ServiceTalk the Journal,<br />

says the time has come to investigate alternatives before someone pulls the plug.<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 29


feature subject<br />

Green I.T. special FEATURE<br />

Virtualisation:<br />

overcoming the problems<br />

The promise of better use of resources, lower costs and potential reduction to<br />

both power costs and real estate is providing a compelling reason to move towards<br />

virtualisation. But the virtual data centre raises some significant new issues in areas<br />

of performance, compliance and security says Dwayne Melancon, VP corporate and<br />

business development, Tripwire.<br />

While the physical infrastructure<br />

provides a clear view of individual<br />

component performance, virtualisation<br />

removes that transparency. Without visibility of<br />

the virtualisation engine organisations cannot<br />

identify potential security loopholes, ensure<br />

system changes do not affect performance or<br />

be confident in compliance to regulations such<br />

as Sarbanes Oxley.<br />

Today, perhaps only 15 or 20 percent of<br />

applications being run on virtual infrastructures<br />

are production systems; the majority of<br />

organisations are using the technology only for<br />

test environments. But analysts believe that the<br />

number of production applications will grow to<br />

between 45 and 60 per cent of total deployments<br />

over the next two years as cost pressures bite.<br />

In the headlong rush to gain cost benefits<br />

there is a very real risk that companies are<br />

moving into virtualisation far ahead of their<br />

ability to understand and manage the technology.<br />

The benefits are compelling. But at what cost to<br />

business risk and security<br />

Virtualisation adds huge complexity to the<br />

IT infrastructure stack, pulling together large<br />

numbers of applications and services into one<br />

consolidated data centre. Traditional, silobased<br />

management tools provide no insight<br />

into operational performance of virtual systems,<br />

leaving an organisation completely blind to the<br />

impact of change, both planned and unplanned,<br />

on the overall infrastructure.<br />

Without a view into this virtual environment,<br />

how can any organisation ensure machines are<br />

tested and configured correctly or impose the<br />

required level of rigour over system changes<br />

To many of us, an energy shortage, similar to<br />

global warning, seems to be something of a<br />

abstract concept at the moment - it is hard<br />

to conceive of a time when the UK will have to<br />

ration its energy consumption. At worse, we can<br />

console ourselves with the knowledge that such<br />

a situation is years from coming to a head.<br />

It seems however that the Inconvenient Truth<br />

as popularised by Al Gore’s film concerning<br />

power usage is making itself felt today.<br />

John Windebank, <strong>itSMF</strong> UK’s <strong>International</strong><br />

representative comments. “If you’re a data<br />

centre in London, you can’t buy any more power<br />

because it’s not available. Power is becoming the<br />

biggest cost to IT, exacerbated by carbon taxes,<br />

and this is a problem that we must all face.”<br />

Whatever your politics, or whether you<br />

believe IT should take more responsibility for<br />

the environment, the facts will ensure that the<br />

green issue is a pertinent one for IT, becoming<br />

perhaps the biggest threat to the current use of<br />

IT we have ever faced.<br />

Part of the problem, according to John, is<br />

gross inefficiency, with data centres running<br />

at between 10 - 12 per cent of their potential.<br />

This leads to an obvious solution: if you can use<br />

this latent 90 per cent of processing power to<br />

run other tasks, you can reduce your energy<br />

consumption dramatically. This is how the<br />

concept of virtualisation was created and it is a<br />

hot topic, with industry analyst group Gartner<br />

calling it the biggest ‘impact trend’ for the IT<br />

infrastructure up to 2012. Virtualisation of<br />

servers - the main point of attack in terms of<br />

reducing energy consumption - is already having<br />

an effect, with Gartner stating that the market for<br />

selling new servers fell by four per cent in 2006.<br />

Moving on, Gartner also predicts that four million<br />

machines will be installed on servers by 2009, so<br />

the sale of new servers is sure to fall further still.<br />

“Virtualisation is hardly a new concept;<br />

storage has already been virtualised - albeit<br />

primarily within the scope of individual<br />

vendor architectures - and networking is also<br />

virtualised,” said Philip Dawson, vice president<br />

at Gartner. “However, as both server and PC<br />

virtualisation become more pervasive, traditional<br />

IT infrastructure orthodoxy is being challenged<br />

and is changing the way business works with IT.”<br />

As hinted by Philip, it is not just servers that<br />

are subject to the virtualisation push, with PCs<br />

increasingly becoming virtualised. In 2007,<br />

Gartner estimated five million virtualised PCs<br />

and predicts 660 million by 2011. This huge<br />

shift will see PCs becoming more like the dumb<br />

terminals of old, with business applications and<br />

even the operating system being offered to users<br />

over a virtual network.<br />

Thomas Bittman, lead analyst at Gartner,<br />

details what the shift could mean for the IT<br />

infrastructure. “Traditionally the operating<br />

system has been the centre of gravity for client<br />

