22.02.2015 Views

Corporate Tax 2011 - Templars Law Firm

Corporate Tax 2011 - Templars Law Firm

Corporate Tax 2011 - Templars Law Firm

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The International Comparative Legal Guide to:<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />

A practical cross-border<br />

insight to corporate tax work<br />

Published by Global Legal Group with<br />

contributions from:<br />

Aivar Pilv <strong>Law</strong> Office<br />

Arias & Muñoz<br />

Avanzia <strong>Tax</strong>and Limited<br />

Avbreht, Zajc & Partners, Ltd.<br />

BC Toms & Co<br />

Boga & Associates<br />

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP<br />

Bredin Prat<br />

Bustamante & Bustamante<br />

Candal-<strong>Tax</strong>and<br />

Cárdenas & Cárdenas Abogados Ltda.<br />

CMS Cameron McKenna LLP<br />

Cuatrecasas, Gonçalves Pereira<br />

Dorda Brugger Jordis<br />

Dr Dr Batliner & Dr Gasser<br />

Elvinger, Hoss & Prussen<br />

Eubelius<br />

Gide Loyrette Nouel<br />

Greenwoods & Freehills<br />

Hannes Snellman Attorneys Ltd.<br />

Hendersen <strong>Tax</strong>and<br />

Herzog Fox & Neeman<br />

HNP Counsellors Limited – <strong>Tax</strong>and Thailand<br />

Juridicon <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Firm</strong><br />

Kilpatrick Stockton<br />

LAWIN<br />

Lee and Li, Attorneys-at-<strong>Law</strong><br />

Lenz & Staehelin<br />

LOGOS legal services<br />

McCann FitzGerald<br />

Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu<br />

Negri & Teijeiro Abogados<br />

P+P Pöllath + Partners<br />

Pachiu & Associates<br />

Pedersoli e Associati<br />

PRA <strong>Law</strong> Offices<br />

Proskauer Rose LLP<br />

Salans<br />

Simpson Grierson<br />

Slaughter and May<br />

TEMPLARS<br />

White & Case<br />

Yoon & Yang LLC


Chapter 36<br />

Nigeria<br />

Afolabi Elebiju<br />

TEMPLARS<br />

Vivian Osayande<br />

1 General: Treaties<br />

1.1 How many income tax treaties are currently in force in<br />

Nigeria?<br />

According to the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) website,<br />

