Ordinance No._____- 2012 AN ORDINANCE ... - San Juan County
Ordinance No._____- 2012 AN ORDINANCE ... - San Juan County
Ordinance No._____- 2012 AN ORDINANCE ... - San Juan County
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Page 43 of 56<br />
Ord. ____-<strong>2012</strong><br />
(F) Monitoring the impact and compensation projects and taking appropriate corrective<br />
measures.<br />
ii. In accordance with WAC 173-26-221(2)(c)(iii) if inventories of critical saltwater habitats<br />
(defined in WAC 173-26-221) have not been completed, overwater and near shore<br />
developments in marine waters may not be approved without an inventory of the site and<br />
adjacent beach sections to assess the presence of these habitats and their functions. The methods<br />
and extent of the inventory shall be consistent with accepted research methodology, in<br />
consultation with the Department of Ecology technical assistance materials.<br />
iii. Public docks and docks serving four or more lots, piers, bulkheads, bridges, fill, floats, jetties,<br />
utility crossings, lifts, stairs, ramps, and other human-made structures shall not intrude into or<br />
over critical saltwater habitats unless all of these conditions are satisfied:<br />
(A) The public's need for such an action or structure is clearly demonstrated and the proposal is<br />
consistent with protection of the public trust, as embodied in RCW 90.58.020;<br />
(B) Avoidance of impacts to critical saltwater habitats by an alternative alignment or location is<br />
not feasible (as defined WAC 173-26-020 (15)), or would result in unreasonable and<br />
disproportionate cost to accomplish the same general purpose;<br />
(C) The project, including any required mitigation, will result in no net loss of ecological<br />
functions associated with critical saltwater habitat; and<br />
(D) The project is consistent with the State's interest in resource protection and species recovery.<br />
iv. Private, noncommercial docks for individual residential use, or for community use by the owners<br />
of no more than three adjacent or nearby parcels, may be authorized provided that:<br />
(A) Avoidance of impacts to critical saltwater habitats by an alternative alignment or location is<br />
not feasible; and<br />
(B) The project, including any required mitigation, will result in no net loss of ecological<br />
functions associated with critical saltwater habitat.<br />
v. When feasible, public access and ecological restoration shall be incorporated into publicly<br />
financed projects (see public access provisions of WAC 173-26-221(4)).<br />
b. Shoreline Stabilization<br />
i. Consistent with WAC 173-26-231 (3)(a)(iii)(B)(I,II,III), if erosion is not caused by upland<br />
conditions (i.e. those landward of the OHWM) and a geotechnical report demonstrates the need<br />
for protection, new, expanded and replacement shoreline stabilization measures are allowed<br />
when necessary to protect the following types of existing development:<br />
(A) The primary upland structure or accessory dwelling unit;<br />
(B) Water dependent activities;<br />
Comment [SH6]: To address public comment,<br />
consider making a clear statement that new<br />
overwater structures are not allowed in areas with<br />
kelp, eelgrass, and documented (and potential)<br />
forage fish spawning beaches, except when there is a<br />
significant public benefit.<br />
Comment [SH7]: To address public comment,<br />
consider removing “water dependent activities” from<br />
this list, and/or make a clear statement that new,<br />
expanded and replacement bulkheads are not<br />
allowed to protect areas where there is no primary<br />
structure.<br />
N:\L<strong>AN</strong>D USE\LONG R<strong>AN</strong>GE PROJECTS\PCODES-11-0004 CAO FWHCAs\Docs from PC and CC\FWHCAOrdCC_<strong>2012</strong>-10-26.doc