07.02.2015 Views

Thursday - Chemical & Engineering News - American Chemical ...

Thursday - Chemical & Engineering News - American Chemical ...

Thursday - Chemical & Engineering News - American Chemical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INFORMEX Show Daily | <strong>Thursday</strong> February 21 2013 | Anaheim Convention Center Anaheim California 17<br />

Five Minutes With…<br />

Edward S. Price<br />

President<br />

PCI Synthesis<br />

What are your major concerns<br />

within your market over the next<br />

two years<br />

I’ve got two concerns about trends<br />

affecting the industry. The first is whether<br />

funding for small, emerging companies will<br />

continue. For a while small biotechs got<br />

funding from both the public markets and<br />

venture capital. When the funding from the public markets dried up, the small<br />

biotechs revamped their business model, became more virtual and developed<br />

a greater dependence on VCs for funding. The greater shift to reliance on VC<br />

funding has had a significant impact on the size, scope and approach that emerging<br />

biotechs now take to develop their products. We’re also seeing that VC funding is<br />

slowing as well. So where does that leave small biotechs Right now the primary<br />

exit strategy for VC-backed biotechs is to get acquired by big pharma.<br />

The problem, and my second concern, is that big pharma continues to<br />

consolidate. Pfizer and Wyeth merged; Merck and Schering-Plough merged;<br />

AstraZeneca bought Ardea Biosciences and Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca<br />

jointly bought Amylin Pharmaceuticals.<br />

Today most VC-based biotechs’ exit strategy is to be acquired by big pharma<br />

player. With big pharma focused on merging with former competitors, there<br />

are fewer and fewer big pharma firms remaining. This thus limits the number of<br />

potential acquirers that will drive down prices, and, in turn, could drive down<br />

funding. The net result: loss of creativity and dwindling access to funding which will<br />

make value creation even more challenging.<br />

Among the challenges facing the industry, which one do you think<br />

is the most pressing—and why<br />

I think big pharma consolidation is the most pressing challenge facing the<br />

industry. The question is: Will there be enough opportunities for promising biotechs<br />

to sell their technologies Fewer big pharma companies mean fewer companies<br />

looking to acquire small companies. Aside from the business implications, this<br />

means that we may be missing out on the kinds of research that small biotechs can<br />

undertake—research that could lead to breakthroughs but that, at the outset, look<br />

unlikely to generate the kind of blockbuster returns that drive big pharma.<br />

What innovation (not your own company’s) do you believe has<br />

addressed a problem with a creative solution<br />

There is a great deal of work going on with continuous manufacturing. It is very<br />

innovative and inspiring because it seeks to dramatically change pharmaceutical<br />

manufacturing for both drug substance and drug product and has the potential<br />

to greatly improve efficiencies. But at the end of the day, a significant part of the<br />

challenge with continuous manufacturing won’t be the technological issues but<br />

regulatory issues such as how the process will be managed and how to deal with<br />

See 5 Minutes With…PCI Synthesis page 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!