Nigeria has tax treaties (TTs) with nine countries: Belgium, Canada,<br />

France, the Netherlands, Pakistan, Philippines, South Africa and the<br />

United Kingdom. Although the Companies Income <strong>Tax</strong> Act<br />

(CITA), 2004 LFN exhibits the Ministerial Orders for only 5<br />

treaties pursuant to section 45 of the CITA, in practice the FIRS<br />

generally regard other TTs (in so far as agreement has been signed<br />

on behalf of Nigeria) as effective. Thus TTs with China and the<br />

Czech and Slovak Republics are given effect to. It is unclear at the<br />

moment whether the appropriate Orders have been made by the<br />

Minister in respect of a number recent TTs, but UNCTAD’s Blue<br />

Book (July 2009) lists other countries such as Republic of Korea,<br />

Denmark, Norway, Poland and Sweden amongst those which have<br />

TTs with Nigeria.<br />

1.2 Do they generally follow the OECD or another model?<br />

Nigerian TTs follow both the OECD and the UN model, albeit the<br />

influence of the UN model is more pronounced. Also there are<br />

strains of ‘domestic models’ of Nigeria and her negotiating partners<br />

in the TTs.<br />

1.3 Do treaties have to be incorporated into domestic law<br />

before they take effect?<br />

The constitution requires treaties to be domesticated before they can<br />

take effect. However, as noted in question 1.1 above, the FIRS<br />

gives effect to TTs once they have been signed on behalf of Nigeria,<br />

including for example the Nigeria-China TT (reportedly signed in<br />

2002, but not on the FIRS website). This may also not be<br />

unconnected with historic FIRS practice (like many other agencies)<br />

of the commencing implementation of government policy<br />

initiatives/directives ahead of completion of the relevant formal<br />

framework. The issue of the constitutionality of section 45(1) of the<br />

CITA, pursuant to which certification by the minister that treaty<br />

arrangements have been made with the government of any country<br />

is sufficient to give the TT effect notwithstanding any provision of<br />

the CITA, has not been tested.<br />

1.4 Do they generally incorporate anti-treaty shopping rules<br />

(or “limitation of benefits” articles)?<br />

No they do not incorporate strict anti-treaty shopping rules.<br />

Generally, a resident of a State that is not a party to the double<br />

taxation treaty may establish an entity within a State that is a party<br />

to such a treaty and obtain the benefits therefrom. Examples of<br />

some restrictions on the enjoyment of treaty benefits is the ‘subject<br />

to tax’ requirement (Nigeria-UK TT) or ‘beneficial owner’ concept<br />

(Nigeria-Netherlands TT), whereby recipient enjoys a treaty rate<br />

only if subject to tax in the country of residence and not a proxy for<br />

the beneficial owner, respectively.<br />

1.5 Are treaties overridden by any rules of domestic law<br />

(whether existing when the treaty takes effect or<br />

introduced subsequently)?<br />

Where a treaty has been ratified, it would take precedence over any<br />

domestic law (except the constitution, which is Nigeria’s<br />

grundnorm) in case of any conflict.<br />

2 Transaction <strong>Tax</strong>es<br />

2.1 Are there any documentary taxes in Nigeria?<br />

Yes. Stamp duties are payable under the Stamp Duties Act (SDA).<br />

The Schedule to the SDA sets out the classification of instruments<br />

and the applicable rates – whether ad valorem or nominal (flat)<br />

rates, depending on the particular instrument. The current rate on<br />

share capital is 0.75%. It is possible to structure transactions to<br />

optimise the related stamp duty exposure. Failure to stamp<br />

documents that are liable to stamp duties does not render the<br />

documents void, but incapable of being tendered in evidence (in<br />

such event the documents can be tendered upon payment of stamp<br />

duties and any applicable penalties for failure to stamp in time).<br />

Accordingly, in practice parties may not stamp agreements between<br />

related companies as the prospect of dispute would be minimal.<br />

Conversely, the share transfers of unlisted companies are stamped<br />

as a necessary incidence of the prudent practice (but not legal<br />

requirement) of filing share transfers at the <strong>Corporate</strong> Affairs<br />

Commission (CAC), since the CAC would not accept unstamped<br />

documentation for filing.<br />

192<br />

WWW.ICLG.CO.UK<br />

ICLG TO: CORPORATE TAX <strong>2011</strong><br />

© Published and reproduced with kind permission by Global Legal Group Ltd, London


TEMPLARS<br />

Nigeria<br />

2.2 Do you have Value Added <strong>Tax</strong> (or a similar tax)? If so, at<br />

what rate or rates?<br />

Yes, Value Added <strong>Tax</strong> (VAT) is chargeable under the VAT Act at 5%<br />