and server computing, but new technologies,<br />

new modes of computing, and infrastructure<br />

virtualisation and automation are changing the<br />

architecture and role of the operating system.<br />

The days of the monolithic, general-purpose<br />

operating system will soon be over.”<br />

This is good news for IT service management<br />

because in theory at least, managing a virtual<br />

IT infrastructure eliminates many of the localised,<br />

user created IT support issues which plague<br />

the service desk, and make it much easier to<br />

manage change and upgrades etc.<br />

So, when you combine the expected benefits<br />

of a virtual infrastructure with the huge, and<br />

vital, cuts to energy usage, the time seems to<br />

be right for virtualisation. As always, such a<br />

push requires thorough research and planning<br />

and on the next page, we look at some of the<br />

issues that must be considered.<br />

30 SERVICETALK july 2008


feature subject<br />

The process becomes ever more complex<br />

when organisations accept the fact that virtual<br />

and physical worlds will co-exist for the<br />

foreseeable future. From the core infrastructure<br />

running the virtual middleware to legacy and<br />

in-house developed applications that are too<br />

complex to migrate to the virtual world, the<br />

physical infrastructure will continue to play a<br />

core role in any data centre.<br />

It is essential, therefore, that organisations<br />

put in place the policies, processes and<br />

monitoring tools required to support the entire<br />

physical and virtual IT infrastructure. Critically,<br />

organisations need to extend existing rigorous<br />

processes within the physical environment<br />

to also encompass a virtual implementation<br />

based on best practice implementation. This<br />

will ensure any business can immediately gain<br />

the cost benefits associated with a virtual world<br />

without undermining the reliability of the data<br />

centre or compromising regulatory compliance.<br />

Compliance pressure<br />

Indeed, the pros and cons of the virtual world<br />

are being taken very seriously by the regulatory<br />

bodies. The virtual environment, with its<br />

continual changes, poses huge new compliance<br />

challenges, especially in the area of audits. How<br />

can an organisation know if a virtual machine is<br />

compliant if it no longer exists How do you<br />

track change history for auditors in a virtual<br />

world Certainly these issues are now coming to<br />

the fore as increasing numbers of organisations<br />

look to virtualise critical production systems.<br />

The payment card industry, for example, has<br />

a number of development boards looking at the<br />

implications of virtualisation on its data security<br />

standard. The good news is that virtualisation<br />

adds some strong capabilities, especially for<br />

those organisations that have opted to run<br />

multiple services on a single system to minimise<br />

hardware costs, creating a high risk single<br />

point of entry.<br />

Running each of those services separately<br />

within the virtual machine will provide more<br />

security by creating disparate services. However,<br />

if the virtual middleware is compromised,<br />

these services are just as vulnerable; in effect<br />

the problem has simply been moved to the<br />

virtual machine. The PCI Standards Council is<br />

now beginning to define policies to include the<br />

virtualised infrastructure, and other regulatory<br />

bodies will undoubtedly follow suit.<br />

But the underlying principles remain unchanged:<br />

- Management taking responsibility for<br />

effective controls<br />

- Strong policies and process<br />

- Fact-based accountability supported by real<br />

time audit and control<br />

As in the physical environment, real time<br />

change monitoring is essential to ensure<br />

organisations remain compliant - or have<br />

early warning of incidents that may affect<br />

compliance status.<br />

Virtual confidence<br />

According to Gartner, 60 percent of production<br />

virtual machines will be less secure than<br />

their physical counterparts through 2009.<br />

And analysts fear that misconfigured and<br />

mismanaged virtual implementations will result<br />

in service interruptions and downtime that will<br />

undermine confidence in the technology and<br />

potentially stall wholesale adoption.<br />

Yet by continually monitoring the performance<br />

of the entire virtual and physical infrastructure<br />

organisations will not only reduce errors and<br />

drive up performance but also contribute to the<br />

incremental adoption of virtualisation across<br />

an organisation. Visibility ensures that all<br />

changes to the infrastructure, both physical and<br />

virtual, occur in full support of the business, in<br />

compliance with policies and procedures and<br />

that any exceptions are rapidly dealt with before<br />

they can cause business damage. n<br />

32 SERVICETALK july 2008


feature eTOM<br />

eTOM FEATURE<br />

The enhanced Telecoms Operations Map (eTOM) is a process-framework designed to<br />

manage the operations associated with telecoms. The owners of the framework<br />

are working with the <strong>itSMF</strong> to align its processes with <strong>ITIL</strong>. This article explores<br />

the meaning of eTOM, how it differs and complements <strong>ITIL</strong> and how the joint<br />

development is gathering pace.<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong>: opening<br />

more doors<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> and eTOM have similar backgrounds and<br />

