Šaltoji termobranduolinė sintezė : „Nemokama energija" = Pseudo mokslas?(Anotacija lietuvių kalba) / Cold Fusion : "Free Energy" = Pseudo Science?

What Are Harmonious Free Energy Intro Scenarios?
• Four possible ideas are presented here, and 4 th scenario is analyzed in depth:
1- Gradual cost reduction(eg: Coal->Thorium—> “Free energy” Thermonuclear
Fusion), 2- Gradual INFRA cost reduction & tech exclusivity WITHIN Free Energy;
Starting with most expensive & exclusive(eg: Fusion)->Less(LENR)->Even
less(inventor tech), 3- In future to allow "free energy device" trading at Amazon
or mainstream Western governmental trading web sites; Currently sold at submainstream
web sites(eg Alibaba,+);
• 4-“Co-existence tech model α”: Both low cost & old tech thrive with full
endorsement by “trusted authorities”(eg; Free Skype vs Charged phone call)
• Recent “free energy” treatment by mainstream is a repeat of “Co-existence
tech model β ”: obfuscate or completely ignore alternative disruptive invention
when complete cover-up is no longer plausible :i.e “Give a small pie” to
disruptive tech while securing no further expansion by at least mainstream data
authority orchestration; ”As long as western mainstream inter-references as
real, controversial, or "go unreported", majority believes anything” or obliged to
act as if so": Ignore/discredit “free tech” while allowing commercialization
avoids “conversion rush” of mainstream crowd, assisting formulation of
adoption ceiling or gradual transition: Promote debate on theoretical level with
an agreement “no investment should take place until theoretical or designated
institutional approval comes because it will waste money”, or entirely avoid the
debate as if such thing doesn't exist. - i.e. no development; ->>cont: 336