of “the value of all taxable goods and services”. Newly-incorporated<br />

companies register for VAT simultaneously upon registration for CIT.<br />

There is pending litigation, instituted by Lagos State, at the Supreme<br />

Court on the constitutionality of the VAT Act, on the basis that in<br />

Nigeria’s federal system, State Governments, and not the Federal<br />

Government, should collect and administer sales taxes.<br />

2.3 Is VAT (or any similar tax) charged on all transactions or<br />

are there any relevant exclusions?<br />

VAT applies to the supply of goods (which includes any transaction<br />

where the whole or property in the goods is transferred or<br />

contemplated to be transferred) and the supply of services for a<br />

consideration. It has been argued that only exempt items listed in<br />

the 1 st Schedule to the VAT Act (including zero rated items in Part<br />

III of the 1 st Schedule, as amended by VAT Amendment Act No. 12<br />

2007), will not be subject to general VAT treatment. The VATexempt<br />

items are necessaries (such as basic food items, medical and<br />

pharmaceutical products and medical services) listed as a matter of<br />

policy or law (agricultural equipment, gas-related equipment, plant<br />

machinery or goods imported for use in export processing or free<br />

trade zones), and exported services. The FIRS maintains that<br />

services provided by a Nigerian resident to a non-resident client are<br />

not “exported services” for the purpose of the VAT Act.<br />

However, the argument has been made, equally convincingly, that<br />

choses in action (e.g. shares, licence interests) are not subject to<br />

VAT because they are neither “goods” nor “services”. This view<br />

has force because tax can not be imposed by implication, but can<br />

only be express words of the tax statute, which in any event must be<br />

construed in favour of the taxpayer and against the Revenue.<br />

Differences of opinion on this issue of whether VAT applies to<br />

choses in action between the FIRS and taxpayers will hopefully<br />

soon be the subject of judicial pronouncement.<br />

2.4 Is it always fully recoverable by all businesses? If not,<br />

what are the relevant restrictions?<br />

Under the VAT Act (section 17), input VAT paid by businesses on<br />

their purchases is recoverable from the output VAT charged on<br />

sales. However, only input VAT incurred on goods imported or<br />

purchased directly for the resale or goods, which form stock-intrade<br />

for the production of other goods on which VAT is charged,<br />

may be recovered from the output VAT. Accordingly, the input VAT<br />

incurred on services, overheads and general administration<br />

expenses can only be recovered through the profit and loss account.<br />

Input VAT incurred on capital expenditure must be capitalised with<br />

the cost of the asset in the balance sheet.<br />

2.5 Are there any other transaction taxes?<br />

Other transaction taxes include principally the following:<br />

(a) Capital gains, pursuant to the Capital Gains <strong>Tax</strong> Act (CGTA),<br />

which charges CGT on “…the gains accruing to any person on<br />

a disposal of assets”(section 1) at 10%. By section 6(1), there<br />

is a disposal of assets by a person “… where any capital sum<br />

is derived from a sale, lease, transfer, an assignment, a<br />

compulsory acquisition, or any other disposition of assets,<br />

notwithstanding that no asset is acquired by the person paying<br />

the capital sum”. “Capital Sum” is defined as any money or<br />

money’s worth which is not excluded from the consideration<br />

(b)<br />

(c)<br />

taken into account in the computation of the Capital Gain. The<br />

CGTA excludes “any money or money’s worth charged to<br />

income tax as income of, or taken into account as, a receipt in<br />

computing income or profits or gains or losses of the person<br />

making the disposal” for the purpose of the CIT. In practice,<br />

CGT is computed at 10% of the net gain (i.e. transfer proceeds<br />

less acquisition, historical costs such as enhancement of asset<br />

and transfer-related costs). By virtue of section 41 of the<br />

CGTA, CGT is subject to the terms of any applicable TTs. For<br />

a Nigerian resident, it is irrelevant that such asset is not<br />

situated in Nigeria; for a non-resident, CGT will only be levied<br />

on the amount received or brought into Nigeria.<br />

Property taxes, especially consent fees charged on the<br />

transfer of any interest in property pursuant to the Land Use<br />

Act. The rates vary from State to State and in Lagos State it<br />

is an average of 15% of the asset value or consideration.<br />

Federal rates (in respect of transactions in Federal land) tend<br />

to be lower.<br />

Perfection costs such as CAC filing fees on mortgages,<br />

charges and registration fees at Lands Registry etc. Land<br />

Use Charge (or its equivalent) is not a transaction tax from a<br />

strict point of view because it is not triggered by any<br />

transaction – liability arises by virtue of the property being in<br />

existence and in a location subject to jurisdiction of the<br />

enabling <strong>Law</strong>.<br />

2.6 Are there any other indirect taxes of which we should be<br />

aware?<br />

Yes there are, and some of these are excise duties, import duties and<br />

export duties. Import duties are assessed using the ECOWAS<br />

Common External Tariff (CET) and the Comprehensive Import<br />

Supervision Scheme (CISS), with an administrative charge of 1% of<br />

F.O.B; the value of the imports. Other charges are: 7% surcharge<br />

calculated on the customs duty; 0.5% trade liberalisation scheme levy<br />

(on customs duty from non-ECOWAS countries); VAT at 5% on the<br />

CIF value of imports, customs duty and the allied charges mentioned<br />

above; and other applicable levies, for example port surcharges.<br />

3 Cross-border Payments<br />

3.1 Is any withholding tax imposed on dividends paid by a<br />

locally resident company to a non-resident?<br />

Yes. Withholding tax (WHT) applies at 10% or 7.5% if the<br />

shareholder is resident in a country which has TTs with Nigeria. In<br />

either case, the WHT is the final tax on such dividend for the nonresident.<br />