perform similar roles in their respective fields<br />

and it is because of this that there have been<br />

suggestions in the past that the frameworks can<br />

conflict if running within the same organisation.<br />

As we will see from this article, this conflict is<br />

not a major issue in reality and moves are afoot<br />

to develop ways for the frameworks to work<br />

alongside each other in the most synergistic way<br />

possible.<br />

Matthew Burrows is head of consulting for<br />

TuringSMI telecoms division and is working<br />

with <strong>itSMF</strong> and the TeleManagement Forum (TM<br />

Forum) as part of a joint working party to align<br />

eTOM and <strong>ITIL</strong>.<br />

Matthew takes up the story, explaining the<br />

background and structure of eTOM, before<br />

moving onto examine the history of <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

and eTOM and how they are being brought<br />

closer together.<br />

eTOM is owned by the TM Forum, an industry<br />

association with over 650 global members.<br />

The aim of the TM Forum is to help members<br />

transform business processes, operations and<br />

systems for managing and monetising on-line<br />

information, communications and entertainment<br />

services. Part of this is delivered through the<br />

Next Generation Operational Support System<br />

(NGOSS) model, of which eTOM is a part. NGOSS<br />

is an initiative to improve efficiency and reduce<br />

the costs associated with operating telecom<br />

networks, allowing service providers to<br />

change the way they think about their<br />

business and operations.<br />

NGOSS is a comprehensive, integrated<br />

framework for developing, procuring and<br />

deploying operational and business support<br />

systems and software. It is available as a toolkit<br />

of industry-agreed specifications and guidelines<br />

that cover key business and technical areas.<br />

The enhanced Telecoms Operations<br />

Map provides a business centric view of a<br />

telecommunications company. Effectively, the<br />

eTOM model is a multi-level process model<br />

representing the complete set of business<br />

processes in use within a telecoms operator. The<br />

model starts at level 0, which consists of three<br />

sections; Strategy, Infrastructure and Product;<br />

Operations; and Enterprise Management, which<br />

underpin the full lifecycle of the products and<br />

services delivered to the customer (see Figure 1).<br />

The operations section is divided into four<br />

main lifecycle stages at level 1; looking at these<br />

sections in some detail helps understand what<br />

eTOM does and how it functions.<br />

Operations support and readiness: responsible<br />

for providing management,<br />

logistics and administrative support to the other<br />

process groupings, and for ensuring operational<br />

readiness in the fulfilment, assurance and<br />

billing areas.<br />

Fulfilment: operations for providing customers<br />

with their requested products and services in<br />

a timely and correct manner. It translates the<br />

customer’s business or personal need into<br />

a solution, which can be delivered using the<br />

specific products in the enterprise’s portfolio.<br />

This process informs the customers of the<br />

status of their purchase order and ensures<br />

completion on time.<br />

Assurance: includes all activities for the<br />

execution of proactive and reactive maintenance<br />

activities to ensure that services provided to<br />

customers are continuously available and<br />

working to service performance levels. It<br />

handles continuous resource status and<br />

performance monitoring to proactively detect<br />

possible failures. It collects performance data<br />

and analyses them to identify potential<br />

Figure 1. eTOM Levels 0, 1 and 2<br />

Strategy, infrastructure and product<br />

Strategy and<br />

comms<br />

Enterprise management<br />

Infrastructure<br />

lifecycle<br />

management<br />

Marketing and offer management<br />

Service development and management<br />

Product<br />

lifecycle<br />

management<br />

Resource development and management<br />

(Application computing and network)<br />

▲<br />

Supply chain development and management<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

Strategic and<br />

enterprise planning<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

Enterprise risk<br />

management<br />

Customer<br />

problems and resolve them without impact to<br />

the customer. This process manages the SLAs<br />

and reports service performance to the customer.<br />

It receives trouble reports from the customer,<br />

informs the customer of the trouble status, and<br />

ensures restoration and repair.<br />

Billing: involves everything necessary for<br />

the collection of appropriate usage records,<br />

production of timely and accurate bills, for<br />

providing pre-bill usage information, for<br />

processing their payments, and performing<br />

payment collections. In addition, it handles<br />

customer enquiries, provides billing enquiry<br />

status and is responsible for resolving problems<br />

to the customer’s satisfaction in a timely manner.<br />

This process grouping also supports<br />

prepayment for services.<br />

eTOM and <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

eTOM is effectively a process framework<br />

designed to support the telecoms product/service<br />

lifecycle, which is almost identical to the service<br />

lifecycle principle used as the basis for <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

