17.02.2015 Views

wfp, food aid and local survival in guinea-bissau, 1998-99 - Nina ...

wfp, food aid and local survival in guinea-bissau, 1998-99 - Nina ...

wfp, food aid and local survival in guinea-bissau, 1998-99 - Nina ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hjalte T<strong>in</strong> : Food Aid <strong>in</strong> Gu<strong>in</strong>ea-Bissau <strong>1<strong>99</strong>8</strong>-<strong>99</strong>. June 2001 ; page 32<br />

solved the <strong>in</strong>ternal UN problem of security rat<strong>in</strong>g. Thus WFP had no idea of how to<br />

br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>food</strong> to Bissau, <strong>and</strong> br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g all 36.000 tons <strong>in</strong>to the Junta Militar controled<br />

regions would have been politically <strong>and</strong> humanely unacceptable <strong>and</strong> complicat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

political situation <strong>and</strong> possibly prolong<strong>in</strong>g the conflict.<br />

For WFP the bottom-l<strong>in</strong>e was not without importance: they managed to keep a largely<br />

unnecessary operation <strong>in</strong> a very small country runn<strong>in</strong>g for two years, seamlessly<br />

bridg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>food</strong> <strong>aid</strong> before, dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> after the war, <strong>and</strong> add<strong>in</strong>g more than 11 million<br />

dollars to the global turn-over of WFP. For the people, the beneficiaries, the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention ignored all <strong>local</strong> resources. Had the displaced <strong>and</strong> needy people of Gu<strong>in</strong>ea-<br />

Bissau depended on WFP for all their <strong>food</strong>, as WFP assumed they did, they would<br />

certa<strong>in</strong>ly not have avoided a fam<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Thus <strong>in</strong> conclusion, there are valid reasons to believe the population of Gu<strong>in</strong>ea-Bissau<br />

had the benefit of WFP failure. They did not suffer because WFP performed poorly, on<br />

the contrary they were spared the negative impact likely to have followed a full-scale<br />

WFP operation. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the Gu<strong>in</strong>eans that did receive WFP-<strong>food</strong> were<br />

happy. Where, <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al analysis, was the break<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t between beneficial <strong>and</strong><br />

harmful impact: was it 5.000 tons, 15.000 tons or perhaps 0 tons of <strong>in</strong>ternational <strong>food</strong><br />

<strong>aid</strong>? That cannot be answered here. The evidence from Gu<strong>in</strong>ea-Bissau suggests that<br />

tonnage was only part of the answer. Chance <strong>in</strong>stitutional <strong>in</strong>dependence as that caused<br />

by WFP evacuation was important, <strong>and</strong> above all the unique capacity of the population<br />

of Gu<strong>in</strong>ea-Bissau to cater for the needs of their displaced <strong>and</strong> war-affected compatriots.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Unpublished :<br />

Documents from the WFP country office <strong>in</strong> Bissau : Donor Reports, Situation Reports, Tables of<br />

Stock Movements, Delivery Sheets, correspondance) ;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!