Pursuant to section 23 of the CITA, a dividend received<br />

from investments in wholly export-oriented businesses is tax<br />

exempt and therefore would not be subject to WHT.<br />

3.2 Would there be any withholding tax on royalties paid by a<br />

local company to a non-resident?<br />

Yes, at the rate of 10% (non-resident individuals 5%). Nigeria TTs<br />

also have beneficial provisions on royalties. WHT deducted on<br />

royalties and interest is the final tax on such income for nonresidents.<br />

3.3 Would there be any withholding tax on interest paid by a<br />

local company to a non-resident?<br />

WHT is applicable at 10% or 7.5% if a non-resident lender is based<br />

in a TT country. However, foreign loans could qualify for full or<br />

Nigeria<br />

ICLG TO: CORPORATE TAX <strong>2011</strong><br />

© Published and reproduced with kind permission by Global Legal Group Ltd, London<br />

WWW.ICLG.CO.UK<br />

193


TEMPLARS<br />

Nigeria<br />

Nigeria<br />

partial WHT exemption based on tenor – including a moratorium<br />

and grace period, pursuant to the 3 rd Schedule of the CITA; loans<br />

with a 7 year + tenor enjoy 100% exemption. The moratorium<br />

period (payment of only the interest but not the principal) could be<br />

zero, but there must be a grace period (during which neither interest<br />

nor principal is payable, although interest accrues). Accelerated<br />

repayment results in loss of the (full) exemption or triggers<br />

graduated exemption depending on timing.<br />

3.4 Would relief for interest so paid be restricted by reference<br />

to “thin capitalisation” rules?<br />

No, there are generally no thin capitalisation rules; interest is<br />

allowed as a deductible expense. However the FIRS would be<br />

interested in the competitiveness of the interest rates, and could<br />

adjust the transaction to impose a “realistic” or “arm’s length”<br />

commercial interest rate and tax the borrower’s profits accordingly,<br />

if they are of the view that the interest is excessive, especially in<br />

related parties’ context. On the other hand, the FIRS does not query<br />

interest free loans or concessionary interest rates from foreign<br />

lenders to Nigerian companies, since this results in higher taxable<br />

profits for the Nigerian company, which is taxable at 30%, rather<br />

than the 10% WHT to be withheld on the interest income.<br />

3.5 If so, is there a “safe harbour” by reference to which tax<br />

relief is assured?<br />

The only “safe harbour” is that the interest was incurred in order to<br />

generate income (i.e. it was an expenditure incurred “wholly,<br />

exclusively, necessarily and reasonably” for that purpose), and the<br />

same is deductible.<br />

a deductible expense. However, it is generally possible to achieve<br />

reasonable transfer pricing objectives with appropriate structuring<br />

of contracts.<br />

4 <strong>Tax</strong> on Business Operations: General<br />

4.1 What is the headline rate of tax on corporate profits?<br />

CIT is charged on corporate profits accruing in, derived from,<br />

brought into or received in Nigeria at 30%. Nigerian companies are<br />

also liable to education tax at 2% of their assessable profits. The<br />

education tax is deductible for CIT purposes.<br />

4.2 When is that tax generally payable?<br />

Generally it is payable within 6 months from the end of the<br />

accounting year when self-assessment returns are filed, and<br />

accompanied at least by instalment payments of the tax due (unless<br />

the company is in a refund position, for example by reason of<br />

excess withholding tax credits).<br />

Eligible companies may enjoy tax incentives, including tax<br />

holidays pursuant to the CITA (section 39 on downstream gas<br />

utilisation) or the Industrial Development (Income <strong>Tax</strong> Relief) Act<br />