Version 3. <strong>ITIL</strong> has traditionally focused ➤<br />

Operations<br />

Operations<br />

support and<br />

rediness<br />

Fullfillment<br />

Customer relationship management<br />

Service management and operations<br />

Resource management and operations<br />

(Application computing and network)<br />

Reassurance Billing<br />

Supplier partner relationship management<br />

▲<br />

Entersprise<br />

effectiveness<br />

management<br />

Knowledge<br />

and research<br />

management<br />

Financial and asset<br />

management<br />

Stakeholder and<br />

external relations<br />

Human resources<br />

management<br />

▲ management ▲ ▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

▲<br />

34 SERVICETALK july 2008<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 35


feature subject<br />

Working<br />

together<br />

As we have seen, the link<br />

between <strong>itSMF</strong> UK and the TMF<br />

has been formalised and here<br />

is a joint statement from the<br />

respective CEOs of the two<br />

organisations, Keith Aldis and<br />

Keith Willetts.<br />

Both the <strong>itSMF</strong> and the TM Forum recognise that<br />

both frameworks have strengths and weaknesses<br />

that, if combined, would have major benefits for<br />

all the industry sectors involved with delivering<br />

convergent services to market. So, we are<br />

actively co-operating to put <strong>ITIL</strong> and eTOM on<br />

a converging course; address any interworking<br />

issues and ensure that more integrated support<br />

is available to users.<br />

A good deal of work has already been done. The<br />

TM Forum is in the final stages of completing its<br />

own major review of eTOM to bring it into closer<br />

alignment with <strong>ITIL</strong> and the two organisations<br />

are undertaking a joint program to identify<br />

further opportunities for closer inter-working<br />

- initial fruits of this work are expected to begin<br />

to roll out by this summer.<br />

There is a good deal of momentum within the<br />

memberships of both organisations for this<br />

to happen, and for us to see a clear position<br />

on using <strong>ITIL</strong> and eTOM as supportive of the<br />

needs of businesses. This builds on the affinity<br />

between the two frameworks, and their real<br />

complementary strengths, so that each can<br />

benefit when they are brought together.<br />

on the activity of providing and managing IT<br />

infrastructure and systems to support the<br />

business processes. eTOM is the business<br />

process framework for telecoms, and <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

could therefore be considered a subset of these<br />

processes, covering the ones that are owned and<br />

operated by the technology or IT function.<br />

There is overlap, but it is possible for eTOM<br />

and <strong>ITIL</strong> processes to coexist and support each<br />

other as part of a mature process framework<br />

for telecoms operators. Unfortunately, in many<br />

organisations there has been conflict between<br />

network operations, who tend to use eTOM, and<br />

IT operations who would usually be more <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

aligned. The reasons for this conflict include<br />

inconsistent terminology between these two<br />

best practices, and a lack of knowledge and<br />

experience of both frameworks. For example,<br />

eTOM refers to ‘faults’ which are almost identical<br />

to an ‘incident’ in <strong>ITIL</strong> terminology. There are<br />

overlaps and synergies with the increasing<br />

convergence at a technology level, where<br />

telecoms products and services are dependent<br />

on telecoms network and IT capabilities, systems<br />

and infrastructure. When a service failure or<br />

degradation occurs, the operational teams<br />

often need to work together to restore service.<br />

Complex hand-offs, inconsistent terminology<br />

Matthew Burrows, TuringSMI<br />

and independent processes often result in the<br />

service taking longer than necessary to restore.<br />

Some organisations have addressed these<br />

issues by consolidating around a single set of<br />

processes and tools, usually opting to either go<br />

for eTOM or <strong>ITIL</strong>, or sometimes creating a<br />

hybrid model. n<br />

How do eTOM and<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> compare<br />

Mike Kelly, who works on the<br />

eTOM and NGOSS compliance<br />

programme at TMF, offers a<br />

comparison of <strong>ITIL</strong> and eTOM.<br />

eTOM<br />

- Telco enterprise model<br />

- ITU (<strong>International</strong> Telecommunication<br />

Union) international standard<br />

- Prescriptive catalogue<br />

- Hierarchy of processes<br />

- Process framework<br />

- Blueprint for process direction for<br />

service providers<br />

- Common language of processes<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong><br />

- IT/ICT service management<br />

- Non-prescriptive guidelines<br />

- Best practice framework<br />

- Methods to deliver controlled and<br />

optimised services<br />

- Standardised vocabulary<br />

Mike’s summary is this: eTOM and <strong>ITIL</strong> are<br />

not in conflict - eTOM can be used to build<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong>-compliant processes, using eTOM<br />

