The impact of Sensory Evaluation of Sound - past, present and future

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The early years (1962-1975) • Focused on concert hall sound quality • Beranek (1962) • Interview based attribute development of 54 concert halls (live) 8 continuous scales developed • Hawkes and Douglas (1971) • 14 provided attribute scales, in 4 halls at 4 locations (live) • Nakayama et al. (1971) • MDS analysis of a single hall, using 1-8 speakers • 3 latent dimensions interpreted • Wilkens (1975) • Binaural recording and reproduction of 6 concert halls Rated on provided 16 scales 3 latent dimensions Sensory Evaluation of Sound, Sensometrix 2012, Rennes, France 14
1975 - 1995 • More concert hall studies • Schoeder (1974), Lavandier (1989), Kahle (1995) • The start of sensory sound reproduction research • Staffeldt (1974), Gabrielsson (1974,1979), Toole (1982, 1985 1986), • The beginning of communication quality research • Voiers (1977, 1983), Quackenbush (1988) Sensory Evaluation of Sound, Sensometrix 2012, Rennes, France 15
Page 1 and 2: The Impact of Sensory Evaluation of
Page 3 and 4: Domains of Sound
Page 5 and 6: The audio application • Is a fair
Page 7 and 8: Product sound • Product sound is
Page 9 and 10: Short historical i overview Some ke
Page 11 and 12: And for sound.. • Things started
Page 13: Reverberation • Understanding the
Page 17 and 18: A spa rse timeline of perceptua l e
Page 19 and 20: Summary of early concert hall works
Page 21 and 22: Staffeldt (1974) • Early applicat
Page 23 and 24: Nakayama (1971) • Early MDS based
Page 25 and 26: Gabrielsson (1974) • Analysis of
Page 27 and 28: Toole (1985) • Further analysis o
Page 29 and 30: Letowski (1989) • A good understa
Page 31 and 32: Zacharov (2001) • Adaption of des
Page 33 and 34: Zacharov (2001) - (3) • Preferenc
Page 35 and 36: Mattila (2001) - (2) Nr. Attribute
Page 37 and 38: Lorho (2005-2010) Sensory Evaluatio
Page 39 and 40: Lorho (2005-2010) - (2) Sensory Eva
Page 41 and 42: Lorho (2005-2010) - (4) Parafac 2 s
Page 43 and 44: Lokki (2011) • Latest and most de
Page 45 and 46: Lokki (2011) - (3) Sensory Evaluati
Page 47 and 48: Sensory Evaluation of Sound, Sensom
Page 49 and 50: So what have we learnt 49
Page 51 and 52: Observations about CVP • CVP work
Page 53 and 54: What do we know about analysis tool
Page 55 and 56: Making this easier • Significant
Page 57 and 58: Conclusion • Sensory science has
Page 60 and 61: References (1) 1. W. Sabine, “Rev

The impact of Sensory Evaluation of Sound - past, present and future

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?