CERES Clouds Working Group Report - NASA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Meteosat-9 vs Aqua Cloud Amounts, Night! • Meteosat higher by 3% both months! ! • Correlations with other parameters look quite good also!
GEOSat Cloud Fraction, March 2013! day! Zonal Means vs. Aqua Ed2, March 2012! night! • GOES has too much cloud at night, Meteosat too little over ocean! !- mask adjustments needed!
Page 1 and 2: CERES Cloud Properties: Ed4, SNPP &
Page 3 and 4: Update of CERES Cloud-related Paper
Page 5 and 6: Cloud Parameters in CERES Edition 2
Page 7 and 8: MODIS Processing Status! • Ed2 pr
Page 9 and 10: • Alteration of Terra 3.7-µm Col
Page 11 and 12: Low Cloud Heights! ! • Ed2 used 7
Page 13 and 14: Daytime boundary layer lapse rates
Page 15 and 16: Instantaneous Low Cloud Height Diff
Page 17 and 18: Regional Mean Nighttime Low Cloud H
Page 19 and 20: Terra! Water Cloud Effective Height
Page 21 and 22: Terra! Ice Cloud Effective Height C
Page 23 and 24: Terra! Aqua! Change Water droplet E
Page 25 and 26: MODIS Edition 4 Tasks! • Continue
Page 27 and 28: VIIRS Spectral Channels!
Page 29 and 30: • Acquire necessary auxiliary inf
Page 31 and 32: VIIRS Cloud Fraction Comparison w/
Page 33 and 34: VIIRS Cloud Detection! • Tune clo
Page 35 and 36: VIIRS Water Cloud COD Comparison w/
Page 37 and 38: Whatʼs Ahead for CERES SNPP VIIRS!
Page 39: Meteosat-9 vs Aqua Cloud Amounts, D
Page 43: GEOSat Tasks! • Validate calibrat

CERES Clouds Working Group Report - NASA

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?