process elements.<br />

36 SERVICETALK july 2008


feature communications<br />

communications FEATURE<br />

In June 2006 the Financial Times ran an<br />

editorial discussing the effectiveness of<br />

communications within the enterprise.<br />

The article looked primarily at the digital<br />

communication channels available such as<br />

e-mail, intranets, Instant Messenger (IM), SMS,<br />

and the conclusion was stark:<br />

“In the attention economy the value of e-mail<br />

is rapidly approaching zero”.<br />

Goodbye e-mail<br />

E-mail is often the primary method that the I.T. department uses to<br />

communicate with business users. But abuse of the communication<br />

channel has impacted its effectiveness; is the damage irreparable<br />

asks Pat Geary, chief marketing officer for Skinkers<br />

What does this mean And if this is true,<br />

what does this mean to the effectiveness<br />

of organisations that rely on e-mail for<br />

communications What value do the other<br />

channels provide and how can they be managed<br />

How does the enterprise service desk offer<br />

the best possible service at low cost when<br />

important notifications cannot cut through this<br />

communication fog<br />

To understand these issues, we first have to<br />

understand how we came to rely on<br />

e-mail and understand what the limitations<br />

of this channel are. The reliance on e-mail, as<br />

the main communication mechanism within<br />

organisations, has steadily and stealthily been<br />

on the increase over many years. Until the<br />

computer era truly came of age, which has<br />

been relatively recently, businesses used to<br />

run to a very structured format: the minutes for<br />

meetings would be transcribed by secretaries,<br />

who would also manage diaries, write up notes,<br />

distribute memorandums and chase actions.<br />

Managers structured their day by dealing with<br />

correspondence at the start of the day, with<br />

every letter opened, read by the secretary and<br />

important ones given priority.<br />

When e-mail arrived it was firstly used by<br />

academics and early technology adopters;<br />

businesses viewed e-mail with suspicion and<br />

it is only recently that e-mail has become<br />

acknowledged, by law, as a permissible form<br />

of correspondent evidence. Very rapidly e-mail<br />

became the business communication tool of<br />

choice and the speed with which correspondence<br />

could be sent and received was almost<br />

instantaneous, compared to the multi-day<br />

turnaround that physical mail required, which<br />

lead to the coining of the term ‘snail mail’ to<br />

describe written and typed correspondence.<br />

The impact was dramatic; typing pools<br />

disappeared almost overnight, secretaries<br />

became personal assistants to only the very<br />

top level managers and middle management<br />

came to rely on e-mails with the volume of<br />

electronic communications growing at an<br />

ever-increasing rate.<br />

This all sounded encouraging; efficiencies<br />

were created within the enterprise through rapid<br />

communications; deals could be concluded in a<br />

much shorter timeframe; lengthy and protracted<br />

correspondence chains could be compressed<br />

into hours rather than days; and the flow of<br />

information within the enterprise continued to<br />

increase. So what happened to sour the picture<br />

In one word: spam.<br />

Not the processed ham beloved of Monty<br />

Python of course but the unsolicited e-mails<br />

spuriously filling the internet and offering<br />

all manner of life enhancing surgery and<br />

opportunities to improve our love lives. In<br />

October 2007 Postini, an e-mail filtering specialist<br />

claimed that 10 in 11 e-mails are spam - over 90<br />

per cent. The traditional definition of this type<br />

of spam referred to messages from outside of<br />

the enterprise. Today we also have to contend<br />

with ‘enterprise spam’ caused by people sending<br />

internal e-mails that are neither relevant nor<br />

important. During the days of memos if someone<br />

found some keys on the floor they would not<br />

get a memo sent round to all the employees<br />

in the company.<br />

We have become e-mail junkies which is<br />

one of the main reasons that enterprises are<br />

finding it increasingly difficult to get important<br />

information through to their employees<br />

through the white noise of e-mail.<br />

The ‘attention economy’ highlights the<br />

problem of information overload, we have<br />

become information-rich, but attention-poor;<br />

our days are filled with different types of<br />

information that may require action, some vital,<br />

some trivial and we are finding it increasing hard<br />

to sort the wheat from the chaff, to get to the<br />

actionable and important information. A Gartner<br />

report on effective electronic communications<br />

(August 2007), stated that an organisation of<br />

10,000 employees could be losing as much<br />

as £20 million per annum from ineffective<br />

communication within the enterprise.<br />

Enterprises today have tried many approaches<br />

to punch through the communication fog;<br />

satellite broadcast networks, newsletters, round<br />

table discussions, canteen briefings etc. and<br />

these do offer value. However, in today’s<br />

digital world, the direct to desktop<br />

