17.02.2015 Views

Preventing Electoral Fraud report SAIRR May 11 ... - AfricanLiberty.org

Preventing Electoral Fraud report SAIRR May 11 ... - AfricanLiberty.org

Preventing Electoral Fraud report SAIRR May 11 ... - AfricanLiberty.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

General by an individual who was in fact acting for the MDC. However, the<br />

Registrar-General quickly realised what had happened. Hence, when additional<br />

copies were requested, all further sales of such material were blocked by him.<br />

April 2002 A High Court application by the MDC to have the roll, as used in<br />

the 2002 presidential election, released in digital format was rejected. 7<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

The MDC's application to acquire the presidential voters' roll then went to the<br />

Supreme Court, and was ultimately denied in a poorly reasoned judgment. Mr<br />

Justice J Friedman, acting as an Independent Observer on behalf of the Forum for<br />

Barristers and Advocates of the International Bar Association, found “the<br />

judgment of the Supreme Court...fundamentally flawed”, adding: “The outcome<br />

of the appeal can therefore....only be described as highly unsatisfactory.” 8<br />

February 2005 An application by the MDC for the voters' roll in digital format<br />

for the imminent 2005 general election was denied.<br />

These successive efforts created considerable bad publicity and embarrassment<br />

for the Zanu-PF regime. Hence, in early 2008 the law was changed to allow a<br />

voters' roll to be supplied in digital format to political parties and interested NGOs<br />

prior to an election. This proved of great significance when Zimbabwe in 2008<br />

staged “harmonised” elections in which voters cast their votes at the same time for<br />

Parliament, the President, the Senate, and their local municipal council.<br />

March 2008 The voters' roll was supplied to political parties, though not in the<br />

readable digital format specified. In addition, the roll for some constituencies was<br />

delivered only after the election was over. The experience of the Zimbabwe<br />

<strong>Electoral</strong> Support Network (ZESN) was typical, for instead of being supplied with<br />

computer disks with the data in analysable form, the ZESN received – only well<br />

after the elections had taken place – a set of 210 CDs of the roll in “tiff” (tagged<br />

image file format). This meant that the CDs contained a photographic<br />

reproduction of each page of the roll, a format not easily susceptible to analysis.<br />

It must have been a large and deliberate exercise to photograph every page of the<br />

roll in that way. It would certainly have been far easier for the Registrar-General<br />

to supply the information in the digital form which his office already used. There<br />

seems little doubt that the law was thus flouted, precisely with the objective of<br />

preventing timeous analysis of the voters' roll.<br />

2009 An MDC application to obtain a copy of the voters' roll as used in the<br />

2008 harmonised elections was denied by the ZEC.<br />

7<br />

Zimbabwe Law Reports 2002, M<strong>org</strong>an Tsvangirai v Registrar-General and Others, High Court,<br />

Harare, HC 12092/01<br />

8<br />

The Hon Justice Mr. J Friedman, Report as Independent Observer, 15 January 2003<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!