Reply to Mr. Bosanquet's Practical observations ... - University Library
Reply to Mr. Bosanquet's Practical observations ... - University Library
Reply to Mr. Bosanquet's Practical observations ... - University Library
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
( 29 )<br />
<strong>to</strong> the Mint, an ounce of coined money is returned.<br />
The only inconvenience therefore that<br />
an importer of bullion can experience in receiving<br />
bullion from abroad,<br />
instead of the money<br />
of England, is the delay during its detention at<br />
the Mint, and which the Bullion Committee<br />
have valued at 1 per cent. One per cent, appears,<br />
therefore, <strong>to</strong> be the natural value<br />
of English<br />
coin above bullion, provided the coin be<br />
not debased, and the currency be not excessive.<br />
But in France the seignorage,<br />
according <strong>to</strong> Dr.<br />
Smith, amounted <strong>to</strong> no less than 8 per cent.,<br />
besides the loss of interest during its<br />
detention<br />
at the Mint. And we have his authority <strong>to</strong>o,<br />
that no sensible inconvenience resulted from it*.<br />
An ounce of gold or silver coin was in France,<br />
therefore, of more value by 8 per cent,<br />
ounce of gold or silver bullion.<br />
than an<br />
It results from<br />
these facts that no bullion could have been imported<br />
in<strong>to</strong> France, unless there was not only a<br />
* Since writing the above I have seen an extract from a<br />
Moniteur of the year 1803, by which it appears that the<br />
seignorage in France was<br />
In 1726 on gold 7^5^ per c. on silver j-^<br />
1729 -<br />
5t*j<br />
- - -<br />
5/^<br />
1755 -<br />
4^ - - -<br />
3i»<br />
1771 • ^ - - - 2^<br />
1785 - Vt<br />
- - - —<br />
And was fixed in 1803 at ^ per c. for gold, and 1| for silver.<br />
profit