communication is still through e-mail, or<br />

via elaborate intranets that provide valuable<br />

information but tend to become disorganised<br />

dumping grounds for information. Intranets<br />

today are akin to putting an important notice<br />

up in a cupboard, but you would only see the<br />

notice if you open the door, and know where the<br />

cupboard is in the first place.<br />

Perhaps the solution is a new approach to<br />

business to employee (B2E) communications that<br />

offers the best attributes of the existing digital<br />

channels, but in addition delivers new high<br />

impact direct ‘push’ channels that can punch<br />

through to employees’ desktops and/or handheld<br />

devices when really critical information needs to<br />

delivered. Skinkers, for example, has developed<br />

a live desktop alert system which sends vital<br />

information to the desktop, mobile phone or<br />

Blackberry. Skinkers has seen a reduction of<br />

calls through to the service desk of between 10<br />

and 20 per cent for clients using this system.<br />

This is one possible solution to the problem of<br />

information overload, but there is no doubt that<br />

IT departments must be much more selective in<br />

the information they deliver to users, otherwise it<br />

will be lost in the din of communications that all<br />

businesses currently contend with. n<br />

38 SERVICETALK july 2008<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 39


Publications FEATURE<br />

IT INFRASTRUCTURE LIBRARY (<strong>ITIL</strong> ® ) V3<br />

SERVICE MANAGEMENT<br />

MICROSOFT OPERATIONS FRAMEWORK (MOF)<br />

COMPLIANCE AND RISK<br />

ISO/IEC 20000<br />

PROJECT, PROGRAM & PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT<br />

G2G3.COM<br />

People are the driving force of business.<br />

With this in mind, G2G3 create Propulsion. Our world-renowned simulations<br />

and communication solutions are designed to create energy and forward<br />

motion, propelling your enterprise to faster results. We work closely with<br />

our clients and partners, using innovative experiential learning techniques<br />

to create positive cultural change.<br />

Over one million people who have participated in our simulations can’t be<br />

wrong. Be forward thinking.<br />

To learn more email INFO@G2G3.COM<br />

SPREADING<br />

THE WORD<br />

The <strong>ITIL</strong> pocket guides have done a superb job getting<br />

the word of best practice into the heart of the<br />

business world and Mark Lillycrop (pictured), manager,<br />

publications and translations, <strong>itSMF</strong> UK, looks at the<br />

creation of the Version 3 incarnations of the guides.<br />

They say that small is beautiful, and that<br />

sentiment certainly applies to books. You<br />

can load your bookcase with weighty<br />

reference works or surf Wikipedia for pages<br />

of dubious information on the latest hot topic.<br />

But nothing compares with the convenience of<br />

slipping a miniature volume into your pocket for<br />

perusal when you are sitting on a plane, waiting<br />

for a bus, or on your way to an exam.<br />

It’s generally agreed that the growth of <strong>itSMF</strong><br />

has been built on the success of one pocket<br />

guide in particular. Tens of thousands of copies<br />

of the ‘Little <strong>ITIL</strong>’ (or ‘IT Service Management – a<br />

Companion to the IT Infrastructure Library’ to<br />

give it its full title) have been sold as a concise<br />

summary of the Service Support and Service<br />

Delivery books in <strong>ITIL</strong> V2, while the follow-on<br />

series of UK pocket guides now reaches into<br />

every corner of service management, from<br />

security management to business perspective.<br />

With <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 the focus has moved to The<br />

Stationary Office’s (TSO) Key Element Guides<br />

(KEGs), co-branded with <strong>itSMF</strong> <strong>International</strong>, a<br />

decidedly bijou companion set to the core books.<br />

The KEGs have had a great deal of input from<br />

<strong>itSMF</strong> UK through authorship and review, and are<br />

now selling extremely well. For those who need<br />

to capture the essence of the core books, the<br />

KEGs are definitely a good way to go.<br />

Continuing with the diminutive theme,<br />

there are plenty of pocket-sized publications<br />

on a broad range of topics available. Titles<br />

devoted to ISO/IEC 20000, IT governance<br />

based on COBIT, IT service Capability Maturity<br />

Model, Six Sigma and <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 are all available<br />

in the six-inch format, complemented by<br />

more detailed management guides and<br />

introductions for those seeking in-depth<br />

information. Visit www.itsmf.co.uk/shop for<br />

more information on our available publications.<br />

Don’t forget to log in to take advantage of<br />

your membership discount. ➤<br />

july 2008 SERVICETALK 41


feature publications<br />

Theory into practice<br />

There are one or two new titles on the horizon<br />

for all those trying to put service management<br />

theory into practice. An update of TSO’s popular<br />

‘<strong>ITIL</strong> Small-scale Implementation’ by Sharon<br />

Taylor and Ivor Macfarlane will shortly be<br />

available to bring the book into line with <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

