24.02.2015 Views

Early and exclusive breastfeeding in Vietnam – determinants ...

Early and exclusive breastfeeding in Vietnam – determinants ...

Early and exclusive breastfeeding in Vietnam – determinants ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Early</strong> <strong>and</strong> Exclusive<br />

Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong><br />

Determ<strong>in</strong>ants & Recommendations<br />

Nguyen Thanh Tuan 1 , MD, PhD<br />

Nguyen Hong Phuong 2 , MD, PhD<br />

Nemat Hajeebhoy 1 , MSW, MHS<br />

World Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g Conference<br />

New Delhi December 6-9, 2012


Why Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g?<br />

• <strong>Vietnam</strong> is a country <strong>in</strong> Southeast<br />

Asia, population of ~88 millions, <strong>and</strong><br />

7.2 millions children < 5 years old<br />

• About 2 millions (29%) children<br />

under five <strong>in</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong> is stunted<br />

• National Nutrition Strategy aims to<br />

reduce this rate to 26% by 2015 <strong>and</strong><br />

23% by 2020<br />

• <strong>Early</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>exclusive</strong> <strong>breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is<br />

critical for child nutrition <strong>and</strong> health


Objectives<br />

Gaps: In <strong>Vietnam</strong>, few studies have explored current<br />

status <strong>and</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>ants of <strong>breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g</strong> practices at<br />

the national level<br />

Objective: to identify critical determ<strong>in</strong>ants of optimal<br />

<strong>breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g</strong> practices, with focus on early <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>exclusive</strong> <strong>breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g</strong>


Methods<br />

• Respondents from urban <strong>and</strong><br />

rural areas <strong>in</strong> 11 prov<strong>in</strong>ces <strong>and</strong> 4<br />

ecological regions <strong>in</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong><br />

• Face-to-face <strong>in</strong>terview 6068<br />

mothers with children


Feed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the First Three Days After Birth<br />

80<br />

70<br />

69.7<br />

<strong>Early</strong> Initiation of Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(49.3%; n=6068)<br />

80<br />

70<br />

73.3<br />

Prelacteal Feed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(n=6068)<br />

60<br />

56.4<br />

60<br />

53.5<br />

50<br />

44.1<br />

50<br />

44.1<br />

40<br />

40<br />

30<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Vag<strong>in</strong>al<br />

Delivery<br />

At CHC<br />

Overall<br />

10.4<br />

Cesarean<br />

Delivery<br />

Vag<strong>in</strong>al<br />

Delivery<br />

At Hospitals (79%)<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

14.8<br />

2.8<br />

Any Formula Water Honey Sugar<br />

Solution


Prevalence Ratios (PR, 95%CI)<br />

<strong>Early</strong> Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g & Challenges (n=6,068)<br />

1<br />

0.87<br />

0.78<br />

0.81<br />

0.75<br />

0.5<br />

0.19<br />

0<br />

Hospital<br />

Delivery<br />

Cesarean<br />

Delivery<br />

Intention of<br />

Feed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Formula<br />

Perceived<br />

Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Difficulty<br />

Liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

Urban Area


Prevalence Ratios (PR, 95%CI)<br />

<strong>Early</strong> Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g & Supports (n=6,068)<br />

3<br />

2.83<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

1.08 1.02 1.11<br />

0.95<br />

0.5<br />

Knew<br />

Benefit<br />

Health<br />

Workers<br />

Family<br />

Members<br />

Health<br />

Workers<br />

Family<br />

Members<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g Pregnancy<br />

After Birth


Prevalence Ratios (PR, 95%CI)<br />

Exclusive Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g & Challenges (n=6,068)<br />

1<br />

0.93 0.94<br />

Exclusive Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g Rate: 20.2%<br />

0.88<br />

0.5<br />

0.15<br />

0<br />

Perceived<br />

Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Difficulty<br />

Seen Formula Ads<br />

Daily<br />

Not seen<br />

Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g Ads<br />

Liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

Urban Area


Prevalence Ratios (PR, 95%CI)<br />

Exclusive Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g & Supports (n=6,068)<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.89<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

1.07<br />

0.95<br />

1.20<br />

0.97<br />

0.5<br />

Knew<br />

Benefit<br />

Health<br />

Workers<br />

Family<br />

Members<br />

Health<br />

Workers<br />

Family<br />

Members<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g Pregnancy<br />

After Birth


Keys F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

• Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g Practices:<br />

– Ever breastfed: 99.5%<br />

– <strong>Early</strong> <strong>breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g</strong>: 49.3%<br />

– Prelacteal feed<strong>in</strong>g: 73.3%<br />

– Exclusive freastfeed<strong>in</strong>g under 6 months: 20.2%<br />

• <strong>Early</strong> Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

– Negatively associated with cesarean delivery, hospital delivery,<br />

<strong>in</strong>tention of feed<strong>in</strong>g formula, perceived <strong>breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g</strong> difficulties,<br />

<strong>and</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> urban areas.<br />

– Positively associated with knowledge <strong>and</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g support by a<br />

health worker dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy <strong>and</strong> after birth<br />

• Exclusive Breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

– Negatively associated with exposure to formula ads, nonexposure<br />

to <strong>breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation, perceived <strong>breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

difficulties, <strong>and</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> urban areas.<br />

– Positively associated with knowledge <strong>and</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g support by a<br />

health worker after birth


Conclusions <strong>and</strong> Recomendations<br />

In conclusion, early <strong>and</strong> <strong>exclusive</strong> <strong>breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g</strong> rates <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Vietnam</strong> are low, <strong>and</strong> can be improved with through the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

• Reduc<strong>in</strong>g unessessary cesarean delivery <strong>and</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

hospital design<br />

• Build<strong>in</strong>g health worker capacity to provide per<strong>in</strong>atal<br />

counsel<strong>in</strong>g & support<br />

• Ensur<strong>in</strong>g greater exposure to <strong>breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g</strong> messages<br />

while simultaneously strengthen<strong>in</strong>g regulations on the<br />

market<strong>in</strong>g of breastmilk substitutes


“While <strong>breastfeed<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

may not seem the<br />

right choice for every<br />

parent, it is the best<br />

choice for every baby”<br />

Amy Spangler<br />

Thank You

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!