Vol 47, No 4, April 2010 - BAA Lunar Section
Vol 47, No 4, April 2010 - BAA Lunar Section
Vol 47, No 4, April 2010 - BAA Lunar Section
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A note on Torricelli<br />
Bill Leatherbarrow<br />
This note is by way of a follow-up to Peter Grego’s fine survey of the Torricelli region, which appeared in the<br />
October 2009 issue of The New Moon (<strong>Vol</strong>. 18, <strong>No</strong>. 1). Peter mentions the debris on the floor of this crater<br />
and attributes this to slumping of the eastern wall. This is an entirely likely explanation, given the tendency<br />
for craters of this intermediate size to produce such wall slumps instead of full-scale terracing. The image<br />
above, from 1 <strong>April</strong> 2009 and taken with a 9.25-inch SCT, shows this floor material.<br />
The second image, below (20 February <strong>2010</strong>) was taken under poorer conditions and without amplification,<br />
with an OMC300. The wider field of view offered by the lower magnification allows us to see Torricelli<br />
in the context of the impressive<br />
impact ejecta field from the larger<br />
and apparently younger crater<br />
Theophilus. (Mike Brown’s image<br />
from 8 October 2009, which accompanied<br />
Peter’s paper, also allows a<br />
fine view of this context.)<br />
These wider-field images make<br />
me wonder whether an alternative<br />
explanation for the floor debris<br />
within Torricelli might not be that it<br />
represents ejecta deposits from the<br />
impact that produced Theophilus It<br />
might be worth further study of the<br />
disposition of the debris material<br />
within Torricelli, especially under<br />
different angles of illumination.<br />
8<br />
<strong>BAA</strong> <strong>Lunar</strong> <strong>Section</strong> Circular <strong>Vol</strong>. <strong>47</strong> <strong>No</strong>. 4 <strong>April</strong> <strong>2010</strong>