(for “pioneer” companies), which includes the solid minerals sector.<br />

Companies in export processing or free trade zones are exempt<br />

from all Federal, State, LG taxes, levies and rates, to the extent that<br />

100% of their production is for export, otherwise tax accrues<br />

proportionately on the profits. This, however, does not relieve them<br />

of reporting requirements to regulatory agencies within the Zones.<br />

194<br />

3.6 Would any such “thin capitalisation” rules extend to debt<br />

advanced by a third party but guaranteed by a parent<br />

company?<br />

See questions 3.4 and 3.5 above. Thin capitalisation is relevant for<br />

financial institutions (especially banks), which have strict capital<br />

adequacy requirements, but these are not tax-driven, but sectorregulated.<br />

3.7 Are there any restrictions on tax relief for interest<br />

payments by a local company to a non-resident in<br />

addition to any thin capitalisation rules mentioned in<br />

questions 3.4-3.6 above?<br />

None – if the expense meets the “wholly, exclusively, necessarily<br />

and reasonably” test of section 24 of the CITA and the interest rate<br />

is competitive.<br />

3.8 Does Nigeria have transfer pricing rules?<br />

Yes, the general anti-avoidance provision of section 22 of the CITA<br />

empowers the FIRS to adjust transactions (especially between<br />

related parties) that it considers artificial or fictious, being entered<br />

into for the primary purpose of reducing tax that would have been<br />

otherwise due, and tax the same accordingly. Pursuant to the<br />

National Office for Technology Acquisition and Promotion<br />

(NOTAP) Act, NOTAP regulates technology payments by Nigerian<br />

beneficiaries to non-resident service providers or licensors of<br />

intellectual property, with a view to checking transfer pricing<br />

abuses. On this basis, fees paid under registrable but unregistered<br />

service agreements with NOTAP may be disallowed by the FIRS as<br />

4.3 What is the tax base for that tax (profits pursuant to<br />

commercial accounts subject to adjustments; other tax<br />

base)?<br />

<strong>Tax</strong> is assessed on total profits pursuant to audited accounts which<br />

are subject to adjustments. Provisions on the payment of minimum<br />

tax may be triggered, but this does not apply to Nigerian companies<br />

which have at least 25% foreign participation, carrying on<br />

agricultural trade or business within the first four years of the<br />

commencement of business (section 33 of the CITA). Sections 19<br />

and 20 of the CITA provide for excess dividend tax, whereby if in<br />

any year the amount of dividends paid exceed the tax payable or the<br />

tax is not payable at all (for example, if dividend is being paid out<br />

of retained earnings), then the company paying the dividend shall<br />

pay CIT on the amount of the dividend “as if the dividend is the<br />

total profits of the company for the year of assessment to which the<br />

accounts, out of which the dividend is declared, relates”. There are<br />

creative opportunities and sustainable arguments to manage this<br />

exposure. Also, section 21 of the CITA stipulates that undistributed<br />

profits of a closely-held company of less than five shareholders may<br />

be treated as distributed for the purpose of taxing the deemed<br />

distribution in the hands of the shareholders through WHT.<br />

4.4 If it otherwise differs from the profit shown in commercial<br />

accounts, what are the main other differences?<br />

None – save for observations above.<br />

4.5 Are there any tax grouping rules? Do these allow for<br />

relief in Nigeria for losses of overseas subsidiaries?<br />

Group tax relief is not allowed in any shape or form in Nigeria –<br />

WWW.ICLG.CO.UK<br />

ICLG TO: CORPORATE TAX <strong>2011</strong><br />

© Published and reproduced with kind permission by Global Legal Group Ltd, London


TEMPLARS<br />

Nigeria<br />

each company is treated as a separate taxable entity. On the basis of<br />

the “wholly, exclusively, necessarily and reasonably incurred”<br />

expense deductibility test in section 24 of the CITA, losses of<br />

overseas subsidiaries should be allowed to reduce the taxable profits<br />

of the Nigerian parent, particularly as such investment income would<br />

have been taxable when brought into Nigeria, but for the specific<br />

exemption in, and upon compliance with, section 23(1)(k) of the<br />

CITA. However, the foregoing would also be subject to the<br />

qualification that the CITA precludes loss from one trade/business<br />

being offset against income from another trade or business.<br />

4.6 Is tax imposed at a different rate upon distributed, as<br />

opposed to retained, profits?<br />

Generally, no. However, by section 21 of the CITA, where small<br />

closely-held companies that have distributable profits (which could be<br />

declared as dividends) fail to do so, the FIRS could deem the<br />

dividends as distributed for the purpose of enforcing payment of WHT<br />

on the deemed distribution from the company. This provision does not<br />

apply to companies which have more than 5 shareholders.<br />

4.7 What other national taxes (excluding those dealt with in<br />

“Transaction <strong>Tax</strong>es”, above) are there - e.g. property<br />

taxes, etc.?<br />

There is the Education <strong>Tax</strong> which is charged at 2% of assessable<br />

