16.02.2015 Views

professional responsibility, student practice, and the clinical

professional responsibility, student practice, and the clinical

professional responsibility, student practice, and the clinical

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1990/91]<br />

STUDENT PRACTICE<br />

prepared <strong>and</strong> apprised of <strong>the</strong> facts, law <strong>and</strong> legal strategy necessary for<br />

competent representation in <strong>the</strong> specific case, it is less likely intervention<br />

would accomplish its intended purpose of remedying unsatisfactory <strong>student</strong><br />

performance. This is, of course, <strong>the</strong> worst of all possible situations for <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>clinical</strong> teacher <strong>and</strong> a dilemma which, in itself, arguably constitutes<br />

un<strong>professional</strong> conduct. 6 ' While <strong>the</strong> chances of a conscientious <strong>clinical</strong><br />

teacher being totally unprepared to take over for a <strong>student</strong> are remote, <strong>the</strong><br />

teacher's level of preparation <strong>and</strong> knowledge will not be constant from case<br />

to case. A teacher's ability to improve on <strong>the</strong> performance of a <strong>student</strong> will<br />

be limited by <strong>the</strong> degree to which <strong>the</strong> teacher lacks relevant <strong>and</strong> specific<br />

information. To that same extent, <strong>the</strong> <strong>clinical</strong> teacher should exercise caution<br />

in assuming direct <strong>responsibility</strong> for representation. A conservative approach<br />

to intervention in such circumstances will also minimize any danger that <strong>the</strong><br />

uninformed teacher will merely substitute his or her style of advocacy or<br />

preferred choices for <strong>the</strong> disparate <strong>and</strong> possibly more thoughtful conduct of<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>student</strong>. 62<br />

5. Burdens on <strong>the</strong> Client <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> System<br />

Issues raised by <strong>the</strong> fifth question relate to <strong>the</strong> need for intervention in<br />

those situations where <strong>student</strong> representation is not inimical to an ultimate<br />

outcome favorable to <strong>the</strong> client but significantly impacts <strong>the</strong> client or legal<br />

system in collateral ways. Even if interventi3n is not necessary to assure <strong>the</strong><br />

desired result, <strong>the</strong> <strong>clinical</strong> teacher should consider <strong>the</strong> consequences of <strong>student</strong><br />

performance in terms of delay, financial <strong>and</strong> emotional costs to <strong>the</strong> client, <strong>and</strong><br />

impact on <strong>the</strong> resources of <strong>the</strong> court <strong>and</strong> interested parties.<br />

A lawyer has a duty to "act with reasonable diligence <strong>and</strong> promptness<br />

in representing a client ' 63 <strong>and</strong> to make "reasonable efforts to expedite<br />

61. See MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CoNDucT Rule 1.1 <strong>and</strong> Rule 5.3 (1990).<br />

The development of <strong>professional</strong> <strong>responsibility</strong> "requires <strong>student</strong>s to be challenged by<br />

teachers who present role models which express that <strong>professional</strong> <strong>responsibility</strong> is<br />

important." Leleiko, Love, Professional Responsibility, The Rule of Law, <strong>and</strong> Clinical Legal<br />

Education, 29 CLEV. ST. L. REv. 641, 656 (1980).<br />

62. The <strong>clinical</strong> teacher has <strong>professional</strong> obligations to both <strong>student</strong> <strong>and</strong> client. This<br />

does not mean <strong>the</strong> teacher should simply substitute his or her decisions for those of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>student</strong> when both are reasonable under <strong>the</strong> circumstances. To do so would deprive <strong>the</strong><br />

client of <strong>the</strong> potential benefits flowing from a close working relationship with <strong>the</strong> <strong>student</strong>.<br />

It would also deprive <strong>the</strong> <strong>student</strong> of <strong>the</strong> opportunity to fully explore <strong>and</strong> test his or her<br />

decisions in a tolerant <strong>and</strong> encouraging environment.<br />

63. MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDucT Rule 1.3 (1990).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!