tcdla - Voice For The Defense Online
tcdla - Voice For The Defense Online
tcdla - Voice For The Defense Online
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the jury, that the statement is reliable based on the time, content, and circumstances<br />
of the statement” (emphasis added).<br />
29. This shows the importance of trying to get discovery through any ongoing<br />
civil case. As a result of the tape-recording, the outcries were suppressed<br />
and the cases dismissed.<br />
30. <strong>The</strong>se are the facts underlying the writ of actual innocence in Ex parte<br />
Harmon, 116 S.W.3d 778 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002).<br />
31. See Endnote 14, above.<br />
32. Fielder v. State, 756 S.W.2d 309 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988), Pierini v. State,<br />
804 S.W.2d 258 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1991, review refused), Lane v.<br />
State, 957 S.W.2d 584 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1997, no writ).<br />
33. Werner v. State, 711 S.W.2d 639 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986).<br />
34. Zani v. State, 758 S.W.2d 233 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988), Vester v. State, 713<br />
S.W.2d 920 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986, en banc), Spence v. State, 795 S.W.2d 743<br />
(Tex. Crim. App. 1990, en banc), Burnett v. State, 642 S.W.2d 765 (Tex. Crim.<br />
App. 1982, en banc).<br />
35. Barley v. State, 906 S.W.2d 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995, en banc); Manson<br />
v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 (1977) (regarding the corrupting effect of unreliable<br />
identification testimony); Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 (1967).<br />
36. See Gail S. Goodman and Vicki Helgreson, Child Sexual Assault: Children’s<br />
Memory and the Law, 40 U. Miami Law Review, 191, 195 (1985).<br />
37. John E. B. Myers, <strong>The</strong> Child Witness: Techniques for Direct Examination,<br />
Cross-Examination and Impeachment, 18 Pac. L.J. 801, 899 (1987).<br />
38. See Debra A. Poole and Lawrence T. White, Effects of Question Repetition<br />
on Eyewitness Testimony of Children and Adults, 27 Developmental Psychology,<br />
November (1991) at 975.<br />
39. Goodman and Helgeson, supra, 40 U. Miami L. Rev. at 184–187.<br />
40. See William Bernet, M.D., Case Study: Allegations of Abuse Created in<br />
a Single Interview, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent<br />
Psychiatry, 36:7, July 1997, pp. 966–970.<br />
41. See State v. Wright, 775 P.2d 1124, 1128 (1989), aff’d sub nom Idaho<br />
v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805, 110 S.Ct. 3139, 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990). (“Once this<br />
tainting of memory has occurred, the problem is irremediable. That memory,<br />
is from then on, as real to the child as any other.”). See also Stephen J. Ceci and<br />
Maggie Bruck, Jeopardy in the Courtroom, 1995, pp. 218–220.<br />
42. See Stephen J. Ceci, PhD, and Mary Lynn Crotteau Huffman, PhD, “How<br />
Suggestible are Preschool Children Cognitive and Social Factors,” Journal of<br />
the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36:7, July 1997,<br />
pp. 948–958, as well as Maryann King and John C. Yuille, Suggestibility and the<br />
Child Witness in Children’s Eyewitness Memory, 29 (Stephen J. Ceci et al., eds.<br />
1987) and Age Difference in Suggestibility in Children’s Eyewitness Memory 82<br />
(Stephen J. Ceci et al., ed. 1987).<br />
43. American Prosecutors; Research Institute, National Center for Prosecution<br />
of Child Abuse, Investigation and Prosecution of Child Abuse at p. II-7 (1987).<br />
44. Id. at II-8.<br />
45. Id. at II-9.<br />
46. Id. at II-5.<br />
47. See Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805, 110 S.Ct. 3139, 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990).<br />
48. <strong>The</strong> right to make a bill of exception is absolute. Kipp v. State, 876 S.W.2d<br />
330 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994). Being refused the right to make a bill of exceptions<br />
may build in reversible error.<br />
Leonard Martinez, a native of San Antonio,<br />
moved to Austin in 1978 and attended the<br />
University of Texas Law School, graduating<br />
in 1981. Board certified in criminal law,<br />
Leonard has been licensed since 1981, practicing<br />
exclusively criminal law.<br />
L. T. “Butch” Bradt is a general practitioner in Houston. Licensed<br />
for 36 years and in 23 different courts, he has handled<br />
cases throughout the country. Recognized as an experienced<br />
trial and appellate attorney, he handles tax, civil, corporate,<br />
criminal, and family law matters. On the criminal side, he has<br />
successfully defended everything from speeding tickets to capital<br />
murder.<br />
Kim Hart is a licensed private investigator and trial consultant<br />
in Toledo, Ohio. She first became involved in defending<br />
allegations of abuse in the mid ’80s, appalled by the dearth of<br />
knowledge and experience in the legal and professional communities.<br />
In 1990, Kim and others formed the National Child<br />
Abuse <strong>Defense</strong> and Resource Center, a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt<br />
educational foundation, in an attempt to educate attorneys,<br />
doctors, mental health professionals, and others about the<br />
science involved in dealing with allegations of abuse. She has<br />
been the prime mover in the biannual seminars put on by the<br />
center, bringing world-renowned experts from around the globe<br />
to present the science of dealing with allegations of abuse to<br />
lawyers, caseworkers, police, judges, and others interested in<br />
separating real cases of abuse from false allegations of abuse.<br />
In addition to serving as the Executive Director of the Resource<br />
Center, Kim maintains an active practice as a trial consultant,<br />
assisting attorneys throughout the country in defending cases<br />
involving allegations of abuse.<br />
TCDLA Ethics Hotline<br />
Confronted by<br />
an ethical<br />
dilemma<br />
Your ethics<br />
hotline<br />
is just a<br />
call away. Call<br />
512.646.2734 and leave a<br />
message. You will receive a<br />
call or several calls within<br />
24 hours.