profits and is imposed on all companies incorporated in Nigeria.<br />

Sectoral taxes, for example the NITDA Levy (1% of profit before<br />

tax), is payable to FIRS by operators in the telecoms/IT industry, and<br />

financial institutions including pension operators, etc., with an annual<br />

turnover of N100 million and above. The Industrial Training Fund<br />

(ITF) Act requires every employer, who has 25 or more employees,<br />

to contribute 1% of annual payroll costs to the ITF; however, the ITF<br />

may grant up to a 60% refund of an employer’s contribution if such<br />

employer satisfies the ITF in respect of the adequacy of its employee<br />

training programme in any particular year.<br />

4.8 Are there any local taxes not dealt with in answers to<br />

other questions?<br />

There are several other taxes, fees and levies which varies from<br />

State to State and local government (county) to local government.<br />

The <strong>Tax</strong>es & Levies (Approved List for Collection) Act sets out the<br />

list. It is to be noted that State Houses of Assembly, ostensibly<br />

relying on constitutional provisions they argue enable them in that<br />

behalf, have legislated for additional taxes collectible by their State<br />

or local governments. The wider constitutional issue of whether the<br />

Act (a federal legislation) could limit taxes collectible by State and<br />

local governments is yet to be decisively determined, although there<br />

have been decisions, such as Eti-Osa Local Government v. Rufus<br />

Jegede & Anor. (2007) 5 CLRN 67 (Court of Appeal), which held<br />

that particular levies were invalid as they were inconsistent with the<br />

Act.<br />

5 Capital Gains<br />

5.1 Is there a special set of rules for taxing capital gains and<br />

losses?<br />

Yes, these rules are contained in the CGTA. The basis of<br />

computation is that of net gain - by deducting from the sum<br />

received or the receivable person realising the chargeable gain, the<br />

cost of acquisition to the plus expenditure incurred on the<br />

improvement or expenses incidental to the realisation of the asset.<br />

5.2 If so, is the rate of tax imposed upon capital gains<br />

different from the rate imposed upon business profits?<br />

Yes it is. The rate for capital gains is 10%, while that of business<br />

profits is 30%.<br />

5.3 Is there a participation exemption?<br />

Sections 30 and 32 of the CGTA exempts gains from the transfer of<br />

shares arising from mergers, acquisitions or other forms of business<br />

combinations from the CGT. Gains accruing to holders of unit trusts<br />

are also exempt provided the proceeds are re-invested (section 33).<br />

Ecclesiastical, charitable or educational institutions and statutory and<br />

diplomatic bodies are exempt. Also the transfer of assets from trustees<br />

to beneficiaries will not attract CGT. Other exemptions include: gains<br />

made upon a disposal of business assets where the proceeds are spent<br />

in acquiring new business assets; and gains made upon the disposal of<br />

an interest in the rights under any policy of an assurance or contract<br />

for a differed annuity on the life of any person.<br />

5.4 Is there any special relief for reinvestment?<br />

Yes. In addition to section 33 on the exemption of proceeds of unit<br />

trust in question 5.3 above, under section 32(1) of the CGTA, where<br />

businessmen or traders sell assets of old businesses and use the<br />

proceeds to procure new and similar business assets, then no gain<br />

will be said to have occurred.<br />

6 Branch or Subsidiary?<br />

6.1 What taxes (e.g. capital duty) would be imposed upon the<br />

formation of a subsidiary?<br />

During incorporation, stamp duty is charged at 0.75% of the<br />

companies share capital. Stamp duty will also apply if the share<br />

capital of the subsidiary is to be increased post-incorporation.<br />

6.2 Are there any other significant taxes or fees that would be<br />

incurred by a locally formed subsidiary but not by a<br />

branch of a non-resident company?<br />

None; in any event branch registration is not permitted in Nigeria,<br />

as section 54 of the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA)<br />

