23.02.2015 Views

12 AN INTRODUCTION TO DIP FINANCING Jane Lee

12 AN INTRODUCTION TO DIP FINANCING Jane Lee

12 AN INTRODUCTION TO DIP FINANCING Jane Lee

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

34<br />

are affected either by the use of cash collateral under section 363 or by the grant of an equal<br />

or senior lien to secure new financing under section 364.<br />

v Whether an adequate protection payment would constitute an interest payment will be<br />

affected by sections 502(b)(2) and 506(b). Section 502(b)(2) provides that “the court shall<br />

allow such claim in such amount, except to the extent that . . . such claim is for unmatured<br />

interest.” 11 U.S.C. § 502(b)(2). The general rule of section 502(b)(2) is modified by section<br />

506(b) if a secured creditor is oversecured. Section 506(b) provides, “To the extent that an<br />

allowed secured claim is secured by property the value of which, after any recovery under<br />

subsection (c) of this section, is greater than the amount of such claim, there shall be allowed<br />

to the holder of such claim, interest on such claim, and any reasonable fees, costs, or charges<br />

provided for under the agreement or State statute under which such claim arose.” 11 U.S.C. §<br />

506(b). The negative implication of section 506(b) is that a secured creditor is entitled to<br />

interest only if its claim is oversecured. 11 U.S.C. § 506(b). Until the value of a secured<br />

creditor’s security interest has been determined, the trustee will not agree to apply the periodic<br />

cash payments to the secured creditor’s pre-petition claim.<br />

vi Note that the safest course is to provide for the administrative expense priority in the order<br />

approving the financing even if the new financing is to be secured by what appears to be an<br />

adequate collateral package. See In re Sobiech, <strong>12</strong>5 B.R. 110, 115 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1991)<br />

(creditor granting a lien under sec. 364(c)(2) is not entitled to an administrative expense claim<br />

for its deficiency claim); see also In re Mayco Plastics, Inc., 379 B.R. 691, 706 (Bankr. E.D.<br />

Mich. 2008) (fact that the <strong>DIP</strong> lender held a superpriority claim under section 364(c)(1) did<br />

not mean that it also held an administrative expense claim under section 364(a) or (b) absent<br />

application for such additional relief).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!