Version 3, while ‘Building an <strong>ITIL</strong> Based Service<br />

Management Department’ by Malcolm Fry<br />

(again from TSO) takes a refreshing look at the<br />

practicalities of creating a service management<br />

operation that adheres to <strong>ITIL</strong> processes and<br />

guidelines. Meanwhile, BCS has launched a<br />

new edition of David Miller’s ‘Business Focused<br />

IT and Service Excellence’, which examines the<br />

perception gap between IT and the business;<br />

and a new work entitled ‘Effective IT Service<br />

Management’ by Rob Addy, published by<br />

Springer, provides practical guidance on IT<br />

services by extending the <strong>ITIL</strong> approach to deliver<br />

proactive and pragmatic IT service management.<br />

The IT service management library is also<br />

going strong. Recent additions have included<br />

‘Implementing ISO/IEC 20000 Certification<br />

– the Roadmap’ for those aiming for corporate<br />

adoption of the standard, complemented by a<br />

more detailed ‘Introduction’ to the subject. Along<br />

with <strong>itSMF</strong> UK’s highly regarded ‘Planning and<br />

Achieving ISO/IEC 20000 Certification’, these<br />

books offer just about everything you need to<br />

know about getting started with the international<br />

service management standard. Over the<br />

coming weeks, the library will see the launch<br />

of ‘ITSM Global Best Practices’, a substantial<br />

compendium of more than 50 contributions<br />

from opinion formers across the industry,<br />

and also ‘Implementing Metrics for IT Service<br />

Management’, which provides an <strong>ITIL</strong>-oriented<br />

measurement framework based on a continuous<br />

improvement lifecycle.<br />

Moving forward, <strong>itSMF</strong> UK will be launching<br />

some new titles later this year, with two Special<br />

Interest Groups (SIGs) pooling their experience<br />

to provide practical guidance on service level<br />

management and change, configuration and<br />

release management respectively. These are<br />

just the first of a number of titles that will be<br />

published by the UK chapter in the months<br />

ahead, reflecting the commitment and expertise<br />

of the UK membership. Watch the website for<br />

further details.<br />

Publications news<br />

By now you should have received the first<br />

few issues of our informative new electronic<br />

newsletter, Publications News. This is the ideal<br />

way to find out about new titles, special offers<br />

and what’s coming next in between issues of<br />

ServiceTalk the Journal. If you haven’t seen<br />

it, and want to receive it please contact<br />

joanne.cooper@itsmf.co.uk<br />

Everyone’s a critic<br />

If you’ve ever fancied giving your views on new<br />

publications, now’s your chance to get your<br />

opinions into print. Starting on the right of this<br />

page, ServiceTalk the Journal will be publishing<br />

independent reviews of publications, to compare<br />

the best (and worst) features of the growing<br />

number of books that are emerging in the service<br />

management space. If this appeals to you, please<br />

get in touch with ServiceTalkEditor@itsmf.co.uk<br />

and we’ll give you the chance to have your say. n<br />

Book review<br />

Laura Jay offers her thoughts on ‘The Official<br />

Introduction to the <strong>ITIL</strong> Service Lifecycle’ book<br />

Did you find the Official Introduction<br />

interesting and insightful<br />

When <strong>ITIL</strong> Version 3 was delivered in 2007,<br />

I was looking forward to reading the new<br />

books with eager anticipation. However,<br />

having received the five core books last year<br />

(all approximately 250 pages each), I found<br />

them rather daunting and despite repeated<br />

attempts to read them from cover to cover,<br />

my enthusiasm for the new version started to<br />

wane.<br />

After several unsuccessful attempts to<br />

read through all five, I was therefore delighted<br />

when this ‘all-in-one’ book came out. I<br />

thought this edition might be a better<br />

approach – especially as the whole book<br />

was less than 250 pages and I was pleasantly<br />

surprised because it was.<br />

The facts are set out in an easy-to-read<br />

layout and written with a busy working<br />

person in mind; you don’t need a degree to<br />

understand the terminology either.<br />

What was new to you about the facts<br />

introduced in the book<br />

As an old hand at <strong>ITIL</strong> V2, it was difficult to<br />

understand in advance just what the new<br />

version was going to come up with. <strong>ITIL</strong> V3<br />

now has five stages: Service Strategy,<br />

Service Design, Service Transition,<br />

Service Operation and Continual Service<br />

Improvement and the key word is lifecycle.<br />

The stages show that <strong>ITIL</strong> has no beginning<br />

or end, just one continuous cycle of defining<br />

strategies, designing new/changed services,<br />

implementing them, improving them,<br />

re-defining them and so on.<br />

There are some other key changes,<br />

for example:<br />

- The importance of how IT services and<br />

business demands need to be aligned<br />

- The inclusion of new processes (some<br />

from ISO/IEC 20000 - previously outside<br />

the scope of <strong>ITIL</strong> V2)<br />

- Some long-overdue amendments such as<br />

incidents and requests now separated out<br />

into two different processes<br />

- More information on areas such as<br />

service catalogue management<br />

How has this book changed your<br />

opinion of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3<br />

Although excited about <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 I wasn’t sure<br />

just how practical it would be. This book<br />

helps explain the increased scope of <strong>ITIL</strong> from<br />

V2 to V3 and how the new existing processes<br />

all work together.<br />

How has the Official Introduction<br />

increased your interest in <strong>ITIL</strong> V3<br />

Using <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 both internally and with our<br />