requires foreign companies to incorporate Nigerian subsidiaries in<br />

order to do business in Nigeria. Although there is provision for<br />

exemption from incorporation pursuant to section 56 of the CAMA,<br />

that procedure, given its cumbersome nature, is rarely invoked.<br />

6.3 How would the taxable profits of a local branch be<br />

determined?<br />

Not applicable. Nigerian tax rules do not distinguish between local<br />

branches and Nigerian subsidiaries – the rules are applied to taxable<br />

income in the same manner. As a matter of practice, historically (to<br />

overcome associated logistical challenges, etc.) the FIRS assesses<br />

non-resident companies to tax, using a deemed profit rate of 20%,<br />

which, given the 30% CIT rate, effectively translates into 6% of<br />

turnover. Such non-residents would prefer high margin projects to be<br />

Nigeria<br />

ICLG TO: CORPORATE TAX <strong>2011</strong><br />

© Published and reproduced with kind permission by Global Legal Group Ltd, London<br />

WWW.ICLG.CO.UK<br />

195


TEMPLARS<br />

Nigeria<br />

Nigeria<br />

taxed on a deemed basis, but low margin ones on actual figures. This<br />

is in contrast to residents which are only taxed on the basis of their<br />

audited accounts. The FIRS is however moving away from using<br />

deemed profit and instead insisting on taxation based on actual figures.<br />

6.4 Would such a branch be subject to a branch profits tax (or<br />

other tax limited to branches of non-resident companies)?<br />

No it would not.<br />

6.5 Would a branch benefit from tax treaty provisions, or<br />

some of them?<br />

Every Nigerian or non-resident company will benefit from<br />

applicable treaty provisions.<br />

6.6 Would any withholding tax or other tax be imposed as the<br />

result of a remittance of profits by the branch?<br />

Any profits to be remitted to the non-resident would be regarded as<br />

dividends and subject to WHT at 10% or 7.5%, if based in a treaty<br />

country.<br />

7 Anti-avoidance<br />

7.1 How does Nigeria address the issue of preventing tax<br />

avoidance? For example, is there a general antiavoidance<br />

rule or a disclosure rule imposing a<br />

requirement to disclose avoidance schemes in advance of<br />

the company’s tax return being submitted?<br />

The general anti-avoidance provision is to be found in section 22 of<br />

the CITA (and also section 20 of the CGTA), giving FIRS the power<br />

to adjust transactions that it considers artificial or fictitious.<br />

Specific anti-avoidance provisions include sections 19, 20 and 21 of<br />

the CITA on excess dividend tax and deemed distribution<br />

respectively (see question 4.3 above). In respect of CGT, antiavoidance<br />

provisions target bargains comprising two or more<br />

transactions and transactions between “connected persons”<br />

(sections 19 and 22). There is no general anti-avoidance rule or<br />

disclosure rules’ imposing a requirement to disclose avoidance<br />

schemes. The FIRS uses its audit powers to review transactions and<br />

may issue additional assessments or take other necessary action as<br />

it deems fit.<br />

Afolabi Elebiju<br />

TEMPLARS<br />

13A, A.J. Marinho Drive<br />

Victoria Island, Lagos<br />

Nigeria<br />

Tel: +234 1 4611 290 93<br />

Fax: +234 1 4611 294<br />

Email: afolabi.elebiju@templars-law.com<br />

URL: www.templars-law.com<br />

Afolabi Elebiju, LLM (Harvard), Fellow, Chartered Institute of<br />

<strong>Tax</strong>ation of Nigeria (FCTI), is a Partner, the tax team and M&A<br />

leader at <strong>Templars</strong>, a leading full service commercial law firm in<br />

Nigeria. He was previously Senior Manager, <strong>Tax</strong> & Regulatory<br />

Services at KPMG Professional Services, where amongst others,<br />

he focused on optimal tax and regulatory structuring of several<br />

landmark transactions across all sectors, particularly foreign<br />

investments. A participant at the inaugural KPMG’s African <strong>Tax</strong><br />

Academy, he is a member of CITN’s Indirect <strong>Tax</strong> Faculty, and<br />

facilitates at CITN training programmes. He recently spoke on<br />

Free Trade Zones & Nigeria <strong>Tax</strong> Regime and <strong>Tax</strong> Issues in Trusts<br />

