Urban and Regional Planning adopting RES - Sitra

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Making Cities Energy Efficient 3.4 Marketing of Training Marketing of the new type of cross-professional training, despite the general recognition of its need, presented challenges. This was mainly due to the novelty of the subject area, low training budget of public authorities to allocate funds for such long training at short (2-3 months) notice, and the European financial crisis. This hampered the training course marketing in Spain and Hungary, imposed limitations on human resources for taking up the long course due to the existing lean organisation of urban planning in Finland, and even to the short courses in UK, where many local authority personnel lost their jobs. Therefore, financial support from IEE was of vital importance for piloting the training in the five countries. Marketing was targeted mainly at regional councils, city planning offices, consulting and construction companies and other public bodies involved with land use and energy planning. Letters, newspaper articles, posters, emails and individual phone calls were used in marketing and attracting participants to the course. Short courses were used in Germany, Hungary and Finland to attract participants to the long course, and information sessions were delivered in Spain. In Finland, for instance, about half of the long course trainees had earlier in Spring 2011 participated in the short course. 3.5 Long Course Training Delivery 3.5.1 Country Specific Training Delivery Based on the differences between the countries in terms of urban planning practices and the technological needs, different approaches were taken in the five countries as well, including the following: • In Finland, there was the 9 month program to urban and regional planners. The program consisted of 8 modules each of two days duration from fall 2011 to summer 2012. The 25 trained planners now work to adjust their plans to adopt new features that favour RES and EE. The trainees were from various different parts of the country. The training of 20 ECTS credits was organised by Aalto University in Helsinki metropolitan area. • In Hungary, the long pilot course was organised as a normal university course by the University of Debrecen. The course lasted one academic year, the extent was as much as 60 ECTS with 16 participating students. 21
Making Cities Energy Efficient • In Germany, the one year lasting long course is underway in 2013 targeted at both urban and energy planners. The benefit of educating both professions together is expected to create mutual understanding in the way of thinking, terms and objectives, and working. All the training takes place in Frankfurt. • In Spain, the long course was also of 9 months duration from fall 2011 to spring 2012 with 34 trainees, representing both public and private practitioners of urban planning. The course afternoon sessions lasting 3 hours, were delivered twice a week summing up a total of 150 face-to-face hours and additional home and project work. The course was delivered at the Chamber of Architects of Catalonia in Barcelona. • In the United Kingdom, there were no such long courses, although discussions have been held with two universities who have already used some of the material for their masters courses. • In the UK, 20 short courses were delivered, initially of duration three days, and then reducing to two days, each were organised in different cities across the country. To each course, planners, developers, energy and environmental experts, consulting engineers were invited to learn the main features of climate change oriented urban planning. Based on the outcome, the attending stakeholders were asked to select a real planning case in their city to which RE and EE could be incorporated. In the five countries above, the pilot training with short and long courses covered about 800 experts, which can be considered a good start towards co-planning of energy and urban structures in the future. 3.5.2 Training Methods in the Long Training Programs 22 The teaching and learning methods in the programs were selected to ensure high quality learning for students. First, all partners recruited the best available experts to teach in the courses – these came not only from the universities, but also from research institutions, associations, municipalities, and companies. Having experts from different organisations brought a variety of viewpoints that enriched learning. Second, learning was facilitated with discussions and problem solving cases; in Finland and Spain there was always a nominated facilitator for each module and training day. His/her role was to raise questions, facilitate learning assignments, and to stimulate discussion. These facilitators had different professional backgrounds. Third, site visits and case studies were used to bring practical knowledge to the training. Fourth, students carried out several assignments that helped them to apply the knowledge. In addition to the above, some other training methods were used including lectures, discussions, distance learning, movies (as an introduction to the topic) and a project clinic exercise to help trainees carry out their project work, illustrated in figures 3 and 4 to follow.
Page 1 and 2: Making Cities Energy Efficient Urba
Page 3 and 4: Authors: Anna-Maija Ahonen Thomas D
Page 5 and 6: Abbreviations AESOP ECTS CHP CPD DC
Page 7 and 8: For the reader This report summaris
Page 9 and 10: Making Cities Energy Efficient ener
Page 11 and 12: Making Cities Energy Efficient the
Page 13 and 14: Making Cities Energy Efficient 3 UP
Page 15 and 16: Making Cities Energy Efficient Rega
Page 17 and 18: Making Cities Energy Efficient 3.3
Page 19 and 20: Making Cities Energy Efficient plan
Page 21: Making Cities Energy Efficient M3 M
Page 25 and 26: Making Cities Energy Efficient Tabl
Page 27 and 28: Making Cities Energy Efficient As s
Page 29 and 30: Making Cities Energy Efficient Esta
Page 31 and 32: Making Cities Energy Efficient Long
Page 33 and 34: Making Cities Energy Efficient Urba
Page 35 and 36: Making Cities Energy Efficient The
Page 37 and 38: Making Cities Energy Efficient Figu
Page 39 and 40: Making Cities Energy Efficient In P
Page 41 and 42: Making Cities Energy Efficient 4.2.
Page 43 and 44: Making Cities Energy Efficient Othe
Page 45 and 46: Making Cities Energy Efficient A se
Page 47 and 48: Making Cities Energy Efficient Less
Page 51 and 52: Making Cities Energy Efficient 5 Gu
Page 53 and 54: Making Cities Energy Efficient Spai
Page 57 and 58: Making Cities Energy Efficient 7 Fu
Page 59 and 60: Making Cities Energy Efficient 8 Co
Page 61: Making Cities Energy Efficient Part

Urban and Regional Planning adopting RES - Sitra

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?