customers is already a direction that Atos<br />

Origin are engaging in, and the condensed<br />

information in this book certainly makes <strong>ITIL</strong><br />

V3 look appealing.<br />

I also firmly believe that for anyone coming<br />

straight to the new version of <strong>ITIL</strong>, this would<br />

be an excellent starting point for them.<br />

Did the Official Introduction fulfil<br />

your needs and expectations<br />

Yes and no. The problem is how do you<br />

introduce all of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 in one book With<br />

great difficulty is the answer. This book does<br />

sum up everything you need to know to start,<br />

but then leaves you wanting more. Which is<br />

what it’s supposed to do I guess.<br />

How would you improve the book<br />

One thing that is difficult to understand in the<br />

book is just where the <strong>ITIL</strong> V2 ‘Ten processes<br />

and a function’ now fit into <strong>ITIL</strong> V3. There<br />

is a diagram in the book which shows this<br />

in a simplified form but further detailed<br />

explanation would definitely make life easier.<br />

Laura is currently the Central London <strong>itSMF</strong><br />

UK regional chair and is working as part of<br />

the BSI standards committee reviewing<br />

ISO/IEC 20000.<br />

October’s issue will be comparing the<br />

different <strong>ITIL</strong> V3 complementary titles<br />

available such as the ‘Official Introduction to<br />

the <strong>ITIL</strong> Service Lifecycle’, ‘the Key Element<br />

Guide Suite’, ‘IT Service Management based<br />

on <strong>ITIL</strong> V3’ and ‘An Introductory Overview<br />

of <strong>ITIL</strong> V3’ available from:<br />

www.itsmf.co.uk/shop<br />

VENDOR DIRECTORY<br />

consulting 6<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

@<br />

®<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong><br />

MANAGED SERVICES 6 RECRUITMENT 6<br />

PRODUCT 6<br />

PRODUCT CONTINUED 6<br />

baleit.co.uk<br />

Capacity Management<br />

SOFTWARE TRAINING CONSULTANCY<br />

training providers 6<br />

®<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong><br />

www.metron.co.uk<br />

Looking for that<br />

®<br />

<strong>ITIL</strong> bit extra from your<br />

recruitment agency<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

@<br />

Capacity Management<br />

SOFTWARE TRAINING CONSULTANCY<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

www.metron.co.uk<br />

We are looking for contributors....<br />

if you would like to advertise or submit an article to ServiceTalk<br />

the Journal contact lindsay.thomas@itsmf.co.uk for more information<br />

In the next<br />

issue...<br />

• In-sourcing<br />

versus<br />

out-sourcing<br />

• Incident<br />

management<br />

processes<br />

• Service<br />

portfolio<br />

management<br />

• Book reviews<br />

• Conference<br />

Supplement<br />

due 14th<br />

october<br />

2008<br />

42 SERVICETALK july 2008 july 2008 SERVICETALK 43


conference & exhibition<br />

10th - 12th November 2008<br />

H I lT o N M E T R o P o l E , B I R M I N g H a M<br />

The premier 3 day IT Service Management Event that offers a packed<br />

conference full of seminars, workshops, interactive sessions and<br />

exhibition, plus *evening entertainment.<br />

This year’s theme is based on organisations “ real experiences” and not<br />

just based on the theory as so many conferences focus on. This will<br />

include the pitfalls that have been encountered along the way along with<br />

the successfully implemented stories.<br />

“Thoroughly enjoyed the whole<br />

conference - found the vendor stands<br />

very informative. <strong>itSMF</strong> folk could not<br />

have been more accommodating.”<br />

“A very enjoyable and enlightening<br />

experience. A lot was learned and some<br />

will be put into practice shortly”<br />

“An excellent Conference - many thanks<br />

to everyone involved in organising such<br />

a successful event!”<br />

The event is geared to satisfy all levels of IT Service Management needs.<br />

There is an extensive exhibition with experts from the service management<br />

world to talk you through the latest products and services that are available<br />

to make best practice and its processes easier to implement.<br />

Each year the <strong>itSMF</strong> hold the largest IT Service Management event with<br />

over 1000 delegates and 80+ exhibitors. We try and choose locations that<br />

are easily accessible for both the delegates and the exhibitors.<br />

Packages now on sale:-<br />

1 Day Delegate at Members Rate £260.00<br />

1 Day Delegate at Non-Member Rate £360.00<br />

2 Day Delegate at Members Rate £515.00<br />

2 Day Delegate at Non-Members Rate £715.00<br />

3 Day Delegate at Members Rate £640.00<br />

3 Day Delegate at Non-Members Rate £860.00<br />

2 Days/1 Night at Members Rate £750.00<br />

2 Days/1 Night at Non-Members Rate £960.00<br />

ALL PRICES ARE EXCLUSIVE OF VAT<br />

*evening entertainment is only available when overnight packages are booked<br />

To b o o k t o c o m e t o t h e e v e n t g o t o :<br />

www.itsmf.co.uk

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!