& Estates. Afolabi contributes a tax focused column,<br />

<strong>Tax</strong>spectives to THISDAY <strong>Law</strong>yer, the legal section of leading<br />

Nigerian daily, THISDAY newspapers. Afolabi’s numerous<br />

publications (articles, case reviews, book reviews) on energy,<br />

corporate, commercial and tax law issues have appeared in<br />

prestigious international legal journals.<br />

Vivian Osayande<br />

TEMPLARS<br />

13A, A.J. Marinho Drive<br />

Victoria Island, Lagos<br />

Nigeria<br />

Tel: +234 8 3405 4846, 4611 889 90<br />

Fax: +234 1 4611 294<br />

Email: vivian.osayande@templars-law.com<br />

URL: www.templars-law.com<br />

Vivian Osayande advises multinational corporations and other<br />

entities on matters involving taxation and transaction structures.<br />

Vivian possesses a deep understanding of legal and fiscal<br />

systems. Recently, Vivian advised BJ Services on the Nigerian<br />

tax and regulatory aspects of its $US5.5 billion dollar acquisition<br />

by Baker Hughes, assisting with the structure of the employee<br />

remuneration and other end of service benefits with a view to<br />

achieving optimum tax advantage on the transaction.<br />

Vivian, a Senior Associate at <strong>Templars</strong> and a core member of the<br />

firm’s <strong>Tax</strong> and <strong>Corporate</strong> Commercial Practice Groups, graduated<br />

from Ambrose Ali University and was admitted to the Nigerian Bar in<br />

2004. Vivian is a member of the US-based National Employment<br />

<strong>Law</strong>yers Council and is also a member of the Chartered Institute of<br />

Arbitrators as well as the Nigerian Industrial Relations Association.<br />

Vivian has several published articles to her credit and she is also a<br />

sought-after conference speaker.<br />

TEMPLARS is a leading full service commercial law firm in Nigeria, with the know-how to provide innovative commercial solutions<br />

for clients with diverse needs. With over 40 lawyers and 12 partners working out of offices in Lagos, Abuja, Port Harcourt and<br />

Uyo, <strong>Templars</strong> is strategically placed to offer quality legal services to clients in Nigeria’s major economic hubs. We are organised<br />

into <strong>Corporate</strong> Commercial, Energy & Projects, Finance and Dispute Resolution Practice Groups. The <strong>Tax</strong> practice straddles all<br />

the Groups and has been involved with transaction advisory, structuring, compliance, tax litigation and investment arbitration.<br />

At <strong>Templars</strong>, we pride ourselves on our multi-specialist strengths in diverse areas of the law and a can-do, collaborative mindset<br />

in helping clients achieve their business goals. We have a reputation for understanding our clients’ operating industries and the<br />

core of our expertise is demonstrated by our comprehensive and practical approach in addressing individual client’s needs.<br />

196<br />

WWW.ICLG.CO.UK<br />

ICLG TO: CORPORATE TAX <strong>2011</strong><br />

© Published and reproduced with kind permission by Global Legal Group Ltd, London


The International Comparative Legal Guide to:<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />

Other titles in the ICLG series include:<br />

Business Crime<br />

Cartels & Leniency<br />

Class Actions<br />

Commodities and Trade <strong>Law</strong><br />

Competition Litigation<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> Governance<br />

<strong>Corporate</strong> Recovery & Insolvency<br />

Dominance<br />

Employment <strong>Law</strong><br />

Enforcement of Competition <strong>Law</strong><br />

Environment <strong>Law</strong><br />

Gas Regulation<br />

International Arbitration<br />

Litigation & Dispute Resolution<br />

Merger Control<br />

Mergers & Acquisitions<br />

Patents<br />

PFI / PPP Projects<br />

Pharmaceutical Advertising<br />

Product Liability<br />

Public Procurement<br />

Real Estate<br />

Securitisation<br />

Telecommunication <strong>Law</strong>s and Regulations<br />

To order a copy of a publication, please contact:<br />

Global Legal Group<br />

59 Tanner Street<br />

London SE1 3PL<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Tel: +44 20 7367 0720<br />

Fax: +44 20 7407 5255<br />

Email: sales@glgroup.co.uk<br />

www.ICLG.co.uk

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!